platform/kernel/linux-starfive.git
10 years agoRevert "btrfs: add ioctl to export size of global metadata reservation"
Chris Mason [Fri, 14 Feb 2014 21:42:13 +0000 (13:42 -0800)]
Revert "btrfs: add ioctl to export size of global metadata reservation"

This reverts commit 01e219e8069516cdb98594d417b8bb8d906ed30d.

David Sterba found a different way to provide these features without adding a new
ioctl.  We haven't released any progs with this ioctl yet, so I'm taking this out
for now until we finalize things.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
CC: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix data corruption when reading/updating compressed extents
Filipe David Borba Manana [Sat, 8 Feb 2014 15:47:46 +0000 (15:47 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix data corruption when reading/updating compressed extents

When using a mix of compressed file extents and prealloc extents, it
is possible to fill a page of a file with random, garbage data from
some unrelated previous use of the page, instead of a sequence of zeroes.

A simple sequence of steps to get into such case, taken from the test
case I made for xfstests, is:

   _scratch_mkfs
   _scratch_mount "-o compress-force=lzo"
   $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0x06 -b 18670 266978 18670" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar
   $XFS_IO_PROG -c "falloc 26450 665194" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar
   $XFS_IO_PROG -c "truncate 542872" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar
   $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar

This results in the following file items in the fs tree:

   item 4 key (257 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 15879 itemsize 160
       inode generation 6 transid 6 size 542872 block group 0 mode 100600
   item 5 key (257 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 15863 itemsize 16
       inode ref index 2 namelen 6 name: foobar
   item 6 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15810 itemsize 53
       extent data disk byte 0 nr 0 gen 6
       extent data offset 0 nr 24576 ram 266240
       extent compression 0
   item 7 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 24576) itemoff 15757 itemsize 53
       prealloc data disk byte 12849152 nr 241664 gen 6
       prealloc data offset 0 nr 241664
   item 8 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 266240) itemoff 15704 itemsize 53
       extent data disk byte 12845056 nr 4096 gen 6
       extent data offset 0 nr 20480 ram 20480
       extent compression 2
   item 9 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 286720) itemoff 15651 itemsize 53
       prealloc data disk byte 13090816 nr 405504 gen 6
       prealloc data offset 0 nr 258048

The on disk extent at offset 266240 (which corresponds to 1 single disk block),
contains 5 compressed chunks of file data. Each of the first 4 compress 4096
bytes of file data, while the last one only compresses 3024 bytes of file data.
Therefore a read into the file region [285648 ; 286720[ (length = 4096 - 3024 =
1072 bytes) should always return zeroes (our next extent is a prealloc one).

The solution here is the compression code path to zero the remaining (untouched)
bytes of the last page it uncompressed data into, as the information about how
much space the file data consumes in the last page is not known in the upper layer
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:__do_readpage(). In __do_readpage we were correctly zeroing
the remainder of the page but only if it corresponds to the last page of the inode
and if the inode's size is not a multiple of the page size.

This would cause not only returning random data on reads, but also permanently
storing random data when updating parts of the region that should be zeroed.
For the example above, it means updating a single byte in the region [285648 ; 286720[
would store that byte correctly but also store random data on disk.

A test case for xfstests follows soon.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: don't loop forever if we can't run because of the tree mod log
Josef Bacik [Fri, 7 Feb 2014 18:57:59 +0000 (13:57 -0500)]
Btrfs: don't loop forever if we can't run because of the tree mod log

A user reported a 100% cpu hang with my new delayed ref code.  Turns out I
forgot to increase the count check when we can't run a delayed ref because of
the tree mod log.  If we can't run any delayed refs during this there is no
point in continuing to look, and we need to break out.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: reserve no transaction units in btrfs_ioctl_set_features
David Sterba [Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:34:04 +0000 (14:34 +0100)]
btrfs: reserve no transaction units in btrfs_ioctl_set_features

Added in patch "btrfs: add ioctls to query/change feature bits online"
modifications to superblock don't need to reserve metadata blocks when
starting a transaction.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: commit transaction after setting label and features
Jeff Mahoney [Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:33:57 +0000 (14:33 +0100)]
btrfs: commit transaction after setting label and features

The set_fslabel ioctl uses btrfs_end_transaction, which means it's
possible that the change will be lost if the system crashes, same for
the newly set features. Let's use btrfs_commit_transaction instead.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix assert screwup for the pending move stuff
Josef Bacik [Wed, 5 Feb 2014 21:19:21 +0000 (16:19 -0500)]
Btrfs: fix assert screwup for the pending move stuff

Wang noticed that he was failing btrfs/030 even though me and Filipe couldn't
reproduce.  Turns out this is because Wang didn't have CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT set,
which meant that a key part of Filipe's original patch was not being built in.
This appears to be a mess up with merging Filipe's patch as it does not exist in
his original patch.  Fix this by changing how we make sure del_waiting_dir_move
asserts that it did not error and take the function out of the ifdef check.
This makes btrfs/030 pass with the assert on or off.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: use late_initcall instead of module_init
Filipe David Borba Manana [Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:27:56 +0000 (21:27 +0000)]
Btrfs: use late_initcall instead of module_init

It seems that when init_btrfs_fs() is called, crc32c/crc32c-intel might
not always be already initialized, which results in the call to crypto_alloc_shash()
returning -ENOENT, as experienced by Ahmet who reported this.

Therefore make sure init_btrfs_fs() is called after crc32c is initialized (which
is at initialization level 6, module_init), by using late_initcall (which is at
initialization level 7) instead of module_init for btrfs.

Reported-and-Tested-by: Ahmet Inan <ainan@mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: use btrfs_crc32c everywhere instead of libcrc32c
Filipe David Borba Manana [Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:06:04 +0000 (21:06 +0000)]
Btrfs: use btrfs_crc32c everywhere instead of libcrc32c

After the commit titled "Btrfs: fix btrfs boot when compiled as built-in",
LIBCRC32C requirement was removed from btrfs' Kconfig. This made it not
possible to build a kernel with btrfs enabled (either as module or built-in)
if libcrc32c is not enabled as well. So just replace all uses of libcrc32c
with the equivalent function in btrfs hash.h - btrfs_crc32c.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: disable snapshot aware defrag for now
Josef Bacik [Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:05:30 +0000 (16:05 -0500)]
Btrfs: disable snapshot aware defrag for now

It's just broken and it's taking a lot of effort to fix it, so for now just
disable it so people can defrag in peace.  Thanks,

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix spin_unlock in check_ref_cleanup
Chris Mason [Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:02:40 +0000 (07:02 -0800)]
Btrfs: fix spin_unlock in check_ref_cleanup

Our goto out should have gone a little farther.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: setup inode location during btrfs_init_inode_locked
Chris Mason [Fri, 10 Jan 2014 01:28:00 +0000 (17:28 -0800)]
Btrfs: setup inode location during btrfs_init_inode_locked

We have a race during inode init because the BTRFS_I(inode)->location is setup
after the inode hash table lock is dropped.  btrfs_find_actor uses the location
field, so our search might not find an existing inode in the hash table if we
race with the inode init code.

This commit changes things to setup the location field sooner.  Also the find actor now
uses only the location objectid to match inodes.  For inode hashing, we just
need a unique and stable test, it doesn't have to reflect the inode numbers we
show to userland.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
10 years agoBtrfs: don't use ram_bytes for uncompressed inline items
Chris Mason [Sat, 4 Jan 2014 05:07:00 +0000 (21:07 -0800)]
Btrfs: don't use ram_bytes for uncompressed inline items

If we truncate an uncompressed inline item, ram_bytes isn't updated to reflect
the new size.  The fixe uses the size directly from the item header when
reading uncompressed inlines, and also fixes truncate to update the
size as it goes.

Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
10 years agoBtrfs: fix btrfs_search_slot_for_read backwards iteration
Filipe David Borba Manana [Sat, 11 Jan 2014 21:28:54 +0000 (21:28 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix btrfs_search_slot_for_read backwards iteration

If the current path's leaf slot is 0, we do search for the previous
leaf (via btrfs_prev_leaf) and set the new path's leaf slot to a
value corresponding to the number of items - 1 of the former leaf.
Fix this by using the slot set by btrfs_prev_leaf, decrementing it
by 1 if it's equal to the leaf's number of items.

Use of btrfs_search_slot_for_read() for backward iteration is used in
particular by the send feature, which could miss items when the input
leaf has less items than its previous leaf.

This could be reproduced by running btrfs/007 from xfstests in a loop.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: do not export ulist functions
Wang Shilong [Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:25:35 +0000 (00:25 +0800)]
Btrfs: do not export ulist functions

There are not any users that use ulist except Btrfs,don't
export them.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: rework ulist with list+rb_tree
Wang Shilong [Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:25:34 +0000 (00:25 +0800)]
Btrfs: rework ulist with list+rb_tree

We are really suffering from now ulist's implementation, some developers
gave their try, and i just gave some of my ideas for things:

 1. use list+rb_tree instead of arrary+rb_tree

 2. add cur_list to iterator rather than ulist structure.

 3. add seqnum into every node when they are added, this is
 used to do selfcheck when iterating node.

I noticed Zach Brown's comments before, long term is to kick off
ulist implementation, however, for now, we need at least avoid
arrary from ulist.

Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix memory leaks on walking backrefs failure
Wang Shilong [Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:13:38 +0000 (19:13 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix memory leaks on walking backrefs failure

When walking backrefs, we may iterate every inode's extent
and add/merge them into ulist, and the caller will free memory
from ulist.

However, if we fail to allocate inode's extents element
memory or ulist_add() fail to allocate memory, we won't
add allocated memory into ulist, and the caller won't
free some allocated memory thus memory leaks happen.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix send file hole detection leading to data corruption
Filipe David Borba Manana [Tue, 28 Jan 2014 01:38:06 +0000 (01:38 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix send file hole detection leading to data corruption

There was a case where file hole detection was incorrect and it would
cause an incremental send to override a section of a file with zeroes.

This happened in the case where between the last leaf we processed which
contained a file extent item for our current inode and the leaf we're
currently are at (and has a file extent item for our current inode) there
are only leafs containing exclusively file extent items for our current
inode, and none of them was updated since the previous send operation.
The file hole detection code would incorrectly consider the file range
covered by these leafs as a hole.

A test case for xfstests follows soon.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: add a reschedule point in btrfs_find_all_roots()
Wang Shilong [Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:32:18 +0000 (22:32 +0800)]
Btrfs: add a reschedule point in btrfs_find_all_roots()

I can easily trigger the following warnings when enabling quota
in my virtual machine(running Opensuse), Steps are firstly creating
a subvolume full of fragment extents, and then create many snapshots
(500 in my test case).

[ 2362.808459] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [btrfs-qgroup-re:1970]

[ 2362.809023] task: e4af8450 ti: e371c000 task.ti: e371c000
[ 2362.809026] EIP: 0060:[<fa38f4ae>] EFLAGS: 00000246 CPU: 0
[ 2362.809049] EIP is at __merge_refs+0x5e/0x100 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809051] EAX: 00000000 EBX: cfadbcf0 ECX: 00000000 EDX: cfadbcb0
[ 2362.809052] ESI: dd8d3370 EDI: e371dde0 EBP: e371dd6c ESP: e371dd5c
[ 2362.809054]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
[ 2362.809055] CR0: 80050033 CR2: ac454d50 CR3: 009a9000 CR4: 001407d0
[ 2362.809099] Stack:
[ 2362.809100]  00000001 e371dde0 dfcc6890 f29f8000 e371de28 fa39016d 00000011 00000001
[ 2362.809105]  99bfc000 00000000 93928000 00000000 00000001 00000050 e371dda8 00000001
[ 2362.809109]  f3a31000 f3413000 00000001 e371ddb8 000040a8 00000202 00000000 00000023
[ 2362.809113] Call Trace:
[ 2362.809136]  [<fa39016d>] find_parent_nodes+0x34d/0x1280 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809156]  [<fa391172>] btrfs_find_all_roots+0xb2/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809174]  [<fa3934a8>] btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x358/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809180]  [<c024d0ce>] ? lock_timer_base.isra.39+0x1e/0x40
[ 2362.809199]  [<fa3648df>] worker_loop+0xff/0x470 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809204]  [<c027a88a>] ? __wake_up_locked+0x1a/0x20
[ 2362.809221]  [<fa3647e0>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x2b0/0x2b0 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809225]  [<c025ebbc>] kthread+0x9c/0xb0
[ 2362.809229]  [<c06b487b>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x30
[ 2362.809233]  [<c025eb20>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110

By adding a reschedule point at the end of btrfs_find_all_roots(), i no longer
hit these warnings.

Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: make send's file extent item search more efficient
Filipe David Borba Manana [Fri, 24 Jan 2014 17:42:09 +0000 (17:42 +0000)]
Btrfs: make send's file extent item search more efficient

Instead of looking for a file extent item, process it, release the path
and do a btree search for the next file extent item, just process all
file extent items in a leaf without intermediate btree searches. This way
we save cpu and we're not blocking other tasks or affecting concurrency on
the btree, because send's paths use the commit root and skip btree node/leaf
locking.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix to catch all errors when resolving indirect ref
Wang Shilong [Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:47:49 +0000 (13:47 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix to catch all errors when resolving indirect ref

We can only tolerate ENOENT here, for other errors, we should
return directly.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix protection between walking backrefs and root deletion
Wang Shilong [Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:47:48 +0000 (13:47 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix protection between walking backrefs and root deletion

There is a race condition between resolving indirect ref and root deletion,
and we should gurantee that root can not be destroyed to avoid accessing
broken tree here.

Here we fix it by holding @subvol_srcu, and we will release it as soon
as we have held root node lock.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: fix warning while merging two adjacent extents
Gui Hecheng [Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:41:09 +0000 (13:41 +0800)]
btrfs: fix warning while merging two adjacent extents

When we have two adjacent extents in relink_extent_backref,
we try to merge them. When we use btrfs_search_slot to locate the
slot for the current extent, we shouldn't set "ins_len = 1",
because we will merge it into the previous extent rather than
insert a new item. Otherwise, we may happen to create a new leaf
in btrfs_search_slot and path->slot[0] will be 0. Then we try to
fetch the previous item using "path->slots[0]--", and it will cause
a warning as follows:

[  145.713385] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1796 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:5043 map_private_extent_buffer+0xd4/0xe0
[  145.713387] btrfs bad mapping eb start 5337088 len 4096, wanted 167772306 8
...
[  145.713462]  [<ffffffffa034b1f4>] map_private_extent_buffer+0xd4/0xe0
[  145.713476]  [<ffffffffa030097a>] ? btrfs_free_path+0x2a/0x40
[  145.713485]  [<ffffffffa0340864>] btrfs_get_token_64+0x64/0xf0
[  145.713498]  [<ffffffffa033472c>] relink_extent_backref+0x41c/0x820
[  145.713508]  [<ffffffffa0334d69>] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x239/0xa80

I encounter this warning when running defrag having mkfs.btrfs
with option -M. At the same time there are read/writes & snapshots
running at background.

Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send
Filipe David Borba Manana [Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:00:53 +0000 (10:00 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send

The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes
that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the
caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the
one we're currently processing) were processed.

This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change
between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory
inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became
parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop,
which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc
warning being displayed in dmesg:

  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0()
  Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid
  CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G           O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3
  Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012
  [ 5381.660441]  00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007
  [ 5381.660447]  0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0
  [ 5381.660452]  0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0
  [ 5381.660457] Call Trace:
  [ 5381.660464]  [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68
  [ 5381.660471]  [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
  [ 5381.660476]  [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
  [ 5381.660480]  [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0
  [ 5381.660487]  [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60
  [ 5381.660491]  [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440
  [ 5381.660495]  [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60
  [ 5381.660502]  [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
  [ 5381.660508]  [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0
  [ 5381.660515]  [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0
  [ 5381.660520]  [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
  [ 5381.660524]  [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
  [ 5381.660530]  [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100
  [ 5381.660536]  [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230
  [ 5381.660560]  [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 5381.660564]  [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
  [ 5381.660569]  [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0
  [ 5381.660586]  [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 5381.660601]  [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs]
  [ 5381.660615]  [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs]
  [ 5381.660628]  [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs]

Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt
to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was
renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
  $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
  $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d
  $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2
  $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc
  $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
  $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send

The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is:

 .                       (ino 256)
 |-- a                   (ino 257)
     |-- b               (ino 258)
         |-- c           (ino 259)
         |   |-- d       (ino 260)
                 |
         |-- c2          (ino 261)

And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is:

 .                       (ino 256)
 |-- a                   (ino 257)
     |-- b               (ino 258)
         |-- c2          (ino 261)
             |-- d2      (ino 260)
                 |-- cc  (ino 259)

Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the
move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child
of 260.

A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: undo sysfs when open_ctree() fails
Anand Jain [Wed, 22 Jan 2014 03:15:51 +0000 (11:15 +0800)]
btrfs: undo sysfs when open_ctree() fails

reproducer:
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb &&\
mount /dev/sdb /btrfs &&\
btrfs dev add -f /dev/sdc /btrfs &&\
umount /btrfs &&\
wipefs -a /dev/sdc &&\
mount -o degraded /dev/sdb /btrfs
//above mount fails so try with RO
mount -o degraded,ro /dev/sdb /btrfs

------
sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/fs/btrfs/3f48c79e-5ed0-4e87-b189-86e749e503f4'
::

dump_stack+0x49/0x5e
warn_slowpath_common+0x87/0xb0
warn_slowpath_fmt+0x41/0x50
strlcat+0x69/0x80
sysfs_warn_dup+0x87/0xa0
sysfs_add_one+0x40/0x50
create_dir+0x76/0xc0
sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x7a/0xc0
kobject_add_internal+0xad/0x220
kobject_add_varg+0x38/0x60
kobject_init_and_add+0x53/0x70
mutex_lock+0x11/0x40
__free_pages+0x25/0x30
free_pages+0x41/0x50
selinux_sb_copy_data+0x14e/0x1e0
mount_fs+0x3e/0x1a0
vfs_kern_mount+0x71/0x120
do_mount+0x3f7/0x980
SyS_mount+0x8b/0xe0
system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
------

further 'modprobe -r btrfs' fails as well

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix snprintf usage by send's gen_unique_name
Filipe David Borba Manana [Tue, 21 Jan 2014 23:36:38 +0000 (23:36 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix snprintf usage by send's gen_unique_name

The buffer size argument passed to snprintf must account for the
trailing null byte added by snprintf, and it returns a value >= then
sizeof(buffer) when the string can't fit in the buffer.

Since our buffer has a size of 64 characters, and the maximum orphan
name we can generate is 63 characters wide, we must pass 64 as the
buffer size to snprintf, and not 63.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: fix defrag 32-bit integer overflow
Justin Maggard [Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:18:29 +0000 (11:18 -0800)]
btrfs: fix defrag 32-bit integer overflow

When defragging a very large file, the cluster variable can wrap its 32-bit
signed int type and become negative, which eventually gets passed to
btrfs_force_ra() as a very large unsigned long value.  On 32-bit platforms,
this eventually results in an Oops from the SLAB allocator.

Change the cluster and max_cluster signed int variables to unsigned long to
match the readahead functions.  This also allows the min() comparison in
btrfs_defrag_file() to work as intended.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: sysfs: list the NO_HOLES feature
David Sterba [Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:56:09 +0000 (18:56 +0100)]
btrfs: sysfs: list the NO_HOLES feature

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: sysfs: don't show reserved incompat feature
David Sterba [Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:56:06 +0000 (18:56 +0100)]
btrfs: sysfs: don't show reserved incompat feature

The COMPRESS_LZOv2 incompat featue is currently not implemented, the bit
is only reserved, no point to list it in sysfs.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: call permission checks earlier in ioctls and return EPERM
David Sterba [Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:50:22 +0000 (15:50 +0100)]
btrfs: call permission checks earlier in ioctls and return EPERM

The owner and capability checks in IOC_SUBVOL_SETFLAGS and
SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL should be called before any other checks are done.

Also unify the error code to EPERM.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: restrict snapshotting to own subvolumes
David Sterba [Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:15:52 +0000 (18:15 +0100)]
btrfs: restrict snapshotting to own subvolumes

Currently, any user can snapshot any subvolume if the path is accessible and
thus indirectly create and keep files he does not own under his direcotries.
This is not possible with traditional directories.

In security context, a user can snapshot root filesystem and pin any
potentially buggy binaries, even if the updates are applied.

All the snapshots are visible to the administrator, so it's possible to
verify if there are suspicious snapshots.

Another more practical problem is that any user can pin the space used
by eg. root and cause ENOSPC.

Original report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/484786

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix wrong block group in trace during the free space allocation
Miao Xie [Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:00:57 +0000 (20:00 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix wrong block group in trace during the free space allocation

We allocate the free space from the former block group, not the current
one, so should use the former one to output the trace information.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: cleanup the code of used_block_group in find_free_extent()
Miao Xie [Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:00:56 +0000 (20:00 +0800)]
Btrfs: cleanup the code of used_block_group in find_free_extent()

used_block_group is just used for the space cluster which doesn't
belong to the current block group, the other place needn't use it.
Or the logic of code seems unclear.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: cleanup the redundant code for the block group allocation and init
Miao Xie [Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:00:55 +0000 (20:00 +0800)]
Btrfs: cleanup the redundant code for the block group allocation and init

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: change the members' order of btrfs_space_info structure to reduce the cache...
Miao Xie [Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:00:54 +0000 (20:00 +0800)]
Btrfs: change the members' order of btrfs_space_info structure to reduce the cache miss

It is better that the position of the lock is close to the data which is
protected by it, because they may be in the same cache line, we will load
less cache lines when we access them. So we rearrange the members' position
of btrfs_space_info structure to make the lock be closer to the its data.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix wrong search path initialization before searching tree root
Wang Shilong [Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:26:43 +0000 (00:26 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix wrong search path initialization before searching tree root

To search tree root without transaction protection, we should neither search commit
root nor skip locking here, fix it.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: flush the dirty pages of the ordered extent aggressively during logging csum
Miao Xie [Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:31:52 +0000 (20:31 +0800)]
Btrfs: flush the dirty pages of the ordered extent aggressively during logging csum

The performance of fsync dropped down suddenly sometimes, the main reason
of this problem was that we might only flush part dirty pages in a ordered
extent, then got that ordered extent, wait for the csum calcucation. But if
no task flushed the left part, we would wait until the flusher flushed them,
sometimes we need wait for several seconds, it made the performance drop
down suddenly. (On my box, it drop down from 56MB/s to 4-10MB/s)

This patch improves the above problem by flushing left dirty pages aggressively.

Test Environment:
CPU: 2CPU * 2Cores
Memory: 4GB
Partition: 20GB(HDD)

Test Command:
 # sysbench --num-threads=8 --test=fileio --file-num=1 \
 > --file-total-size=8G --file-block-size=32768 \
 > --file-io-mode=sync --file-fsync-freq=100 \
 > --file-fsync-end=no --max-requests=10000 \
 > --file-test-mode=rndwr run

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix transaction abortion when remounting btrfs from RW to RO
Wang Shilong [Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:42:20 +0000 (19:42 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix transaction abortion when remounting btrfs from RW to RO

Steps to reproduce:
 # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sda8
 # mount /dev/sda8 /mnt -o flushoncommit
 # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/data bs=4k count=102400 &
 # mount /dev/sda8 /mnt -o remount, ro

When remounting RW to RO, the logic is to firstly set flag
to RO and then commit transaction, however with option
flushoncommit enabled,we will do RO check within committing
transaction, so we get a transaction abortion here.

Actually,here check is wrong, we should check if FS_STATE_ERROR
is set, fix it.

Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Suggested-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: faster file extent item search in clone ioctl
Filipe David Borba Manana [Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:35:01 +0000 (19:35 +0000)]
Btrfs: faster file extent item search in clone ioctl

When we are looking for file extent items that intersect the cloning
range, for each one that falls completely outside the range, don't
release the path and do another full tree search - just move on
to the next slot and copy the file extent item into our buffer only
if the item intersects the cloning range.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix extent state leak on transaction abortion
Liu Bo [Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:53:53 +0000 (19:53 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix extent state leak on transaction abortion

When transaction is aborted, we fail to commit transaction, instead we do
cleanup work.  After that when we umount btrfs, we get to free fs roots' log
trees respectively, but that happens after we unpin extents, so those extents
pinned by freeing log trees will remain in memory and lead to the leak.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Cleanup the btrfs_parse_options for remount.
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:36:07 +0000 (13:36 +0800)]
btrfs: Cleanup the btrfs_parse_options for remount.

Since remount will pending the new mount options to the original mount
options, which will make btrfs_parse_options check the old options then
new options, causing some stupid output like "enabling XXX" following by
"disable XXX".

This patch will add extra check before every btrfs_info to skip the
output from old options checking.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Add noinode_cache mount option
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:36:06 +0000 (13:36 +0800)]
btrfs: Add noinode_cache mount option

Add noinode_cache mount option for btrfs.

Since inode map cache involves all the btrfs_find_free_ino/return_ino
things and if just trigger the mount_opt,
an inode number get from inode map cache will not returned to inode map
cache.

To keep the find and return inode both in the same behavior,
a new bit in mount_opt, CHANGE_INODE_CACHE, is introduced for this idea.
CHANGE_INODE_CACHE is set/cleared in remounting, and the original
INODE_MAP_CACHE is set/cleared according to CHANGE_INODE_CACHE after a
success transaction.
Since find/return inode is all done between btrfs_start_transaction and
btrfs_commit_transaction, this will keep consistent behavior.

Also noinode_cache mount option will not stop the caching_kthread.

Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix to search previous metadata extent item since skinny metadata
Wang Shilong [Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:38:33 +0000 (21:38 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix to search previous metadata extent item since skinny metadata

There is a bug that using btrfs_previous_item() to search metadata extent item.
This is because in btrfs_previous_item(), we need type match, however, since
skinny metada was introduced by josef, we may mix this two types. So just
use btrfs_previous_item() is not working right.

To keep btrfs_previous_item() like normal tree search, i introduce another
function btrfs_previous_extent_item().

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix missing skinny metadata check in scrub_stripe()
Wang Shilong [Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:38:32 +0000 (21:38 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix missing skinny metadata check in scrub_stripe()

Check if we support skinny metadata firstly and fix to use
right type to search.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix send to not send non-aligned clone operations
Filipe David Borba Manana [Sun, 12 Jan 2014 02:26:28 +0000 (02:26 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix send to not send non-aligned clone operations

It is possible for the send feature to send clone operations that
request a cloning range (offset + length) that is not aligned with
the block size. This makes the btrfs receive command send issue a
clone ioctl call that will fail, as the ioctl will return an -EINVAL
error because of the unaligned range.

Fix this by not sending clone operations for non block aligned ranges,
and instead send regular write operation for these (less common) cases.

The following xfstest reproduces this issue, which fails on the second
btrfs receive command without this change:

  seq=`basename $0`
  seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
  echo "QA output created by $seq"

  tmp=`mktemp -d`

  status=1 # failure is the default!
  trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15

  _cleanup()
  {
      rm -fr $tmp
  }

  # get standard environment, filters and checks
  . ./common/rc
  . ./common/filter

  # real QA test starts here
  _supported_fs btrfs
  _supported_os Linux
  _require_scratch
  _need_to_be_root

  rm -f $seqres.full

  _scratch_mkfs >/dev/null 2>&1
  _scratch_mount

  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 819200" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch

  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "falloc -k 819200 667648" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch

  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite 1482752 2978" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 | \
      _filter_scratch

  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 883305" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 | \
      _filter_scratch

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $tmp/1.snap 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 \
      -f $tmp/2.snap 2>&1 | _filter_scratch

  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_scratch
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo | _filter_scratch
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo | _filter_scratch

  _scratch_unmount
  _check_btrfs_filesystem $SCRATCH_DEV
  _scratch_mkfs >/dev/null 2>&1
  _scratch_mount

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/1.snap
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo | _filter_scratch

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/2.snap
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo | _filter_scratch

  _scratch_unmount
  _check_btrfs_filesystem $SCRATCH_DEV

  status=0
  exit

The tests expected output is:

  QA output created by 025
  FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT'
  FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT'
  wrote 2978/2978 bytes at offset 1482752
  XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
  FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT'
  Create a readonly snapshot of 'SCRATCH_MNT' in 'SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1'
  FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT'
  Create a readonly snapshot of 'SCRATCH_MNT' in 'SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2'
  At subvol SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1
  At subvol SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2
  129b8eaee8d3c2bcad49bec596591cb3  SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  42b6369eae2a8725c1aacc0440e597aa  SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo
  129b8eaee8d3c2bcad49bec596591cb3  SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo
  At subvol mysnap1
  42b6369eae2a8725c1aacc0440e597aa  SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo
  At snapshot mysnap2
  129b8eaee8d3c2bcad49bec596591cb3  SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix btrfs boot when compiled as built-in
Filipe David Borba Manana [Sun, 12 Jan 2014 02:22:46 +0000 (02:22 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix btrfs boot when compiled as built-in

After the change titled "Btrfs: add support for inode properties", if
btrfs was built-in the kernel (i.e. not as a module), it would cause a
kernel panic, as reported recently by Fengguang:

[    2.024722] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at           (null)
[    2.027814] IP: [<ffffffff81501594>] crc32c+0xc/0x6b
[    2.028684] PGD 0
[    2.028684] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
[    2.028684] Modules linked in:
[    2.028684] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.13.0-rc7-04795-ga7b57c2 #1
[    2.028684] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[    2.028684] task: ffff88000edba100 ti: ffff88000edd6000 task.ti: ffff88000edd6000
[    2.028684] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81501594>]  [<ffffffff81501594>] crc32c+0xc/0x6b
[    2.028684] RSP: 0000:ffff88000edd7e58  EFLAGS: 00010246
[    2.028684] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82295550 RCX: 0000000000000000
[    2.028684] RDX: 0000000000000011 RSI: ffffffff81efe393 RDI: 00000000fffffffe
[    2.028684] RBP: ffff88000edd7e60 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000015d20
[    2.028684] R10: ffffffff81ef225e R11: ffffffff811b0222 R12: ffffffffffffffff
[    2.028684] R13: 0000000000000239 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[    2.028684] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88000fa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[    2.028684] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[    2.028684] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000000220c000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
[    2.028684] Stack:
[    2.028684]  ffffffff82295550 ffff88000edd7e80 ffffffff8238af62 ffffffff8238ac05
[    2.028684]  0000000000000000 ffff88000edd7e98 ffffffff8238ac0f ffffffff8238ac05
[    2.028684]  ffff88000edd7f08 ffffffff810002ba ffff88000edd7f00 ffffffff810e2404
[    2.028684] Call Trace:
[    2.028684]  [<ffffffff8238af62>] btrfs_props_init+0x4f/0x96
[    2.028684]  [<ffffffff8238ac05>] ? ftrace_define_fields_btrfs_space_reservation+0x145/0x145
[    2.028684]  [<ffffffff8238ac0f>] init_btrfs_fs+0xa/0xf0
[    2.028684]  [<ffffffff8238ac05>] ? ftrace_define_fields_btrfs_space_reservation+0x145/0x145
[    2.028684]  [<ffffffff810002ba>] do_one_initcall+0xa4/0x13a
[    2.028684]  [<ffffffff810e2404>] ? parse_args+0x25f/0x33d
[    2.028684]  [<ffffffff8234cf75>] kernel_init_freeable+0x1aa/0x230
[    2.028684]  [<ffffffff8234c785>] ? do_early_param+0x88/0x88
[    2.028684]  [<ffffffff819f61b5>] ? rest_init+0x89/0x89
[    2.028684]  [<ffffffff819f61c3>] kernel_init+0xe/0x109

The issue here is that the initialization function of btrfs (super.c:init_btrfs_fs)
started using crc32c (from lib/libcrc32c.c). But when it needs to call crc32c (as
part of the properties initialization routine), the libcrc32c is not yet initialized,
so crc32c derreferenced a NULL pointer (lib/libcrc32c.c:tfm), causing the kernel
panic on boot.

The approach to fix this is to use crypto component directly to use its crc32c (which
is basically what lib/libcrc32c.c is, a wrapper around crypto). This is what ext4 is
doing as well, it uses crypto directly to get crc32c functionality.

Verified this works both when btrfs is built-in and when it's loadable kernel module.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: unlock inodes in correct order in clone ioctl
Filipe David Borba Manana [Sat, 11 Jan 2014 21:31:25 +0000 (21:31 +0000)]
Btrfs: unlock inodes in correct order in clone ioctl

In the clone ioctl, when the source and target inodes are different,
we can acquire their mutexes in 2 possible different orders. After
we're done cloning, we were releasing the mutexes always in the same
order - the most correct way of doing it is to release them by the
reverse order they were acquired.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: optimize to remove unnecessary removal with ulist reallocation
Wang Shilong [Fri, 10 Jan 2014 13:25:46 +0000 (21:25 +0800)]
Btrfs: optimize to remove unnecessary removal with ulist reallocation

Here we are not going to free memory, no need to remove every node
one by one, just init root node here is ok.

Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: release subvolume's block_rsv before transaction commit
Liu Bo [Thu, 9 Jan 2014 06:57:06 +0000 (14:57 +0800)]
Btrfs: release subvolume's block_rsv before transaction commit

We don't have to keep subvolume's block_rsv during transaction commit,
and within transaction commit, we may also need the free space reclaimed
from this block_rsv to process delayed refs.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix the race between write back and nocow buffered write
Miao Xie [Thu, 9 Jan 2014 02:06:10 +0000 (10:06 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix the race between write back and nocow buffered write

When we ran the 274th case of xfstests with nodatacow mount option,
We met the following warning message:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 14185 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3734 btrfs_free_reserved_data_space+0xa6/0xd0

It is caused by the race between the write back and nocow buffered
write:
  Task1 Task2
  __btrfs_buffered_write()
    skip data reservation
    reserve the metadata space
    copy the data
    dirty the pages
    unlock the pages
write back the pages
release the data space
      becasue there is no
  noreserve flag
   set the noreserve flag

This patch fixes this problem by unlocking the pages after
the noreserve flag is set.

Reported-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: only process as many file extents as there are refs
Josef Bacik [Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:05:42 +0000 (14:05 -0500)]
Btrfs: only process as many file extents as there are refs

The backref walking code will search down to the key it is looking for and then
proceed to walk _all_ of the extents on the file until it hits the end.  This is
suboptimal with large files, we only need to look for as many extents as we have
references for that inode.  I have a testcase that creates a randomly written 4
gig file and before this patch it took 6min 30sec to do the initial send, with
this patch it takes 2min 30sec to do the intial send.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix qgroup rescan to work with skinny metadata
Josef Bacik [Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:45:10 +0000 (16:45 -0500)]
Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan to work with skinny metadata

Could have sworn I fixed this before but apparently not.  This makes us pass
btrfs/022 with skinny metadata enabled.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix extent_from_logical to deal with skinny metadata
Josef Bacik [Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:03:45 +0000 (16:03 -0500)]
Btrfs: fix extent_from_logical to deal with skinny metadata

I don't think this is an issue and I've not seen it in practice but
extent_from_logical will fail to find a skinny extent because it uses
btrfs_previous_item and gives it the normal extent item type.  This is just not
a place to use btrfs_previous_item since we care about either normal extents or
skinny extents, so open code btrfs_previous_item to properly check.  This would
only affect metadata and the only place this is used for metadata is scrub and
I'm pretty sure it's just for printing stuff out, not actually doing any work so
hopefully it was never a problem other than a cosmetic one.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: throttle delayed refs better
Josef Bacik [Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:54:11 +0000 (10:54 -0500)]
Btrfs: throttle delayed refs better

On one of our gluster clusters we noticed some pretty big lag spikes.  This
turned out to be because our transaction commit was taking like 3 minutes to
complete.  This is because we have like 30 gigs of metadata, so our global
reserve would end up being the max which is like 512 mb.  So our throttling code
would allow a ridiculous amount of delayed refs to build up and then they'd all
get run at transaction commit time, and for a cold mounted file system that
could take up to 3 minutes to run.  So fix the throttling to be based on both
the size of the global reserve and how long it takes us to run delayed refs.
This patch tracks the time it takes to run delayed refs and then only allows 1
seconds worth of outstanding delayed refs at a time.  This way it will auto-tune
itself from cold cache up to when everything is in memory and it no longer has
to go to disk.  This makes our transaction commits take much less time to run.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: attach delayed ref updates to delayed ref heads
Josef Bacik [Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:21:38 +0000 (09:21 -0500)]
Btrfs: attach delayed ref updates to delayed ref heads

Currently we have two rb-trees, one for delayed ref heads and one for all of the
delayed refs, including the delayed ref heads.  When we process the delayed refs
we have to hold onto the delayed ref lock for all of the selecting and merging
and such, which results in quite a bit of lock contention.  This was solved by
having a waitqueue and only one flusher at a time, however this hurts if we get
a lot of delayed refs queued up.

So instead just have an rb tree for the delayed ref heads, and then attach the
delayed ref updates to an rb tree that is per delayed ref head.  Then we only
need to take the delayed ref lock when adding new delayed refs and when
selecting a delayed ref head to process, all the rest of the time we deal with a
per delayed ref head lock which will be much less contentious.

The locking rules for this get a little more complicated since we have to lock
up to 3 things to properly process delayed refs, but I will address that problem
later.  For now this passes all of xfstests and my overnight stress tests.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: make fsync latency less sucky
Josef Bacik [Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:34:13 +0000 (13:34 -0500)]
Btrfs: make fsync latency less sucky

Looking into some performance related issues with large amounts of metadata
revealed that we can have some pretty huge swings in fsync() performance.  If we
have a lot of delayed refs backed up (as you will tend to do with lots of
metadata) fsync() will wander off and try to run some of those delayed refs
which can result in reading from disk and such.  Since the actual act of fsync()
doesn't create any delayed refs there is no need to make it throttle on delayed
ref stuff, that will be handled by other people.  With this patch we get much
smoother fsync performance with large amounts of metadata.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: add support for inode properties
Filipe David Borba Manana [Tue, 7 Jan 2014 11:47:46 +0000 (11:47 +0000)]
Btrfs: add support for inode properties

This change adds infrastructure to allow for generic properties for
inodes. Properties are name/value pairs that can be associated with
inodes for different purposes. They are stored as xattrs with the
prefix "btrfs."

Properties can be inherited - this means when a directory inode has
inheritable properties set, these are added to new inodes created
under that directory. Further, subvolumes can also have properties
associated with them, and they can be inherited from their parent
subvolume. Naturally, directory properties have priority over subvolume
properties (in practice a subvolume property is just a regular
property associated with the root inode, objectid 256, of the
subvolume's fs tree).

This change also adds one specific property implementation, named
"compression", whose values can be "lzo" or "zlib" and it's an
inheritable property.

The corresponding changes to btrfs-progs were also implemented.
A patch with xfstests for this feature will follow once there's
agreement on this change/feature.

Further, the script at the bottom of this commit message was used to
do some benchmarks to measure any performance penalties of this feature.

Basically the tests correspond to:

Test 1 - create a filesystem and mount it with compress-force=lzo,
then sequentially create N files of 64Kb each, measure how long it took
to create the files, unmount the filesystem, mount the filesystem and
perform an 'ls -lha' against the test directory holding the N files, and
report the time the command took.

Test 2 - create a filesystem and don't use any compression option when
mounting it - instead set the compression property of the subvolume's
root to 'lzo'. Then create N files of 64Kb, and report the time it took.
The unmount the filesystem, mount it again and perform an 'ls -lha' like
in the former test. This means every single file ends up with a property
(xattr) associated to it.

Test 3 - same as test 2, but uses 4 properties - 3 are duplicates of the
compression property, have no real effect other than adding more work
when inheriting properties and taking more btree leaf space.

Test 4 - same as test 3 but with 10 properties per file.

Results (in seconds, and averages of 5 runs each), for different N
numbers of files follow.

* Without properties (test 1)

                    file creation time        ls -lha time
10 000 files              3.49                   0.76
100 000 files            47.19                   8.37
1 000 000 files         518.51                 107.06

* With 1 property (compression property set to lzo - test 2)

                    file creation time        ls -lha time
10 000 files              3.63                    0.93
100 000 files            48.56                    9.74
1 000 000 files         537.72                  125.11

* With 4 properties (test 3)

                    file creation time        ls -lha time
10 000 files              3.94                    1.20
100 000 files            52.14                   11.48
1 000 000 files         572.70                  142.13

* With 10 properties (test 4)

                    file creation time        ls -lha time
10 000 files              4.61                    1.35
100 000 files            58.86                   13.83
1 000 000 files         656.01                  177.61

The increased latencies with properties are essencialy because of:

*) When creating an inode, we now synchronously write 1 more item
   (an xattr item) for each property inherited from the parent dir
   (or subvolume). This could be done in an asynchronous way such
   as we do for dir intex items (delayed-inode.c), which could help
   reduce the file creation latency;

*) With properties, we now have larger fs trees. For this particular
   test each xattr item uses 75 bytes of leaf space in the fs tree.
   This could be less by using a new item for xattr items, instead of
   the current btrfs_dir_item, since we could cut the 'location' and
   'type' fields (saving 18 bytes) and maybe 'transid' too (saving a
   total of 26 bytes per xattr item) from the btrfs_dir_item type.

Also tried batching the xattr insertions (ignoring proper hash
collision handling, since it didn't exist) when creating files that
inherit properties from their parent inode/subvolume, but the end
results were (surprisingly) essentially the same.

Test script:

$ cat test.pl
  #!/usr/bin/perl -w

  use strict;
  use Time::HiRes qw(time);
  use constant NUM_FILES => 10_000;
  use constant FILE_SIZES => (64 * 1024);
  use constant DEV => '/dev/sdb4';
  use constant MNT_POINT => '/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/dev';
  use constant TEST_DIR => (MNT_POINT . '/testdir');

  system("mkfs.btrfs", "-l", "16384", "-f", DEV) == 0 or die "mkfs.btrfs failed!";

  # following line for testing without properties
  #system("mount", "-o", "compress-force=lzo", DEV, MNT_POINT) == 0 or die "mount failed!";

  # following 2 lines for testing with properties
  system("mount", DEV, MNT_POINT) == 0 or die "mount failed!";
  system("btrfs", "prop", "set", MNT_POINT, "compression", "lzo") == 0 or die "set prop failed!";

  system("mkdir", TEST_DIR) == 0 or die "mkdir failed!";
  my ($t1, $t2);

  $t1 = time();
  for (my $i = 1; $i <= NUM_FILES; $i++) {
      my $p = TEST_DIR . '/file_' . $i;
      open(my $f, '>', $p) or die "Error opening file!";
      $f->autoflush(1);
      for (my $j = 0; $j < FILE_SIZES; $j += 4096) {
          print $f ('A' x 4096) or die "Error writing to file!";
      }
      close($f);
  }
  $t2 = time();
  print "Time to create " . NUM_FILES . ": " . ($t2 - $t1) . " seconds.\n";
  system("umount", DEV) == 0 or die "umount failed!";
  system("mount", DEV, MNT_POINT) == 0 or die "mount failed!";

  $t1 = time();
  system("bash -c 'ls -lha " . TEST_DIR . " > /dev/null'") == 0 or die "ls failed!";
  $t2 = time();
  print "Time to ls -lha all files: " . ($t2 - $t1) . " seconds.\n";
  system("umount", DEV) == 0 or die "umount failed!";

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: faster file extent item replace operations
Filipe David Borba Manana [Tue, 7 Jan 2014 11:42:27 +0000 (11:42 +0000)]
Btrfs: faster file extent item replace operations

When writing to a file we drop existing file extent items that cover the
write range and then add a new file extent item that represents that write
range.

Before this change we were doing a tree lookup to remove the file extent
items, and then after we did another tree lookup to insert the new file
extent item.
Most of the time all the file extent items we need to drop are located
within a single leaf - this is the leaf where our new file extent item ends
up at. Therefore, in this common case just combine these 2 operations into
a single one.

By avoiding the second btree navigation for insertion of the new file extent
item, we reduce btree node/leaf lock acquisitions/releases, btree block/leaf
COW operations, CPU time on btree node/leaf key binary searches, etc.

Besides for file writes, this is an operation that happens for file fsync's
as well. However log btrees are much less likely to big as big as regular
fs btrees, therefore the impact of this change is smaller.

The following benchmark was performed against an SSD drive and a
HDD drive, both for random and sequential writes:

  sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=4096 --file-total-size=8G \
     --file-test-mode=[rndwr|seqwr] --num-threads=512 \
     --file-block-size=8192 \ --max-requests=1000000 \
     --file-fsync-freq=0 --file-io-mode=sync [prepare|run]

All results below are averages of 10 runs of the respective test.

** SSD sequential writes

Before this change: 225.88 Mb/sec
After this change:  277.26 Mb/sec

** SSD random writes

Before this change: 49.91 Mb/sec
After this change:  56.39 Mb/sec

** HDD sequential writes

Before this change: 68.53 Mb/sec
After this change:  69.87 Mb/sec

** HDD random writes

Before this change: 13.04 Mb/sec
After this change:  14.39 Mb/sec

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: handle EAGAIN case properly in btrfs_drop_snapshot()
Wang Shilong [Tue, 7 Jan 2014 09:26:58 +0000 (17:26 +0800)]
Btrfs: handle EAGAIN case properly in btrfs_drop_snapshot()

We may return early in btrfs_drop_snapshot(), we shouldn't
call btrfs_std_err() for this case, fix it.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: remove unnecessary transaction commit before send
Wang Shilong [Tue, 7 Jan 2014 09:26:57 +0000 (17:26 +0800)]
Btrfs: remove unnecessary transaction commit before send

We will finish orphan cleanups during snapshot, so we don't
have to commit transaction here.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix protection between send and root deletion
Wang Shilong [Tue, 7 Jan 2014 09:25:19 +0000 (17:25 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix protection between send and root deletion

We should gurantee that parent and clone roots can not be destroyed
during send, for this we have two ideas.

1.by holding @subvol_sem, this might be a nightmare, because it will
block all subvolumes deletion for a long time.

2.Miao pointed out we can reuse @send_in_progress, that mean we will
skip snapshot deletion if root sending is in progress.

Here we adopt the second approach since it won't block other subvolumes
deletion for a long time.

Besides in btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot(), we only check first root
, if this root is involved in send, we return directly rather than
continue to check.There are several reasons about it:

1.this case happen seldomly.
2.after sending,cleaner thread can continue to drop that root.
3.make code simple

Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix wrong send_in_progress accounting
Wang Shilong [Tue, 7 Jan 2014 09:25:18 +0000 (17:25 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix wrong send_in_progress accounting

Steps to reproduce:
 # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sda8
 # mount /dev/sda8 /mnt
 # btrfs sub snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
 # btrfs sub snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
 # btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -p /mnt/snap2 -f /mnt/1
 # dmesg

The problem is that we will sort clone roots(include @send_root), it
might push @send_root before thus @send_root's @send_in_progress will
be decreased twice.

Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Add treelog mount option.
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 6 Jan 2014 01:58:33 +0000 (09:58 +0800)]
btrfs: Add treelog mount option.

Add treelog mount option to enable tree log with
remount option.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Add datasum mount option.
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 6 Jan 2014 01:58:32 +0000 (09:58 +0800)]
btrfs: Add datasum mount option.

Add datasum mount option to enable checksum with
remount option.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Add datacow mount option.
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 6 Jan 2014 01:58:31 +0000 (09:58 +0800)]
btrfs: Add datacow mount option.

Add datacow mount option to enable copy-on-write with
remount option.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Add acl mount option.
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 6 Jan 2014 01:58:30 +0000 (09:58 +0800)]
btrfs: Add acl mount option.

Add acl mount option to enable acl with remount option.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Add noflushoncommit mount option.
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 6 Jan 2014 01:58:29 +0000 (09:58 +0800)]
btrfs: Add noflushoncommit mount option.

Add noflushoncommit mount option to disable flush on commit with
remount option.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Add noenospc_debug mount option.
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 6 Jan 2014 01:58:28 +0000 (09:58 +0800)]
btrfs: Add noenospc_debug mount option.

Add noenospc_debug mount option to disable ENOSPC debug with
remount option.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Add nodiscard mount option.
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 6 Jan 2014 01:58:27 +0000 (09:58 +0800)]
btrfs: Add nodiscard mount option.

Add nodiscard mount option to disable discard with remount option.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Add noautodefrag mount option.
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 6 Jan 2014 01:58:26 +0000 (09:58 +0800)]
btrfs: Add noautodefrag mount option.

Btrfs has autodefrag mount option but no pairing noautodefrag option,
which makes it impossible to disable autodefrag without umount.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Add "barrier" option to support "-o remount,barrier"
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 6 Jan 2014 01:58:25 +0000 (09:58 +0800)]
btrfs: Add "barrier" option to support "-o remount,barrier"

Btrfs can be remounted without barrier, but there is no "barrier" option
so nobody can remount btrfs back with barrier on. Only umount and
mount again can re-enable barrier.(Quite awkward)

Also the mount options in the document is also changed slightly for the
further pairing options changes.

Reported-by: Daniel Blueman <daniel@quora.org>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Fleetwood <mike.fleetwood@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: only fua the first superblock when writting supers
Wang Shilong [Fri, 3 Jan 2014 10:22:57 +0000 (18:22 +0800)]
Btrfs: only fua the first superblock when writting supers

We only intent to fua the first superblock in every device from
comments, fix it.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: return free space to global_rsv as much as possible
Liu Bo [Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:44:50 +0000 (21:44 +0800)]
Btrfs: return free space to global_rsv as much as possible

@full is not protected within global_rsv.lock, so we may think global_rsv
is already full but in fact it's not, so we miss the opportunity to return
free space to global_rsv directly when we release other block_rsvs.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix an oops when we fail to relocate tree blocks
Wang Shilong [Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:52:39 +0000 (19:52 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix an oops when we fail to relocate tree blocks

During balance test, we hit an oops:
[ 2013.841551] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1174!

The problem is that if we fail to relocate tree blocks, we should
update backref cache, otherwise, some pending nodes are not updated
while snapshot check @cache->last_trans is within one transaction
and won't update it and then oops happen.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix the wrong nocow range check
Miao Xie [Fri, 27 Dec 2013 13:11:50 +0000 (21:11 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix the wrong nocow range check

The following warning message was outputed when running the 274th case
of xfstests with nodatacow option:
 BUG: Bad page state in process kswapd0  pfn:1c66f
 page:ffffea0000636848 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:(null) index:0x78000
 page flags: 0x1000000000100a(error|uptodate|private_2)

It is because the check of nocow range was wrong, we should compare the
start and end position of the extent with the write position to verify
if the write position was in the extent, but the current code just used
the start postion to do the check, so we got the wrong extent and told
the caller that it was a nocow write. And then when we write back the
dirty pages, we found we should cow the extent, but at that time, there
was no space in the fs, we had to the error flag for the page. When
someone reclaimed that page, the above warning outputed. Fix it.

Reported-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix an oops when we fail to merge reloc roots
Wang Shilong [Thu, 26 Dec 2013 05:10:50 +0000 (13:10 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix an oops when we fail to merge reloc roots

Previously, we will free reloc root memory and then force filesystem
to be readonly. The problem is that there may be another thread commiting
transaction which will try to access freed reloc root during merging reloc
roots process.

To keep consistency snapshots shared space, we should allow snapshot
finished if possible, so here we don't free reloc root memory.

signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: remove unused argument from select_reloc_root()
Wang Shilong [Thu, 26 Dec 2013 05:10:49 +0000 (13:10 +0800)]
Btrfs: remove unused argument from select_reloc_root()

@nr is no longer used, remove it from select_reloc_root()

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: reduce btree node locking duration on item update
Filipe David Borba Manana [Mon, 23 Dec 2013 11:53:02 +0000 (11:53 +0000)]
Btrfs: reduce btree node locking duration on item update

If we do a btree search with the goal of updating an existing item
without changing its size (ins_len == 0 and cow == 1), then we never
need to hold locks on upper level nodes (even when slot == 0) after we
COW their child nodes/leaves, as we won't have node splits or merges
in this scenario (that is, no key additions, removals or shifts on any
nodes or leaves).

Therefore release the locks immediately after COWing the child nodes/leaves
while navigating the btree, even if their parent slot is 0, instead of
returning a path to the caller with those nodes locked, which would get
released only when the caller releases or frees the path (or if it calls
btrfs_unlock_up_safe).

This is a common scenario, for example when updating inode items in fs
trees and block group items in the extent tree.

The following benchmarks were performed on a quad core machine with 32Gb
of ram, using a leaf/node size of 4Kb (to generate deeper fs trees more
quickly).

  sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=131072 --file-total-size=8G \
    --file-test-mode=seqwr --num-threads=512 --file-block-size=8192 \
    --max-requests=100000 --file-io-mode=sync [prepare|run]

Before this change:  49.85Mb/s (average of 5 runs)
After this change:   50.38Mb/s (average of 5 runs)

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agofs/btrfs: Integer overflow in btrfs_ioctl_resize()
Wenliang Fan [Fri, 20 Dec 2013 07:28:56 +0000 (15:28 +0800)]
fs/btrfs: Integer overflow in btrfs_ioctl_resize()

The local variable 'new_size' comes from userspace. If a large number
was passed, there would be an integer overflow in the following line:
new_size = old_size + new_size;

Signed-off-by: Wenliang Fan <fanwlexca@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: stop caching thread if extent_commit_sem is contended
Josef Bacik [Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:02:11 +0000 (10:02 -0400)]
Btrfs: stop caching thread if extent_commit_sem is contended

We can starve out the transaction commit with a bunch of caching threads all
running at the same time.  This is because we will only drop the
extent_commit_sem if we need_resched(), which isn't likely to happen since we
will be reading a lot from the disk so have already schedule()'ed plenty.  Alex
observed that he could starve out a transaction commit for up to a minute with
32 caching threads all running at once.  This will allow us to drop the
extent_commit_sem to allow the transaction commit to swap the commit_root out
and then all the cachers will start back up. Here is an explanation provided by
Igno

So, just to fill in what happens in this loop:

                                mutex_unlock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
                                cond_resched();
                                goto again;

where 'again:' takes caching_ctl->mutex and fs_info->extent_commit_sem
again:

        again:
                mutex_lock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
                /* need to make sure the commit_root doesn't disappear */
                down_read(&fs_info->extent_commit_sem);

So, if I'm reading the code correct, there can be a fair amount of
concurrency here: there may be multiple 'caching kthreads' per filesystem
active, while there's one fs_info->extent_commit_sem per filesystem
AFAICS.

So, what happens if there are a lot of CPUs all busy holding the
->extent_commit_sem rwsem read-locked and a writer arrives? They'd all
rush to try to release the fs_info->extent_commit_sem, and they'd block in
the down_read() because there's a writer waiting.

So there's a guarantee of forward progress. This should answer akpm's
concern I think.

Thanks,

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agorwsem: add rwsem_is_contended
Josef Bacik [Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:05:22 +0000 (10:05 -0400)]
rwsem: add rwsem_is_contended

Btrfs needs a simple way to know if it needs to let go of it's read lock on a
rwsem.  Introduce rwsem_is_contended to check to see if there are any waiters on
this rwsem currently.  This is just a hueristic, it is meant to be light and not
100% accurate and called by somebody already holding on to the rwsem in either
read or write.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
10 years agoBtrfs: introduce the delayed inode ref deletion for the single link inode
Miao Xie [Thu, 26 Dec 2013 05:07:06 +0000 (13:07 +0800)]
Btrfs: introduce the delayed inode ref deletion for the single link inode

The inode reference item is close to inode item, so we insert it simultaneously
with the inode item insertion when we create a file/directory.. In fact, we also
can handle the inode reference deletion by the same way. So we made this patch to
introduce the delayed inode reference deletion for the single link inode(At most
case, the file doesn't has hard link, so we don't take the hard link into account).

This function is based on the delayed inode mechanism. After applying this patch,
we can reduce the time of the file/directory deletion by ~10%.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: use flags instead of the bool variants in delayed node
Miao Xie [Thu, 26 Dec 2013 05:07:05 +0000 (13:07 +0800)]
Btrfs: use flags instead of the bool variants in delayed node

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: remove btrfs_end_transaction_dmeta()
Miao Xie [Thu, 26 Dec 2013 05:07:04 +0000 (13:07 +0800)]
Btrfs: remove btrfs_end_transaction_dmeta()

Two reasons:
- btrfs_end_transaction_dmeta() is the same as btrfs_end_transaction_throttle()
  so it is unnecessary.
- All the delayed items should be dealt in the current transaction, so the
  workers should not commit the transaction, instead, deal with the delayed
  items as many as possible.

So we can remove btrfs_end_transaction_dmeta()

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: cleanup code of btrfs_balance_delayed_items()
Miao Xie [Thu, 26 Dec 2013 05:07:03 +0000 (13:07 +0800)]
Btrfs: cleanup code of btrfs_balance_delayed_items()

- move the condition check for wait into a function
- use wait_event_interruptible instead of prepare-schedule-finish process

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: don't run delayed nodes again after all nodes flush
Miao Xie [Thu, 26 Dec 2013 05:07:02 +0000 (13:07 +0800)]
Btrfs: don't run delayed nodes again after all nodes flush

If the number of the delayed items is greater than the upper limit, we will
try to flush all the delayed items. After that, it is unnecessary to run
them again because they are being dealt with by the wokers or the number of
them is less than the lower limit.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: remove residual code in delayed inode async helper
Miao Xie [Thu, 26 Dec 2013 05:07:01 +0000 (13:07 +0800)]
Btrfs: remove residual code in delayed inode async helper

Before applying the patch
  commit de3cb945db4d8eb3b046dc7a5ea89a893372750c
  title: Btrfs: improve the delayed inode throttling

We need requeue the async work after the current work was done, it
introduced a deadlock problem. So we wrote the code that this patch
removes to avoid the above problem. But after applying the above
patch, the deadlock problem didn't exist. So we should remove that
fix code.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: convert printk to btrfs_ and fix BTRFS prefix
Frank Holton [Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:37:06 +0000 (11:37 -0500)]
Btrfs: convert printk to btrfs_ and fix BTRFS prefix

Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros.

Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix.

Signed-off-by: Frank Holton <fholton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix tree mod logging
Filipe David Borba Manana [Fri, 20 Dec 2013 15:17:46 +0000 (15:17 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix tree mod logging

While running the test btrfs/004 from xfstests in a loop, it failed
about 1 time out of 20 runs in my desktop. The failure happened in
the backref walking part of the test, and the test's error message was
like this:

  btrfs/004 93s ... [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad)
      --- tests/btrfs/004.out 2013-11-26 18:25:29.263333714 +0000
      +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad 2013-12-10 15:25:10.327518516 +0000
      @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
       QA output created by 004
       *** test backref walking
      -*** done
      +unexpected output from
      + /home/fdmanana/git/hub/btrfs-progs/btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve -P 141512704 /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1
      +expected inum: 405, expected address: 454656, file: /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1/snap1/p0/d6/d3d/d156/fce, got:
      +
       ...
       (Run 'diff -u tests/btrfs/004.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
  Ran: btrfs/004
  Failures: btrfs/004
  Failed 1 of 1 tests

But immediately after the test finished, the btrfs inspect-internal command
returned the expected output:

  $ btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve -P 141512704 /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1
  inode 405 offset 454656 root 258
  inode 405 offset 454656 root 5

It turned out this was because the btrfs_search_old_slot() calls performed
during backref walking (backref.c:__resolve_indirect_ref) were not finding
anything. The reason for this turned out to be that the tree mod logging
code was not logging some node multi-step operations atomically, therefore
btrfs_search_old_slot() callers iterated often over an incomplete tree that
wasn't fully consistent with any tree state from the past. Besides missing
items, this often (but not always) resulted in -EIO errors during old slot
searches, reported in dmesg like this:

[ 4299.933936] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 4299.933949] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 23190 at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1343 btrfs_search_old_slot+0x57b/0xab0 [btrfs]()
[ 4299.933950] Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) bnep rfcomm bluetooth parport_pc ppdev binfmt_misc joydev snd_hda_codec_h
[ 4299.933977] CPU: 0 PID: 23190 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
[ 4299.933978] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012
[ 4299.933979]  000000000000053f ffff8806f3fd98f8 ffffffff8176d284 0000000000000007
[ 4299.933982]  0000000000000000 ffff8806f3fd9938 ffffffff8104a81c ffff880659c64b70
[ 4299.933984]  ffff880659c643d0 ffff8806599233d8 ffff880701e2e938 0000160000000000
[ 4299.933987] Call Trace:
[ 4299.933991]  [<ffffffff8176d284>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76
[ 4299.933994]  [<ffffffff8104a81c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
[ 4299.933997]  [<ffffffff8104a86a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
[ 4299.934003]  [<ffffffffa065d3bb>] btrfs_search_old_slot+0x57b/0xab0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934005]  [<ffffffff81775f3b>] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x2b/0x50
[ 4299.934010]  [<ffffffffa0655001>] ? __tree_mod_log_search+0x81/0xc0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934019]  [<ffffffffa06dd9b0>] __resolve_indirect_refs+0x130/0x5f0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934027]  [<ffffffffa06a21f1>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x61/0xc0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934034]  [<ffffffffa06de39c>] find_parent_nodes+0x1fc/0xe40 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934042]  [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934048]  [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934056]  [<ffffffffa06df980>] iterate_extent_inodes+0xe0/0x250 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934058]  [<ffffffff817762db>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x50
[ 4299.934065]  [<ffffffffa06dfb82>] iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x92/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934071]  [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934078]  [<ffffffffa06b7015>] btrfs_ioctl+0xf65/0x1f60 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934080]  [<ffffffff811658b8>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x278/0xb00
[ 4299.934083]  [<ffffffff81075563>] ? up_read+0x23/0x40
[ 4299.934085]  [<ffffffff8177a41c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x20c/0x5a0
[ 4299.934088]  [<ffffffff811b2946>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x570
[ 4299.934090]  [<ffffffff81776e23>] ? error_sti+0x5/0x6
[ 4299.934093]  [<ffffffff810b71e8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0
[ 4299.934096]  [<ffffffff81776a09>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13
[ 4299.934098]  [<ffffffff811b2eb1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0
[ 4299.934100]  [<ffffffff813eecde>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[ 4299.934102]  [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 4299.934102]  [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 4299.934104] ---[ end trace 48f0cfc902491414 ]---
[ 4299.934378] btrfs bad fsid on block 0

These tree mod log operations that must be performed atomically, tree_mod_log_free_eb,
tree_mod_log_eb_copy, tree_mod_log_insert_root and tree_mod_log_insert_move, used to
be performed atomically before the following commit:

  c8cc6341653721b54760480b0d0d9b5f09b46741
  (Btrfs: stop using GFP_ATOMIC for the tree mod log allocations)

That change removed the atomicity of such operations. This patch restores the
atomicity while still not doing the GFP_ATOMIC allocations of tree_mod_elem
structures, so it has to do the allocations using GFP_NOFS before acquiring
the mod log lock.

This issue has been experienced by several users recently, such as for example:

  http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg28574.html

After running the btrfs/004 test for 679 consecutive iterations with this
patch applied, I didn't ran into the issue anymore.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: check balance of send_in_progress
David Sterba [Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:07:20 +0000 (15:07 +0100)]
btrfs: check balance of send_in_progress

Warn if the balance goes below zero, which appears to be unlikely
though. Otherwise cleans up the code a bit.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: remove transaction from btrfs send
Wang Shilong [Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:57:21 +0000 (19:57 +0800)]
Btrfs: remove transaction from btrfs send

Since daivd did the work that force us to use readonly snapshot,
we can safely remove transaction protection from btrfs send.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix double initialization of the raid kobject
Miao Xie [Tue, 17 Dec 2013 04:01:12 +0000 (12:01 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix double initialization of the raid kobject

We met the following oops when doing space balance:
 kobject (ffff88081b590278): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong.
 ...
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff81937262>] dump_stack+0x49/0x5f
  [<ffffffff8137d259>] kobject_init+0x89/0xa0
  [<ffffffff8137d36a>] kobject_init_and_add+0x2a/0x70
  [<ffffffffa009bd79>] ? clear_extent_bit+0x199/0x470 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa005e82c>] __link_block_group+0xfc/0x120 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa006b9db>] btrfs_make_block_group+0x24b/0x370 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa00a899b>] __btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x54b/0x7e0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa00a8c6f>] btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x3f/0x50 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa0060123>] do_chunk_alloc+0x363/0x440 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa00633d4>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x104/0x310 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa0069f4d>] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x48d/0x600 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa007aad4>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x184/0x250 [btrfs]
  ...

Steps to reproduce:
 # mkfs.btrfs -f <dev>
 # mount -o nospace_cache <dev> <mnt>
 # btrfs balance start <mnt>
 # dd if=/dev/zero of=<mnt>/tmpfile bs=1M count=1

The reason of this problem is that we initialized the raid kobject when we added
a block group into a empty raid list. As we know, when we mounted a btrfs filesystem,
the raid list was empty, we would initialize the raid kobject when we added the first
block group. But if there was not data stored in the block group, the block group
would be freed when doing balance, and the raid list would be empty. And then if we
allocated a new block group and added it into the raid list, we would initialize
the raid kobject again, the oops happened.

Fix this problem by initializing the raid kobject just when mounting the fs.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reported-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix a warning when iput a file
Wang Shilong [Sat, 14 Dec 2013 07:27:31 +0000 (15:27 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix a warning when iput a file

See the warning below:

[ 1209.102076]  [<ffffffffa04721b9>] remove_extent_mapping+0x69/0x70 [btrfs]
[ 1209.102084]  [<ffffffffa0466b06>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x96/0x4d0 [btrfs]
[ 1209.102089]  [<ffffffff81073010>] ? wake_atomic_t_function+0x40/0x40
[ 1209.102092]  [<ffffffff8118ab2e>] evict+0x9e/0x190
[ 1209.102094]  [<ffffffff8118b313>] iput+0xf3/0x180
[ 1209.102101]  [<ffffffffa0461fd1>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0xb1/0xd0 [btrfs]
[ 1209.102107]  [<ffffffffa045d358>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x268/0x350 [btrfs]

clear extent bit here to avoid triggering WARN_ON() in remove_extent_mapping()

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Check read-only status of roots during send
David Sterba [Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:34:17 +0000 (17:34 +0100)]
btrfs: Check read-only status of roots during send

All the subvolues that are involved in send must be read-only during the
whole operation. The ioctl SUBVOL_SETFLAGS could be used to change the
status to read-write and the result of send stream is undefined if the
data change unexpectedly.

Fix that by adding a refcount for all involved roots and verify that
there's no send in progress during SUBVOL_SETFLAGS ioctl call that does
read-only -> read-write transition.

We need refcounts because there are no restrictions on number of send
parallel operations currently run on a single subvolume, be it source,
parent or one of the multiple clone sources.

Kernel is silent when the RO checks fail and returns EPERM. The same set
of checks is done already in userspace before send starts.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: remove unused mnt from send_ctx
David Sterba [Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:34:14 +0000 (17:34 +0100)]
btrfs: remove unused mnt from send_ctx

Unused since ed2590953bd06b892f0411fc94e19175d32f197a
"Btrfs: stop using vfs_read in send".

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: send: clean up dead code
David Sterba [Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:34:10 +0000 (17:34 +0100)]
btrfs: send: clean up dead code

Remove ifdefed code:

- tlv_put for 8, 16 and 32, add a generic tempalte if needed in future
- tlv_put_timespec - the btrfs_timespec fields are used
- fs_path_remove obsoleted long ago

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix deadlock when iterating inode refs and running delayed inodes
Filipe David Borba Manana [Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:43:58 +0000 (12:43 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix deadlock when iterating inode refs and running delayed inodes

While running btrfs/004 from xfstests, after 503 iterations, dmesg reported
a deadlock between tasks iterating inode refs and tasks running delayed inodes
(during a transaction commit).

It turns out that iterating inode refs implies doing one tree search and
release all nodes in the path except the leaf node, and then passing that
leaf node to btrfs_ref_to_path(), which in turn does another tree search
without releasing the lock on the leaf node it received as parameter.

This is a problem when other task wants to write to the btree as well and
ends up updating the leaf that is read locked - the writer task locks the
parent of the leaf and then blocks waiting for the leaf's lock to be
released - at the same time, the task executing btrfs_ref_to_path()
does a second tree search, without releasing the lock on the first leaf,
and wants to access a leaf (the same or another one) that is a child of
the same parent, resulting in a deadlock.

The trace reported by lockdep follows.

[84314.936373] INFO: task fsstress:11930 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[84314.936381]       Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
[84314.936383] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[84314.936386] fsstress        D ffff8806e1bf8000     0 11930  11926 0x00000000
[84314.936393]  ffff8804d6d89b78 0000000000000046 ffff8804d6d89b18 ffffffff810bd8bd
[84314.936399]  ffff8806e1bf8000 ffff8804d6d89fd8 ffff8804d6d89fd8 ffff8804d6d89fd8
[84314.936405]  ffff880806308000 ffff8806e1bf8000 ffff8804d6d89c08 ffff8804deb8f190
[84314.936410] Call Trace:
[84314.936421]  [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[84314.936428]  [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70
[84314.936451]  [<ffffffffa0715bf5>] btrfs_tree_lock+0x75/0x270 [btrfs]
[84314.936457]  [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
[84314.936470]  [<ffffffffa06ba231>] btrfs_search_slot+0x7f1/0x930 [btrfs]
[84314.936489]  [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[84314.936504]  [<ffffffffa06d2e1f>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0xa0 [btrfs]
[84314.936510]  [<ffffffff810bd6ef>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x1f/0x1e0
[84314.936528]  [<ffffffffa073173c>] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x4c/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[84314.936543]  [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[84314.936558]  [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[84314.936573]  [<ffffffffa0731c82>] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x192/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[84314.936589]  [<ffffffffa0731d03>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13/0x20 [btrfs]
[84314.936604]  [<ffffffffa06dbcd4>] btrfs_flush_all_pending_stuffs+0x24/0x80 [btrfs]
[84314.936620]  [<ffffffffa06ddc13>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x223/0xa20 [btrfs]
[84314.936630]  [<ffffffffa06ae5ae>] btrfs_sync_fs+0x6e/0x110 [btrfs]
[84314.936635]  [<ffffffff811d0b50>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x60/0x60
[84314.936639]  [<ffffffff811d0b50>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x60/0x60
[84314.936643]  [<ffffffff811d0b70>] sync_fs_one_sb+0x20/0x30
[84314.936648]  [<ffffffff811a3541>] iterate_supers+0xf1/0x100
[84314.936652]  [<ffffffff811d0c45>] sys_sync+0x55/0x90
[84314.936658]  [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[84314.936660] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[84314.936663] INFO: task btrfs:11955 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[84314.936666]       Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
[84314.936668] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[84314.936670] btrfs           D ffff880541729a88     0 11955  11608 0x00000000
[84314.936674]  ffff880541729a38 0000000000000046 ffff8805417299d8 ffffffff810bd8bd
[84314.936680]  ffff88075430c8a0 ffff880541729fd8 ffff880541729fd8 ffff880541729fd8
[84314.936685]  ffffffff81c104e0 ffff88075430c8a0 ffff8804de8b00b8 ffff8804de8b0000
[84314.936690] Call Trace:
[84314.936695]  [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[84314.936700]  [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70
[84314.936717]  [<ffffffffa0715815>] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0xd5/0x140 [btrfs]
[84314.936721]  [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
[84314.936733]  [<ffffffffa06ba201>] btrfs_search_slot+0x7c1/0x930 [btrfs]
[84314.936746]  [<ffffffffa06bd505>] btrfs_find_item+0x55/0x160 [btrfs]
[84314.936763]  [<ffffffffa06ff689>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x49/0xc0 [btrfs]
[84314.936780]  [<ffffffffa073c9ca>] btrfs_ref_to_path+0xba/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[84314.936797]  [<ffffffffa06f9719>] ? release_extent_buffer+0xb9/0xe0 [btrfs]
[84314.936813]  [<ffffffffa06ff689>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x49/0xc0 [btrfs]
[84314.936830]  [<ffffffffa073cb50>] inode_to_path+0x60/0xd0 [btrfs]
[84314.936846]  [<ffffffffa073d365>] paths_from_inode+0x115/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[84314.936851]  [<ffffffff8118dd44>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x114/0x200
[84314.936868]  [<ffffffffa0714494>] btrfs_ioctl+0xf14/0x2030 [btrfs]
[84314.936873]  [<ffffffff817762db>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x50
[84314.936877]  [<ffffffff8116598f>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x34f/0xb00
[84314.936882]  [<ffffffff81075563>] ? up_read+0x23/0x40
[84314.936886]  [<ffffffff8177a41c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x20c/0x5a0
[84314.936892]  [<ffffffff811b2946>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x570
[84314.936896]  [<ffffffff81776e23>] ? error_sti+0x5/0x6
[84314.936901]  [<ffffffff810b71e8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0
[84314.936906]  [<ffffffff81776a09>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13
[84314.936910]  [<ffffffff811b2eb1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0
[84314.936915]  [<ffffffff813eecde>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[84314.936920]  [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[84314.936922] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[84434.866873] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:11921 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[84434.866881]       Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
[84434.866883] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[84434.866886] btrfs-transacti D ffff880755b6a478     0 11921      2 0x00000000
[84434.866893]  ffff8800735b9ce8 0000000000000046 ffff8800735b9c88 ffffffff810bd8bd
[84434.866899]  ffff8805a1b848a0 ffff8800735b9fd8 ffff8800735b9fd8 ffff8800735b9fd8
[84434.866904]  ffffffff81c104e0 ffff8805a1b848a0 ffff880755b6a478 ffff8804cece78f0
[84434.866910] Call Trace:
[84434.866920]  [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[84434.866927]  [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70
[84434.866948]  [<ffffffffa06dd2ef>] wait_current_trans.isra.33+0xbf/0x120 [btrfs]
[84434.866954]  [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
[84434.866970]  [<ffffffffa06dec18>] start_transaction+0x388/0x5a0 [btrfs]
[84434.866985]  [<ffffffffa06db9b5>] ? transaction_kthread+0xb5/0x280 [btrfs]
[84434.866999]  [<ffffffffa06dee97>] btrfs_attach_transaction+0x17/0x20 [btrfs]
[84434.867012]  [<ffffffffa06dba9e>] transaction_kthread+0x19e/0x280 [btrfs]
[84434.867026]  [<ffffffffa06db900>] ? open_ctree+0x2260/0x2260 [btrfs]
[84434.867030]  [<ffffffff81070dad>] kthread+0xed/0x100
[84434.867035]  [<ffffffff81070cc0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x190/0x190
[84434.867040]  [<ffffffff8177ee6c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[84434.867044]  [<ffffffff81070cc0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x190/0x190

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: remove dead comments for read_csums()
Wang Shilong [Sun, 15 Dec 2013 03:39:42 +0000 (11:39 +0800)]
Btrfs: remove dead comments for read_csums()

Chris introduced hleper function  read_csums() and this function
has been removed, but we forgot to remove its corresponding comments.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: remove field tree_mod_seq_elem from btrfs_fs_info struct
Filipe David Borba Manana [Fri, 13 Dec 2013 19:39:54 +0000 (19:39 +0000)]
Btrfs: remove field tree_mod_seq_elem from btrfs_fs_info struct

It's not used anywhere, so just drop it.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix use of uninitialized err variable
Filipe David Borba Manana [Fri, 13 Dec 2013 19:39:34 +0000 (19:39 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix use of uninitialized err variable

fs/btrfs/file.c: In function ‘prepare_pages.isra.18’:
fs/btrfs/file.c:1265:6: warning: ‘err’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: remove unnecessary filemap writting and waiting after block group relocation
Wang Shilong [Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:30:44 +0000 (18:30 +0800)]
Btrfs: remove unnecessary filemap writting and waiting after block group relocation

We have commited transaction before, remove redundant filemap writting and
waiting here, it can speed up balance relocation process.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>