platform/kernel/linux-rpi.git
4 years agobtrfs: use nofs allocations for running delayed items
Josef Bacik [Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:11:32 +0000 (10:11 -0400)]
btrfs: use nofs allocations for running delayed items

Zygo reported the following lockdep splat while testing the balance
patches

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.6.0-c6f0579d496a+ #53 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/1133 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888092f622c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0

but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8fc5f860 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}:
       fs_reclaim_acquire.part.91+0x29/0x30
       fs_reclaim_acquire+0x19/0x20
       kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x32/0x740
       add_block_entry+0x45/0x260
       btrfs_ref_tree_mod+0x6e2/0x8b0
       btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x789/0x880
       alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0xc6/0xf0
       __btrfs_cow_block+0x270/0x940
       btrfs_cow_block+0x1ba/0x3a0
       btrfs_search_slot+0x999/0x1030
       btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x81/0xe0
       btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x128/0x7d0
       __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0xf4/0x2a0
       btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13/0x20
       btrfs_commit_transaction+0x5cc/0x1390
       insert_balance_item.isra.39+0x6b2/0x6e0
       btrfs_balance+0x72d/0x18d0
       btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3de/0x4c0
       btrfs_ioctl+0x30ab/0x44a0
       ksys_ioctl+0xa1/0xe0
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x43/0x50
       do_syscall_64+0x77/0x2c0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

-> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}:
       __lock_acquire+0x197e/0x2550
       lock_acquire+0x103/0x220
       __mutex_lock+0x13d/0xce0
       mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
       __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0
       btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x49/0x50
       btrfs_evict_inode+0x6fc/0x900
       evict+0x19a/0x2c0
       dispose_list+0xa0/0xe0
       prune_icache_sb+0xbd/0xf0
       super_cache_scan+0x1b5/0x250
       do_shrink_slab+0x1f6/0x530
       shrink_slab+0x32e/0x410
       shrink_node+0x2a5/0xba0
       balance_pgdat+0x4bd/0x8a0
       kswapd+0x35a/0x800
       kthread+0x1e9/0x210
       ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(fs_reclaim);
                               lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
                               lock(fs_reclaim);
  lock(&delayed_node->mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by kswapd0/1133:
 #0: ffffffff8fc5f860 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30
 #1: ffffffff8fc380d8 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}, at: shrink_slab+0x1e8/0x410
 #2: ffff8881e0e6c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#42){++++}, at: trylock_super+0x1b/0x70

stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 1133 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.6.0-c6f0579d496a+ #53
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0xc1/0x11a
 print_circular_bug.isra.38.cold.57+0x145/0x14a
 check_noncircular+0x2a9/0x2f0
 ? print_circular_bug.isra.38+0x130/0x130
 ? stack_trace_consume_entry+0x90/0x90
 ? save_trace+0x3cc/0x420
 __lock_acquire+0x197e/0x2550
 ? btrfs_inode_clear_file_extent_range+0x9b/0xb0
 ? register_lock_class+0x960/0x960
 lock_acquire+0x103/0x220
 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0
 __mutex_lock+0x13d/0xce0
 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0
 ? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20
 ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0xeb/0x190
 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0
 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0xc20/0xc20
 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
 ? check_chain_key+0x1e6/0x2e0
 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
 ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0
 btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x49/0x50
 btrfs_evict_inode+0x6fc/0x900
 ? btrfs_setattr+0x840/0x840
 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140
 evict+0x19a/0x2c0
 dispose_list+0xa0/0xe0
 prune_icache_sb+0xbd/0xf0
 ? invalidate_inodes+0x310/0x310
 super_cache_scan+0x1b5/0x250
 do_shrink_slab+0x1f6/0x530
 shrink_slab+0x32e/0x410
 ? do_shrink_slab+0x530/0x530
 ? do_shrink_slab+0x530/0x530
 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
 ? mem_cgroup_protected+0x13d/0x260
 shrink_node+0x2a5/0xba0
 balance_pgdat+0x4bd/0x8a0
 ? mem_cgroup_shrink_node+0x490/0x490
 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x40
 ? finish_task_switch+0xce/0x390
 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
 kswapd+0x35a/0x800
 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4c/0x60
 ? balance_pgdat+0x8a0/0x8a0
 ? finish_wait+0x110/0x110
 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
 ? __kthread_parkme+0xc6/0xe0
 ? balance_pgdat+0x8a0/0x8a0
 kthread+0x1e9/0x210
 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0xc0/0xc0
 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

This is because we hold that delayed node's mutex while doing tree
operations.  Fix this by just wrapping the searches in nofs.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: sysfs: Use scnprintf() instead of snprintf()
Takashi Iwai [Sun, 22 Mar 2020 09:09:11 +0000 (10:09 +0100)]
btrfs: sysfs: Use scnprintf() instead of snprintf()

snprintf() is a hard-to-use function, and it's especially difficult to
use it properly for concatenating substrings in a buffer with a limited
size.  Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size, not the actual
size, the subsequent use of snprintf() may point to the incorrect
position easily.  Also, returning the value from snprintf() directly to
sysfs show function would pass a bogus value that is higher than the
actually truncated string.

That said, although the current code doesn't actually overflow the
buffer with PAGE_SIZE, it's a usage that shouldn't be done.  Or it's
worse; this gives a wrong confidence as if it were doing safe
operations.

This patch replaces such snprintf() calls with a safer version,
scnprintf().  It returns the actual output size, hence it's more
intuitive and the code does what's expected.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: do not resolve backrefs for roots that are being deleted
Josef Bacik [Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:17:09 +0000 (17:17 -0400)]
btrfs: do not resolve backrefs for roots that are being deleted

Zygo reported a deadlock where a task was stuck in the inode logical
resolve code.  The deadlock looks like this

  Task 1
  btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino
  ->iterate_inodes_from_logical
   ->iterate_extent_inodes
    ->path->search_commit_root isn't set, so a transaction is started
      ->resolve_indirect_ref for a root that's being deleted
->search for our key, attempt to lock a node, DEADLOCK

  Task 2
  btrfs_drop_snapshot
  ->walk down to a leaf, lock it, walk up, lock node
   ->end transaction
    ->start transaction
      -> wait_cur_trans

  Task 3
  btrfs_commit_transaction
  ->wait_event(cur_trans->write_wait, num_writers == 1) DEADLOCK

We are holding a transaction open in btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino while we
try to resolve our references.  btrfs_drop_snapshot() holds onto its
locks while it stops and starts transaction handles, because it assumes
nobody is going to touch the root now.  Commit just does what commit
does, waiting for the writers to finish, blocking any new trans handles
from starting.

Fix this by making the backref code not try to resolve backrefs of roots
that are currently being deleted.  This will keep us from walking into a
snapshot that's currently being deleted.

This problem was harder to hit before because we rarely broke out of the
snapshot delete halfway through, but with my delayed ref throttling code
it happened much more often.  However we've always been able to do this,
so it's not a new problem.

Fixes: 8da6d5815c59 ("Btrfs: added btrfs_find_all_roots()")
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: track reloc roots based on their commit root bytenr
Josef Bacik [Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:17:08 +0000 (17:17 -0400)]
btrfs: track reloc roots based on their commit root bytenr

We always search the commit root of the extent tree for looking up back
references, however we track the reloc roots based on their current
bytenr.

This is wrong, if we commit the transaction between relocating tree
blocks we could end up in this code in build_backref_tree

  if (key.objectid == key.offset) {
  /*
   * Only root blocks of reloc trees use backref
   * pointing to itself.
   */
  root = find_reloc_root(rc, cur->bytenr);
  ASSERT(root);
  cur->root = root;
  break;
  }

find_reloc_root() is looking based on the bytenr we had in the commit
root, but if we've COWed this reloc root we will not find that bytenr,
and we will trip over the ASSERT(root).

Fix this by using the commit_root->start bytenr for indexing the commit
root.  Then we change the __update_reloc_root() caller to be used when
we switch the commit root for the reloc root during commit.

This fixes the panic I was seeing when we started throttling relocation
for delayed refs.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: restart relocate_tree_blocks properly
Josef Bacik [Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:17:07 +0000 (17:17 -0400)]
btrfs: restart relocate_tree_blocks properly

There are two bugs here, but fixing them independently would just result
in pain if you happened to bisect between the two patches.

First is how we handle the -EAGAIN from relocate_tree_block().  We don't
set error, unless we happen to be the first node, which makes no sense,
I have no idea what the code was trying to accomplish here.

We in fact _do_ want err set here so that we know we need to restart in
relocate_block_group().  Also we need finish_pending_nodes() to not
actually call link_to_upper(), because we didn't actually relocate the
block.

And then if we do get -EAGAIN we do not want to set our backref cache
last_trans to the one before ours.  This would force us to update our
backref cache if we didn't cross transaction ids, which would mean we'd
have some nodes updated to their new_bytenr, but still able to find
their old bytenr because we're searching the same commit root as the
last time we went through relocate_tree_blocks.

Fixing these two things keeps us from panicing when we start breaking
out of relocate_tree_blocks() either for delayed ref flushing or enospc.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: reloc: reorder reservation before root selection
Josef Bacik [Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:17:06 +0000 (17:17 -0400)]
btrfs: reloc: reorder reservation before root selection

Since we're not only checking for metadata reservations but also if we
need to throttle our delayed ref generation, reorder
reserve_metadata_space() above the select_one_root() call in
relocate_tree_block().

The reason we want this is because select_reloc_root() will mess with
the backref cache, and if we're going to bail we want to be able to
cleanly remove this node from the backref cache and come back along to
regenerate it.  Move it up so this is the first thing we do to make
restarting cleaner.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: do not readahead in build_backref_tree
Josef Bacik [Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:09:54 +0000 (17:09 -0400)]
btrfs: do not readahead in build_backref_tree

Here we are just searching down to the bytenr we're building the backref
tree for, and all of it's paths to the roots.  These bytenrs are not
guaranteed to be anywhere near each other, so readahead just generates
extra latency.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: do not use readahead for running delayed refs
Josef Bacik [Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:09:53 +0000 (17:09 -0400)]
btrfs: do not use readahead for running delayed refs

Readahead will generate a lot of extra reads for adjacent nodes, but
when running delayed refs we have no idea if the next ref is going to be
adjacent or not, so this potentially just generates a lot of extra IO.
To make matters worse each ref is truly just looking for one item, it
doesn't generally search forward, so we simply don't need it here.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: Remove async_transid from btrfs_mksubvol/create_subvol/create_snapshot
Nikolay Borisov [Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:23:20 +0000 (17:23 +0200)]
btrfs: Remove async_transid from btrfs_mksubvol/create_subvol/create_snapshot

With BTRFS_SUBVOL_CREATE_ASYNC support remove it's no longer required to
pass the async_transid parameter so remove it and any code using it.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: Remove transid argument from btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid
Nikolay Borisov [Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:23:19 +0000 (17:23 +0200)]
btrfs: Remove transid argument from btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid

btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid no longer takes a transid argument, so
remove it and rename the function to __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create to
reflect it's an internal, worker function.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: Remove BTRFS_SUBVOL_CREATE_ASYNC support
Nikolay Borisov [Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:23:18 +0000 (17:23 +0200)]
btrfs: Remove BTRFS_SUBVOL_CREATE_ASYNC support

This functionality was deprecated in kernel 5.4. Since no one has
complained of the impending removal it's time we did so.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: kill the subvol_srcu
Josef Bacik [Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:11:47 +0000 (16:11 -0500)]
btrfs: kill the subvol_srcu

Now that we have proper root ref counting everywhere we can kill the
subvol_srcu.

* removal of fs_info::subvol_srcu reduces size of fs_info by 1176 bytes

* the refcount_t used for the references checks for accidental 0->1
  in cases where the root lifetime would not be properly protected

* there's a leak detector for roots to catch unfreed roots at umount
  time

* SRCU served us well over the years but is was not a proper
  synchronization mechanism for some cases

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: make btrfs_cleanup_fs_roots use the radix tree lock
Josef Bacik [Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:11:46 +0000 (16:11 -0500)]
btrfs: make btrfs_cleanup_fs_roots use the radix tree lock

The radix root is primarily protected by the fs_roots_radix_lock, so use
that to lookup and get a ref on all of our fs roots in
btrfs_cleanup_fs_roots. The tree reference is taken in the protected
section as before.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: don't take an extra root ref at allocation time
Josef Bacik [Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:11:45 +0000 (16:11 -0500)]
btrfs: don't take an extra root ref at allocation time

Now that all the users of roots take references for them we can drop the
extra root ref we've been taking.  Before we had roots at 2 refs for the
life of the file system, one for the radix tree, and one simply for
existing.  Now that we have proper ref accounting in all places that use
roots we can drop this extra ref simply for existing as we no longer
need it.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: hold a ref on the root on the dead roots list
Josef Bacik [Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:11:44 +0000 (16:11 -0500)]
btrfs: hold a ref on the root on the dead roots list

At the point we add a root to the dead roots list we have no open inodes
for that root, so we need to hold a ref on that root to keep it from
disappearing.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: make inodes hold a ref on their roots
Josef Bacik [Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:11:43 +0000 (16:11 -0500)]
btrfs: make inodes hold a ref on their roots

If we make sure all the inodes have refs on their root we don't have to
worry about the root disappearing while we have open inodes.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: move the root freeing stuff into btrfs_put_root
Josef Bacik [Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:11:42 +0000 (16:11 -0500)]
btrfs: move the root freeing stuff into btrfs_put_root

There are a few different ways to free roots, either you allocated them
yourself and you just do

free_extent_buffer(root->node);
free_extent_buffer(root->commit_node);
btrfs_put_root(root);

Which is the pattern for log roots.  Or for snapshots/subvolumes that
are being dropped you simply call btrfs_free_fs_root() which does all
the cleanup for you.

Unify this all into btrfs_put_root(), so that we don't free up things
associated with the root until the last reference is dropped.  This
makes the root freeing code much more significant.

The only caveat is at close_ctree() time we have to free the extent
buffers for all of our main roots (extent_root, chunk_root, etc) because
we have to drop the btree_inode and we'll run into issues if we hold
onto those nodes until ->kill_sb() time.  This will be addressed in the
future when we kill the btree_inode.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: move ino_cache_inode dropping out of btrfs_free_fs_root
Josef Bacik [Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:11:41 +0000 (16:11 -0500)]
btrfs: move ino_cache_inode dropping out of btrfs_free_fs_root

We are going to make root life be controlled soley by refcounting, and
inodes will be one of the things that hold a ref on the root.  This
means we need to handle dropping the ino_cache_inode outside of the root
freeing logic, so move it into btrfs_drop_and_free_fs_root() so it is
cleaned up properly on unmount.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: make the extent buffer leak check per fs info
Josef Bacik [Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:11:40 +0000 (16:11 -0500)]
btrfs: make the extent buffer leak check per fs info

I'm going to make the entire destruction of btrfs_root's controlled by
their refcount, so it will be helpful to notice if we're leaking their
eb's on umount.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: remove a BUG_ON() from merge_reloc_roots()
Josef Bacik [Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:18:30 +0000 (11:18 -0500)]
btrfs: remove a BUG_ON() from merge_reloc_roots()

This was pretty subtle, we default to reloc roots having 0 root refs, so
if we crash in the middle of the relocation they can just be deleted.
If we successfully complete the relocation operations we'll set our root
refs to 1 in prepare_to_merge() and then go on to merge_reloc_roots().

At prepare_to_merge() time if any of the reloc roots have a 0 reference
still, we will remove that reloc root from our reloc root rb tree, and
then clean it up later.

However this only happens if we successfully start a transaction.  If
we've aborted previously we will skip this step completely, and only
have reloc roots with a reference count of 0, but were never properly
removed from the reloc control's rb tree.

This isn't a problem per-se, our references are held by the list the
reloc roots are on, and by the original root the reloc root belongs to.
If we end up in this situation all the reloc roots will be added to the
dirty_reloc_list, and then properly dropped at that point.  The reloc
control will be free'd and the rb tree is no longer used.

There were two options when fixing this, one was to remove the BUG_ON(),
the other was to make prepare_to_merge() handle the case where we
couldn't start a trans handle.

IMO this is the cleaner solution.  I started with handling the error in
prepare_to_merge(), but it turned out super ugly.  And in the end this
BUG_ON() simply doesn't matter, the cleanup was happening properly, we
were just panicing because this BUG_ON() only matters in the success
case.  So I've opted to just remove it and add a comment where it was.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: hold a ref on the root->reloc_root
Josef Bacik [Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:44:47 +0000 (11:44 -0400)]
btrfs: hold a ref on the root->reloc_root

We previously were relying on root->reloc_root to be cleaned up by the
drop snapshot, or the error handling.  However if btrfs_drop_snapshot()
failed it wouldn't drop the ref for the root.  Also we sort of depend on
the right thing to happen with moving reloc roots between lists and the
fs root they belong to, which makes it hard to figure out who owns the
reference.

Fix this by explicitly holding a reference on the reloc root for
roo->reloc_root.  This means that we hold two references on reloc roots,
one for whichever reloc_roots list it's attached to, and the
root->reloc_root we're on.

This makes it easier to reason out who owns a reference on the root, and
when it needs to be dropped.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: clear DEAD_RELOC_TREE before dropping the reloc root
Josef Bacik [Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:44:46 +0000 (11:44 -0400)]
btrfs: clear DEAD_RELOC_TREE before dropping the reloc root

The DEAD_RELOC_TREE flag is in place in order to avoid a use after free
in init_reloc_root, tracking the presence of reloc_root.  However adding
the explicit tree references in previous patches makes the use after
free impossible because at this point we no longer have a reloc_control
set on the fs_info and thus cannot enter the function.

So move this to be coupled with clearing the root->reloc_root so we're
consistent with all other operations of the reloc root.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: free the reloc_control in a consistent way
Josef Bacik [Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:18:26 +0000 (11:18 -0500)]
btrfs: free the reloc_control in a consistent way

If we have an error while processing the reloc roots we could leak roots
that were added to rc->reloc_roots before we hit the error.  We could
have also not removed the reloc tree mapping from our rb_tree, so clean
up any remaining nodes in the reloc root rb_tree.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ use rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: do not init a reloc root if we aren't relocating
Josef Bacik [Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:18:24 +0000 (11:18 -0500)]
btrfs: do not init a reloc root if we aren't relocating

We previously were checking if the root had a dead root before accessing
root->reloc_root in order to avoid a use-after-free type bug.  However
this scenario happens after we've unset the reloc control, so we would
have been saved if we'd simply checked for fs_info->reloc_control.  At
this point during relocation we no longer need to be creating new reloc
roots, so simply move this check above the reloc_root checks to avoid
any future races and confusion.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: reloc: clean dirty subvols if we fail to start a transaction
Josef Bacik [Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:18:27 +0000 (11:18 -0500)]
btrfs: reloc: clean dirty subvols if we fail to start a transaction

If we do merge_reloc_roots() we could insert a few roots onto the dirty
subvol roots list, where we hold a ref on them.  If we fail to start the
transaction we need to run clean_dirty_subvols() in order to cleanup the
refs.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: unset reloc control if we fail to recover
Josef Bacik [Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:18:25 +0000 (11:18 -0500)]
btrfs: unset reloc control if we fail to recover

If we fail to load an fs root, or fail to start a transaction we can
bail without unsetting the reloc control, which leads to problems later
when we free the reloc control but still have it attached to the file
system.

In the normal path we'll end up calling unset_reloc_control() twice, but
all it does is set fs_info->reloc_control = NULL, and we can only have
one balance at a time so it's not racey.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: drop block from cache on error in relocation
Josef Bacik [Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:18:23 +0000 (11:18 -0500)]
btrfs: drop block from cache on error in relocation

If we have an error while building the backref tree in relocation we'll
process all the pending edges and then free the node.  However if we
integrated some edges into the cache we'll lose our link to those edges
by simply freeing this node, which means we'll leak memory and
references to any roots that we've found.

Instead we need to use remove_backref_node(), which walks through all of
the edges that are still linked to this node and free's them up and
drops any root references we may be holding.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: relocation: Use btrfs_find_all_leafs to locate data extent parent tree leaves
Qu Wenruo [Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:14:15 +0000 (16:14 +0800)]
btrfs: relocation: Use btrfs_find_all_leafs to locate data extent parent tree leaves

In relocation, we need to locate all parent tree leaves referring to one
data extent, thus we have a complex mechanism to iterate throught extent
tree and subvolume trees to locate the related leaves.

However this is already done in backref.c, we have
btrfs_find_all_leafs(), which can return a ulist containing all leaves
referring to that data extent.

Use btrfs_find_all_leafs() to replace find_data_references().

There is a special handling for v1 space cache data extents, where we
need to delete the v1 space cache data extents, to avoid those data
extents to hang the data relocation.

In this patch, the special handling is done by re-iterating the root
tree leaf.  Although it's a little less efficient than the old handling,
considering we can reuse a lot of code, it should be acceptable.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: fix ref-verify to catch operations on 0 ref extents
Josef Bacik [Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:21:44 +0000 (11:21 -0400)]
btrfs: fix ref-verify to catch operations on 0 ref extents

While debugging I noticed I wasn't getting ref verify errors before
everything blew up.  Turns out it's because we don't warn when we try to
add a normal ref via btrfs_inc_ref() if the block entry exists but has 0
references.  This is incorrect, we should never be doing anything other
than adding a new extent once a block entry drops to 0 references.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: make ranged full fsyncs more efficient
Filipe Manana [Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:41:08 +0000 (12:41 +0000)]
btrfs: make ranged full fsyncs more efficient

Commit 0c713cbab6200b ("Btrfs: fix race between ranged fsync and writeback
of adjacent ranges") fixed a bug where we could end up with file extent
items in a log tree that represent file ranges that overlap due to a race
between the hole detection of a ranged full fsync and writeback for a
different file range.

The problem was solved by forcing any ranged full fsync to become a
non-ranged full fsync - setting the range start to 0 and the end offset to
LLONG_MAX. This was a simple solution because the code that detected and
marked holes was very complex, it used to be done at copy_items() and
implied several searches on the fs/subvolume tree. The drawback of that
solution was that we started to flush delalloc for the entire file and
wait for all the ordered extents to complete for ranged full fsyncs
(including ordered extents covering ranges completely outside the given
range). Fortunatelly ranged full fsyncs are not the most common case
(hopefully for most workloads).

However a later fix for detecting and marking holes was made by commit
0e56315ca147b3 ("Btrfs: fix missing hole after hole punching and fsync
when using NO_HOLES") and it simplified a lot the detection of holes,
and now copy_items() no longer does it and we do it in a much more simple
way at btrfs_log_holes().

This makes it now possible to simply make the code that detects holes to
operate only on the initial range and no longer need to operate on the
whole file, while also avoiding the need to flush delalloc for the entire
file and wait for ordered extents that cover ranges that don't overlap the
given range.

Another special care is that we must skip file extent items that fall
entirely outside the fsync range when copying inode items from the
fs/subvolume tree into the log tree - this is to avoid races with ordered
extent completion for extents falling outside the fsync range, which could
cause us to end up with file extent items in the log tree that have
overlapping ranges - for example if the fsync range is [1Mb, 2Mb], when
we copy inode items we could copy an extent item for the range [0, 512K],
then release the search path and before moving to the next leaf, an
ordered extent for a range of [256Kb, 512Kb] completes - this would
cause us to copy the new extent item for range [256Kb, 512Kb] into the
log tree after we have copied one for the range [0, 512Kb] - the extents
overlap, resulting in a corruption.

So this change just does these steps:

1) When the NO_HOLES feature is enabled it leaves the initial range
   intact - no longer sets it to [0, LLONG_MAX] when the full sync bit
   is set in the inode. If NO_HOLES is not enabled, always set the range
   to a full, just like before this change, to avoid missing file extent
   items representing holes after replaying the log (for both full and
   fast fsyncs);

2) Make the hole detection code to operate only on the fsync range;

3) Make the code that copies items from the fs/subvolume tree to skip
   copying file extent items that cover a range completely outside the
   range of the fsync.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: factor out inode items copy loop from btrfs_log_inode()
Filipe Manana [Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:41:07 +0000 (12:41 +0000)]
btrfs: factor out inode items copy loop from btrfs_log_inode()

The function btrfs_log_inode() is quite large and so is its loop which
iterates the inode items from the fs/subvolume tree and copies them into
a log tree. Because this is a large loop inside a very large function
and because an upcoming patch in this series needs to add some more logic
inside that loop, move the loop into a helper function to make it a bit
more manageable.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: add helper to get the end offset of a file extent item
Filipe Manana [Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:41:06 +0000 (12:41 +0000)]
btrfs: add helper to get the end offset of a file extent item

Getting the end offset for a file extent item requires a bit of code since
the extent can be either inline or regular/prealloc. There are some places
all over the code base that open code this logic and in another patch
later in this series it will be needed again. Therefore encapsulate this
logic in a helper function and use it.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: fix missing file extent item for hole after ranged fsync
Filipe Manana [Mon, 9 Mar 2020 12:41:05 +0000 (12:41 +0000)]
btrfs: fix missing file extent item for hole after ranged fsync

When doing a fast fsync for a range that starts at an offset greater than
zero, we can end up with a log that when replayed causes the respective
inode miss a file extent item representing a hole if we are not using the
NO_HOLES feature. This is because for fast fsyncs we don't log any extents
that cover a range different from the one requested in the fsync.

Example scenario to trigger it:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -O ^no-holes -f /dev/sdd
  $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

  # Create a file with a single 256K and fsync it to clear to full sync
  # bit in the inode - we want the msync below to trigger a fast fsync.
  $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 256K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo

  # Force a transaction commit and wipe out the log tree.
  $ sync

  # Dirty 768K of data, increasing the file size to 1Mb, and flush only
  # the range from 256K to 512K without updating the log tree
  # (sync_file_range() does not trigger fsync, it only starts writeback
  # and waits for it to finish).

  $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcd 256K 768K" /mnt/foo
  $ xfs_io -c "sync_range -abw 256K 256K" /mnt/foo

  # Now dirty the range from 768K to 1M again and sync that range.
  $ xfs_io -c "mmap -w 768K 256K"        \
           -c "mwrite -S 0xef 768K 256K" \
           -c "msync -s 768K 256K"       \
           -c "munmap"                   \
           /mnt/foo

  <power fail>

  # Mount to replay the log.
  $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
  $ umount /mnt

  $ btrfs check /dev/sdd
  Opening filesystem to check...
  Checking filesystem on /dev/sdd
  UUID: 482fb574-b288-478e-a190-a9c44a78fca6
  [1/7] checking root items
  [2/7] checking extents
  [3/7] checking free space cache
  [4/7] checking fs roots
  root 5 inode 257 errors 100, file extent discount
  Found file extent holes:
       start: 262144, len: 524288
  ERROR: errors found in fs roots
  found 720896 bytes used, error(s) found
  total csum bytes: 512
  total tree bytes: 131072
  total fs tree bytes: 32768
  total extent tree bytes: 16384
  btree space waste bytes: 123514
  file data blocks allocated: 589824
    referenced 589824

Fix this issue by setting the range to full (0 to LLONG_MAX) when the
NO_HOLES feature is not enabled. This results in extra work being done
but it gives the guarantee we don't end up with missing holes after
replaying the log.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: account ticket size at add/delete time
Nikolay Borisov [Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:00:35 +0000 (11:00 +0200)]
btrfs: account ticket size at add/delete time

Instead of iterating all pending tickets on the normal/priority list to
sum their total size the cost can be amortized across ticket addition/
removal. This turns O(n) + O(m) (where n is the size of the normal list
and m of the priority list) into O(1). This will mostly have effect in
workloads that experience heavy flushing.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: implement migratepage callback for data pages
Roman Gushchin [Thu, 5 Mar 2020 00:57:35 +0000 (16:57 -0800)]
btrfs: implement migratepage callback for data pages

Currently btrfs doesn't provide a migratepage callback for data pages.
It means that fallback_migrate_page() is used to migrate btrfs pages.

fallback_migrate_page() cannot move dirty pages, instead it tries to
flush them (in sync mode) or just fails (in async mode).

In the sync mode pages which are scheduled to be processed by
btrfs_writepage_fixup_worker() can't be effectively flushed by the
migration code, because there is no established way to wait for the
completion of the delayed work.

It all leads to page migration failures.

To fix it the patch implements a btrs-specific migratepage callback,
which is similar to iomap_migrate_page() used by some other fs, except
it does take care of the PagePrivate2 flag which is used for data
ordering purposes.

Reviewed-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: Remove block_rsv parameter from btrfs_drop_snapshot
Nikolay Borisov [Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:43:51 +0000 (11:43 +0200)]
btrfs: Remove block_rsv parameter from btrfs_drop_snapshot

It's no longer used following 30d40577e322 ("btrfs: reloc: Also queue
orphan reloc tree for cleanup to avoid BUG_ON()"), so just remove it.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: Remove __ prefix from btrfs_block_rsv_release
Nikolay Borisov [Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:59:31 +0000 (10:59 +0200)]
btrfs: Remove __ prefix from btrfs_block_rsv_release

Currently the non-prefixed version is a simple wrapper used to hide
the 4th argument of the prefixed version. This doesn't bring much value
in practice and only makes the code harder to follow by adding another
level of indirection. Rectify this by removing the __ prefix and
have only one public function to release bytes from a block reservation.
No semantic changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: relocation: Check cancel request after each extent found
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 17 Feb 2020 06:16:54 +0000 (14:16 +0800)]
btrfs: relocation: Check cancel request after each extent found

When relocating data block groups with tons of small extents, or large
metadata block groups, there can be over 200,000 extents.

We will iterate all extents of such block group in relocate_block_group(),
where iteration itself can be kinda time-consuming.

So when user want to cancel the balance, the extent iteration loop can
be another target.

This patch will add the cancelling check in the extent iteration loop of
relocate_block_group() to make balance cancelling faster.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: relocation: Check cancel request after each data page read
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 17 Feb 2020 06:16:53 +0000 (14:16 +0800)]
btrfs: relocation: Check cancel request after each data page read

When relocating a data extents with large large data extents, we spend
most of our time in relocate_file_extent_cluster() at stage "moving data
extents":

 1)               |  btrfs_relocate_block_group [btrfs]() {
 1)               |    relocate_file_extent_cluster [btrfs]() {
 1) $ 6586769 us  |    }
 1) + 18.260 us   |    relocate_file_extent_cluster [btrfs]();
 1) + 15.770 us   |    relocate_file_extent_cluster [btrfs]();
 1) $ 8916340 us  |  }
 1)               |  btrfs_relocate_block_group [btrfs]() {
 1)               |    relocate_file_extent_cluster [btrfs]() {
 1) $ 11611586 us |    }
 1) + 16.930 us   |    relocate_file_extent_cluster [btrfs]();
 1) + 15.870 us   |    relocate_file_extent_cluster [btrfs]();
 1) $ 14986130 us |  }

To make data relocation cancelling quicker, add extra balance cancelling
check after each page read in relocate_file_extent_cluster().

Cleanup and error handling uses the same mechanism as if the whole
process finished

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: relocation: add error injection points for cancelling balance
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 17 Feb 2020 06:16:52 +0000 (14:16 +0800)]
btrfs: relocation: add error injection points for cancelling balance

Introduce a new error injection point, should_cancel_balance().

It's just a wrapper of atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_cancel_req), but
allows us to override the return value.

Currently there are only one locations using this function:

- btrfs_balance()
  It checks cancel before each block group.

There are other locations checking fs_info->balance_cancel_req, but they
are not used as an indicator to exit, so there is no need to use the
wrapper.

But there will be more locations coming, and some locations can cause
kernel panic if not handled properly.  So introduce this error injection
to provide better test interface.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agoBtrfs: implement full reflink support for inline extents
Filipe Manana [Fri, 28 Feb 2020 13:04:19 +0000 (13:04 +0000)]
Btrfs: implement full reflink support for inline extents

There are a few cases where we don't allow cloning an inline extent into
the destination inode, returning -EOPNOTSUPP to user space. This was done
to prevent several types of file corruption and because it's not very
straightforward to deal with these cases, as they can't rely on simply
copying the inline extent between leaves. Such cases require copying the
inline extent's data into the respective page of the destination inode.

Not supporting these cases makes it harder and more cumbersome to write
applications/libraries that work on any filesystem with reflink support,
since all these cases for which btrfs fails with -EOPNOTSUPP work just
fine on xfs for example. These unsupported cases are also not documented
anywhere and explaining which exact cases fail require a bit of too
technical understanding of btrfs's internal (inline extents and when and
where can they exist in a file), so it's not really user friendly.

Also some test cases from fstests that use fsx, such as generic/522 for
example, can sporadically fail because they trigger one of these cases,
and fsx expects all operations to succeed.

This change adds supports for cloning all these cases by copying the
inline extent's data into the respective page of the destination inode.

With this change test case btrfs/112 from fstests fails because it
expects some clone operations to fail, so it will be updated. Also a
new test case that exercises all these previously unsupported cases
will be added to fstests.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agoBtrfs: simplify inline extent handling when doing reflinks
Filipe Manana [Fri, 28 Feb 2020 13:04:18 +0000 (13:04 +0000)]
Btrfs: simplify inline extent handling when doing reflinks

We can not reflink parts of an inline extent, we must always reflink the
whole inline extent. We know that inline extents always start at file
offset 0 and that can never represent an amount of data larger then the
filesystem's sector size (both compressed and uncompressed). We also have
had the constraints that reflink operations must have a start offset that
is aligned to the sector size and an end offset that is also aligned or
it ends the inode's i_size, so there's no way for user space to be able
to do a reflink operation that will refer to only a part of an inline
extent.

Initially there was a bug in the inlining code that could allow compressed
inline extents that encoded more than 1 page, but that was fixed in 2008
by commit 70b99e6959a4c2 ("Btrfs: Compression corner fixes") since that
was problematic.

So remove all the extent cloning code that deals with the possibility
of cloning only partial inline extents.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agoBtrfs: move all reflink implementation code into its own file
Filipe Manana [Fri, 28 Feb 2020 13:04:17 +0000 (13:04 +0000)]
Btrfs: move all reflink implementation code into its own file

The reflink code is quite large and has been living in ioctl.c since ever.
It has grown over the years after many bug fixes and improvements, and
since I'm planning on making some further improvements on it, it's time
to get it better organized by moving into its own file, reflink.c
(similar to what xfs does for example).

This change only moves the code out of ioctl.c into the new file, it
doesn't do any other change.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: scrub: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
Gustavo A. R. Silva [Fri, 6 Mar 2020 22:13:33 +0000 (16:13 -0600)]
btrfs: scrub: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array
member[1][2], introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in
case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will
help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this
change:

  "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
   may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
   zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero." [1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: rcu-string: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
Gustavo A. R. Silva [Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:51:05 +0000 (10:51 -0600)]
btrfs: rcu-string: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array
member[1][2], introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in
case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will
help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this
change:

 "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
  may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
  zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero." [1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: delayed-inode: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
Gustavo A. R. Silva [Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:49:12 +0000 (10:49 -0600)]
btrfs: delayed-inode: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array
member[1][2], introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in
case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will
help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this
change:

 "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
  may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
  zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero." [1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: add RCU locks around block group initialization
Madhuparna Bhowmik [Fri, 6 Mar 2020 06:52:43 +0000 (12:22 +0530)]
btrfs: add RCU locks around block group initialization

The space_info list is normally RCU protected and should be traversed
with rcu_read_lock held. There's a warning

  [29.104756] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
  [29.105046] 5.6.0-rc4-next-20200305 #1 Not tainted
  [29.105231] -----------------------------
  [29.105401] fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2011 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!

pointing out that the locking is missing in btrfs_read_block_groups.
However this is not necessary as the list traversal happens at mount
time when there's no other thread potentially accessing the list.

To fix the warning and for consistency let's add the RCU lock/unlock,
the code won't be affected much as it's doing some lightweight
operations.

Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: Open code insert_extent_backref
Nikolay Borisov [Wed, 4 Mar 2020 09:33:53 +0000 (11:33 +0200)]
btrfs: Open code insert_extent_backref

No need to add a level of indirection for hiding a simple 'if'. Open
code insert_extent_backref in its sole caller. No functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: Remove impossible BUG_ON in get_tree_block_key
Nikolay Borisov [Wed, 4 Mar 2020 15:04:47 +0000 (17:04 +0200)]
btrfs: Remove impossible BUG_ON in get_tree_block_key

relocate_tree_blocks calls get_tree_block_key for a block iff that block
has its ->key_ready equal false. Thus the BUG_ON in the latter function
cannot ever be triggered so remove it.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: balance: factor out convert profile validation
David Sterba [Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:00:52 +0000 (21:00 +0100)]
btrfs: balance: factor out convert profile validation

The validation follows the same steps for all three block group types,
the existing helper validate_convert_profile can be enhanced and do more
of the common things.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: return void from csum_tree_block
David Sterba [Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:00:49 +0000 (21:00 +0100)]
btrfs: return void from csum_tree_block

Now that csum_tree_block is not returning any errors, we can make
csum_tree_block return void and simplify callers.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: simplify tree block checksumming loop
David Sterba [Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:00:47 +0000 (21:00 +0100)]
btrfs: simplify tree block checksumming loop

Thw whole point of csum_tree_block is to iterate over all extent buffer
pages and pass it to checksumming functions. The bytes where checksum is
stored must be skipped, thus map_private_extent_buffer. This complicates
further offset calculations.

As the first page will be always present, checksum the relevant bytes
unconditionally and then do a simple iteration over the remaining pages.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: inline checksum name and driver definitions
David Sterba [Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:00:45 +0000 (21:00 +0100)]
btrfs: inline checksum name and driver definitions

There's an unnecessary indirection in the checksum definition table,
pointer and the string itself. The strings are short and the overall
size of one entry is now 24 bytes.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: Rename __btrfs_alloc_chunk to btrfs_alloc_chunk
Nikolay Borisov [Mon, 2 Mar 2020 10:29:25 +0000 (12:29 +0200)]
btrfs: Rename __btrfs_alloc_chunk to btrfs_alloc_chunk

Having btrfs_alloc_chunk doesn't bring any value since it
encapsulates a lockdep assert and a call to find_next_chunk. Simply
rename the internal __btrfs_alloc_chunk function to the public one
and remove it's 2nd parameter as all callers always pass the return
value of find_next_chunk. Finally, migrate the call to
lockdep_assert_held so as to not lose the check.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: fix btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size calculation
Josef Bacik [Fri, 21 Feb 2020 21:41:10 +0000 (16:41 -0500)]
btrfs: fix btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size calculation

I noticed while running my snapshot torture test that we were getting a
lot of metadata chunks allocated with very little actually used.
Digging into this we would commit the transaction, still not have enough
space, and then force a chunk allocation.

I noticed that we were barely flushing any delalloc at all, despite the
fact that we had around 13gib of outstanding delalloc reservations.  It
turns out this is because of our btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size()
calculation.  It _only_ takes into account the outstanding ticket sizes,
which isn't the whole story.  In this particular workload we're slowly
filling up the disk, which means our overcommit space will suddenly
become a lot less, and our outstanding reservations will be well more
than what we can handle.  However we are only flushing based on our
ticket size, which is much less than we need to actually reclaim.

So fix btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size() to take into account the
overage in the case that we've gotten less available space suddenly.
This makes it so we attempt to reclaim a lot more delalloc space, which
allows us to make our reservations and we no longer are allocating a
bunch of needless metadata chunks.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agoBtrfs: fix crash during unmount due to race with delayed inode workers
Filipe Manana [Fri, 28 Feb 2020 13:04:36 +0000 (13:04 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix crash during unmount due to race with delayed inode workers

During unmount we can have a job from the delayed inode items work queue
still running, that can lead to at least two bad things:

1) A crash, because the worker can try to create a transaction just
   after the fs roots were freed;

2) A transaction leak, because the worker can create a transaction
   before the fs roots are freed and just after we committed the last
   transaction and after we stopped the transaction kthread.

A stack trace example of the crash:

 [79011.691214] kernel BUG at lib/radix-tree.c:982!
 [79011.692056] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
 [79011.693180] CPU: 3 PID: 1394 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Tainted: G        W         5.6.0-rc2-btrfs-next-54 #2
 (...)
 [79011.696789] Workqueue: btrfs-delayed-meta btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
 [79011.697904] RIP: 0010:radix_tree_tag_set+0xe7/0x170
 (...)
 [79011.702014] RSP: 0018:ffffb3c84a317ca0 EFLAGS: 00010293
 [79011.702949] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
 [79011.704202] RDX: ffffb3c84a317cb0 RSI: ffffb3c84a317ca8 RDI: ffff8db3931340a0
 [79011.705463] RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: ffffffff974629d0
 [79011.706756] R10: ffffb3c84a317bc0 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8db393134000
 [79011.708010] R13: ffff8db3931340a0 R14: ffff8db393134068 R15: 0000000000000001
 [79011.709270] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8db3b6a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 [79011.710699] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 [79011.711710] CR2: 00007f22c2a0a000 CR3: 0000000232ad4005 CR4: 00000000003606e0
 [79011.712958] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 [79011.714205] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 [79011.715448] Call Trace:
 [79011.715925]  record_root_in_trans+0x72/0xf0 [btrfs]
 [79011.716819]  btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x4b/0x70 [btrfs]
 [79011.717925]  start_transaction+0xdd/0x5c0 [btrfs]
 [79011.718829]  btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x17e/0x2b0 [btrfs]
 [79011.719915]  btrfs_work_helper+0xaa/0x720 [btrfs]
 [79011.720773]  process_one_work+0x26d/0x6a0
 [79011.721497]  worker_thread+0x4f/0x3e0
 [79011.722153]  ? process_one_work+0x6a0/0x6a0
 [79011.722901]  kthread+0x103/0x140
 [79011.723481]  ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
 [79011.724379]  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
 (...)

The following diagram shows a sequence of steps that lead to the crash
during ummount of the filesystem:

        CPU 1                                             CPU 2                                CPU 3

 btrfs_punch_hole()
   btrfs_btree_balance_dirty()
     btrfs_balance_delayed_items()
       --> sees
           fs_info->delayed_root->items
           with value 200, which is greater
           than
           BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND (128)
           and smaller than
           BTRFS_DELAYED_WRITEBACK (512)
       btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node()
         --> queues a job for
             fs_info->delayed_workers to run
             btrfs_async_run_delayed_root()

                                                                                            btrfs_async_run_delayed_root()
                                                                                              --> job queued by CPU 1

                                                                                              --> starts picking and running
                                                                                                  delayed nodes from the
                                                                                                  prepare_list list

                                                 close_ctree()

                                                   btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()

                                                   btrfs_commit_super()

                                                     btrfs_join_transaction()
                                                       --> gets transaction N

                                                     btrfs_commit_transaction(N)
                                                       --> set transaction state
                                                        to TRANTS_STATE_COMMIT_START

                                                                                             btrfs_first_prepared_delayed_node()
                                                                                               --> picks delayed node X through
                                                                                                   the prepared_list list

                                                       btrfs_run_delayed_items()

                                                         btrfs_first_delayed_node()
                                                           --> also picks delayed node X
                                                               but through the node_list
                                                               list

                                                         __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items()
                                                            --> runs all delayed items from
                                                                this node and drops the
                                                                node's item count to 0
                                                                through call to
                                                                btrfs_release_delayed_inode()

                                                         --> finishes running any remaining
                                                             delayed nodes

                                                       --> finishes transaction commit

                                                   --> stops cleaner and transaction threads

                                                   btrfs_free_fs_roots()
                                                     --> frees all roots and removes them
                                                         from the radix tree
                                                         fs_info->fs_roots_radix

                                                                                             btrfs_join_transaction()
                                                                                               start_transaction()
                                                                                                 btrfs_record_root_in_trans()
                                                                                                   record_root_in_trans()
                                                                                                     radix_tree_tag_set()
                                                                                                       --> crashes because
                                                                                                           the root is not in
                                                                                                           the radix tree
                                                                                                           anymore

If the worker is able to call btrfs_join_transaction() before the unmount
task frees the fs roots, we end up leaking a transaction and all its
resources, since after the call to btrfs_commit_super() and stopping the
transaction kthread, we don't expect to have any transaction open anymore.

When this situation happens the worker has a delayed node that has no
more items to run, since the task calling btrfs_run_delayed_items(),
which is doing a transaction commit, picks the same node and runs all
its items first.

We can not wait for the worker to complete when running delayed items
through btrfs_run_delayed_items(), because we call that function in
several phases of a transaction commit, and that could cause a deadlock
because the worker calls btrfs_join_transaction() and the task doing the
transaction commit may have already set the transaction state to
TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING.

Also it's not possible to get into a situation where only some of the
items of a delayed node are added to the fs/subvolume tree in the current
transaction and the remaining ones in the next transaction, because when
running the items of a delayed inode we lock its mutex, effectively
waiting for the worker if the worker is running the items of the delayed
node already.

Since this can only cause issues when unmounting a filesystem, fix it in
a simple way by waiting for any jobs on the delayed workers queue before
calling btrfs_commit_supper() at close_ctree(). This works because at this
point no one can call btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() or
btrfs_balance_delayed_items(), and if we end up waiting for any worker to
complete, btrfs_commit_super() will commit the transaction created by the
worker.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: factor out prepare_allocation() for extent allocation
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:26 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: factor out prepare_allocation() for extent allocation

This function finally factor out prepare_allocation() form
find_free_extent(). This function is called before the allocation loop
and a specific allocator function like prepare_allocation_clustered()
should initialize their private information and can set proper hint_byte
to indicate where to start the allocation with.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: skip LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE if not clustered allocation
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:25 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: skip LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE if not clustered allocation

LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE is solely dedicated for clustered allocation. So, we
can skip this stage and give up the allocation.

Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: factor out chunk_allocation_failed() for extent allocation
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:24 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: factor out chunk_allocation_failed() for extent allocation

Factor out chunk_allocation_failed() from
find_free_extent_update_loop().  This function is called when it failed
to allocate a chunk. The function can modify "ffe_ctl->loop" and return
0 to continue with the next stage.  Or, it can return -ENOSPC to give up
here.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: drop unnecessary arguments from find_free_extent_update_loop()
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:23 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: drop unnecessary arguments from find_free_extent_update_loop()

Now that, we don't use last_ptr and use_cluster in the function. Drop
these arguments from it.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: factor out found_extent() for extent allocation
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:22 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: factor out found_extent() for extent allocation

Factor out found_extent() from find_free_extent_update_loop(). This
function is called when a proper extent is found and before returning
from find_free_extent().  Hook functions like found_extent_clustered()
should save information for a next allocation.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: factor out release_block_group()
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:21 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: factor out release_block_group()

Factor out release_block_group() from find_free_extent(). This function
is called when it gives up an allocation from a block group. Each
allocation policy should reset its information for an allocation in
the next block group.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: drop unnecessary arguments from clustered allocation functions
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:20 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: drop unnecessary arguments from clustered allocation functions

Now that, find_free_extent_clustered() and find_free_extent_unclustered()
can access "last_ptr" from the "clustered" variable, we can drop it from
the arguments.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: factor out do_allocation() for extent allocation
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:19 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: factor out do_allocation() for extent allocation

Factor out do_allocation() from find_free_extent(). This function do an
actual extent allocation in a given block group. The ffe_ctl->policy is
used to determine the actual allocator function to use.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: move variables for clustered allocation into find_free_extent_ctl
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:18 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: move variables for clustered allocation into find_free_extent_ctl

Move "last_ptr" and "use_cluster" into struct find_free_extent_ctl, so
that hook functions for clustered allocator can use these variables.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: move hint_byte into find_free_extent_ctl
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:17 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: move hint_byte into find_free_extent_ctl

This commit moves hint_byte into find_free_extent_ctl, so that we can
modify the hint_byte in the other functions. This will help us split
find_free_extent further. This commit also renames the function argument
"hint_byte" to "hint_byte_orig" to avoid misuse.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: introduce extent allocation policy
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:16 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: introduce extent allocation policy

This commit introduces extent allocation policy for btrfs. This policy
controls how btrfs allocate an extents from block groups.  There is no
functional change introduced with this commit.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: parameterize dev_extent_min for chunk allocation
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:15 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: parameterize dev_extent_min for chunk allocation

Currently, we ignore a device whose available space is less than
"BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN * dev_stripes". This is a lower limit for current
allocation policy (to maximize the number of stripes). This commit
parameterizes dev_extent_min, so that other policies can set their own
lower limitat to ignore a device with insufficient space.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: factor out create_chunk()
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:14 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: factor out create_chunk()

Factor out create_chunk() from __btrfs_alloc_chunk(). This function
finally creates a chunk. There is no functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: factor out decide_stripe_size()
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:13 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: factor out decide_stripe_size()

Factor out decide_stripe_size() from __btrfs_alloc_chunk(). This
function calculates the actual stripe size to allocate.
decide_stripe_size() handles the common case to round down the 'ndevs'
to 'devs_increment' and check the upper and lower limitation of 'ndevs'.
decide_stripe_size_regular() decides the size of a stripe and the size
of a chunk. The policy is to maximize the number of stripes.

This commit has no functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: factor out gather_device_info()
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:12 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: factor out gather_device_info()

Factor out gather_device_info() from __btrfs_alloc_chunk(). This
function iterates over devices list and gather information about
devices. This commit also introduces "max_avail" and
"dev_extent_min" to fold the same calculation to one variable.
This commit has no functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: factor out init_alloc_chunk_ctl
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:11 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: factor out init_alloc_chunk_ctl

Factor out init_alloc_chunk_ctl() from __btrfs_alloc_chunk(). This
function initialises parameters of "struct alloc_chunk_ctl" for
allocation.  init_alloc_chunk_ctl() handles a common part of the
initialisation to load the RAID parameters from btrfs_raid_array.
init_alloc_chunk_ctl_policy_regular() decides some parameters for its
allocation.

The last "else" case in the original code is moved to
__btrfs_alloc_chunk() to handle the error case in the common code.
Replace the BUG_ON with ASSERT() and error return at the same time.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: introduce alloc_chunk_ctl
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:10 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: introduce alloc_chunk_ctl

Introduce "struct alloc_chunk_ctl" to wrap needed parameters for the
chunk allocation.  This will be used to split __btrfs_alloc_chunk() into
smaller functions.

This commit folds a number of local variables in __btrfs_alloc_chunk()
into one "struct alloc_chunk_ctl ctl". There is no functional change.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: refactor find_free_dev_extent_start()
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:09 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: refactor find_free_dev_extent_start()

Factor out two functions from find_free_dev_extent_start().
dev_extent_search_start() decides the starting position of the search.
dev_extent_hole_check() checks if a hole found is suitable for device
extent allocation.

These functions also have the switch-cases to change the allocation
behavior depending on the policy.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: introduce chunk allocation policy
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:08 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: introduce chunk allocation policy

Introduce chunk allocation policy for btrfs. This policy controls how
chunks and device extents are allocated from devices.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: handle invalid profile in chunk allocation
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:07 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: handle invalid profile in chunk allocation

Do not BUG_ON() when an invalid profile is passed to __btrfs_alloc_chunk().
Instead return -EINVAL with ASSERT() to catch a bug in the development
stage.

Suggested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: change full_search to bool in find_free_extent_update_loop
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 25 Feb 2020 03:56:06 +0000 (12:56 +0900)]
btrfs: change full_search to bool in find_free_extent_update_loop

While the "full_search" variable defined in find_free_extent() is bool,
but the full_search argument of find_free_extent_update_loop() is
defined as int. Let's trivially fix the argument type.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: qgroup: Remove the unnecesaary spin lock for qgroup_rescan_running
Qu Wenruo [Fri, 7 Feb 2020 05:38:21 +0000 (13:38 +0800)]
btrfs: qgroup: Remove the unnecesaary spin lock for qgroup_rescan_running

After the previous patch, qgroup_rescan_running is protected by
btrfs_fs_info::qgroup_rescan_lock, thus no need for the extra spinlock.

Suggested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: qgroup: ensure qgroup_rescan_running is only set when the worker is at least...
Qu Wenruo [Fri, 7 Feb 2020 05:38:20 +0000 (13:38 +0800)]
btrfs: qgroup: ensure qgroup_rescan_running is only set when the worker is at least queued

[BUG]
There are some reports about btrfs wait forever to unmount itself, with
the following call trace:

  INFO: task umount:4631 blocked for more than 491 seconds.
        Tainted: G               X  5.3.8-2-default #1
  "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  umount          D    0  4631   3337 0x00000000
  Call Trace:
  ([<00000000174adf7a>] __schedule+0x342/0x748)
   [<00000000174ae3ca>] schedule+0x4a/0xd8
   [<00000000174b1f08>] schedule_timeout+0x218/0x420
   [<00000000174af10c>] wait_for_common+0x104/0x1d8
   [<000003ff804d6994>] btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion+0x84/0xb0 [btrfs]
   [<000003ff8044a616>] close_ctree+0x4e/0x380 [btrfs]
   [<0000000016fa3136>] generic_shutdown_super+0x8e/0x158
   [<0000000016fa34d6>] kill_anon_super+0x26/0x40
   [<000003ff8041ba88>] btrfs_kill_super+0x28/0xc8 [btrfs]
   [<0000000016fa39f8>] deactivate_locked_super+0x68/0x98
   [<0000000016fcb198>] cleanup_mnt+0xc0/0x140
   [<0000000016d6a846>] task_work_run+0xc6/0x110
   [<0000000016d04f76>] do_notify_resume+0xae/0xb8
   [<00000000174b30ae>] system_call+0xe2/0x2c8

[CAUSE]
The problem happens when we have called qgroup_rescan_init(), but
not queued the worker. It can be caused mostly by error handling.

Qgroup ioctl thread | Unmount thread
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
|
btrfs_qgroup_rescan() |
|- qgroup_rescan_init() |
|  |- qgroup_rescan_running = true; |
| |
|- trans = btrfs_join_transaction() |
|  Some error happened |
| |
|- btrfs_qgroup_rescan() returns error |
   But qgroup_rescan_running == true; |
| close_ctree()
| |- btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion()
|    |- running == true;
|    |- wait_for_completion();

btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker is never queued, thus no one is going to wake
up close_ctree() and we get a deadlock.

All involved qgroup_rescan_init() callers are:

- btrfs_qgroup_rescan()
  The example above. It's possible to trigger the deadlock when error
  happened.

- btrfs_quota_enable()
  Not possible. Just after qgroup_rescan_init() we queue the work.

- btrfs_read_qgroup_config()
  It's possible to trigger the deadlock. It only init the work, the
  work queueing happens in btrfs_qgroup_rescan_resume().
  Thus if error happened in between, deadlock is possible.

We shouldn't set fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running just in
qgroup_rescan_init(), as at that stage we haven't yet queued qgroup
rescan worker to run.

[FIX]
Set qgroup_rescan_running before queueing the work, so that we ensure
the rescan work is queued when we wait for it.

Fixes: 8d9eddad1946 ("Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan worker initialization")
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
[ Change subject and cause analyse, use a smaller fix ]
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agouuid: Remove no more needed macro
Andy Shevchenko [Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:37:52 +0000 (17:37 +0200)]
uuid: Remove no more needed macro

uuid_le_gen() is no used anymore, remove it for good.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: switch to use new generic UUID API
Andy Shevchenko [Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:37:51 +0000 (17:37 +0200)]
btrfs: switch to use new generic UUID API

There are new types and helpers that are supposed to be used in new code.

As a preparation to get rid of legacy types and API functions do
the conversion here.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agouuid: Provide a GUID generator for raw buffer
Andy Shevchenko [Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:37:50 +0000 (17:37 +0200)]
uuid: Provide a GUID generator for raw buffer

In some cases we would like to generate a GUID and export it.  Though it
would require either casting to internal kernel types or an intermediate
buffer. Instead we may achieve this by supplying a pointer to raw buffer
and make a complimentary API to existing one for UUIDs.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agouuid: Add inline helpers to import / export UUIDs
Andy Shevchenko [Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:37:49 +0000 (17:37 +0200)]
uuid: Add inline helpers to import / export UUIDs

Sometimes we may need to import UUID from or export to the raw buffer,
which is provided outside of kernel and can't be declared as UUID type.
With current API this operation will require an explicit casting
to one of UUID types and length, that is always a constant derived as sizeof
the certain UUID type.

Provide a helpful set of inline helpers to minimize developer's effort
in the cases when raw buffers are involved.

Suggested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: Don't submit any btree write bio if the fs has errors
Qu Wenruo [Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:12:44 +0000 (14:12 +0800)]
btrfs: Don't submit any btree write bio if the fs has errors

[BUG]
There is a fuzzed image which could cause KASAN report at unmount time.

  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_queue_work+0x2c1/0x390
  Read of size 8 at addr ffff888067cf6848 by task umount/1922

  CPU: 0 PID: 1922 Comm: umount Tainted: G        W         5.0.21 #1
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x5b/0x8b
   print_address_description+0x70/0x280
   kasan_report+0x13a/0x19b
   btrfs_queue_work+0x2c1/0x390
   btrfs_wq_submit_bio+0x1cd/0x240
   btree_submit_bio_hook+0x18c/0x2a0
   submit_one_bio+0x1be/0x320
   flush_write_bio.isra.41+0x2c/0x70
   btree_write_cache_pages+0x3bb/0x7f0
   do_writepages+0x5c/0x130
   __writeback_single_inode+0xa3/0x9a0
   writeback_single_inode+0x23d/0x390
   write_inode_now+0x1b5/0x280
   iput+0x2ef/0x600
   close_ctree+0x341/0x750
   generic_shutdown_super+0x126/0x370
   kill_anon_super+0x31/0x50
   btrfs_kill_super+0x36/0x2b0
   deactivate_locked_super+0x80/0xc0
   deactivate_super+0x13c/0x150
   cleanup_mnt+0x9a/0x130
   task_work_run+0x11a/0x1b0
   exit_to_usermode_loop+0x107/0x130
   do_syscall_64+0x1e5/0x280
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

[CAUSE]
The fuzzed image has a completely screwd up extent tree:

  leaf 29421568 gen 8 total ptrs 6 free space 3587 owner EXTENT_TREE
  refs 2 lock (w:0 r:0 bw:0 br:0 sw:0 sr:0) lock_owner 0 current 5938
          item 0 key (12587008 168 4096) itemoff 3942 itemsize 53
                  extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 1
                  ref#0: extent data backref root 5 objectid 259 offset 0 count 1
          item 1 key (12591104 168 8192) itemoff 3889 itemsize 53
                  extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 1
                  ref#0: extent data backref root 5 objectid 271 offset 0 count 1
          item 2 key (12599296 168 4096) itemoff 3836 itemsize 53
                  extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 1
                  ref#0: extent data backref root 5 objectid 259 offset 4096 count 1
          item 3 key (29360128 169 0) itemoff 3803 itemsize 33
                  extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 2
                  ref#0: tree block backref root 5
          item 4 key (29368320 169 1) itemoff 3770 itemsize 33
                  extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 2
                  ref#0: tree block backref root 5
          item 5 key (29372416 169 0) itemoff 3737 itemsize 33
                  extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 2
                  ref#0: tree block backref root 5

Note that leaf 29421568 doesn't have its backref in the extent tree.
Thus extent allocator can re-allocate leaf 29421568 for other trees.

In short, the bug is caused by:

- Existing tree block gets allocated to log tree
  This got its generation bumped.

- Log tree balance cleaned dirty bit of offending tree block
  It will not be written back to disk, thus no WRITTEN flag.

- Original owner of the tree block gets COWed
  Since the tree block has higher transid, no WRITTEN flag, it's reused,
  and not traced by transaction::dirty_pages.

- Transaction aborted
  Tree blocks get cleaned according to transaction::dirty_pages. But the
  offending tree block is not recorded at all.

- Filesystem unmount
  All pages are assumed to be are clean, destroying all workqueue, then
  call iput(btree_inode).
  But offending tree block is still dirty, which triggers writeback, and
  causes use-after-free bug.

The detailed sequence looks like this:

- Initial status
  eb: 29421568, header=WRITTEN bflags_dirty=0, page_dirty=0, gen=8,
      not traced by any dirty extent_iot_tree.

- New tree block is allocated
  Since there is no backref for 29421568, it's re-allocated as new tree
  block.
  Keep in mind that tree block 29421568 is still referred by extent
  tree.

- Tree block 29421568 is filled for log tree
  eb: 29421568, header=0 bflags_dirty=1, page_dirty=1, gen=9 << (gen bumped)
      traced by btrfs_root::dirty_log_pages

- Some log tree operations
  Since the fs is using node size 4096, the log tree can easily go a
  level higher.

- Log tree needs balance
  Tree block 29421568 gets all its content pushed to right, thus now
  it is empty, and we don't need it.
  btrfs_clean_tree_block() from __push_leaf_right() get called.

  eb: 29421568, header=0 bflags_dirty=0, page_dirty=0, gen=9
      traced by btrfs_root::dirty_log_pages

- Log tree write back
  btree_write_cache_pages() goes through dirty pages ranges, but since
  page of tree block 29421568 gets cleaned already, it's not written
  back to disk. Thus it doesn't have WRITTEN bit set.
  But ranges in dirty_log_pages are cleared.

  eb: 29421568, header=0 bflags_dirty=0, page_dirty=0, gen=9
      not traced by any dirty extent_iot_tree.

- Extent tree update when committing transaction
  Since tree block 29421568 has transid equal to running trans, and has
  no WRITTEN bit, should_cow_block() will use it directly without adding
  it to btrfs_transaction::dirty_pages.

  eb: 29421568, header=0 bflags_dirty=1, page_dirty=1, gen=9
      not traced by any dirty extent_iot_tree.

  At this stage, we're doomed. We have a dirty eb not tracked by any
  extent io tree.

- Transaction gets aborted due to corrupted extent tree
  Btrfs cleans up dirty pages according to transaction::dirty_pages and
  btrfs_root::dirty_log_pages.
  But since tree block 29421568 is not tracked by neither of them, it's
  still dirty.

  eb: 29421568, header=0 bflags_dirty=1, page_dirty=1, gen=9
      not traced by any dirty extent_iot_tree.

- Filesystem unmount
  Since all cleanup is assumed to be done, all workqueus are destroyed.
  Then iput(btree_inode) is called, expecting no dirty pages.
  But tree 29421568 is still dirty, thus triggering writeback.
  Since all workqueues are already freed, we cause use-after-free.

This shows us that, log tree blocks + bad extent tree can cause wild
dirty pages.

[FIX]
To fix the problem, don't submit any btree write bio if the filesytem
has any error.  This is the last safe net, just in case other cleanup
haven't caught catch it.

Link: https://github.com/bobfuzzer/CVE/tree/master/CVE-2019-19377
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: ioctl: resize: only show message if size is changed
Marcos Paulo de Souza [Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:55:26 +0000 (10:55 -0300)]
btrfs: ioctl: resize: only show message if size is changed

There is no point to inform the user about size change if there's none.
Update the message to conform to a commonly used format where the path
and devid are printed and also print old and new sizes.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos@mpdesouza.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ enhance message ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: slightly simplify global block reserve calculations
Anand Jain [Tue, 4 Feb 2020 11:05:58 +0000 (19:05 +0800)]
btrfs: slightly simplify global block reserve calculations

In btrfs_update_global_block_rsv the lines:

  num_bytes = block_rsv->size - block_rsv->reserved;
  block_rsv->reserved += num_bytes;

imply:

  block_rsv->reserved = block_rsv->size;

Assign block_rsv->size to block_rsv->reserved directly and reorder lines
so they match the other branch.

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: merge unlocking to common exit block in btrfs_commit_transaction
David Sterba [Thu, 28 Nov 2019 15:03:00 +0000 (16:03 +0100)]
btrfs: merge unlocking to common exit block in btrfs_commit_transaction

The tree_log_mutex and reloc_mutex locks are properly nested so we can
simplify error handling and add labels for them. This reduces line count
of the function.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: reduce pointer intdirections in btree_readpage_end_io_hook
David Sterba [Thu, 28 Nov 2019 15:15:04 +0000 (16:15 +0100)]
btrfs: reduce pointer intdirections in btree_readpage_end_io_hook

All we need to read is checksum size from fs_info superblock, and
fs_info is provided by extent buffer so we can get rid of the wild
pointer indirections from page/inode/root.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: adjust delayed refs message level
David Sterba [Thu, 28 Nov 2019 14:34:28 +0000 (15:34 +0100)]
btrfs: adjust delayed refs message level

The message seems to be for debugging and has little value for users.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: replace u_long type cast with unsigned long
David Sterba [Thu, 28 Nov 2019 14:31:46 +0000 (15:31 +0100)]
btrfs: replace u_long type cast with unsigned long

We don't use the u_XX types anywhere, though they're defined.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: raid56: simplify sort_parity_stripes
David Sterba [Thu, 28 Nov 2019 14:31:17 +0000 (15:31 +0100)]
btrfs: raid56: simplify sort_parity_stripes

Remove trivial comprator and open coded swap of two values.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: adjust message level for unrecognized mount option
David Sterba [Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:02:05 +0000 (16:02 +0100)]
btrfs: adjust message level for unrecognized mount option

An unrecognized option is a failure that should get user/administrator
attention, the info level is often below what gets logged, so make it
error.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: simplify parameters of btrfs_set_disk_extent_flags
David Sterba [Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:54:13 +0000 (11:54 +0100)]
btrfs: simplify parameters of btrfs_set_disk_extent_flags

All callers pass extent buffer start and length so the extent buffer
itself should work fine.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: open code trivial helper btrfs_header_chunk_tree_uuid
David Sterba [Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:17:13 +0000 (13:17 +0100)]
btrfs: open code trivial helper btrfs_header_chunk_tree_uuid

The helper btrfs_header_chunk_tree_uuid follows naming convention of
other struct accessors but does something compeletly different. As the
offsetof calculation is clear in the context of extent buffer operations
we can remove it.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: open code trivial helper btrfs_header_fsid
David Sterba [Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:15:57 +0000 (13:15 +0100)]
btrfs: open code trivial helper btrfs_header_fsid

The helper btrfs_header_fsid follows naming convention of other struct
accessors but does something compeletly different. As the offsetof
calculation is clear in the context of extent buffer operations we can
remove it.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: move mapping of block for discard to its caller
David Sterba [Thu, 2 Aug 2018 22:36:29 +0000 (00:36 +0200)]
btrfs: move mapping of block for discard to its caller

There's a simple forwarded call based on the operation that would better
fit the caller btrfs_map_block that's until now a trivial wrapper.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: use struct_size to calculate size of raid hash table
David Sterba [Fri, 29 Mar 2019 01:07:02 +0000 (02:07 +0100)]
btrfs: use struct_size to calculate size of raid hash table

The struct_size macro does the same calculation and is safe regarding
overflows. Though we're not expecting them to happen, use the helper for
clarity.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: convert snapshot/nocow exlcusion to drew lock
Nikolay Borisov [Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:59:45 +0000 (14:59 +0200)]
btrfs: convert snapshot/nocow exlcusion to drew lock

This patch removes all haphazard code implementing nocow writers
exclusion from pending snapshot creation and switches to using the drew
lock to ensure this invariant still holds.

'Readers' are snapshot creators from create_snapshot and 'writers' are
nocow writers from buffered write path or btrfs_setsize. This locking
scheme allows for multiple snapshots to happen while any nocow writers
are blocked, since writes to page cache in the nocow path will make
snapshots inconsistent.

So for performance reasons we'd like to have the ability to run multiple
concurrent snapshots and also favors readers in this case. And in case
there aren't pending snapshots (which will be the majority of the cases)
we rely on the percpu's writers counter to avoid cacheline contention.

The main gain from using the drew lock is it's now a lot easier to
reason about the guarantees of the locking scheme and whether there is
some silent breakage lurking.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: Implement DREW lock
Nikolay Borisov [Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:59:44 +0000 (14:59 +0200)]
btrfs: Implement DREW lock

A (D)ouble (R)eader (W)riter (E)xclustion lock is a locking primitive
that allows to have multiple readers or multiple writers but not
multiple readers and writers holding it concurrently.

The code is factored out from the existing open-coded locking scheme
used to exclude pending snapshots from nocow writers and vice-versa.
Current implementation actually favors Readers (that is snapshot
creaters) to writers (nocow writers of the filesystem).

The API provides lock/unlock/trylock for reads and writes.

Formal specification for TLA+ provided by Valentin Schneider is at
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/2dcaf81c-f0d3-409e-cb29-733d8b3b4cc9@arm.com/

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 years agobtrfs: simplify error handling in __btrfs_write_out_cache()
Johannes Thumshirn [Tue, 11 Feb 2020 15:10:22 +0000 (00:10 +0900)]
btrfs: simplify error handling in __btrfs_write_out_cache()

The error cleanup gotos in __btrfs_write_out_cache() needlessly jump
back making the code less readable then needed.  Flatten them out so no
back-jump is necessary and the read flow is uninterrupted.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>