platform/upstream/btrfs-progs.git
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Introduce function to get correct stripe length
Qu Wenruo [Wed, 31 May 2017 05:56:08 +0000 (13:56 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Introduce function to get correct stripe length

Introduce a new function, btrfs_get_chunk_stripe_len() to get correct
stripe length.
This is very handy for lowmem mode, which checks the mapping between
device extent and chunk item.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: check: Reuse btrfs_check_chunk_valid in lowmem mode
Qu Wenruo [Wed, 31 May 2017 05:56:07 +0000 (13:56 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: check: Reuse btrfs_check_chunk_valid in lowmem mode

Before this patch, btrfs check lowmem mode manually checks found chunk
item, even we already have the generic chunk validation checker,
btrfs_check_chunk_valid().

This patch will use btrfs_check_chunk_valid() to replace open-coded
chunk validation checker in check_chunk_item().

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Enhance chunk item validation check
Qu Wenruo [Wed, 31 May 2017 05:56:06 +0000 (13:56 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Enhance chunk item validation check

btrfs_check_chunk_valid() doesn't check if
1) chunk flag has conflicting flags
   For example chunk type DATA|METADATA|RAID1|RAID10 is completely
   invalid, while current check_chunk_valid() can't detect it.
2) num_stripes is invalid for RAID10
   Num_stripes 5 is not valid for RAID10.

This patch will enhance btrfs_check_chunk_valid() to handle above cases.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Introduce wrapper to recover raid56 data
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 25 May 2017 06:21:50 +0000 (14:21 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Introduce wrapper to recover raid56 data

Introduce a wrapper to recover raid56 data.

The logical is the same with kernel one, but with different interfaces,
since kernel ones cares the performance while in btrfs we don't care
that much.

And the interface is more caller friendly inside btrfs-progs.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: raid56: Allow raid6 to recover data and P
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 25 May 2017 06:21:49 +0000 (14:21 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: raid56: Allow raid6 to recover data and P

Copied from kernel lib/raid6/recov.c.

Minor modifications includes:
- Rename from raid6_datap_recov_intx() to raid5_recov_datap()
- Rename parameter from faila to dest1

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: raid56: Allow raid6 to recover 2 data stripes
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 25 May 2017 06:21:48 +0000 (14:21 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: raid56: Allow raid6 to recover 2 data stripes

Copied from kernel lib/raid6/recov.c raid6_2data_recov_intx1() function.
With the following modification:
- Rename to raid6_recov_data2() for shorter name
- s/kfree/free/g modification

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: raid56: Introduce tables for RAID6 recovery
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 25 May 2017 06:21:47 +0000 (14:21 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: raid56: Introduce tables for RAID6 recovery

Use kernel RAID6 galois tables for later RAID6 recovery.

Galois tables file, kernel-lib/tables.c is generated by user space
program, mktable.

Galois field tables declaration, in kernel-lib/raid56.h, is completely
copied from kernel.

The mktables.c is copied from kernel with minor header/macro
modification, to ensure the generated tables.c works well in
btrfs-progs.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: raid56: Introduce raid56 header for later recovery usage
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 25 May 2017 06:21:46 +0000 (14:21 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: raid56: Introduce raid56 header for later recovery usage

Introduce a new header, kernel-lib/raid56.h, for later raid56 works.

It contains 2 functions, from original btrfs-progs code:
void raid6_gen_syndrome(int disks, size_t bytes, void **ptrs);
int raid5_gen_result(int nr_devs, size_t stripe_len, int dest, void **data);

Will be expanded later and some part of it(RAID6 recover part) may keep
sync with kernel later.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
[ unify gpl header, rename header macro ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Fix slot >= nritems
Philipp Hahn [Mon, 15 May 2017 17:00:23 +0000 (19:00 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: Fix slot >= nritems

Running "btrfsck --repair /dev/sdd2" crashed as it can happen in
(corrupted) file systems, that slot > nritems:
> (gdb) bt full
> #0  0x00007ffff7020e71 in __memmove_sse2_unaligned_erms () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
> #1  0x0000000000438764 in btrfs_del_ptr (trans=<optimized out>, root=0x6e4fe0, path=0x1d17880, level=0, slot=7)
>     at ctree.c:2611
>         parent = 0xcd96980
>         nritems = <optimized out>
>         __func__ = "btrfs_del_ptr"
> #2  0x0000000000421b15 in repair_btree (corrupt_blocks=<optimized out>, root=<optimized out>) at cmds-check.c:3539
>         key = {objectid = 77990592512, type = 168 '\250', offset = 16384}
>         trans = 0x8f48c0
>         path = 0x1d17880
>         level = 0
> #3  check_fs_root (wc=<optimized out>, root_cache=<optimized out>, root=<optimized out>) at cmds-check.c:3703
>         corrupt = 0x1d17880
>         corrupt_blocks = {root = {rb_node = 0x6e80c60}}
>         path = {nodes = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, slots = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, locks = {0, 0,
>             0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, reada = 0, lowest_level = 0, search_for_split = 0, skip_check_block = 0}
>         nrefs = {bytenr = {271663104271646720560021504, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, refs = {1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}}
>         wret = 215575372
>         root_node = {cache = {rb_node = {__rb_parent_color = 0, rb_right = 0x0, rb_left = 0x0}, objectid = 0,
>             start = 0, size = 0}, root_cache = {root = {rb_node = 0x0}}, inode_cache = {root = {
>               rb_node = 0x781c80}}, current = 0x819530, refs = 0}
>         status = 215575372
>         rec = 0x1
> #4  check_fs_roots (root_cache=0xcd96b6d, root=<optimized out>) at cmds-check.c:3809
>         path = {nodes = {0x6eed90, 0x6a2f40, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, slots = {18, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0},
>           locks = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, reada = 0, lowest_level = 0, search_for_split = 0,
>           skip_check_block = 0}
>         key = {objectid = 323, type = 132 '\204', offset = 18446744073709551615}
>         wc = {shared = {root = {rb_node = 0x0}}, nodes = {0x0, 0x0, 0x7fffffffe428, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0},
>           active_node = 2, root_level = 2}
>         leaf = 0x6e4fe0
>         tmp_root = 0x6e4fe0
> #5  0x00000000004287c3 in cmd_check (argc=215575372, argv=0x1d17880) at cmds-check.c:11521
>         root_cache = {root = {rb_node = 0x98c2940}}
>         info = 0x6927b0
>         bytenr = 6891440
>         tree_root_bytenr = 0
>         uuidbuf = "f65ff1a1-76ef-456e-beb5-c6c3841e7534"
>         num = 215575372
>         readonly = 218080104
>         qgroups_repaired = 0
> #6  0x000000000040a41f in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffebe8) at btrfs.c:243
>         cmd = 0x689868
>         bname = <optimized out>
>         ret = <optimized out>

in that case the count of remaining items (nritems - slot - 1) gets
negative. That is then casted to (unsigned long len), which leads to the
observed crash.

Change the tests before the move to handle only the non-corrupted case,
were slow < nritems.

This does not fix the corruption, but allows btrfsck to finish without
crashing.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Hahn <hahn@univention.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor read_node_slot function to get rid of btrfs_root
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 03:11:55 +0000 (11:11 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor read_node_slot function to get rid of btrfs_root
parameter

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor read_tree_block to get rid of btrfs_root
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 02:51:08 +0000 (10:51 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor read_tree_block to get rid of btrfs_root

The only reasom read_tree_block() needs a btrfs_root parameter is to get
its node/sector size.

And long ago, I have already introduced a compactible interface,
read_tree_block_fs_info() to pass btrfs_fs_info instead of btrfs_root.

Since we have cleaned up all root->sector/node/stripesize users, we
should be OK to refactor read_tree_block() function.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor btrfs_root paramters in btrfs-corrupt-block.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 02:36:19 +0000 (10:36 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor btrfs_root paramters in btrfs-corrupt-block.c

Refactor the following functions and its callers to get rid of
incorrectly passed btrfs_root parameters:

1) corrupt_keys()
2) corrupt_metadata_block()

The only reason passing btrfs_root for them is to get block sizes.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Remove block size members in btrfs_root
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 02:22:22 +0000 (10:22 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Remove block size members in btrfs_root

Finally, we can get rid of per tree block size members now.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize users in cmds-inspect-dump-tree.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 02:21:34 +0000 (10:21 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize users in cmds-inspect-dump-tree.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize users in convert/source-ext2.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 02:14:19 +0000 (10:14 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize users in convert/source-ext2.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize users in convert/main.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 02:13:27 +0000 (10:13 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize users in convert/main.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize in convert/source-fs.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 02:11:46 +0000 (10:11 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize in convert/source-fs.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize users in free-space-tree.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 02:09:53 +0000 (10:09 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize users in free-space-tree.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize users in volumes.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 02:09:10 +0000 (10:09 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize users in volumes.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize users in file.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 02:06:40 +0000 (10:06 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize users in file.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize users in free-space-cache.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 02:05:22 +0000 (10:05 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize users in free-space-cache.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsizes users in file-item.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 02:02:24 +0000 (10:02 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsizes users in file-item.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize users in mkfs/main.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 02:00:01 +0000 (10:00 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor sectorsize users in mkfs/main.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor nodesize users in cmds-inspect-tree-stats.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 01:54:49 +0000 (09:54 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor nodesize users in cmds-inspect-tree-stats.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor nodesize users in qgroup-verify.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 01:51:55 +0000 (09:51 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor nodesize users in qgroup-verify.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor nodesize user in print-tree.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 01:50:51 +0000 (09:50 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor nodesize user in print-tree.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in extent-tree.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 01:48:52 +0000 (09:48 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in extent-tree.c

And in the refactoring, also refactors a open-coded round_up().

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor nodesize users in utils.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 01:40:25 +0000 (09:40 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor nodesize users in utils.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor nodesize user in btrfstune.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 01:39:03 +0000 (09:39 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor nodesize user in btrfstune.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in cmds-check.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 01:38:03 +0000 (09:38 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in cmds-check.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor nodesize users in image/main.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 01:29:54 +0000 (09:29 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor nodesize users in image/main.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor nodesize user in extent_io.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 01:27:32 +0000 (09:27 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor nodesize user in extent_io.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in cmds-restore.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 01:26:48 +0000 (09:26 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in cmds-restore.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in backref.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 01:24:55 +0000 (09:24 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in backref.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in chunk-recover.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 01:23:59 +0000 (09:23 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in chunk-recover.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in btrfs-map-logical.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 01:21:05 +0000 (09:21 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in btrfs-map-logical.c

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in ctree.c and ctree.h
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 01:17:41 +0000 (09:17 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in ctree.c and ctree.h

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in btrfs-corrupt-block.c
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 18 May 2017 01:11:20 +0000 (09:11 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in btrfs-corrupt-block.c

Convert root->sectorsize/nodesize users in btrfs-corrupt-block.

This provides the basis to further refactor incorrect btrfs_root
parameter to btrfs_fs_info parameter.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in disk-io.c
Qu Wenruo [Wed, 17 May 2017 09:17:56 +0000 (17:17 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Refactor block sizes users in disk-io.c

Since we have cached block sizes in fs_info, there is no need to specify
these sizes in btrfs_setup_root() function.

And refactor all root->sector/node/stripesize users in disk-io.c.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Introduce sectorsize nodesize and stripesize members for
Qu Wenruo [Wed, 17 May 2017 08:57:35 +0000 (16:57 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Introduce sectorsize nodesize and stripesize members for
btrfs_fs_info

Just like what we do in kernel, since we will not support different
leaf/node/stripe size per tree, there is no need to store these block
sizes in btrfs_root.

This patch will introduce these block size members into btrfs_fs_info
structure, allowing us to convert such usage in later patches.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Remove deprecated leafsize usage
Qu Wenruo [Wed, 17 May 2017 08:42:50 +0000 (16:42 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Remove deprecated leafsize usage

Leafsize is deprecated for a long time, and kernel has already updated
ctree.h to rename sb->leafsize to sb->__unused_leafsize.

This patch will remove normal users of leafsize:
1) Remove leafsize member from btrfs_root structure
   Now only root->nodesize and root->sectorisze.
   No longer root->leafsize.

2) Remove @leafsize parameter from btrfs_setup_root() function
   Since no root->leafsize, no need for @leafsize parameter.

The remaining user of leafsize will be:
1) btrfs inspect-internal dump-super
   Reformat the "leafsize" output to "leafsize (deprecated)" and
   use le32_to_cpu() to do the cast manually.

2) mkfs
   We still need to set sb->__unused_leafsize to nodesize.
   Do the manual cast too.

3) convert
   Same as mkfs, these two superblock setup should be merged later

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Cleanup open-coded btrfs_chunk_item_size
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 15 May 2017 08:27:38 +0000 (16:27 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Cleanup open-coded btrfs_chunk_item_size

In btrfs_check_chunk_valid() we calculate chunk item using open code,
use an existing helper btrfs_chunk_item_size() instead.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: docs: document conventions
David Sterba [Thu, 18 May 2017 16:49:00 +0000 (18:49 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: docs: document conventions

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agoBtrfs progs v4.11.1
David Sterba [Fri, 30 Jun 2017 16:34:24 +0000 (18:34 +0200)]
Btrfs progs v4.11.1

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: update CHANGES for v4.11.1
David Sterba [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:20:21 +0000 (14:20 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: update CHANGES for v4.11.1

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agoBtrfs-progs: convert: do not clear header rev
Liu Bo [Mon, 26 Jun 2017 23:55:02 +0000 (17:55 -0600)]
Btrfs-progs: convert: do not clear header rev

So btrfs_set_header_flags() vs btrfs_set_header_flag, the difference is
sort of similar to "=" vs "|=", when creating and initialising a new
extent buffer, convert uses the former one which clears header_rev by
accident.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agoBtrfs-progs: convert: do not clear nodatasum flag in inode item
Liu Bo [Wed, 28 Jun 2017 21:29:49 +0000 (15:29 -0600)]
Btrfs-progs: convert: do not clear nodatasum flag in inode item

With the current btrfs-convert, if we convert a ext4 without data checksum,
it'd not set nodatasum flag in inode item, nor create csum item, reading
file ends up with checksum errors.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agoBtrfs-progs: man: nodesize must be power of 2 now
Liu Bo [Tue, 27 Jun 2017 21:25:45 +0000 (15:25 -0600)]
Btrfs-progs: man: nodesize must be power of 2 now

This updates mkfs.btrfs's man page with the new limitation that nodesize must
be a power of 2 as well.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix false alert about file extent interrupt
Lu Fengqi [Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:12:56 +0000 (16:12 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix false alert about file extent interrupt

As Qu mentioned in this thread
(https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg64469.html), compression
can cause regular extent to co-exist with an inlined extent. This
coexistence makes things confusing. Since it is currently allowed and
can appear in a filesystem, fix btrfsck to prevent a bunch of error
reports to appear that will make user feel uneasy.

When checking a file extent, record the extent_end of the regular extent
to check if there is a gap between the regular extents. Normally there
is only one inlined extent, so the extent_end of inlined extent is
useless. However, if a regular extent can co-exist with an inlined
extent, the extent_end of the inlined extent also needs to be recorded.

Reported-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: tests: Add test case to check file hole extents with NO_HOLES flag
Qu Wenruo [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 01:43:23 +0000 (09:43 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: tests: Add test case to check file hole extents with NO_HOLES flag

Add test case which we have NO_HOLES incompat flag while still have
hole file extent.

This can be created by enabling NO_HOLES feature on an existing
filesystem, which lowmem mode would cause false alert for it.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
[ minor adjustments ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: check: Fix false alert about EXTENT_DATA that shouldn't be a hole
Qu Wenruo [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 01:43:22 +0000 (09:43 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: check: Fix false alert about EXTENT_DATA that shouldn't be a hole

Since the incompat feature NO_HOLES still allows us to have an explicit
hole file extent, current check is too strict and will cause false
alerts like:

  root 5 EXTENT_DATA[257, 0] shouldn't be hole

Fix it by removing the strict file hole extent check.

Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg66374.html
Reported-by: Henk Slager <eye1tm@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Henk Slager <eye1tm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: convert: Add larger device support
Lakshmipathi.G [Sat, 3 Jun 2017 09:57:45 +0000 (15:27 +0530)]
btrfs-progs: convert: Add larger device support

With larger file system (in this case its 22TB), ext2fs_open() returns
EXT2_ET_CANT_USE_LEGACY_BITMAPS error message with
ext2fs_read_block_bitmap().

To overcome this issue,
(a) we need pass EXT2_FLAG_64BITS flag with ext2fs_open.
(b) use 64-bit functions like ext2fs_get_block_bitmap_range2,
    ext2fs_inode_data_blocks2,ext2fs_read_ext_attr2
(c) use 64bit types with btrfs_convert_context fields

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194795
Signed-off-by: Lakshmipathi.G <lakshmipathi.g@giis.co.in>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: convert: widen int types in convert context
Lakshmipathi.G [Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:43:31 +0000 (14:43 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: convert: widen int types in convert context

The u32 types in the convert context might not be enough for some very
large filesytems (20TB). Use 64bit types to be safe.

Signed-off-by: Lakshmipathi.G <lakshmipathi.g@giis.co.in>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Fix 'btrfs device stats --check' cli option
Lakshmipathi.G [Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:57:53 +0000 (13:27 +0530)]
btrfs-progs: Fix 'btrfs device stats --check' cli option

"Bug 194961 - btrfs device stats --check <folder> does not work"

The long option --check is not recognized as it's missing from the
option table.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194961
Reported-by: Tomas Thiemel<thiemel@centrum.cz>
Signed-off-by: Lakshmipathi.G <Lakshmipathi.G@giis.co.in>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: docs: replace <dev> with <device>
Kasijjuf [Thu, 22 Jun 2017 17:49:55 +0000 (12:49 -0500)]
btrfs-progs: docs: replace <dev> with <device>

As discussed in #50, use 'device' everywhere a path do a device is
expected.

Pull request: #52
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: docs: Wrong section in ref to manpage
Kasijjuf [Thu, 22 Jun 2017 01:52:01 +0000 (20:52 -0500)]
btrfs-progs: docs: Wrong section in ref to manpage

Pull request: #51
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: build: sync recent makefile changes to android.mk
David Sterba [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:21:44 +0000 (18:21 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: build: sync recent makefile changes to android.mk

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: docs: Expand confusing abbreviation in documentation
Kasijjuf [Wed, 14 Jun 2017 05:26:08 +0000 (00:26 -0500)]
btrfs-progs: docs: Expand confusing abbreviation in documentation

While the command interpreter may be able to disambiguate the meaning,
the reader is not helped by being forced to do so.

Pull request: #48
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: docs: update note about device deletion
David Sterba [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:08:50 +0000 (15:08 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: docs: update note about device deletion

User Kasijjuf points out the VFS initialism is not explained anywhere.
While this could be fixed, the whole note about inability to delete the
device by which the filesystem has been mounted, is wrong.

Issue: #49
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: send operates on ro snapshots only
Hans van Kranenburg [Tue, 6 Jun 2017 13:00:58 +0000 (15:00 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: send operates on ro snapshots only

While talking to another btrfs user on IRC today, it became clear that a
major point of confusion in the btrfs send manual is that it's not
telling the user soon enough that send/receive solely operates on
subvolume snapshots instead of the original (read/write) subvolumes.

So, change the first few lines to explicitly mention snapshots instead.
Technically, snapshots are also just subvolumes, but requiring this
level of technical detailed knowledge doesn't help the user who is just
trying out things.

Signed-off-by: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: docs: fix sentence for no-dump file attribute
David Sterba [Mon, 5 Jun 2017 14:39:33 +0000 (16:39 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: docs: fix sentence for no-dump file attribute

User Kasijjuf found a nonsensical sentence in the maunal page.

Issue: #45
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: docs: update formatting of btrfs-property
David Sterba [Wed, 31 May 2017 11:49:08 +0000 (13:49 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: docs: update formatting of btrfs-property

Reported by a wiki user, that there are formatting artifacts in the
'get' section:

in html rendered as "The -t <em><type></em> option can be..."

This is probably due to the nesting '' and <>. We don't need the <> in
the explanation, as this is only to describe the command line syntax.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: docs: update formatting of btrfs-rescue
David Sterba [Wed, 31 May 2017 11:49:08 +0000 (13:49 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: docs: update formatting of btrfs-rescue

Reported by a wiki user, that the 'zero-log' section indentaion is
wrong.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: test for restoring multiple devices fs into a single device
Filipe Manana [Wed, 17 May 2017 01:41:31 +0000 (02:41 +0100)]
btrfs-progs: test for restoring multiple devices fs into a single device

Test that we are able to create an image from a multiple devices fs, that
we are able to restore that image into a single device and finally that we
are able to mount it.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
[ added shell quotation and chmod a+w so testsuite on NFS works ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Fix restoring image from multi devices fs into single device
Filipe Manana [Wed, 17 May 2017 01:41:21 +0000 (02:41 +0100)]
btrfs-progs: Fix restoring image from multi devices fs into single device

We correctly build an image from a multiple devices filesystem but when
restoring the image into a single device we were missing updating the
number of devices in the superblock to the value 1 (we already took care
of setting the number of stripes to 1 for each chunk item and setting
the device id for each chunk item to match the device id from the super
block).

This missing update of the number of devices makes it impossible to mount
the restored filesystem on recent kernels, more specifically since the
linux kernel commit 99e3ecfcb9f4ca35192d20a5bea158b81f600062
("Btrfs: add more validation checks for superblock"), that produce the
following message in the dmesg/syslog:

[21097.542047] BTRFS error (device sdi): super_num_devices 2 mismatch with num_devices 1 found here
[21097.543972] BTRFS error (device sdi): failed to read chunk tree: -22
[21097.720360] BTRFS error (device sdi): open_ctree failed

So fix this by updating the number of devices to 1 in the superblock.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: tests: remove variable quotation from convert-tests
Tsutomu Itoh [Tue, 16 May 2017 03:01:53 +0000 (12:01 +0900)]
btrfs-progs: tests: remove variable quotation from convert-tests

In btrfs-progs-v4.11-rc1, the following convert-tests failed.

    [TEST/conv]   008-readonly-image
    [TEST/conv]     readonly image test, btrfs defaults
failed: mke2fs -t ext4 -b 4096 -F /Build/btrfs-progs-v4.11-rc1/tests/test.img
test failed for case 008-readonly-image
Makefile:271: recipe for target 'test-convert' failed
make: *** [test-convert] Error 1
    [TEST/conv]   009-common-inode-flags
    [TEST/conv]     common inode flags test, btrfs defaults
failed: mke2fs -t ext4 -b 4096 -F /Build/btrfs-progs-v4.11-rc1/tests/test.img
test failed for case 009-common-inode-flags
Makefile:271: recipe for target 'test-convert' failed
make: *** [test-convert] Error 1

So, remove quotes from $default_mke2fs.

Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agoBtrfs progs v4.11
David Sterba [Thu, 18 May 2017 14:16:03 +0000 (16:16 +0200)]
Btrfs progs v4.11

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: update CHANGES for v4.11
David Sterba [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:20:21 +0000 (14:20 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: update CHANGES for v4.11

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: tests: fix misc/019-receive-clones-on-munted-subvol
David Sterba [Mon, 15 May 2017 14:34:31 +0000 (16:34 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: tests: fix misc/019-receive-clones-on-munted-subvol

Patches "btrfs-progs: tests: correctly receive clones to mounted subvol"
(8eaf63bc9a7b957c566be23df7c6701a9a5b22a2) and followup are missing last
unmount which leads to failure of misc/020.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: receiv: fail on first -ENODATA only
Christian Brauner [Sat, 29 Apr 2017 21:54:05 +0000 (23:54 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: receiv: fail on first -ENODATA only

Returning -ENODATA is only considered invalid on the first run of the
loop where we would detect entirely empty stream.

The enhanced test misc-tests/018-recv-end-of-stream now passes.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195597
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: print-tree: Add leaf flags and backref revision output
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 8 May 2017 07:38:10 +0000 (15:38 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: print-tree: Add leaf flags and backref revision output

Btrfs header has a u64 member flags, whose lowest 56 bits are for header
flags like WRITTEN and RELOC.
And its highest 8 bits are for backref revision.

Manually checking btrfs_header_flags() will be a pain, so add such leaf
flags and backref revision output for print-tree.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: check: Avoid reading beyond item boundary for dir_item and dir_index
Qu Wenruo [Wed, 3 May 2017 08:42:40 +0000 (16:42 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: check: Avoid reading beyond item boundary for dir_item and dir_index

When reading out name from inode_ref, it's possible that corrupted
name_len can lead to read beyond boundary of item or even extent buffer.

This happens when checking fuzzed image /tmp/bko-161811.raw, for both
lowmem mode and original mode.

Below is the example from lowmem mode.

ERROR: root 5 INODE REF[256 256] doesn't have related DIR_INDEX[256 216172782113783808] namelen 255 filename bar filetype 0
ERROR: root 5 INODE REF[256 256] doesn't have related DIR_ITEM[256 1306590535] namelen 255 filename bar filetype 0
WARNING: root 5 INODE[256] mode 0 shouldn't have DIR_INDEX[256 1167283096]
WARNING: root 5 DIR_ITEM[256 1167283096] name too long
==13013== Invalid read of size 1
==13013==    at 0x4C31A38: memmove (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==13013==    by 0x431518: read_extent_buffer (extent_io.c:863)
==13013==    by 0x4752AB: check_dir_item (cmds-check.c:4627)
==13013==    by 0x475E5C: check_inode_item (cmds-check.c:4911)
==13013==    by 0x476200: check_fs_first_inode (cmds-check.c:5011)
==13013==    by 0x476276: check_fs_root_v2 (cmds-check.c:5044)
==13013==    by 0x4769FB: check_fs_roots_v2 (cmds-check.c:5242)
==13013==    by 0x488B5B: cmd_check (cmds-check.c:13033)
==13013==    by 0x40A8C5: main (btrfs.c:246)
==13013==  Address 0x5c95b80 is 0 bytes after a block of size 4,224 alloc'd
==13013==    at 0x4C2CF35: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==13013==    by 0x4307E0: __alloc_extent_buffer (extent_io.c:538)
==13013==    by 0x430C37: alloc_extent_buffer (extent_io.c:642)
==13013==    by 0x413DFE: btrfs_find_create_tree_block (disk-io.c:193)
==13013==    by 0x414370: read_tree_block_fs_info (disk-io.c:340)
==13013==    by 0x40B5D5: read_tree_block (disk-io.h:125)
==13013==    by 0x40CFD2: read_node_slot (ctree.c:652)
==13013==    by 0x40E5EB: btrfs_search_slot (ctree.c:1172)
==13013==    by 0x4761A8: check_fs_first_inode (cmds-check.c:5001)
==13013==    by 0x476276: check_fs_root_v2 (cmds-check.c:5044)
==13013==    by 0x4769FB: check_fs_roots_v2 (cmds-check.c:5242)
==13013==    by 0x488B5B: cmd_check (cmds-check.c:13033)

Fix it by double checking dir_item, name_len against item boundary
before trying to read out name from extent buffer, for both original
mode and lowmem mode.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: check: Avoid reading beyond item boundary for inode_ref
Qu Wenruo [Wed, 3 May 2017 08:42:39 +0000 (16:42 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: check: Avoid reading beyond item boundary for inode_ref

When reading out name from inode_ref, it's possible that corrupted
name_len can lead to read beyond boundary of item or even extent buffer.

This happens when checking fuzzed image /tmp/bko-161811.raw, for both
lowmem mode and original mode.

ERROR: root 5 INODE REF[256 256] doesn't have related DIR_INDEX[256 504403158265495680] namelen 0 filename  filetype 0
ERROR: root 5 INODE REF[256 256] doesn't have related DIR_ITEM[256 4294967294] namelen 0 filename  filetype 0
WARNING: root 5 INODE_REF[256 256] name too long
==13022== Invalid read of size 8
==13022==    at 0x4C319BE: memmove (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==13022==    by 0x431518: read_extent_buffer (extent_io.c:863)
==13022==    by 0x474730: check_inode_ref (cmds-check.c:4307)
==13022==    by 0x475D65: check_inode_item (cmds-check.c:4890)
==13022==    by 0x476200: check_fs_first_inode (cmds-check.c:5011)
==13022==    by 0x476276: check_fs_root_v2 (cmds-check.c:5044)
==13022==    by 0x4769FB: check_fs_roots_v2 (cmds-check.c:5242)
==13022==    by 0x488B5B: cmd_check (cmds-check.c:13033)
==13022==    by 0x40A8C5: main (btrfs.c:246)
==13022==  Address 0x5c96780 is 0 bytes after a block of size 4,224 alloc'd
==13022==    at 0x4C2CF35: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==13022==    by 0x4307E0: __alloc_extent_buffer (extent_io.c:538)
==13022==    by 0x430C37: alloc_extent_buffer (extent_io.c:642)
==13022==    by 0x413DFE: btrfs_find_create_tree_block (disk-io.c:193)
==13022==    by 0x414370: read_tree_block_fs_info (disk-io.c:340)
==13022==    by 0x40B5D5: read_tree_block (disk-io.h:125)
==13022==    by 0x40CFD2: read_node_slot (ctree.c:652)
==13022==    by 0x40E5EB: btrfs_search_slot (ctree.c:1172)
==13022==    by 0x4761A8: check_fs_first_inode (cmds-check.c:5001)
==13022==    by 0x476276: check_fs_root_v2 (cmds-check.c:5044)
==13022==    by 0x4769FB: check_fs_roots_v2 (cmds-check.c:5242)
==13022==    by 0x488B5B: cmd_check (cmds-check.c:13033)
=

Fix it by double checking inode_ref, name_len against item boundary
before trying to read out name from extent buffer, for both original
mode and lowmem mode.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: check: Fix heap use after free
Su Yue [Wed, 3 May 2017 01:50:14 +0000 (09:50 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: check: Fix heap use after free

fsck/004-no-dir-index makes valgrinds complaining about Invalid read.
==31890== Invalid read of size 1
==31890==    at 0x453D09: repair_inode_backrefs (cmds-check.c:2690)
==31890==    by 0x453D09: check_inode_recs (cmds-check.c:3330)
==31890==    by 0x453D09: check_fs_root (cmds-check.c:4012)
==31890==    by 0x45E788: check_fs_roots (cmds-check.c:4098)
==31890==    by 0x45E788: cmd_check (cmds-check.c:13031)
==31890==    by 0x40A88A: main (btrfs.c:246)
==31890==  Address 0x5cb7b90 is 16 bytes inside a block of size 50 free'd
==31890==    at 0x4C2C14B: free (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==31890==    by 0x453D08: repair_inode_backrefs (cmds-check.c:2684)
==31890==    by 0x453D08: check_inode_recs (cmds-check.c:3330)
==31890==    by 0x453D08: check_fs_root (cmds-check.c:4012)
==31890==    by 0x45E788: check_fs_roots (cmds-check.c:4098)
==31890==    by 0x45E788: cmd_check (cmds-check.c:13031)
==31890==    by 0x40A88A: main (btrfs.c:246)
==31890==  Block was alloc'd at
==31890==    at 0x4C2AF1F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==31890==    by 0x45055C: get_inode_backref (cmds-check.c:1075)
==31890==    by 0x45055C: add_inode_backref (cmds-check.c:1097)
==31890==    by 0x45180C: process_dir_item (cmds-check.c:1525)
==31890==    by 0x45180C: process_one_leaf (cmds-check.c:1838)
==31890==    by 0x45180C: walk_down_tree (cmds-check.c:2134)
==31890==    by 0x45180C: check_fs_root (cmds-check.c:3957)
==31890==    by 0x45E788: check_fs_roots (cmds-check.c:4098)
==31890==    by 0x45E788: cmd_check (cmds-check.c:13031)
==31890==    by 0x40A88A: main (btrfs.c:246)
==31890==
==31890== Invalid read of size 8
==31890==    at 0x452D66: repair_inode_backrefs (cmds-check.c:2731)
==31890==    by 0x452D66: check_inode_recs (cmds-check.c:3330)
==31890==    by 0x452D66: check_fs_root (cmds-check.c:4012)
==31890==    by 0x45E788: check_fs_roots (cmds-check.c:4098)
==31890==    by 0x45E788: cmd_check (cmds-check.c:13031)
==31890==    by 0x40A88A: main (btrfs.c:246)
==31890==  Address 0x5cb7b90 is 16 bytes inside a block of size 50 free'd
==31890==    at 0x4C2C14B: free (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==31890==    by 0x453D08: repair_inode_backrefs (cmds-check.c:2684)
==31890==    by 0x453D08: check_inode_recs (cmds-check.c:3330)
==31890==    by 0x453D08: check_fs_root (cmds-check.c:4012)
==31890==    by 0x45E788: check_fs_roots (cmds-check.c:4098)
==31890==    by 0x45E788: cmd_check (cmds-check.c:13031)
==31890==    by 0x40A88A: main (btrfs.c:246)
==31890==  Block was alloc'd at
==31890==    at 0x4C2AF1F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==31890==    by 0x45055C: get_inode_backref (cmds-check.c:1075)
==31890==    by 0x45055C: add_inode_backref (cmds-check.c:1097)
==31890==    by 0x45180C: process_dir_item (cmds-check.c:1525)
==31890==    by 0x45180C: process_one_leaf (cmds-check.c:1838)
==31890==    by 0x45180C: walk_down_tree (cmds-check.c:2134)
==31890==    by 0x45180C: check_fs_root (cmds-check.c:3957)
==31890==    by 0x45E788: check_fs_roots (cmds-check.c:4098)
==31890==    by 0x45E788: cmd_check (cmds-check.c:13031)
==31890==    by 0x40A88A: main (btrfs.c:246)
==31890==

While iterating over backrefs in repair_inode_backrefs, there are
several situations to repair one backref according
backref->found_dir_item and backref->found_dir_index.  Two of these
branches may free the backref, but next checks will still access the
freed memory.

Because these branches are independent, let repair_inode_backrefs skip
to handle next backref after free can fix it.

Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: tests: add variable quotation to convert-tests
Lakshmipathi.G [Sun, 23 Apr 2017 19:00:00 +0000 (00:30 +0530)]
btrfs-progs: tests: add variable quotation to convert-tests

Signed-off-by: Lakshmipathi.G <Lakshmipathi.G@giis.co.in>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: check: make max_size consistent with nr
Christophe de Dinechin [Fri, 28 Apr 2017 09:51:21 +0000 (11:51 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: check: make max_size consistent with nr

Since we memset tmpl, max_size==0. This does not seem consistent with nr = 1.
In check_extent_refs, we will call:

  set_extent_dirty(root->fs_info->excluded_extents,
                   rec->start,
                   rec->start + rec->max_size - 1);

This ends up with BUG_ON(end < start) in insert_state.

Signed-off-by: Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: check: prevent attempt to insert extent record with max_size==0
Christophe de Dinechin [Fri, 28 Apr 2017 09:50:23 +0000 (11:50 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: check: prevent attempt to insert extent record with max_size==0

When this happens, we will trip a BUG_ON(end < start) in insert_state
because in check_extent_refs, we use this max_size expecting it's not zero:

  set_extent_dirty(root->fs_info->excluded_extents,
                   rec->start,
                   rec->start + rec->max_size - 1);

See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435567
for an example where this scenario occurs.

Signed-off-by: Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: check: disambiguate between cases where add_tree_backref fails
Christophe de Dinechin [Fri, 28 Apr 2017 09:12:35 +0000 (11:12 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: check: disambiguate between cases where add_tree_backref fails

See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435567 for an example
where the message occurs.

Signed-off-by: Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@redhat.com>
[ un-indent strings overfowing 80 cols ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Use more strict check to read out tree root
Qu Wenruo [Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:40:16 +0000 (16:40 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Use more strict check to read out tree root

Fuzzed image bko-156811-bad-parent-ref-qgroup-verify.raw causes qgroup
to report -ENOMEM.

But the fact is, such image is heavily damaged so there is no valid root
item for the extent tree.

Normal extent tree key in root tree should be (EXTENT_TREE ROOT_ITEM 0),
while in that fuzzed image, we got (EXTENT_TREE EXXTENT_DATA SOME_NUMBER).

It's btrfs_find_last_root() that only checks the objectid, not caring
about the key type leading to such problem.

Fix it by doing extra check on key type.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
[ edit changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: tests: Fix fuzz-test for bko-161821.raw.txt
Lu Fengqi [Tue, 2 May 2017 07:36:09 +0000 (15:36 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: tests: Fix fuzz-test for bko-161821.raw.txt

Fuzzed image bko-161821.raw causes btrfs check to get segmentation fault.

The function check_owner_ref attempts to access a non-exist quota tree
when dealing with extent_item [4198400 4096] in the corrupted filesystem.

The function btrfs_new_fs_info always allocates memory for
fs_info->quota_root regardless of whether quota_tree exists or not.
Additionally, the function btrfs_read_fs_root will directly return
fs_info->quota_root if location->objectid == BTRFS_QUOTA_TREE_OBJECTID.

This patch does the following things:
1. Do extra check and return ENOENT if quota tree does not exist in the
   function btrfs_read_fs_root.
2. Free useless fs_info->quota_root in the function btrfs_setup_all_roots
   to reduce confusion.
3. free_extent_buffer even if check_child_node failed in the function
   walk_down_tree.

Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: check: Fix memory leak in check_chunks_and_extents
Qu Wenruo [Tue, 2 May 2017 03:17:25 +0000 (11:17 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: check: Fix memory leak in check_chunks_and_extents

fsck/003-shift-offsets makes valgrinds complaining about memory leaks.
==5910==
==5910== HEAP SUMMARY:
==5910==     in use at exit: 1,112 bytes in 11 blocks
==5910==   total heap usage: 161 allocs, 150 frees, 164,800 bytes allocated
==5910==
==5910== 216 (72 direct, 144 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3 of 5
==5910==    at 0x4C2AF1F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==5910==    by 0x4815A3: add_root_item_to_list (cmds-check.c:9683)
==5910==    by 0x481CE2: check_chunks_and_extents (cmds-check.c:9886)
==5910==    by 0x48888B: cmd_check (cmds-check.c:12977)
==5910==    by 0x40A8C5: main (btrfs.c:246)
==5910==

The check_chunks_and_extents() memory leaks are caused by not freeing
added root items of normal_trees and dropping_trees.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: fssum: fix warning, include correct header for major()
David Sterba [Tue, 2 May 2017 14:23:54 +0000 (16:23 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: fssum: fix warning, include correct header for major()

tests/fssum.c:599:13: warning: In the GNU C Library, "major" is defined
 by <sys/sysmacros.h>. For historical compatibility, it is
 currently defined by <sys/types.h> as well, but we plan to
 remove this soon. To use "major", include <sys/sysmacros.h>
 directly. If you did not intend to use a system-defined macro
 "major", you should undefine it after including <sys/types.h>.
    sum_add_u64(&cs, major(st.st_rdev));

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: tests: fssum, fix memory leak
Lu Fengqi [Wed, 26 Apr 2017 01:22:41 +0000 (09:22 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: tests: fssum, fix memory leak

Free the alloced memory and close dir before exit.

Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: Fix memory leak when 0 sized block group item is found
Qu Wenruo [Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:01:17 +0000 (16:01 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: Fix memory leak when 0 sized block group item is found

When a 0 sized block group item is found, set_extent_bits() will not
really set any bits.
While set_state_private() still inserts allocated block group cache into
block group extent_io_tree.

So at close_ctree() time, we won't free the private block group cache
stored since we can't find any bit set for the 0 sized block group.

To fix it, at btrfs_read_block_groups() we skip any 0 sized block group,
so such leak won't happen.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: tests: add variable quotation to fsck-tests
Lakshmipathi.G [Mon, 24 Apr 2017 13:29:40 +0000 (18:59 +0530)]
btrfs-progs: tests: add variable quotation to fsck-tests

Signed-off-by: Lakshmipathi.G <Lakshmipathi.G@giis.co.in>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: docs: update formatting and wording for btrfs(5)
David Sterba [Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:50:02 +0000 (18:50 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: docs: update formatting and wording for btrfs(5)

- emphasize features in the list
- minor whitespace fixes

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: print-tree: add validation to print_chunk
Lu Fengqi [Thu, 20 Apr 2017 08:07:57 +0000 (16:07 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: print-tree: add validation to print_chunk

In print_chunk, validate the value of uuid_offset when read the dev_uuid of
stripe.

Was triggered by misc-test/015-dump-super-garbage running indefinetelly.

Issue: #37
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: dump-super: check array_size in print_sys_chunk_array
Lu Fengqi [Thu, 20 Apr 2017 08:07:56 +0000 (16:07 +0800)]
btrfs-progs: dump-super: check array_size in print_sys_chunk_array

Without validation of array_size, the dump-super may lead to a bad
memory access.

Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: send: always print a space after path in dump
Evan Danaher [Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:33:40 +0000 (12:33 -0400)]
btrfs-progs: send: always print a space after path in dump

I was shocked to discover that 'btrfs receive --dump' doesn't print a
space after long filenames, so it runs together into the metadata; for
example:

truncate        ./20-00-03/this-name-is-32-characters-longsize=0

This is a trivial patch to add a single space unconditionally, so the
result is the following:

truncate        ./20-00-03/this-name-is-32-characters-long size=0

I suppose this is technically a breaking change, but it seems unlikely
to me that anyone would depend on the existing behavior given how
unfriendly it is.

Signed-off-by: Evan Danaher <github@edanaher.net>
Reviewed-by: Noah Massey <noah.massey@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: misc-tests: Superblock corruption and recovery using backup
Lakshmipathi.G [Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:13:08 +0000 (15:43 +0530)]
btrfs-progs: misc-tests: Superblock corruption and recovery using backup

Signed-off-by: Lakshmipathi.G <Lakshmipathi.G@giis.co.in>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: docs: Fix newlines for man btrfstune
Hans van Kranenburg [Sun, 16 Apr 2017 17:20:02 +0000 (19:20 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: docs: Fix newlines for man btrfstune

A bunch of newlines were missing, which resulted in only -S and -r to
show as option after xmlto is used to convert the documentation to a man
page.

The rest of the options would end up being appended to the explanation
of -r.

Signed-off-by: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: balance: minor wording adjustment for full balance warning
David Sterba [Thu, 13 Apr 2017 21:56:55 +0000 (23:56 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: balance: minor wording adjustment for full balance warning

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: docs: Fix missing newline in man 5 btrfs
Hans van Kranenburg [Sat, 8 Apr 2017 22:37:47 +0000 (00:37 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: docs: Fix missing newline in man 5 btrfs

The text compress_lzo:: would show up directly after 'bigger than the
page size' on the same line.

Signed-off-by: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: tests: misc/018-receive use receive -e to terminate on end marker
Christian Brauner [Mon, 3 Apr 2017 20:21:08 +0000 (22:21 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: tests: misc/018-receive use receive -e to terminate on end marker

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
[ enhance tests to take extra options and use for -e ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: fix btrfs send & receive with -e flag
Christian Brauner [Mon, 3 Apr 2017 20:21:07 +0000 (22:21 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: fix btrfs send & receive with -e flag

The old check here tried to ensure that empty streams are not considered valid.
The old check however, will always fail when only one run through the while(1)
loop is needed and honor_end_cmd is set. So this:

btrfs send /some/subvol | btrfs receive -e /some/

will consistently fail because -e causes honor_cmd_to be set and
btrfs_read_and_process_send_stream() to correctly return 1. So the command will
be successful but btrfs receive will error out because the send - receive
concluded in one run through the while(1) loop.

If we want to exclude empty streams we need a way to tell the difference between
btrfs_read_and_process_send_stream() returning 1 because read_buf() did not
detect any data and read_and_process_cmd() returning 1 because honor_end_cmd was
set. Without introducing too many changes the best way to me seems to have
btrfs_read_and_process_send_stream() return -ENODATA in the first case. The rest
stays the same. We can then check for -ENODATA in do_receive() and report a
proper error in this case. This should also be backwards compatible to previous
versions of btrfs receive. They will fail on empty streams because a negative
value is returned. The only thing that they will lack is a nice error message.

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: docs: btrfs-replace, fix typo
David Sterba [Fri, 7 Apr 2017 16:21:07 +0000 (12:21 -0400)]
btrfs-progs: docs: btrfs-replace, fix typo

Github pull request #39, from gabo77.

Author: 3psus <gabo77@me.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: README: sort bug reports means by preference
David Sterba [Mon, 3 Apr 2017 17:47:10 +0000 (19:47 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: README: sort bug reports means by preference

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: rework option parser to use getopt for global options
David Sterba [Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:40:43 +0000 (13:40 +0100)]
btrfs-progs: rework option parser to use getopt for global options

Preparatory work to support more global options. The current parser
abuses the subcommand table to understand help and version when
specified as options (--). These are now special case when processing
the global options.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agobtrfs-progs: docs: mount options, enhance ssd/nossd
David Sterba [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:40:05 +0000 (19:40 +0200)]
btrfs-progs: docs: mount options, enhance ssd/nossd

Reported-by: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
7 years agoBtrfs progs v4.10.2
David Sterba [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:29:12 +0000 (17:29 +0200)]
Btrfs progs v4.10.2

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>