Josef Bacik [Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:53:54 +0000 (08:53 -0400)]
btrfs: cleanup cow block on error
In fstest btrfs/064 a transaction abort in __btrfs_cow_block could lead
to a system lockup. It gets stuck trying to write back inodes, and the
write back thread was trying to lock an extent buffer:
$ cat /proc/2143497/stack
[<0>] __btrfs_tree_lock+0x108/0x250
[<0>] lock_extent_buffer_for_io+0x35e/0x3a0
[<0>] btree_write_cache_pages+0x15a/0x3b0
[<0>] do_writepages+0x28/0xb0
[<0>] __writeback_single_inode+0x54/0x5c0
[<0>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x1e8/0x510
[<0>] wb_writeback+0xcc/0x440
[<0>] wb_workfn+0xd7/0x650
[<0>] process_one_work+0x236/0x560
[<0>] worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
[<0>] kthread+0x13a/0x150
[<0>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
This is because we got an error while COWing a block, specifically here
if (test_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE, &root->state)) {
ret = btrfs_reloc_cow_block(trans, root, buf, cow);
if (ret) {
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
return ret;
}
}
[16402.241552] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
[16402.242362] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2563188 at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1074 __btrfs_cow_block+0x376/0x540
[16402.249469] CPU: 1 PID: 2563188 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6+ #8
[16402.249936] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
[16402.250525] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_cow_block+0x376/0x540
[16402.252417] RSP: 0018:
ffff9cca40e578b0 EFLAGS:
00010282
[16402.252787] RAX:
0000000000000025 RBX:
0000000000000002 RCX:
ffff9132bbd19388
[16402.253278] RDX:
00000000ffffffd8 RSI:
0000000000000027 RDI:
ffff9132bbd19380
[16402.254063] RBP:
ffff9132b41a49c0 R08:
0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000000
[16402.254887] R10:
0000000000000000 R11:
ffff91324758b080 R12:
ffff91326ef17ce0
[16402.255694] R13:
ffff91325fc0f000 R14:
ffff91326ef176b0 R15:
ffff9132815e2000
[16402.256321] FS:
00007f542c6d7b80(0000) GS:
ffff9132bbd00000(0000) knlGS:
0000000000000000
[16402.256973] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0:
0000000080050033
[16402.257374] CR2:
00007f127b83f250 CR3:
0000000133480002 CR4:
0000000000370ee0
[16402.257867] Call Trace:
[16402.258072] btrfs_cow_block+0x109/0x230
[16402.258356] btrfs_search_slot+0x530/0x9d0
[16402.258655] btrfs_lookup_file_extent+0x37/0x40
[16402.259155] __btrfs_drop_extents+0x13c/0xd60
[16402.259628] ? btrfs_block_rsv_migrate+0x4f/0xb0
[16402.259949] btrfs_replace_file_extents+0x190/0x820
[16402.260873] btrfs_clone+0x9ae/0xc00
[16402.261139] btrfs_extent_same_range+0x66/0x90
[16402.261771] btrfs_remap_file_range+0x353/0x3b1
[16402.262333] vfs_dedupe_file_range_one.part.0+0xd5/0x140
[16402.262821] vfs_dedupe_file_range+0x189/0x220
[16402.263150] do_vfs_ioctl+0x552/0x700
[16402.263662] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x62/0xb0
[16402.264023] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[16402.264364] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[16402.264862] RIP: 0033:0x7f542c7d15cb
[16402.266901] RSP: 002b:
00007ffd35944ea8 EFLAGS:
00000246 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000010
[16402.267627] RAX:
ffffffffffffffda RBX:
00000000009d1968 RCX:
00007f542c7d15cb
[16402.268298] RDX:
00000000009d2490 RSI:
00000000c0189436 RDI:
0000000000000003
[16402.268958] RBP:
00000000009d2520 R08:
0000000000000036 R09:
00000000009d2e64
[16402.269726] R10:
0000000000000000 R11:
0000000000000246 R12:
0000000000000002
[16402.270659] R13:
000000000001f000 R14:
00000000009d1970 R15:
00000000009d2e80
[16402.271498] irq event stamp: 0
[16402.271846] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<
0000000000000000>] 0x0
[16402.272497] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<
ffffffff910dbf59>] copy_process+0x6b9/0x1ba0
[16402.273343] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<
ffffffff910dbf59>] copy_process+0x6b9/0x1ba0
[16402.273905] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<
0000000000000000>] 0x0
[16402.274338] ---[ end trace
737874a5a41a8236 ]---
[16402.274669] BTRFS: error (device dm-9) in __btrfs_cow_block:1074: errno=-2 No such entry
[16402.276179] BTRFS info (device dm-9): forced readonly
[16402.277046] BTRFS: error (device dm-9) in btrfs_replace_file_extents:2723: errno=-2 No such entry
[16402.278744] BTRFS: error (device dm-9) in __btrfs_cow_block:1074: errno=-2 No such entry
[16402.279968] BTRFS: error (device dm-9) in __btrfs_cow_block:1074: errno=-2 No such entry
[16402.280582] BTRFS info (device dm-9): balance: ended with status: -30
The problem here is that as soon as we allocate the new block it is
locked and marked dirty in the btree inode. This means that we could
attempt to writeback this block and need to lock the extent buffer.
However we're not unlocking it here and thus we deadlock.
Fix this by unlocking the cow block if we have any errors inside of
__btrfs_cow_block, and also free it so we do not leak it.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Goldwyn Rodrigues [Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:39:09 +0000 (11:39 -0500)]
btrfs: remove BTRFS_INODE_READDIO_NEED_LOCK
Since we now perform direct reads using i_rwsem, we can remove this
inode flag used to co-ordinate unlocked reads.
The truncate call takes i_rwsem. This means it is correctly synchronized
with concurrent direct reads.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Goldwyn Rodrigues [Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:39:08 +0000 (11:39 -0500)]
fs: remove no longer used dio_end_io()
Since we removed the last user of dio_end_io() when btrfs got converted
to iomap infrastructure ("btrfs: switch to iomap for direct IO"), remove
the helper function dio_end_io().
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik [Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:44:33 +0000 (16:44 -0400)]
btrfs: return error if we're unable to read device stats
I noticed when fixing device stats for seed devices that we simply threw
away the return value from btrfs_search_slot(). This is because we may
not have stat items, but we could very well get an error, and thus miss
reporting the error up the chain.
Fix this by returning ret if it's an actual error, and then stop trying
to init the rest of the devices stats and return the error up the chain.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik [Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:44:32 +0000 (16:44 -0400)]
btrfs: init device stats for seed devices
We recently started recording device stats across the fleet, and noticed
a large increase in messages such as this
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): get dev_stats failed, not yet valid
on our tiers that use seed devices for their root devices. This is
because we do not initialize the device stats for any seed devices if we
have a sprout device and mount using that sprout device. The basic
steps for reproducing are:
$ mkfs seed device
$ mount seed device
# fill seed device
$ umount seed device
$ btrfstune -S 1 seed device
$ mount seed device
$ btrfs device add -f sprout device /mnt/wherever
$ umount /mnt/wherever
$ mount sprout device /mnt/wherever
$ btrfs device stats /mnt/wherever
This will fail with the above message in dmesg.
Fix this by iterating over the fs_devices->seed if they exist in
btrfs_init_dev_stats. This fixed the problem and properly reports the
stats for both devices.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ rename to btrfs_device_init_dev_stats ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:34:39 +0000 (16:34 +0300)]
btrfs: remove struct extent_io_ops
It's no longer used just remove the function and any related code which
was initialising it for inodes. No functional changes.
Removing 8 bytes from extent_io_tree in turn reduces size of other
structures where it is embedded, notably btrfs_inode where it reduces
size by 24 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:34:38 +0000 (16:34 +0300)]
btrfs: call submit_bio_hook directly for metadata pages
No need to go through a function pointer indirection simply call
submit_bio_hook directly by exporting and renaming the helper to
btrfs_submit_metadata_bio. This makes the code more readable and should
result in somewhat faster code due to no longer paying the price for
specualtive attack mitigations that come with indirect function calls.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:34:37 +0000 (16:34 +0300)]
btrfs: stop calling submit_bio_hook for data inodes
Instead export and rename the function to btrfs_submit_data_bio and
call it directly in submit_one_bio. This avoids paying the cost for
speculative attacks mitigations and improves code readability.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:34:36 +0000 (16:34 +0300)]
btrfs: don't opencode is_data_inode in end_bio_extent_readpage
Use the is_data_inode helper.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:34:35 +0000 (16:34 +0300)]
btrfs: call submit_bio_hook directly in submit_one_bio
BTRFS has 2 inode types (for the purposes of the code in submit_one_bio)
- ordinary data inodes (including the freespace inode) and the btree
inode. Both of these implement submit_bio_hook so btrfsic_submit_bio can
never be called from submit_one_bio so just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:34:34 +0000 (16:34 +0300)]
btrfs: remove extent_io_ops::readpage_end_io_hook
It's no longer used so let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:34:33 +0000 (16:34 +0300)]
btrfs: replace readpage_end_io_hook with direct calls
Don't call readpage_end_io_hook for the btree inode. Instead of relying
on indirect calls to implement metadata buffer validation simply check
if the inode whose page we are processing equals the btree inode. If it
does call the necessary function.
This is an improvement in 2 directions:
1. We aren't paying the penalty of indirect calls in a post-speculation
attacks world.
2. The function is now named more explicitly so it's obvious what's
going on
This is in preparation to removing struct extent_io_ops altogether.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Filipe Manana [Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:13:30 +0000 (14:13 +0100)]
btrfs: send, recompute reference path after orphanization of a directory
During an incremental send, when an inode has multiple new references we
might end up emitting rename operations for orphanizations that have a
source path that is no longer valid due to a previous orphanization of
some directory inode. This causes the receiver to fail since it tries
to rename a path that does not exists.
Example reproducer:
$ cat reproducer.sh
#!/bin/bash
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdi >/dev/null
mount /dev/sdi /mnt/sdi
touch /mnt/sdi/f1
touch /mnt/sdi/f2
mkdir /mnt/sdi/d1
mkdir /mnt/sdi/d1/d2
# Filesystem looks like:
#
# . (ino 256)
# |----- f1 (ino 257)
# |----- f2 (ino 258)
# |----- d1/ (ino 259)
# |----- d2/ (ino 260)
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdi /mnt/sdi/snap1
btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send /mnt/sdi/snap1
# Now do a series of changes such that:
#
# *) inode 258 has one new hardlink and the previous name changed
#
# *) both names conflict with the old names of two other inodes:
#
# 1) the new name "d1" conflicts with the old name of inode 259,
# under directory inode 256 (root)
#
# 2) the new name "d2" conflicts with the old name of inode 260
# under directory inode 259
#
# *) inodes 259 and 260 now have the old names of inode 258
#
# *) inode 257 is now located under inode 260 - an inode with a number
# smaller than the inode (258) for which we created a second hard
# link and swapped its names with inodes 259 and 260
#
ln /mnt/sdi/f2 /mnt/sdi/d1/f2_link
mv /mnt/sdi/f1 /mnt/sdi/d1/d2/f1
# Swap d1 and f2.
mv /mnt/sdi/d1 /mnt/sdi/tmp
mv /mnt/sdi/f2 /mnt/sdi/d1
mv /mnt/sdi/tmp /mnt/sdi/f2
# Swap d2 and f2_link
mv /mnt/sdi/f2/d2 /mnt/sdi/tmp
mv /mnt/sdi/f2/f2_link /mnt/sdi/f2/d2
mv /mnt/sdi/tmp /mnt/sdi/f2/f2_link
# Filesystem now looks like:
#
# . (ino 256)
# |----- d1 (ino 258)
# |----- f2/ (ino 259)
# |----- f2_link/ (ino 260)
# | |----- f1 (ino 257)
# |
# |----- d2 (ino 258)
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdi /mnt/sdi/snap2
btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p /mnt/sdi/snap1 /mnt/sdi/snap2
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdj >/dev/null
mount /dev/sdj /mnt/sdj
btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send /mnt/sdj
btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send /mnt/sdj
umount /mnt/sdi
umount /mnt/sdj
When executed the receive of the incremental stream fails:
$ ./reproducer.sh
Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1'
At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1
Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2'
At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2
At subvol snap1
At snapshot snap2
ERROR: rename d1/d2 -> o260-6-0 failed: No such file or directory
This happens because:
1) When processing inode 257 we end up computing the name for inode 259
because it is an ancestor in the send snapshot, and at that point it
still has its old name, "d1", from the parent snapshot because inode
259 was not yet processed. We then cache that name, which is valid
until we start processing inode 259 (or set the progress to 260 after
processing its references);
2) Later we start processing inode 258 and collecting all its new
references into the list sctx->new_refs. The first reference in the
list happens to be the reference for name "d1" while the reference for
name "d2" is next (the last element of the list).
We compute the full path "d1/d2" for this second reference and store
it in the reference (its ->full_path member). The path used for the
new parent directory was "d1" and not "f2" because inode 259, the
new parent, was not yet processed;
3) When we start processing the new references at process_recorded_refs()
we start with the first reference in the list, for the new name "d1".
Because there is a conflicting inode that was not yet processed, which
is directory inode 259, we orphanize it, renaming it from "d1" to
"o259-6-0";
4) Then we start processing the new reference for name "d2", and we
realize it conflicts with the reference of inode 260 in the parent
snapshot. So we issue an orphanization operation for inode 260 by
emitting a rename operation with a destination path of "o260-6-0"
and a source path of "d1/d2" - this source path is the value we
stored in the reference earlier at step 2), corresponding to the
->full_path member of the reference, however that path is no longer
valid due to the orphanization of the directory inode 259 in step 3).
This makes the receiver fail since the path does not exists, it should
have been "o259-6-0/d2".
Fix this by recomputing the full path of a reference before emitting an
orphanization if we previously orphanized any directory, since that
directory could be a parent in the new path. This is a rare scenario so
keeping it simple and not checking if that previously orphanized directory
is in fact an ancestor of the inode we are trying to orphanize.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Filipe Manana [Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:13:29 +0000 (14:13 +0100)]
btrfs: send, orphanize first all conflicting inodes when processing references
When doing an incremental send it is possible that when processing the new
references for an inode we end up issuing rename or link operations that
have an invalid path, which contains the orphanized name of a directory
before we actually orphanized it, causing the receiver to fail.
The following reproducer triggers such scenario:
$ cat reproducer.sh
#!/bin/bash
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdi >/dev/null
mount /dev/sdi /mnt/sdi
touch /mnt/sdi/a
touch /mnt/sdi/b
mkdir /mnt/sdi/testdir
# We want "a" to have a lower inode number then "testdir" (257 vs 259).
mv /mnt/sdi/a /mnt/sdi/testdir/a
# Filesystem looks like:
#
# . (ino 256)
# |----- testdir/ (ino 259)
# | |----- a (ino 257)
# |
# |----- b (ino 258)
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdi /mnt/sdi/snap1
btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send /mnt/sdi/snap1
# Now rename 259 to "testdir_2", then change the name of 257 to
# "testdir" and make it a direct descendant of the root inode (256).
# Also create a new link for inode 257 with the old name of inode 258.
# By swapping the names and location of several inodes and create a
# nasty dependency chain of rename and link operations.
mv /mnt/sdi/testdir/a /mnt/sdi/a2
touch /mnt/sdi/testdir/a
mv /mnt/sdi/b /mnt/sdi/b2
ln /mnt/sdi/a2 /mnt/sdi/b
mv /mnt/sdi/testdir /mnt/sdi/testdir_2
mv /mnt/sdi/a2 /mnt/sdi/testdir
# Filesystem now looks like:
#
# . (ino 256)
# |----- testdir_2/ (ino 259)
# | |----- a (ino 260)
# |
# |----- testdir (ino 257)
# |----- b (ino 257)
# |----- b2 (ino 258)
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdi /mnt/sdi/snap2
btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p /mnt/sdi/snap1 /mnt/sdi/snap2
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdj >/dev/null
mount /dev/sdj /mnt/sdj
btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send /mnt/sdj
btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send /mnt/sdj
umount /mnt/sdi
umount /mnt/sdj
When running the reproducer, the receive of the incremental send stream
fails:
$ ./reproducer.sh
Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1'
At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1
Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2'
At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2
At subvol snap1
At snapshot snap2
ERROR: link b -> o259-6-0/a failed: No such file or directory
The problem happens because of the following:
1) Before we start iterating the list of new references for inode 257,
we generate its current path and store it at @valid_path, done at
the very beginning of process_recorded_refs(). The generated path
is "o259-6-0/a", containing the orphanized name for inode 259;
2) Then we iterate over the list of new references, which has the
references "b" and "testdir" in that specific order;
3) We process reference "b" first, because it is in the list before
reference "testdir". We then issue a link operation to create
the new reference "b" using a target path corresponding to the
content at @valid_path, which corresponds to "o259-6-0/a".
However we haven't yet orphanized inode 259, its name is still
"testdir", and not "o259-6-0". The orphanization of 259 did not
happen yet because we will process the reference named "testdir"
for inode 257 only in the next iteration of the loop that goes
over the list of new references.
Fix the issue by having a preliminar iteration over all the new references
at process_recorded_refs(). This iteration is responsible only for doing
the orphanization of other inodes that have and old reference that
conflicts with one of the new references of the inode we are currently
processing. The emission of rename and link operations happen now in the
next iteration of the new references.
A test case for fstests will follow soon.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Qu Wenruo [Tue, 22 Sep 2020 02:37:01 +0000 (10:37 +0800)]
btrfs: tree-checker: fix false alert caused by legacy btrfs root item
Commit
259ee7754b67 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Add ROOT_ITEM check")
introduced btrfs root item size check, however btrfs root item has two
versions, the legacy one which just ends before generation_v2 member, is
smaller than current btrfs root item size.
This caused btrfs kernel to reject valid but old tree root leaves.
Fix this problem by also allowing legacy root item, since kernel can
already handle them pretty well and upgrade to newer root item format
when needed.
Reported-by: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
Fixes:
259ee7754b67 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Add ROOT_ITEM check")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Tested-By: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
David Sterba [Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:58:42 +0000 (14:58 +0200)]
btrfs: use unaligned helpers for stack and header set/get helpers
In the definitions generated by BTRFS_SETGET_HEADER_FUNCS there's direct
pointer assignment but we should use the helpers for unaligned access
for clarity. It hasn't been a problem so far because of the natural
alignment.
Similarly for BTRFS_SETGET_STACK_FUNCS, that usually get a structure
from stack that has an aligned start but some members may not be aligned
due to packing. This as well hasn't caused problems so far.
Move the put/get_unaligned_le8 stubs to ctree.h so we can use them.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
David Sterba [Tue, 15 Sep 2020 11:32:34 +0000 (13:32 +0200)]
btrfs: free-space-cache: use unaligned helpers to access data
The free space inode stores the tracking data, checksums etc, using the
io_ctl structure and moving the pointers. The data are generally aligned
to at least 4 bytes (u32 for CRC) so it's not completely unaligned but
for clarity we should use the proper helpers whenever a struct is
initialized from io_ctl->cur pointer.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
David Sterba [Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:54:23 +0000 (10:54 +0200)]
btrfs: send: use helpers for unaligned access to header members
The header is mapped onto the send buffer and thus its members may be
potentially unaligned so use the helpers instead of directly assigning
the pointers. This has worked so far but let's use the helpers to make
that clear.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Qu Wenruo [Tue, 15 Sep 2020 05:35:27 +0000 (13:35 +0800)]
btrfs: use own btree inode io_tree owner id
Btree inode is special compared to all other inode extent io_trees,
although it has a btrfs inode, it doesn't have the track_uptodate bit at
all.
This means a lot of things like extent locking doesn't even need to be
applied to btree io tree.
Since it's so special, adds a new owner value for it to make debuging a
little easier.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Johannes Thumshirn [Tue, 22 Sep 2020 08:27:29 +0000 (17:27 +0900)]
btrfs: reschedule when cloning lots of extents
We have several occurrences of a soft lockup from fstest's generic/175
testcase, which look more or less like this one:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [xfs_io:10030]
Kernel panic - not syncing: softlockup: hung tasks
CPU: 0 PID: 10030 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G L 5.9.0-rc5+ #768
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
dump_stack+0x77/0xa0
panic+0xfa/0x2cb
watchdog_timer_fn.cold+0x85/0xa5
? lockup_detector_update_enable+0x50/0x50
__hrtimer_run_queues+0x99/0x4c0
? recalibrate_cpu_khz+0x10/0x10
hrtimer_run_queues+0x9f/0xb0
update_process_times+0x28/0x80
tick_handle_periodic+0x1b/0x60
__sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x76/0x210
asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20
</IRQ>
sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x7f/0x90
asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
RIP: 0010:btrfs_tree_unlock+0x91/0x1a0 [btrfs]
RSP: 0018:
ffffc90007123a58 EFLAGS:
00000282
RAX:
ffff8881cea2fbe0 RBX:
ffff8881cea2fbe0 RCX:
0000000000000000
RDX:
ffff8881d23fd200 RSI:
ffffffff82045220 RDI:
ffff8881cea2fba0
RBP:
0000000000000001 R08:
0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000032
R10:
0000160000000000 R11:
0000000000001000 R12:
0000000000001000
R13:
ffff8882357fd5b0 R14:
ffff88816fa76e70 R15:
ffff8881cea2fad0
? btrfs_tree_unlock+0x15b/0x1a0 [btrfs]
btrfs_release_path+0x67/0x80 [btrfs]
btrfs_insert_replace_extent+0x177/0x2c0 [btrfs]
btrfs_replace_file_extents+0x472/0x7c0 [btrfs]
btrfs_clone+0x9ba/0xbd0 [btrfs]
btrfs_clone_files.isra.0+0xeb/0x140 [btrfs]
? file_update_time+0xcd/0x120
btrfs_remap_file_range+0x322/0x3b0 [btrfs]
do_clone_file_range+0xb7/0x1e0
vfs_clone_file_range+0x30/0xa0
ioctl_file_clone+0x8a/0xc0
do_vfs_ioctl+0x5b2/0x6f0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x37/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
RIP: 0033:0x7f87977fc247
RSP: 002b:
00007ffd51a2f6d8 EFLAGS:
00000206 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000010
RAX:
ffffffffffffffda RBX:
0000000000000000 RCX:
00007f87977fc247
RDX:
00007ffd51a2f710 RSI:
000000004020940d RDI:
0000000000000003
RBP:
0000000000000004 R08:
00007ffd51a79080 R09:
0000000000000000
R10:
00005621f11352f2 R11:
0000000000000206 R12:
0000000000000000
R13:
0000000000000000 R14:
00005621f128b958 R15:
0000000080000000
Kernel Offset: disabled
---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: softlockup: hung tasks ]---
All of these lockup reports have the call chain btrfs_clone_files() ->
btrfs_clone() in common. btrfs_clone_files() calls btrfs_clone() with
both source and destination extents locked and loops over the source
extent to create the clones.
Conditionally reschedule in the btrfs_clone() loop, to give some time back
to other processes.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Denis Efremov [Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:03:36 +0000 (20:03 +0300)]
btrfs: use kvcalloc for allocation in btrfs_ioctl_send()
Replace kvzalloc() call with kvcalloc() that also checks the size
internally. There's a standalone overflow check in the function so we
can return invalid parameter combination. Use array_size() helper to
compute the memory size for clone_sources_tmp.
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Denis Efremov [Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:03:35 +0000 (20:03 +0300)]
btrfs: use kvzalloc() to allocate clone_roots in btrfs_ioctl_send()
btrfs_ioctl_send() used open-coded kvzalloc implementation earlier.
The code was accidentally replaced with kzalloc() call [1]. Restore
the original code by using kvzalloc() to allocate sctx->clone_roots.
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9757891/#
20529627
Fixes:
818e010bf9d0 ("btrfs: replace opencoded kvzalloc with the helper")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:15:53 +0000 (12:15 +0300)]
btrfs: remove inode argument from btrfs_start_ordered_extent
The passed in ordered_extent struct is always well-formed and contains
the inode making the explicit argument redundant.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:15:52 +0000 (12:15 +0300)]
btrfs: remove inode argument from add_pending_csums
It's used to reference the csum root which can be done from the trans
handle as well. Simplify the signature and while at it also remove the
noinline attribute as the function uses only at most 16 bytes of stack
space.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:15:51 +0000 (12:15 +0300)]
btrfs: sink inode argument in insert_ordered_extent_file_extent
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:15:50 +0000 (12:15 +0300)]
btrfs: switch btrfs_remove_ordered_extent to btrfs_inode
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:15:49 +0000 (12:15 +0300)]
btrfs: clean BTRFS_I usage in btrfs_destroy_inode
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:39:16 +0000 (14:39 +0300)]
btrfs: open code extent_read_full_page to its sole caller
This makes reading the code a tad easier by decreasing the level of
indirection by one.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:37:11 +0000 (12:37 +0300)]
btrfs: sink mirror_num argument in __do_readpage
It's always set to 0 by the 2 callers so move it inside __do_readpage.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:37:10 +0000 (12:37 +0300)]
btrfs: sink read_flags argument into extent_read_full_page
It's always set to 0 by its sole caller - btrfs_readpage. Simply remove
it.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:37:09 +0000 (12:37 +0300)]
btrfs: sink mirror_num argument in extent_read_full_page
It's always set to 0 from the sole caller - btrfs_readpage.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:37:08 +0000 (12:37 +0300)]
btrfs: promote extent_read_full_page to btrfs_readpage
Now that btrfs_readpage is the only caller of extent_read_full_page the
latter can be open coded in the former. Use the occassion to rename
__extent_read_full_page to extent_read_full_page. To facillitate this
change submit_one_bio has to be exported as well.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:37:07 +0000 (12:37 +0300)]
btrfs: remove mirror_num argument from extent_read_full_page
It's called only from btrfs_readpage which always passes 0 so just sink
the argument into extent_read_full_page.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:37:06 +0000 (12:37 +0300)]
btrfs: remove btrfs_get_extent indirection from __do_readpage
Now that this function is only responsible for reading data pages it's
no longer necessary to pass get_extent_t parameter across several
layers of functions. This patch removes this parameter from multiple
functions: __get_extent_map/__do_readpage/__extent_read_full_page/
extent_read_full_page and simply calls btrfs_get_extent directly in
__get_extent_map.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:37:05 +0000 (12:37 +0300)]
btrfs: remove btree_get_extent
The sole purpose of this function was to satisfy the requirements of
__do_readpage. Since that function is no longer used to read metadata
pages the need to keep btree_get_extent around has also disappeared.
Simply remove it.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:37:04 +0000 (12:37 +0300)]
btrfs: simplify metadata pages reading
Metadata pages currently use __do_readpage to read metadata pages,
unfortunately this function is also used to deal with ordinary data
pages. This makes the metadata pages reading code to go through multiple
hoops in order to adhere to __do_readpage invariants. Most of these are
necessary for data pages which could be compressed. For metadata it's
enough to simply build a bio and submit it.
To this effect simply call submit_extent_page directly from
read_extent_buffer_pages which is the only callpath used to populate
extent_buffers with data. This in turn enables further cleanups.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:37:03 +0000 (12:37 +0300)]
btrfs: remove btree_readpage
There is no way for this function to be called as ->readpage() since
it's called from
generic_file_buffered_read/filemap_fault/do_read_cache_page/readhead
code. BTRFS doesn't utilize the first 3 for the btree inode and
implements it's owon readhead mechanism. So simply remove the function.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Filipe Manana [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:27:50 +0000 (15:27 +0100)]
btrfs: reschedule if necessary when logging directory items
Logging directories with many entries can take a significant amount of
time, and in some cases monopolize a cpu/core for a long time if the
logging task doesn't happen to block often enough.
Johannes and Lu Fengqi reported test case generic/041 triggering a soft
lockup when the kernel has CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR=y. For this test
case we log an inode with 3002 hard links, and because the test removed
one hard link before fsyncing the file, the inode logging causes the
parent directory do be logged as well, which has 6004 directory items to
log (3002 BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY items plus 3002 BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY items),
so it can take a significant amount of time and trigger the soft lockup.
So just make tree-log.c:log_dir_items() reschedule when necessary,
releasing the current search path before doing so and then resume from
where it was before the reschedule.
The stack trace produced when the soft lockup happens is the following:
[10480.277653] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 22s! [xfs_io:28172]
[10480.279418] Modules linked in: dm_thin_pool dm_persistent_data (...)
[10480.284915] irq event stamp:
29646366
[10480.285987] hardirqs last enabled at (
29646365): [<
ffffffff85249b66>] __slab_alloc.constprop.0+0x56/0x60
[10480.288482] hardirqs last disabled at (
29646366): [<
ffffffff8579b00d>] irqentry_enter+0x1d/0x50
[10480.290856] softirqs last enabled at (4612): [<
ffffffff85a00323>] __do_softirq+0x323/0x56c
[10480.293615] softirqs last disabled at (4483): [<
ffffffff85800dbf>] asm_call_on_stack+0xf/0x20
[10480.296428] CPU: 2 PID: 28172 Comm: xfs_io Not tainted 5.9.0-rc4-default+ #1248
[10480.298948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
[10480.302455] RIP: 0010:__slab_alloc.constprop.0+0x19/0x60
[10480.304151] Code: 86 e8 31 75 21 00 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 (...)
[10480.309558] RSP: 0018:
ffffadbe09397a58 EFLAGS:
00000282
[10480.311179] RAX:
ffff8a495ab92840 RBX:
0000000000000282 RCX:
0000000000000006
[10480.313242] RDX:
0000000000000000 RSI:
0000000000000000 RDI:
ffffffff85249b66
[10480.315260] RBP:
ffff8a497d04b740 R08:
0000000000000001 R09:
0000000000000001
[10480.317229] R10:
ffff8a497d044800 R11:
ffff8a495ab93c40 R12:
0000000000000000
[10480.319169] R13:
0000000000000000 R14:
0000000000000c40 R15:
ffffffffc01daf70
[10480.321104] FS:
00007fa1dc5c0e40(0000) GS:
ffff8a497da00000(0000) knlGS:
0000000000000000
[10480.323559] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0:
0000000080050033
[10480.325235] CR2:
00007fa1dc5befb8 CR3:
0000000004f8a006 CR4:
0000000000170ea0
[10480.327259] Call Trace:
[10480.328286] ? overwrite_item+0x1f0/0x5a0 [btrfs]
[10480.329784] __kmalloc+0x831/0xa20
[10480.331009] ? btrfs_get_32+0xb0/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[10480.332464] overwrite_item+0x1f0/0x5a0 [btrfs]
[10480.333948] log_dir_items+0x2ee/0x570 [btrfs]
[10480.335413] log_directory_changes+0x82/0xd0 [btrfs]
[10480.336926] btrfs_log_inode+0xc9b/0xda0 [btrfs]
[10480.338374] ? init_once+0x20/0x20 [btrfs]
[10480.339711] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x8d3/0xd10 [btrfs]
[10480.341257] ? dget_parent+0x97/0x2e0
[10480.342480] btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs]
[10480.343977] btrfs_sync_file+0x24b/0x5e0 [btrfs]
[10480.345381] do_fsync+0x38/0x70
[10480.346483] __x64_sys_fsync+0x10/0x20
[10480.347703] do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70
[10480.348891] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[10480.350444] RIP: 0033:0x7fa1dc80970b
[10480.351642] Code: 0f 05 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 45 c3 0f 1f 40 00 48 (...)
[10480.356952] RSP: 002b:
00007fffb3d081d0 EFLAGS:
00000293 ORIG_RAX:
000000000000004a
[10480.359458] RAX:
ffffffffffffffda RBX:
0000562d93d45e40 RCX:
00007fa1dc80970b
[10480.361426] RDX:
0000562d93d44ab0 RSI:
0000562d93d45e60 RDI:
0000000000000003
[10480.363367] RBP:
0000000000000001 R08:
0000000000000000 R09:
00007fa1dc7b2a40
[10480.365317] R10:
0000562d93d0e366 R11:
0000000000000293 R12:
0000000000000001
[10480.367299] R13:
0000562d93d45290 R14:
0000562d93d45e40 R15:
0000562d93d45e60
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20180713090216.GC575@fnst.localdomain/
Reported-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik [Tue, 1 Sep 2020 21:40:38 +0000 (17:40 -0400)]
btrfs: do not create raid sysfs entries under any locks
While running xfstests btrfs/177 I got the following lockdep splat
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.9.0-rc3+ #5 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff97066aa56760 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff9fd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80
slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200
kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270
alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0
iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0
kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130
kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240
sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40
vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
path_mount+0x434/0xc00
__x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120
do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150
kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x7a/0xb0
sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x60/0xb0
kobject_add_internal+0xc0/0x2c0
kobject_add+0x6e/0x90
btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type+0x102/0x160
btrfs_make_block_group+0x167/0x230
btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x54f/0xb80
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x18e/0x3a0
find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210
btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310
alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60
__btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530
btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220
btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0
btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0
btrfs_new_inode+0x225/0x730
btrfs_create+0xab/0x1f0
lookup_open.isra.0+0x52d/0x690
path_openat+0x2a7/0x9e0
do_filp_open+0x75/0x100
do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130
__x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70
do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0
find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210
btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310
alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60
__btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530
btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220
btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0
btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0x8f
__btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x80/0x240
btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x119/0x120
btrfs_evict_inode+0x357/0x500
evict+0xcf/0x1f0
do_unlinkat+0x1a9/0x2b0
do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0
lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0
__mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
__btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500
evict+0xcf/0x1f0
dispose_list+0x48/0x70
prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50
super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0
do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0
shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290
shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0
balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670
kswapd+0x213/0x4c0
kthread+0x138/0x160
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(kernfs_mutex);
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by kswapd0/100:
#0:
ffffffff9fd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
#1:
ffffffff9fd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290
#2:
ffff9706629780e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #5
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8
check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150
__lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0
lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
__mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0
? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
__btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500
evict+0xcf/0x1f0
dispose_list+0x48/0x70
prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50
super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0
do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0
shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290
shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0
balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670
kswapd+0x213/0x4c0
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50
? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70
? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670
kthread+0x138/0x160
? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
This happens because when we link in a block group with a new raid index
type we'll create the corresponding sysfs entries for it. This is
problematic because while restriping we're holding the chunk_mutex, and
while mounting we're holding the tree locks.
Fixing this isn't pretty, we move the call to the sysfs stuff into the
btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() work, where we're not holding any
locks. This creates a slight race where other threads could see that
there's no sysfs kobj for that raid type, and race to create the
sysfs dir. Fix this by wrapping the creation in space_info->lock, so we
only get one thread calling kobject_add() for the new directory. We
don't worry about the lock on cleanup as it only gets deleted on
unmount.
On mount it's more straightforward, we loop through the space_infos
already, just check every raid index in each space_info and added the
sysfs entries for the corresponding block groups.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik [Tue, 1 Sep 2020 21:40:37 +0000 (17:40 -0400)]
btrfs: kill the RCU protection for fs_info->space_info
We have this thing wrapped in an RCU lock, but it's really not needed.
We create all the space_info's on mount, and we destroy them on unmount.
The list never changes and we're protected from messing with it by the
normal mount/umount path, so kill the RCU stuff around it.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:40:01 +0000 (17:40 +0300)]
btrfs: improve error message in setup_items_for_insert
Reword and update formats to match variable types.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update formats ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:40:00 +0000 (17:40 +0300)]
btrfs: add kerneldoc for setup_items_for_insert
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:39:59 +0000 (17:39 +0300)]
btrfs: sink total_data parameter in setup_items_for_insert
That parameter can easily be derived based on the "data_size" and "nr"
parameters exploit this fact to simply the function's signature. No
functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:39:58 +0000 (17:39 +0300)]
btrfs: eliminate total_size parameter from setup_items_for_insert
The value of this argument can be derived from the total_data as it's
simply the value of the data size + size of btrfs_items being touched.
Move the parameter calculation inside the function. This results in a
simpler interface and also a minor size reduction:
./scripts/bloat-o-meter ctree.original fs/btrfs/ctree.o
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 0/-34 (-34)
Function old new delta
btrfs_duplicate_item 260 259 -1
setup_items_for_insert 1200 1190 -10
btrfs_insert_empty_items 177 154 -23
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:39:57 +0000 (17:39 +0300)]
btrfs: re-arrange statements in setup_items_for_insert
Rearrange statements calculating the offset of the newly added items so
that the calculation has to be done only once. No functional change.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Omar Sandoval [Fri, 21 Aug 2020 07:39:54 +0000 (00:39 -0700)]
btrfs: sysfs: export supported send stream version
This reports the latest send stream version supported by the kernel as
the feature in /sys/fs/btrfs/features/send_stream_version .
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Omar Sandoval [Fri, 21 Aug 2020 07:39:53 +0000 (00:39 -0700)]
btrfs: send: use btrfs_file_extent_end() in send_write_or_clone()
send_write_or_clone() basically has an open-coded copy of
btrfs_file_extent_end() except that it (incorrectly) aligns to PAGE_SIZE
instead of sectorsize. Fix and simplify the code by using
btrfs_file_extent_end().
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Omar Sandoval [Fri, 21 Aug 2020 07:39:52 +0000 (00:39 -0700)]
btrfs: send: avoid copying file data
send_write() currently copies from the page cache to sctx->read_buf, and
then from sctx->read_buf to sctx->send_buf. Similarly, send_hole()
zeroes sctx->read_buf and then copies from sctx->read_buf to
sctx->send_buf. However, if we write the TLV header manually, we can
copy to sctx->send_buf directly and get rid of sctx->read_buf.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Omar Sandoval [Fri, 21 Aug 2020 07:39:51 +0000 (00:39 -0700)]
btrfs: send: get rid of i_size logic in send_write()
send_write()/fill_read_buf() have some logic for avoiding reading past
i_size. However, everywhere that we call
send_write()/send_extent_data(), we've already clamped the length down
to i_size. Get rid of the i_size handling, which simplifies the next
change.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Filipe Manana [Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:27:24 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: rename btrfs_insert_clone_extent() to a more generic name
Now that we use the same mechanism to replace all the extents in a file
range with either a hole, an existing extent (when cloning) or a new
extent (when using fallocate), the name of btrfs_insert_clone_extent()
no longer reflects its genericity.
So rename it to btrfs_insert_replace_extent(), since what it does is
to either insert an existing extent or a new extent into a file range.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Filipe Manana [Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:27:23 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: rename btrfs_punch_hole_range() to a more generic name
The function btrfs_punch_hole_range() is now used to replace all the file
extents in a given file range with an extent described in the given struct
btrfs_replace_extent_info argument. This extent can either be an existing
extent that is being cloned or it can be a new extent (namely a prealloc
extent). When that argument is NULL it only punches a hole (drops all the
existing extents) in the file range.
So rename the function to btrfs_replace_file_extents().
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Filipe Manana [Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:27:22 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: rename struct btrfs_clone_extent_info to a more generic name
Now that we can use btrfs_clone_extent_info to convey information for a
new prealloc extent as well, and not just for existing extents that are
being cloned, rename it to btrfs_replace_extent_info, which reflects the
fact that this is now more generic and it is used to replace all existing
extents in a file range with the extent described by the structure.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Filipe Manana [Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:27:21 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: remove item_size member of struct btrfs_clone_extent_info
The value of item_size of struct btrfs_clone_extent_info is always set to
the size of a non-inline file extent item, and in fact the infrastructure
that uses this structure (btrfs_punch_hole_range()) does not work with
inline file extents at all (and it is not supposed to).
So just remove that field from the structure and use directly
sizeof(struct btrfs_file_extent_item) instead. Also assert that the
file extent type is not inline at btrfs_insert_clone_extent().
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Filipe Manana [Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:27:20 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: fix metadata reservation for fallocate that leads to transaction aborts
When doing an fallocate(), specially a zero range operation, we assume
that reserving 3 units of metadata space is enough, that at most we touch
one leaf in subvolume/fs tree for removing existing file extent items and
inserting a new file extent item. This assumption is generally true for
most common use cases. However when we end up needing to remove file extent
items from multiple leaves, we can end up failing with -ENOSPC and abort
the current transaction, turning the filesystem to RO mode. When this
happens a stack trace like the following is dumped in dmesg/syslog:
[ 1500.620934] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 1500.620938] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
[ 1500.620973] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 30807 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:9724 __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x512/0x570 [btrfs]
[ 1500.620974] Modules linked in: btrfs intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common kvm_intel (...)
[ 1500.621010] CPU: 2 PID: 30807 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc3-btrfs-next-67 #1
[ 1500.621012] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 1500.621023] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x512/0x570 [btrfs]
[ 1500.621026] Code: 8b 40 50 f0 48 (...)
[ 1500.621028] RSP: 0018:
ffffb05fc8803ca0 EFLAGS:
00010286
[ 1500.621030] RAX:
0000000000000000 RBX:
ffff9608af276488 RCX:
0000000000000000
[ 1500.621032] RDX:
0000000000000001 RSI:
0000000000000027 RDI:
00000000ffffffff
[ 1500.621033] RBP:
ffffb05fc8803d90 R08:
0000000000000001 R09:
0000000000000001
[ 1500.621035] R10:
0000000000000000 R11:
0000000000000000 R12:
0000000003200000
[ 1500.621037] R13:
00000000ffffffe4 R14:
ffff9608af275fe8 R15:
ffff9608af275f60
[ 1500.621039] FS:
00007fb5b2368ec0(0000) GS:
ffff9608b6600000(0000) knlGS:
0000000000000000
[ 1500.621041] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0:
0000000080050033
[ 1500.621043] CR2:
00007fb5b2366fb8 CR3:
0000000202d38005 CR4:
00000000003706e0
[ 1500.621046] DR0:
0000000000000000 DR1:
0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000
[ 1500.621047] DR3:
0000000000000000 DR6:
00000000fffe0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000400
[ 1500.621049] Call Trace:
[ 1500.621076] btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x10/0x20 [btrfs]
[ 1500.621087] btrfs_fallocate+0xccd/0x1280 [btrfs]
[ 1500.621108] vfs_fallocate+0x14d/0x290
[ 1500.621112] ksys_fallocate+0x3a/0x70
[ 1500.621117] __x64_sys_fallocate+0x1a/0x20
[ 1500.621120] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
[ 1500.621123] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 1500.621126] RIP: 0033:0x7fb5b248c477
[ 1500.621128] Code: 89 7c 24 08 (...)
[ 1500.621130] RSP: 002b:
00007ffc7bee9060 EFLAGS:
00000293 ORIG_RAX:
000000000000011d
[ 1500.621132] RAX:
ffffffffffffffda RBX:
0000000000000002 RCX:
00007fb5b248c477
[ 1500.621134] RDX:
0000000000000000 RSI:
0000000000000010 RDI:
0000000000000003
[ 1500.621136] RBP:
0000557718faafd0 R08:
0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000000
[ 1500.621137] R10:
0000000003200000 R11:
0000000000000293 R12:
0000000000000010
[ 1500.621139] R13:
0000557718faafb0 R14:
0000557718faa480 R15:
0000000000000003
[ 1500.621151] irq event stamp: 1026217
[ 1500.621154] hardirqs last enabled at (1026223): [<
ffffffffba965570>] console_unlock+0x500/0x5c0
[ 1500.621156] hardirqs last disabled at (1026228): [<
ffffffffba9654c7>] console_unlock+0x457/0x5c0
[ 1500.621159] softirqs last enabled at (1022486): [<
ffffffffbb6003dc>] __do_softirq+0x3dc/0x606
[ 1500.621161] softirqs last disabled at (1022477): [<
ffffffffbb4010b2>] asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20
[ 1500.621162] ---[ end trace
2955b08408d8b9d4 ]---
[ 1500.621167] BTRFS: error (device sdj) in __btrfs_prealloc_file_range:9724: errno=-28 No space left
When we use fallocate() internally, for reserving an extent for a space
cache, inode cache or relocation, we can't hit this problem since either
there aren't any file extent items to remove from the subvolume tree or
there is at most one.
When using plain fallocate() it's very unlikely, since that would require
having many file extent items representing holes for the target range and
crossing multiple leafs - we attempt to increase the range (merge) of such
file extent items when punching holes, so at most we end up with 2 file
extent items for holes at leaf boundaries.
However when using the zero range operation of fallocate() for a large
range (100+ MiB for example) that's fairly easy to trigger. The following
example reproducer triggers the issue:
$ cat reproducer.sh
#!/bin/bash
umount /dev/sdj &> /dev/null
mkfs.btrfs -f -n 16384 -O ^no-holes /dev/sdj > /dev/null
mount /dev/sdj /mnt/sdj
# Create a 100M file with many file extent items. Punch a hole every 8K
# just to speedup the file creation - we could do 4K sequential writes
# followed by fsync (or O_SYNC) as well, but that takes a lot of time.
file_size=$((100 * 1024 * 1024))
xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 10M 0 $file_size" /mnt/sdj/foobar
for ((i = 0; i < $file_size; i += 8192)); do
xfs_io -c "fpunch $i 4096" /mnt/sdj/foobar
done
# Force a transaction commit, so the zero range operation will be forced
# to COW all metadata extents it need to touch.
sync
xfs_io -c "fzero 0 $file_size" /mnt/sdj/foobar
umount /mnt/sdj
$ ./reproducer.sh
wrote
104857600/
104857600 bytes at offset 0
100 MiB, 10 ops; 0.0669 sec (1.458 GiB/sec and 149.3117 ops/sec)
fallocate: No space left on device
$ dmesg
<shows the same stack trace pasted before>
To fix this use the existing infrastructure that hole punching and
extent cloning use for replacing a file range with another extent. This
deals with doing the removal of file extent items and inserting the new
one using an incremental approach, reserving more space when needed and
always ensuring we don't leave an implicit hole in the range in case
we need to do multiple iterations and a crash happens between iterations.
A test case for fstests will follow up soon.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
YueHaibing [Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:51:42 +0000 (21:51 +0800)]
btrfs: remove unused function calc_global_rsv_need_space()
It is not used since commit
0096420adb03 ("btrfs: do not
account global reserve in can_overcommit").
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Anand Jain [Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:34:36 +0000 (01:34 +0800)]
btrfs: move btrfs_dev_replace_update_device_in_mapping_tree to drop declaration
The function is short and simple, we can get rid of the declaration as
it's not necessary for a static function. Move it before its first
caller. No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Anand Jain [Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:34:35 +0000 (01:34 +0800)]
btrfs: simplify gotos in open_seed_device
The function does not have a common exit block and returns immediatelly
so there's no point having the goto. Remove the two cases.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Anand Jain [Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:34:34 +0000 (01:34 +0800)]
btrfs: remove unnecessary tmp variable in btrfs_assign_next_active_device()
We can check the argument value directly, no need for the temporary
variable.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Anand Jain [Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:34:32 +0000 (01:34 +0800)]
btrfs: remove tmp variable for list traversal in btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev
In the function btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev(), the local variable
devices is used only once, we can remove it.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Anand Jain [Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:34:31 +0000 (01:34 +0800)]
btrfs: use sprout device_list_mutex in btrfs_init_devices_late
On a mounted sprout filesystem, all threads now are using the
sprout::device_list_mutex, and this is the only code using the
seed::device_list_mutex. This patch converts to use the sprouts
fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex.
The same reasoning holds true here, that device delete is holding
the sprout::device_list_mutex.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Anand Jain [Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:34:30 +0000 (01:34 +0800)]
btrfs: reada: lock all seed/sprout devices in __reada_start_machine
On an fs mounted using a sprout device, the seed fs_devices are
maintained in a linked list under fs_info->fs_devices. Each seeds
fs_devices also has device_list_mutex initialized to protect against the
potential race with delete threads. But the delete thread (at
btrfs_rm_device()) is holding the fs_info::fs_devices::device_list_mutex
mutex which belongs to sprout device_list_mutex instead of seed
device_list_mutex. Moreover, there aren't any significient benefits in
using the seed::device_list_mutex instead of sprout::device_list_mutex.
So this patch converts them of using the seed::device_list_mutex to
sprout::device_list_mutex.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Anand Jain [Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:34:29 +0000 (01:34 +0800)]
btrfs: handle errors in btrfs_sysfs_add_fs_devices
btrfs_sysfs_add_fs_devices() is called by btrfs_sysfs_add_mounted().
btrfs_sysfs_add_mounted() assumes that btrfs_sysfs_add_fs_devices() will
either add sysfs entries for all the devices or none. So this patch keeps up
to its caller expecatation and cleans up the created sysfs entries if it
has to fail at some device in the list.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Anand Jain [Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:34:28 +0000 (01:34 +0800)]
btrfs: initialize sysfs devid and device link for seed device
We don't initialize the sysfs devid kobject and device-link yet for the
seed devices in an sprouted filesystem.
So this patch initializes the seed device devid kobject and the device
link in the sysfs.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Anand Jain [Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:34:27 +0000 (01:34 +0800)]
btrfs: split and refactor btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir
Similar to btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir()'s refactoring, split
btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir() so that we don't have to use the device
argument to indicate whether to free all devices or just one device.
Export btrfs_sysfs_remove_device() as device operations outside of
sysfs.c now calls this instead of btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir().
btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir() is renamed to
btrfs_sysfs_remove_fs_devices() to suite its new role.
Now, no one outside of sysfs.c calls btrfs_sysfs_remove_fs_devices()
so it is redeclared s static. And the same function had to be moved
before its first caller.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Anand Jain [Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:34:26 +0000 (01:34 +0800)]
btrfs: simplify parameters of btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir
When we add a device we need to add it to sysfs, so instead of using the
btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir() fs_devices argument to specify whether to
add a device or all of fs_devices, call the helper function directly
btrfs_sysfs_add_device() and thus make it non-static.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Anand Jain [Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:34:25 +0000 (01:34 +0800)]
btrfs: make btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir return void
btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir() return value is unused declare it as
void.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Anand Jain [Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:34:24 +0000 (01:34 +0800)]
btrfs: add btrfs_sysfs_remove_device helper
btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir() removes device link and devid kobject
(sysfs entries) for a device or all the devices in the btrfs_fs_devices.
In preparation to remove these sysfs entries for the seed as well, add
a btrfs_sysfs_remove_device() helper function and avoid code
duplication.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Anand Jain [Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:34:23 +0000 (01:34 +0800)]
btrfs: add btrfs_sysfs_add_device helper
btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir() adds device link and devid kobject
(sysfs entries) for a device or all the devices in the btrfs_fs_devices.
In preparation to add these sysfs entries for the seed as well, add
a btrfs_sysfs_add_device() helper function and avoid code duplication.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Anand Jain [Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:34:22 +0000 (01:34 +0800)]
btrfs: fix replace of seed device
If you replace a seed device in a sprouted fs, it appears to have
successfully replaced the seed device, but if you look closely, it
didn't. Here is an example.
$ mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda
$ btrfstune -S1 /dev/sda
$ mount /dev/sda /btrfs
$ btrfs device add /dev/sdb /btrfs
$ umount /btrfs
$ btrfs device scan --forget
$ mount -o device=/dev/sda /dev/sdb /btrfs
$ btrfs replace start -f /dev/sda /dev/sdc /btrfs
$ echo $?
0
BTRFS info (device sdb): dev_replace from /dev/sda (devid 1) to /dev/sdc started
BTRFS info (device sdb): dev_replace from /dev/sda (devid 1) to /dev/sdc finished
$ btrfs fi show
Label: none uuid:
ab2c88b7-be81-4a7e-9849-
c3666e7f9f4f
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 256.00KiB
devid 1 size 3.00GiB used 520.00MiB path /dev/sdc
devid 2 size 3.00GiB used 896.00MiB path /dev/sdb
Label: none uuid:
10bd3202-0415-43af-96a8-
d5409f310a7e
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 128.00KiB
devid 1 size 3.00GiB used 536.00MiB path /dev/sda
So as per the replace start command and kernel log replace was successful.
Now let's try to clean mount.
$ umount /btrfs
$ btrfs device scan --forget
$ mount -o device=/dev/sdc /dev/sdb /btrfs
mount: /btrfs: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
[ 636.157517] BTRFS error (device sdc): failed to read chunk tree: -2
[ 636.180177] BTRFS error (device sdc): open_ctree failed
That's because per dev items it is still looking for the original seed
device.
$ btrfs inspect-internal dump-tree -d /dev/sdb
item 0 key (DEV_ITEMS DEV_ITEM 1) itemoff 16185 itemsize 98
devid 1 total_bytes
3221225472 bytes_used
545259520
io_align 4096 io_width 4096 sector_size 4096 type 0
generation 6 start_offset 0 dev_group 0
seek_speed 0 bandwidth 0
uuid
59368f50-9af2-4b17-91da-
8a783cc418d4 <--- seed uuid
fsid
10bd3202-0415-43af-96a8-
d5409f310a7e <--- seed fsid
item 1 key (DEV_ITEMS DEV_ITEM 2) itemoff 16087 itemsize 98
devid 2 total_bytes
3221225472 bytes_used
939524096
io_align 4096 io_width 4096 sector_size 4096 type 0
generation 0 start_offset 0 dev_group 0
seek_speed 0 bandwidth 0
uuid
56a0a6bc-4630-4998-8daf-
3c3030c4256a <- sprout uuid
fsid
ab2c88b7-be81-4a7e-9849-
c3666e7f9f4f <- sprout fsid
But the replaced target has the following uuid+fsid in its superblock
which doesn't match with the expected uuid+fsid in its devitem.
$ btrfs in dump-super /dev/sdc | egrep '^generation|dev_item.uuid|dev_item.fsid|devid'
generation 20
dev_item.uuid
59368f50-9af2-4b17-91da-
8a783cc418d4
dev_item.fsid
ab2c88b7-be81-4a7e-9849-
c3666e7f9f4f [match]
dev_item.devid 1
So if you provide the original seed device the mount shall be
successful. Which so long happening in the test case btrfs/163.
$ btrfs device scan --forget
$ mount -o device=/dev/sda /dev/sdb /btrfs
Fix in this patch:
If a seed is not sprouted then there is no replacement of it, because of
its read-only filesystem with a read-only device. Similarly, in the case
of a sprouted filesystem, the seed device is still read only. So, mark
it as you can't replace a seed device, you can only add a new device and
then delete the seed device. If replace is attempted then returns
-EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Anand Jain [Thu, 3 Sep 2020 13:30:12 +0000 (21:30 +0800)]
btrfs: improve device scanning messages
Systems booting without the initramfs seems to scan an unusual kind
of device path (/dev/root). And at a later time, the device is updated
to the correct path. We generally print the process name and PID of the
process scanning the device but we don't capture the same information if
the device path is rescanned with a different pathname.
The current message is too long, so drop the unnecessary UUID and add
process name and PID.
While at this also update the duplicate device warning to include the
process name and PID so the messages are consistent
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89721
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 3 Sep 2020 18:29:51 +0000 (14:29 -0400)]
btrfs: pretty print leaked root name
I'm a actual human being so am incapable of converting u64 to s64 in my
head, so add a helper to get the pretty name of a root objectid and use
that helper to spit out the name for any special roots for leaked roots,
so I don't have to scratch my head and figure out which root I messed up
the refs for.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Goldwyn Rodrigues [Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:02:33 +0000 (10:02 -0500)]
btrfs: sysfs: export currently running exclusive operation
/sys/fs/<fsid>/exclusive_operation contains the currently executing
exclusive operation. Add a sysfs_notify() when operation end, so
userspace can be notified of exclusive operation is finished.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Goldwyn Rodrigues [Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:02:32 +0000 (10:02 -0500)]
btrfs: enumerate the type of exclusive operation in progress
Instead of using a flag bit for exclusive operation, use a variable to
store which exclusive operation is being performed. Introduce an API
to start and finish an exclusive operation.
This would enable another way for tools to check which operation is
running on why starting an exclusive operation failed. The followup
patch adds a sysfs_notify() to alert userspace when the state changes, so
userspace can perform select() on it to get notified of the change.
This would enable us to enqueue a command which will wait for current
exclusive operation to complete before issuing the next exclusive
operation. This has been done synchronously as opposed to a background
process, or else error collection (if any) will become difficult.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update comments ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik [Tue, 1 Sep 2020 12:09:01 +0000 (08:09 -0400)]
btrfs: sysfs: init devices outside of the chunk_mutex
While running btrfs/061, btrfs/073, btrfs/078, or btrfs/178 we hit the
following lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff96ecc22ef4a0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80
slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200
kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270
alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0
iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0
kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130
kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240
sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40
vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
path_mount+0x434/0xc00
__x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120
do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150
kernfs_create_link+0x63/0xa0
sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0
btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x81/0x130
btrfs_init_new_device+0x67f/0x1250
btrfs_ioctl+0x1ef/0x2e20
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0
find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210
btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310
alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60
__btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530
btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220
btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0
btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0
btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x90/0x4f0
btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x93/0x140
btrfs_log_inode+0x5de/0x2020
btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x429/0xc90
btrfs_log_new_name+0x95/0x9b
btrfs_rename2+0xbb9/0x1800
vfs_rename+0x64f/0x9f0
do_renameat2+0x320/0x4e0
__x64_sys_rename+0x1f/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0
lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0
__mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
__btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500
evict+0xcf/0x1f0
dispose_list+0x48/0x70
prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50
super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0
do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0
shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290
shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0
balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670
kswapd+0x213/0x4c0
kthread+0x138/0x160
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(kernfs_mutex);
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by kswapd0/100:
#0:
ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
#1:
ffffffff8dd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290
#2:
ffff96ed2ade30e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #4
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8
check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150
__lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0
lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
__mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0
? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
__btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330
btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500
evict+0xcf/0x1f0
dispose_list+0x48/0x70
prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50
super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0
do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0
shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290
shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0
balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670
kswapd+0x213/0x4c0
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50
? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70
? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670
kthread+0x138/0x160
? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
This happens because we are holding the chunk_mutex at the time of
adding in a new device. However we only need to hold the
device_list_mutex, as we're going to iterate over the fs_devices
devices. Move the sysfs init stuff outside of the chunk_mutex to get
rid of this lockdep splat.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x: f3cd2c58110dad14e: btrfs: sysfs, rename device_link add/remove functions
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:42:49 +0000 (14:42 +0300)]
btrfs: make extent_fiemap take btrfs_inode
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:42:48 +0000 (14:42 +0300)]
btrfs: make btrfs_zero_range_check_range_boundary take btrfs_inode
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:42:47 +0000 (14:42 +0300)]
btrfs: make copy_inline_to_page take btrfs_inode
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:42:46 +0000 (14:42 +0300)]
btrfs: make btrfs_find_ordered_sum take btrfs_inode
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:42:45 +0000 (14:42 +0300)]
btrfs: make get_extent_skip_holes take btrfs_inode
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:42:44 +0000 (14:42 +0300)]
btrfs: make btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered btrfs_inode-centric
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:42:43 +0000 (14:42 +0300)]
btrfs: make btrfs_invalidatepage work on btrfs_inode
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:42:42 +0000 (14:42 +0300)]
btrfs: convert btrfs_inode_sectorsize to take btrfs_inode
It's counterintuitive to have a function named btrfs_inode_xxx which
takes a generic inode. Also move the function to btrfs_inode.h so that
it has access to the definition of struct btrfs_inode.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:42:41 +0000 (14:42 +0300)]
btrfs: make btrfs_dec_test_ordered_pending take btrfs_inode
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:42:40 +0000 (14:42 +0300)]
btrfs: make ordered extent tracepoint take btrfs_inode
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:42:39 +0000 (14:42 +0300)]
btrfs: make btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent take btrfs_inode
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:42:38 +0000 (14:42 +0300)]
btrfs: make inode_tree_del take btrfs_inode
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:46:08 +0000 (11:46 -0400)]
btrfs: use BTRFS_NESTED_NEW_ROOT for double splits
I've made this change separate since it requires both of the newly added
NESTED flags and I didn't want to slip it into one of those changes.
If we do a double split of a node we can end up doing a
BTRFS_NESTED_SPLIT on level 0, which throws lockdep off because it
appears as a double lock. Since we're maxed out on subclasses, use
BTRFS_NESTED_NEW_ROOT if we had to do a double split. This is OK
because we won't have to do a double split if we had to insert a new
root, and the new root would be at a higher level anyway.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:46:07 +0000 (11:46 -0400)]
btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_NEW_ROOT for adding new roots
The way we add new roots is confusing from a locking perspective for
lockdep. We generally have the rule that we lock things in order from
highest level to lowest, but in the case of adding a new level to the
tree we actually allocate a new block for the root, which makes the
locking go in reverse. A similar issue exists for snapshotting, we cow
the original root for the root of a new tree, however they're at the
same level. Address this by using BTRFS_NESTING_NEW_ROOT for these
operations.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:46:06 +0000 (11:46 -0400)]
btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT for split blocks
If we are splitting a leaf/node, we could do something like the
following
lock(leaf) BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL
lock(left) BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT + BTRFS_NESTING_COW
push from leaf -> left
reset path to point to left
split left
allocate new block, lock block BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT
at the new block point we need to have a different nesting level,
because we have already used either BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT or
BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT when pushing items from the original leaf into the
adjacent leaves.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:46:05 +0000 (11:46 -0400)]
btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT/RIGHT_COW
For similar reasons as BTRFS_NESTING_COW, we need
BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT/RIGHT_COW. The pattern is this
lock leaf -> BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL
cow leaf -> BTRFS_NESTING_COW
split leaf
lock left -> BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT
cow left -> BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT_COW
We need this in order to indicate to lockdep that these locks are
discrete and are being taken in a safe order.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:46:04 +0000 (11:46 -0400)]
btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT/BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT
Our lockdep maps are based on rootid+level, however in some cases we
will lock adjacent blocks on the same level, namely in searching forward
or in split/balance. Because of this lockdep will complain, so we need
a separate subclass to indicate to lockdep that these are different
locks.
lock leaf -> BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL
cow leaf -> BTRFS_NESTING_COW
split leaf
lock left -> BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT
lock right -> BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT
The above graph illustrates the need for this new nesting subclass.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:46:03 +0000 (11:46 -0400)]
btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_COW for cow'ing blocks
When we COW a block we are holding a lock on the original block, and
then we lock the new COW block. Because our lockdep maps are based on
root + level, this will make lockdep complain. We need a way to
indicate a subclass for locking the COW'ed block, so plumb through our
btrfs_lock_nesting from btrfs_cow_block down to the btrfs_init_buffer,
and then introduce BTRFS_NESTING_COW to be used for cow'ing blocks.
The reason I've added all this extra infrastructure is because there
will be need of different nesting classes in follow up patches.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:46:02 +0000 (11:46 -0400)]
btrfs: add nesting tags to the locking helpers
We will need these when we switch to an rwsem, so plumb in the
infrastructure here to use later on. I violate the 80 character limit
some here because it'll be cleaned up later.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:46:01 +0000 (11:46 -0400)]
btrfs: introduce btrfs_path::recurse
Our current tree locking stuff allows us to recurse with read locks if
we're already holding the write lock. This is necessary for the space
cache inode, as we could be holding a lock on the root_tree root when we
need to cache a block group, and thus need to be able to read down the
root_tree to read in the inode cache.
We can get away with this in our current locking, but we won't be able
to with a rwsem. Handle this by purposefully annotating the places
where we require recursion, so that in the future we can maybe come up
with a way to avoid the recursion. In the case of the free space inode,
this will be superseded by the free space tree.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik [Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:46:00 +0000 (11:46 -0400)]
btrfs: rename extent_buffer::lock_nested to extent_buffer::lock_recursed
Nested locking with lockdep and everything else refers to lock hierarchy
within the same lock map. This is how we indicate the same locks for
different objects are ok to take in a specific order, for our use case
that would be to take the lock on a leaf and then take a lock on an
adjacent leaf.
What ->lock_nested _actually_ refers to is if we happen to already be
holding the write lock on the extent buffer and we're allowing a read
lock to be taken on that extent buffer, which is recursion. Rename this
so we don't get confused when we switch to a rwsem and have to start
using the _nested helpers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Wed, 22 Jul 2020 08:09:25 +0000 (11:09 +0300)]
btrfs: don't opencode sync_blockdev in btrfs_init_new_device
Instead of opencoding filemap_write_and_wait simply call syncblockdev as
it makes it abundantly clear what's going on and why this is used. No
semantics changes.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Wed, 22 Jul 2020 08:09:24 +0000 (11:09 +0300)]
btrfs: remove redundant code from btrfs_free_stale_devices
Following the refactor of btrfs_free_stale_devices in
7bcb8164ad94 ("btrfs: use device_list_mutex when removing stale devices")
fs_devices are freed after they have been iterated by the inner
list_for_each so the use-after-free fixed by introducing the break in
fd649f10c3d2 ("btrfs: Fix use-after-free when cleaning up fs_devs with
a single stale device") is no longer necessary. Just remove it
altogether. No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Wed, 22 Jul 2020 08:09:23 +0000 (11:09 +0300)]
btrfs: refactor locked condition in btrfs_init_new_device
Invert unlocked to locked and exploit the fact it can only ever be
modified if we are adding a new device to a seed filesystem. This allows
to simplify the check in error: label. No semantics changes.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov [Wed, 22 Jul 2020 08:09:22 +0000 (11:09 +0300)]
btrfs: use RCU for quick device check in btrfs_init_new_device
When adding a new device there's a mandatory check to see if a device is
being duplicated to the filesystem it's added to. Since this is a
read-only operations not necessary to take device_list_mutex and can simply
make do with an rcu-readlock.
Using just RCU is safe because there won't be another device add delete
running in parallel as btrfs_init_new_device is called only from
btrfs_ioctl_add_dev.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Qu Wenruo [Wed, 19 Aug 2020 06:35:50 +0000 (14:35 +0800)]
btrfs: ctree: check key order before merging tree blocks
[BUG]
With a crafted image, btrfs can panic at btrfs_del_csums():
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:3188!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
CPU: 0 PID: 1156 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8+ #9
RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0x16c/0x180
RSP: 0018:
ffff976141257ab8 EFLAGS:
00010202
RAX:
0000000000000001 RBX:
ffff898a6b890930 RCX:
0000000004b70000
RDX:
0000000000000000 RSI:
ffff976141257bae RDI:
ffff976141257acf
RBP:
ffff976141257b10 R08:
0000000000001000 R09:
ffff9761412579a8
R10:
0000000000000000 R11:
0000000000000000 R12:
ffff976141257abe
R13:
0000000000000003 R14:
ffff898a6a8be578 R15:
ffff976141257bae
FS:
0000000000000000(0000) GS:
ffff898a77a00000(0000) knlGS:
0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0:
0000000080050033
CR2:
00007f779d9cd624 CR3:
000000022b2b4006 CR4:
00000000000206f0
Call Trace:
truncate_one_csum+0xac/0xf0
btrfs_del_csums+0x24f/0x3a0
__btrfs_free_extent.isra.72+0x5a7/0xbe0
__btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x539/0x1120
btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xdb/0x1b0
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x52/0x950
? start_transaction+0x94/0x450
transaction_kthread+0x163/0x190
kthread+0x105/0x140
? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x560/0x560
? kthread_destroy_worker+0x50/0x50
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace
93bf9db00e6c374e ]---
[CAUSE]
This crafted image has a tricky key order corruption:
checksum tree key (CSUM_TREE ROOT_ITEM 0)
node
29741056 level 1 items 14 free 107 generation 19 owner CSUM_TREE
...
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM
73785344) block
29757440 gen 19
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM
77594624) block
29753344 gen 19
...
leaf
29757440 items 5 free space 150 generation 19 owner CSUM_TREE
item 0 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM
73785344) itemoff 2323 itemsize 1672
range start
73785344 end
75497472 length 1712128
item 1 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM
75497472) itemoff 2319 itemsize 4
range start
75497472 end
75501568 length 4096
item 2 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM
75501568) itemoff 579 itemsize 1740
range start
75501568 end
77283328 length 1781760
item 3 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM
77283328) itemoff 575 itemsize 4
range start
77283328 end
77287424 length 4096
item 4 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM
4120596480) itemoff 275 itemsize 300 <<<
range start
4120596480 end
4120903680 length 307200
leaf
29753344 items 3 free space 1936 generation 19 owner CSUM_TREE
item 0 key (
18446744073457893366 EXTENT_CSUM
77594624) itemoff 2323 itemsize 1672
range start
77594624 end
79306752 length 1712128
...
Note the item 4 key of leaf
29757440, which is obviously too large, and
even larger than the first key of the next leaf.
However it still follows the key order in that tree block, thus tree
checker is unable to detect it at read time, since tree checker can only
work inside one leaf, thus such complex corruption can't be detected in
advance.
[FIX]
The next time to detect such problem is at tree block merge time,
which is in push_node_left(), balance_node_right(), push_leaf_left() or
push_leaf_right().
Now we check if the key order of the right-most key of the left node is
larger than the left-most key of the right node.
By this we don't need to call the full tree-checker, while still keeping
the key order correct as key order in each node is already checked by
tree checker thus we only need to check the above two slots.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202833
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
projects / platform / kernel / linux-rpi.git / log