Emmanuele Bassi [Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:11:46 +0000 (13:11 +0100)]
datetime: Rename internal method
Use add_ymd(), to reflect the order of the arguments.
Emmanuele Bassi [Mon, 6 Sep 2010 10:43:04 +0000 (11:43 +0100)]
build: Fix warnings caused by missing includes
Khaled Hosny [Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:23:00 +0000 (16:23 +0200)]
Updated Arabic translation
Chao-Hsiung Liao [Sun, 5 Sep 2010 11:24:01 +0000 (19:24 +0800)]
Updated Traditional Chinese translation(Hong Kong and Taiwan)
Matthias Clasen [Sun, 5 Sep 2010 04:23:03 +0000 (00:23 -0400)]
More header inclusion cleanup
Emmanuele Bassi [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:24:50 +0000 (18:24 +0100)]
build: Quench the compiler's thirst for warnings
Emmanuele Bassi [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:15:15 +0000 (18:15 +0100)]
gmain: Define _GNU_SOURCE before including glibconfig.h
As it pulls in unistd.h from something else.
Emmanuele Bassi [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:04:34 +0000 (18:04 +0100)]
Build fixes for the fall-out of the inclusion changes
Emmanuele Bassi [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:03:33 +0000 (18:03 +0100)]
gtimer: Fix a compilation warning
Emmanuele Bassi [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 16:22:39 +0000 (17:22 +0100)]
Hack to include glib/gdatasetprivate.h directly
The gdatasetprivate.h header includes gatomic.h directly. It all works
well in GLib, but inside GObject it will trigger the single inclusion
guard.
Since this is a private header, and it's kind of a special case, one way
to fix it is to declare GLIB_COMPILATION around it and fool the single
inclusion guard in gatomic.h into thinking we're compiling GLib and not
GObject.
Emmanuele Bassi [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 16:22:18 +0000 (17:22 +0100)]
Add missing gstrfuncs.h include
For g_strdup() and friends.
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 03:03:14 +0000 (23:03 -0400)]
More include cleanups
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 01:24:40 +0000 (21:24 -0400)]
Don't include glib.h in other headers
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 01:20:07 +0000 (21:20 -0400)]
Remove excessive header includes
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 01:15:45 +0000 (21:15 -0400)]
Remove excessive header includes
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 01:12:03 +0000 (21:12 -0400)]
Don't include glib.h in other headers
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:57:05 +0000 (20:57 -0400)]
Remove excessive header inclusions
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:55:17 +0000 (20:55 -0400)]
Remove excessive header inclusions
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:53:37 +0000 (20:53 -0400)]
Remove excessive header inclusions
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:51:08 +0000 (20:51 -0400)]
Remove excessive header inclusions
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:46:40 +0000 (20:46 -0400)]
Remove some unneeded headers
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:44:59 +0000 (20:44 -0400)]
Remove eexcessive header inclusions
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:41:52 +0000 (20:41 -0400)]
Remove redundant header inclusions
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:38:30 +0000 (20:38 -0400)]
Remove redundant header inclusions
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:34:15 +0000 (20:34 -0400)]
Remove redundant header inclusions
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:30:54 +0000 (20:30 -0400)]
Remove redundant header inclusions
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:27:45 +0000 (20:27 -0400)]
Remove redundant header inclusions
and some whitespace cleanup.
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:15:16 +0000 (20:15 -0400)]
Remove redundant header inclusions
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:12:09 +0000 (20:12 -0400)]
Remove redundant header inclusions
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:05:27 +0000 (20:05 -0400)]
Remove redundant header inclusions
Matthias Clasen [Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:01:55 +0000 (20:01 -0400)]
Remove redundant header inclusions
Matthias Clasen [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:49:34 +0000 (19:49 -0400)]
Remove redundant header inclusions
and clean up some whitespace
Matthias Clasen [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:41:49 +0000 (19:41 -0400)]
Remove redundant header inclusions
and clean up some whitespace
Matthias Clasen [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:38:56 +0000 (19:38 -0400)]
Whitespace cleanup
Matthias Clasen [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:37:54 +0000 (19:37 -0400)]
Remove redundant header inclusions
Matthias Clasen [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:33:11 +0000 (19:33 -0400)]
Whitespace cleanup
Matthias Clasen [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:32:02 +0000 (19:32 -0400)]
Remove redundant header inclusions
Matthias Clasen [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 23:03:34 +0000 (19:03 -0400)]
Sort extensions properly
Just taking the difference of the priorities has overflow issues,
as pointed out in bug 623069.
Matthias Clasen [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 22:11:08 +0000 (18:11 -0400)]
Add a note about size limits of private structures
Also add some assertions to check these limits, instead of
failing silently. Bug 604479.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:05:28 +0000 (16:05 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in the gdbus-proxy test
==23341== 65 bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 927 of 1,020
==23341== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==23341== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==23341== by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==23341== by 0x40717FC: g_strdup (gstrfuncs.c:101)
==23341== by 0x4147F56: value_lcopy_string (gvaluetypes.c:313)
==23341== by 0x4123F0B: g_object_get_valist (gobject.c:1643)
==23341== by 0x41240FF: g_object_get (gobject.c:1731)
==23341== by 0x804C39E: test_basic (gdbus-proxy.c:522)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:04:29 +0000 (16:04 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in the gdbus-proxy test
==23341== 85 (24 direct, 61 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 900 of 971
==23341== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==23341== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==23341== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==23341== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==23341== by 0x403A751: g_error_new_valist (gerror.c:54)
==23341== by 0x403AAD4: g_set_error (gerror.c:240)
==23341== by 0x420B807: decode_method_reply (gdbusconnection.c:4774)
==23341== by 0x420C2BA: g_dbus_connection_call_sync (gdbusconnection.c:5188)
==23341== by 0x421B7C9: g_dbus_proxy_call_sync (gdbusproxy.c:2477)
==23341== by 0x804BD89: test_bogus_method_return (gdbus-proxy.c:430)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:03:48 +0000 (16:03 -0400)]
Plug some mem leaks in gdbus-peer test
==29535== 56 (24 direct, 32 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,112 of 1,264
==29535== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535== by 0x406F364: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==29535== by 0x403A9B2: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==29535== by 0x42066D3: initable_init (gdbusconnection.c:2314)
==29535== by 0x41A73E5: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==29535== by 0x41A7587: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==29535== by 0x41A742A: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==29535== by 0x4206DCC: g_dbus_connection_new_for_address_sync (gdbusconnection.c:2585)
==29535== by 0x804D63A: test_nonce_tcp (gdbus-peer.c:1229)
==29535== 107 (24 direct, 83 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,188 of 1,264
==29535== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535== by 0x406F364: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==29535== by 0x403A9B2: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==29535== by 0x42066D3: initable_init (gdbusconnection.c:2314)
==29535== by 0x41A73E5: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==29535== by 0x41A7587: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==29535== by 0x41A742A: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==29535== by 0x4206DCC: g_dbus_connection_new_for_address_sync (gdbusconnection.c:2585)
==29535== by 0x804D8E8: test_nonce_tcp (gdbus-peer.c:1259)
==29535== 112 (24 direct, 88 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,193 of 1,264
==29535== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535== by 0x406F364: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==29535== by 0x403A9B2: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==29535== by 0x42066D3: initable_init (gdbusconnection.c:2314)
==29535== by 0x41A73E5: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==29535== by 0x41A7587: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==29535== by 0x41A742A: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==29535== by 0x4206DCC: g_dbus_connection_new_for_address_sync (gdbusconnection.c:2585)
==29535== by 0x804D79A: test_nonce_tcp (gdbus-peer.c:1248)
==29535== 73 (24 direct, 49 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,152 of 1,264
==29535== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535== by 0x406F364: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==29535== by 0x403A9B2: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==29535== by 0x42066D3: initable_init (gdbusconnection.c:2314)
==29535== by 0x41A73E5: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==29535== by 0x41A7587: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==29535== by 0x41A742A: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==29535== by 0x4206DCC: g_dbus_connection_new_for_address_sync (gdbusconnection.c:2585)
==29535== by 0x804C6CE: test_peer (gdbus-peer.c:803)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:02:11 +0000 (16:02 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in the gdbus-peer test
==6793== 32 (24 direct, 8 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 779 of 1,423
==6793== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==6793== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==6793== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==6793== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==6793== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==6793== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==6793== by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==6793== by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==6793== by 0x41DB4F9: g_unix_fd_list_new (gunixfdlist.c:159)
==6793== by 0x804AADD: test_interface_method_call (gdbus-peer.c:172)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:01:10 +0000 (16:01 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in network-address test
==4616== 46 (32 direct, 14 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 193 of 305
==4616== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==4616== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==4616== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==4616== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==4616== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==4616== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==4616== by 0x4123147: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1347)
==4616== by 0x41236BB: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1463)
==4616== by 0x4122BB4: g_object_new (gobject.c:1181)
==4616== by 0x41B2D0F: g_network_address_new (gnetworkaddress.c:262)
==4616== by 0x8048A70: test_basic (network-address.c:10)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 20:00:15 +0000 (16:00 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in contexts test
==14059== 96 bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 520 of 543
==14059== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==14059== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==14059== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==14059== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==14059== by 0x41385BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==14059== by 0x411E72A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==14059== by 0x411DE1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==14059== by 0x411DB93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==14059== by 0x42296AF: _g_local_file_input_stream_new (glocalfileinputstream.c:152)
==14059== by 0x422281F: g_local_file_read (glocalfile.c:1322)
==14059== by 0x418A8A9: open_read_async_thread (gfile.c:5050)
==14059== by 0x41B71BB: run_in_thread (gsimpleasyncresult.c:853)
==14059== by 0x41A5FBC: io_job_thread (gioscheduler.c:181)
==14059== by 0x407DCDE: g_thread_pool_thread_proxy (gthreadpool.c:314)
==14059== by 0x407C6B0: g_thread_create_proxy (gthread.c:1897)
==14059== by 0x57D918: start_thread (pthread_create.c:301)
==14059== by 0x4C6CBD: clone (clone.S:133)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:58:51 +0000 (15:58 -0400)]
Plug mem leaks in contexts test
==2464== 80 (16 direct, 64 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 515 of 547
==2464== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2464== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2464== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2464== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2464== by 0x41385BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2464== by 0x411E72A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2464== by 0x411DE1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2464== by 0x411DB93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2464== by 0x4220D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2464== by 0x422C897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2464== by 0x41CA91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2464== by 0x418C1B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2464== by 0x8049509: test1_thread (contexts.c:110)
==2464== 80 (16 direct, 64 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 516 of 547
==2464== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2464== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2464== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2464== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2464== by 0x41385BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2464== by 0x411E72A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2464== by 0x411DE1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2464== by 0x411DB93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2464== by 0x4220D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2464== by 0x422C897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2464== by 0x41CA91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2464== by 0x418C1B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2464== by 0x804964D: test_context_independence (contexts.c:144)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:57:26 +0000 (15:57 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in buffered-input-stream test
==2429== 49 (24 direct, 25 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 276 of 355
==2429== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2429== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2429== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2429== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2429== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2429== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2429== by 0x4175525: g_buffered_input_stream_read_byte (gbufferedinputstream.c:880)
==2429== by 0x804A21A: test_read_byte (buffered-input-stream.c:153)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:56:23 +0000 (15:56 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in g-icon test
==2428== 256 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 591 of 604
==2428== at 0x4005CD2: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==2428== by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==2428== by 0x4075287: g_string_maybe_expand (gstring.c:395)
==2428== by 0x40760D8: g_string_insert_c (gstring.c:1049)
==2428== by 0x4074D41: g_string_append_c_inline (gstring.h:153)
==2428== by 0x4075B3C: g_string_append_uri_escaped (gstring.c:822)
==2428== by 0x41A46AC: g_icon_to_string_tokenized (gicon.c:164)
==2428== by 0x41A498F: g_icon_to_string (gicon.c:252)
==2428== by 0x8049E1A: test_g_icon_serialize (g-icon.c:222)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:55:10 +0000 (15:55 -0400)]
Plug a huge mem leak in data-output-stream test
==12763== 16,777,215 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 357 of 357
==12763== at 0x4004F1B: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418)
==12763== by 0x405711D: g_malloc0 (gmem.c:157)
==12763== by 0x8048ED6: test_basic (data-output-stream.c:40)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:53:56 +0000 (15:53 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in data-output-stream test
==2426== 45,034 bytes in 4,094 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 358 of 361
==2426== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2426== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2426== by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==2426== by 0x4071ABD: g_strconcat (gstrfuncs.c:315)
==2426== by 0x804916A: test_read_lines (data-output-stream.c:83)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:53:05 +0000 (15:53 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in data-input-stream test
==12351== 45,045 bytes in 4,095 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 377 of 380
==12351== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==12351== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==12351== by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==12351== by 0x4071ABD: g_strconcat (gstrfuncs.c:315)
==12351== by 0x8049811: test_read_lines (data-input-stream.c:99)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:47:38 +0000 (15:47 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in data-input-stream test
==2415== 45,045 bytes in 4,095 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 393 of 399
==2415== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2415== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2415== by 0x417FC29: g_data_input_stream_read_line (gdatainputstream.c:797)
==2415== by 0x8049874: test_read_lines (data-input-stream.c:111)
==12088== 360 bytes in 40 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 368 of 381
==12088== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==12088== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==12088== by 0x417FF4C: g_data_input_stream_read_until (gdatainputstream.c:914)
==12088== by 0x8049B6F: test_read_until (data-input-stream.c:182)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:45:48 +0000 (15:45 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in data-input-stream test
==2415== 165 (72 direct, 93 indirect) bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 373 of 399
==2415== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2415== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2415== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2415== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2415== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2415== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2415== by 0x417ED29: read_data (gdatainputstream.c:309)
==2415== by 0x417EE9D: g_data_input_stream_read_byte (gdatainputstream.c:344)
==2415== by 0x8049DEC: test_data_array (data-input-stream.c:263)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:44:28 +0000 (15:44 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in readwrite test
==10395== 80 (24 direct, 56 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 529 of 561
==10395== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==10395== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==10395== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==10395== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==10395== by 0x403A751: g_error_new_valist (gerror.c:54)
==10395== by 0x403AAD4: g_set_error (gerror.c:240)
==10395== by 0x4230328: _g_local_file_output_stream_create (glocalfileoutputstream.c:628)
==10395== by 0x4227A04: g_local_file_create_readwrite (glocalfile.c:1388)
==10395== by 0x418974C: g_file_create_readwrite (gfile.c:1784)
==10395== by 0x8049FCD: test_g_file_create_readwrite (readwrite.c:187)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:43:03 +0000 (15:43 -0400)]
Plug some huge mem leaks in converter-stream test
==8564== 24,000,000 bytes in 6 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 592 of 594
==8564== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==8564== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==8564== by 0x804AA37: test_corruption (converter-stream.c:589)
==8564== by 0x804B05B: test_roundtrip (converter-stream.c:652)
==9459== 25,165,824 bytes in 6 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 593 of 594
==9459== at 0x4005CD2: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==9459== by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==9459== by 0x41B08A3: array_resize (gmemoryoutputstream.c:501)
==9459== by 0x41B0A5D: g_memory_output_stream_write (gmemoryoutputstream.c:578)
==9459== by 0x41B57EF: g_output_stream_write (goutputstream.c:216)
==9459== by 0x41B591B: g_output_stream_write_all (goutputstream.c:268)
==9459== by 0x417D617: flush_buffer (gconverteroutputstream.c:359)
==9459== by 0x417D958: g_converter_output_stream_write (gconverteroutputstream.c:502)
==9459== by 0x41B5D7F: g_output_stream_real_splice (goutputstream.c:428)
==9459== by 0x41B5C6C: g_output_stream_splice (goutputstream.c:380)
==9459== by 0x804AB10: test_corruption (converter-stream.c:600)
==9785== 25,165,824 bytes in 6 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 592 of 592
==9785== at 0x4005CD2: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==9785== by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==9785== by 0x41B08A3: array_resize (gmemoryoutputstream.c:501)
==9785== by 0x41B0A5D: g_memory_output_stream_write (gmemoryoutputstream.c:578)
==9785== by 0x41B5D7F: g_output_stream_real_splice (goutputstream.c:428)
==9785== by 0x41B5C6C: g_output_stream_splice (goutputstream.c:380)
==9785== by 0x804ADF1: test_corruption (converter-stream.c:622)
==9785== by 0x804B06C: test_roundtrip (converter-stream.c:652)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:40:55 +0000 (15:40 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in convert-stream test
==7540== 487 (64 direct, 423 indirect) bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 597 of 615
==7540== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==7540== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==7540== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==7540== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==7540== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==7540== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==7540== by 0x4123147: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1347)
==7540== by 0x41236BB: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1463)
==7540== by 0x41A756E: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:214)
==7540== by 0x41A743E: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==7540== by 0x417B67A: g_charset_converter_new (gcharsetconverter.c:215)
==7540== by 0x804B043: test_charset (converter-stream.c:675)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:39:58 +0000 (15:39 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in converter-stream test
==2396== 168 (92 direct, 76 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 598 of 625
==2396== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2396== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2396== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2396== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2396== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2396== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2396== by 0x4123147: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1347)
==2396== by 0x41236BB: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1463)
==2396== by 0x4122BB4: g_object_new (gobject.c:1181)
==2396== by 0x417C54D: g_converter_input_stream_new (gconverterinputstream.c:204)
==2396== by 0x804A53E: test_compressor (converter-stream.c:484)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:39:07 +0000 (15:39 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in converter-stream test
==2396== 66 (24 direct, 42 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 565 of 625
==2396== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2396== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2396== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2396== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2396== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2396== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2396== by 0x417BA38: g_charset_converter_convert (gcharsetconverter.c:344)
==2396== by 0x417BF67: g_converter_convert (gconverter.c:174)
==2396== by 0x417C9EB: g_converter_input_stream_read (gconverterinputstream.c:403)
==2396== by 0x41A7A17: g_input_stream_read (ginputstream.c:204)
==2396== by 0x41A7B43: g_input_stream_read_all (ginputstream.c:256)
==2396== by 0x804B0E4: test_charset (converter-stream.c:682)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:37:56 +0000 (15:37 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in converter-stream test
==2396== 39 (24 direct, 15 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 398 of 625
==2396== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2396== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2396== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2396== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2396== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2396== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2396== by 0x80498F7: g_compressor_converter_convert (converter-stream.c:244)
==2396== by 0x417BF67: g_converter_convert (gconverter.c:174)
==2396== by 0x417CBDE: g_converter_input_stream_read (gconverterinputstream.c:460)
==2396== by 0x41A7A17: g_input_stream_read (ginputstream.c:204)
==2396== by 0x804A832: test_compressor (converter-stream.c:545)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:37:08 +0000 (15:37 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in g-file-info test
==2395== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 381 of 407
==2395== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2395== by 0x4005C66: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==2395== by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==2395== by 0x401D670: g_ptr_array_maybe_expand (garray.c:968)
==2395== by 0x401DD0B: g_ptr_array_add (garray.c:1225)
==2395== by 0x4199AA9: g_file_info_list_attributes (gfileinfo.c:646)
==2395== by 0x80491CE: test_g_file_info (g-file-info.c:76)
==2395== 132 (64 direct, 68 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 396 of 407
==2395== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2395== by 0x4005C66: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==2395== by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==2395== by 0x401D670: g_ptr_array_maybe_expand (garray.c:968)
==2395== by 0x401DD0B: g_ptr_array_add (garray.c:1225)
==2395== by 0x4199A82: g_file_info_list_attributes (gfileinfo.c:642)
==2395== by 0x80492B7: test_g_file_info (g-file-info.c:86)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:35:44 +0000 (15:35 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in the readwrite test
And use g_assert_[no_]error().
==2392== 49 (24 direct, 25 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 451 of 573
==2392== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2392== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2392== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2392== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2392== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2392== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2392== by 0x41B7619: g_output_stream_set_pending (goutputstream.c:1198)
==2392== by 0x41B5799: g_output_stream_write (goutputstream.c:210)
==2392== by 0x41B590B: g_output_stream_write_all (goutputstream.c:268)
==2392== by 0x8049B54: verify_iostream (readwrite.c:110)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:34:12 +0000 (15:34 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in the readwrite test
==2392== 38 (16 direct, 22 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 369 of 573
==2392== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2392== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2392== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2392== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2392== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2392== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2392== by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2392== by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2392== by 0x4225D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2392== by 0x4231897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2392== by 0x41CF91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2392== by 0x41911B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2392== by 0x804A2B9: test_g_file_replace_readwrite (readwrite.c:235)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:33:28 +0000 (15:33 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in the readwrite test
==2392== 38 (16 direct, 22 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 368 of 573
==2392== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2392== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2392== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2392== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2392== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2392== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2392== by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2392== by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2392== by 0x4225D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2392== by 0x4231897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2392== by 0x41CF91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2392== by 0x41911B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2392== by 0x8049F23: test_g_file_create_readwrite (readwrite.c:183)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:32:32 +0000 (15:32 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in the readwrite test
==2392== 38 (16 direct, 22 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 367 of 573
==2392== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2392== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2392== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2392== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2392== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2392== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2392== by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2392== by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2392== by 0x4225D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2392== by 0x4231897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2392== by 0x41CF91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2392== by 0x41911B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2392== by 0x8049E30: test_g_file_open_readwrite (readwrite.c:153)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:31:37 +0000 (15:31 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in the memory-input-stream test
==2389== 84 (44 direct, 40 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 299 of 315
==2389== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2389== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2389== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2389== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2389== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2389== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2389== by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2389== by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2389== by 0x41AF54C: g_memory_input_stream_new (gmemoryinputstream.c:199)
==2389== by 0x8048BD1: test_read_chunks (memory-input-stream.c:40)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:30:47 +0000 (15:30 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in the memory-input-stream test
==2389== 59 (24 direct, 35 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 290 of 315
==2389== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2389== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2389== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2389== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2389== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2389== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2389== by 0x41AFD15: g_memory_input_stream_truncate (gmemoryinputstream.c:517)
==2389== by 0x41BAC0F: g_seekable_truncate (gseekable.c:174)
==2389== by 0x8049595: test_truncate (memory-input-stream.c:123)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:29:51 +0000 (15:29 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in gsettings test
==2530== 13 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 373 of 681
==2530== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2530== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2530== by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==2530== by 0x40717FC: g_strdup (gstrfuncs.c:101)
==2530== by 0x4147F56: value_lcopy_string (gvaluetypes.c:313)
==2530== by 0x4123F0B: g_object_get_valist (gobject.c:1643)
==2530== by 0x41240FF: g_object_get (gobject.c:1731)
==2530== by 0x804A4BA: test_basic (gsettings.c:28)
Bug #628331.
Christian Persch [Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:42:32 +0000 (19:42 +0200)]
Plug a mem leak
Don't leak the ptr arrays in the map_sender_unique_name_to_signal_data_array
hash table.
==23440== 84 (20 direct, 64 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 920 of 993
==23440== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==23440== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==23440== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==23440== by 0x401D2D0: g_ptr_array_sized_new (garray.c:799)
==23440== by 0x401D2AC: g_ptr_array_new (garray.c:783)
==23440== by 0x420834A: g_dbus_connection_signal_subscribe (gdbusconnection.c:3084)
Bug #628436.
Christian Persch [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:31:09 +0000 (19:31 +0200)]
Plug a mem leak
==31063== 98 (24 direct, 74 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 946 of 1,136
==31063== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==31063== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==31063== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==31063== by 0x4092383: g_variant_get_child_value (gvariant-core.c:847)
==31063== by 0x408BE9E: g_variant_get_variant (gvariant.c:709)
==31063== by 0x40903F5: g_variant_valist_get_nnp (gvariant.c:3767)
==31063== by 0x40907A9: g_variant_valist_get_leaf (gvariant.c:3884)
==31063== by 0x4090D10: g_variant_valist_get (gvariant.c:4065)
==31063== by 0x4090E59: g_variant_valist_get (gvariant.c:4100)
==31063== by 0x40911B6: g_variant_get_va (gvariant.c:4296)
==31063== by 0x40910BC: g_variant_get (gvariant.c:4248)
==31063== by 0x4208DAF: invoke_set_property_in_idle_cb (gdbusconnection.c:3676)
Bug #628346.
Christian Persch [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:00:05 +0000 (19:00 +0200)]
Plug a mem leak
... and use g_error_matches().
==29535== 1,360 (408 direct, 952 indirect) bytes in 17 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,252 of 1,264
==29535== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==29535== by 0x403A751: g_error_new_valist (gerror.c:54)
==29535== by 0x403AAD4: g_set_error (gerror.c:240)
==29535== by 0x41C06C8: g_socket_send_message (gsocket.c:2967)
==29535== by 0x421CB64: write_message_continue_writing (gdbusprivate.c:958)
==29535== by 0x421CE2A: write_message_async (gdbusprivate.c:1049)
==29535== by 0x421D4DD: maybe_write_next_message (gdbusprivate.c:1291)
==29535== by 0x421D26B: message_written (gdbusprivate.c:1187)
==29535== by 0x421D322: write_message_cb (gdbusprivate.c:1216)
Bug #628345.
Matthias Clasen [Fri, 3 Sep 2010 18:52:16 +0000 (14:52 -0400)]
Make ordering for overridden interface properties consistent
g_object_class_list_properties tries to sort the returned list of
paramspecs by 'type depth' and param_id. But all the overridden
interface properties have a param_id of 0, so they come out in
a random order.
Bug 628253.
Tor Lillqvist [Thu, 2 Sep 2010 18:56:02 +0000 (21:56 +0300)]
Recuce DLL hijack risk on Windows
Don't call LoadLibrary() on shell32.dll or kernel32.dll. kernel32.dll
is always loaded. Shell32.dll is also already loaded as glib links to
functions in it. So just call GetModuleHandle() on them.
For mlang.dll in win_iconv.c and winhttp.dll in gwinhttpvfs.c, always
try loading them from a complete path, from the Windows system
directory.
Use the "tool help" API to enumerate modules in gmodule-win32.c. It is
present in all Windows versions since Windows 2000, which is all we
support anyway. Thus no need to look that API up dynamically. Just
link to it normally. We can bin the fallback code that attempts to use
the psapi API.
Kjartan Maraas [Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:56:09 +0000 (11:56 +0200)]
Updated Norwegian bokmål translation
noch [Thu, 2 Sep 2010 07:35:02 +0000 (12:35 +0500)]
Modified Armenian translation - po file
Christian Persch [Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:05:59 +0000 (15:05 +0200)]
Fix building with zlib < 1.2.4 on win32
The gzip header processing functions were only exported
since 1.2.4 on win32, so #ifdef this code accordingly.
Bug #628505.
Ryan Lortie [Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:04:41 +0000 (15:04 +0200)]
Fix small bug in registry backend
'n' and 'q' types had their signed/unsigned meaning inverted.
Sam Thursfield [Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:10:23 +0000 (16:10 +0100)]
Add GSettings Windows Registry backend
Jon Nordby [Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:51:33 +0000 (16:51 +0200)]
docs: Inline docs from tmpl/memory.smgl
Andika Triwidada [Wed, 1 Sep 2010 02:54:52 +0000 (09:54 +0700)]
Updated Indonesian translation
noch [Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:49:31 +0000 (16:49 +0500)]
Modified hy.po
noch [Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:34:36 +0000 (12:34 +0500)]
Modified hy.po
Matthias Clasen [Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:47:40 +0000 (20:47 -0400)]
Bump version
Matthias Clasen [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:29:09 +0000 (19:29 -0400)]
Update symbol list
Branko Kokanović [Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:33:26 +0000 (02:33 +0200)]
Updated Serbian translation
Philip Withnall [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:13:18 +0000 (22:13 +0100)]
Update British English translation
Matthias Clasen [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:08:25 +0000 (16:08 -0400)]
Add one more bug ref
David Zeuthen [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:58:41 +0000 (13:58 -0400)]
GDBusProxy: remove superfluous -gdbus-proxy-method-name qdata
Looks like we're not using this anymore.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
David Zeuthen [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:45:46 +0000 (13:45 -0400)]
Bug 628324 – Invalid reads in gdbus-export test
Looks like we forgot to ref the returned GVariant in
g_dbus_proxy_call_finish().
It's a good question why code using g_dbus_proxy_call() and
g_dbus_proxy_call_finish() worked in the first place - probably the
answer is that no-one really used these APIs.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Matthias Clasen [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:28:06 +0000 (13:28 -0400)]
Tweak the wording
Ryan Lortie [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:58:49 +0000 (18:58 +0200)]
GAction is now an interface
the new class GSimpleAction is the implementation half
Ryan Lortie [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:31:06 +0000 (17:31 +0200)]
GActionGroup is now an interface
- make GAction.get_state() return a reference
- fix some leaks/warnings in the tests
- fix signal propagation in GSimpleActionGroup
Matthias Clasen [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:11:52 +0000 (13:11 -0400)]
Update NEWS for 2.25.15
Christian Persch [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:12:42 +0000 (16:12 +0200)]
Make g_emblemed_icon_add_emblem() keep the list sorted
Fixes bug #628317.
Christian Persch [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:53:49 +0000 (15:53 +0200)]
Don't leak the FD list
==6793== 32 (24 direct, 8 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 780 of 1,423
==6793== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==6793== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==6793== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==6793== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==6793== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==6793== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==6793== by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==6793== by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==6793== by 0x41DB582: g_unix_fd_list_new_from_array (gunixfdlist.c:191)
==6793== by 0x421BFD6: _g_dbus_worker_do_read_cb (gdbusprivate.c:590)
Bug #628329.
Christian Persch [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:21:43 +0000 (10:21 -0400)]
Fix invalid reads
Don't use a guint16* when getting a guint property via g_object_get()!
Bug #628323.
Christian Persch [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:18:30 +0000 (10:18 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak in GConverterOutputStream
==8221== 1,047 (672 direct, 375 indirect) bytes in 28 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 589 of 603
==8221== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==8221== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==8221== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==8221== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==8221== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==8221== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==8221== by 0x80499DC: g_compressor_converter_convert (converter-stream.c:267)
==8221== by 0x417BF67: g_converter_convert (gconverter.c:174)
==8221== by 0x417D7F0: g_converter_output_stream_write (gconverteroutputstream.c:428)
==8221== by 0x41B57DF: g_output_stream_write (goutputstream.c:216)
==8221== by 0x804A367: test_compressor (converter-stream.c:456)
Bug #628309.
Christian Persch [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:16:31 +0000 (10:16 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak
==6793== 19 (8 direct, 11 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 640 of 1,423
==6793== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==6793== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==6793== by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==6793== by 0x4073D1B: g_strsplit (gstrfuncs.c:2436)
==6793== by 0x4224A89: initable_init (gdbusserver.c:1040)
==6793== by 0x41A73F9: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==6793== by 0x41A759B: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==6793== by 0x41A743E: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==6793== by 0x42238F5: g_dbus_server_new_sync (gdbusserver.c:484)
Bug #628328.
Christian Persch [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:14:39 +0000 (10:14 -0400)]
Plug a mem leak
==6793== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 632 of 1,423
==6793== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==6793== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==6793== by 0x417FC29: g_data_input_stream_read_line (gdatainputstream.c:797)
==6793== by 0x41F99C1: _my_g_data_input_stream_read_line (gdbusauth.c:279)
==6793== by 0x41FA728: _g_dbus_auth_run_client (gdbusauth.c:759)
Bug #628327.
Matthias Clasen [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:02:32 +0000 (10:02 -0400)]
Add an annotation
Dan Winship [Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:23:09 +0000 (09:23 -0400)]
GSocketClient: fix a crash on cancellation
some code rearrangement when adding proxy support resulted in trying to
use a GSocket that wasn't there.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628296
projects / platform / upstream / glib.git / log