platform/kernel/linux-starfive.git
16 months agobtrfs: only subtract from len_to_oe_boundary when it is tracking an extent
Chris Mason [Tue, 1 Aug 2023 16:28:28 +0000 (09:28 -0700)]
btrfs: only subtract from len_to_oe_boundary when it is tracking an extent

bio_ctrl->len_to_oe_boundary is used to make sure we stay inside a zone
as we submit bios for writes.  Every time we add a page to the bio, we
decrement those bytes from len_to_oe_boundary, and then we submit the
bio if we happen to hit zero.

Most of the time, len_to_oe_boundary gets set to U32_MAX.
submit_extent_page() adds pages into our bio, and the size of the bio
ends up limited by:

- Are we contiguous on disk?
- Does bio_add_page() allow us to stuff more in?
- is len_to_oe_boundary > 0?

The len_to_oe_boundary math starts with U32_MAX, which isn't page or
sector aligned, and subtracts from it until it hits zero.  In the
non-zoned case, the last IO we submit before we hit zero is going to be
unaligned, triggering BUGs.

This is hard to trigger because bio_add_page() isn't going to make a bio
of U32_MAX size unless you give it a perfect set of pages and fully
contiguous extents on disk.  We can hit it pretty reliably while making
large swapfiles during provisioning because the machine is freshly
booted, mostly idle, and the disk is freshly formatted.  It's also
possible to trigger with reads when read_ahead_kb is set to 4GB.

The code has been clean up and shifted around a few times, but this flaw
has been lurking since the counter was added.  I think the commit
24e6c8082208 ("btrfs: simplify main loop in submit_extent_page") ended
up exposing the bug.

The fix used here is to skip doing math on len_to_oe_boundary unless
we've changed it from the default U32_MAX value.  bio_add_page() is the
real limit we want, and there's no reason to do extra math when block
layer is doing it for us.

Sample reproducer, note you'll need to change the path to the bdi and
device:

  SUBVOL=/btrfs/swapvol
  SWAPFILE=$SUBVOL/swapfile
  SZMB=8192

  mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/vdb
  mount /dev/vdb /btrfs

  btrfs subvol create $SUBVOL
  chattr +C $SUBVOL
  dd if=/dev/zero of=$SWAPFILE bs=1M count=$SZMB
  sync

  echo 4 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches

  echo 4194304 > /sys/class/bdi/btrfs-2/read_ahead_kb

  while true; do
  echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
  echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
  dd of=/dev/zero if=$SWAPFILE bs=4096M count=2 iflag=fullblock
  done

Fixes: 24e6c8082208 ("btrfs: simplify main loop in submit_extent_page")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.4+
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
16 months agobtrfs: fix replace/scrub failure with metadata_uuid
Anand Jain [Fri, 28 Jul 2023 06:48:13 +0000 (14:48 +0800)]
btrfs: fix replace/scrub failure with metadata_uuid

Fstests with POST_MKFS_CMD="btrfstune -m" (as in the mailing list)
reported a few of the test cases failing.

The failure scenario can be summarized and simplified as follows:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -fq -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdb2 :0
  $ btrfstune -m /dev/sdb1 :0
  $ wipefs -a /dev/sdb1 :0
  $ mount -o degraded /dev/sdb2 /btrfs :0
  $ btrfs replace start -B -f -r 1 /dev/sdb1 /btrfs :1
    STDERR:
    ERROR: ioctl(DEV_REPLACE_START) failed on "/btrfs": Input/output error

  [11290.583502] BTRFS warning (device sdb2): tree block 22036480 mirror 2 has bad fsid, has 99835c32-49f0-4668-9e66-dc277a96b4a6 want da40350c-33ac-4872-92a8-4948ed8c04d0
  [11290.586580] BTRFS error (device sdb2): unable to fix up (regular) error at logical 22020096 on dev /dev/sdb8 physical 1048576

As above, the replace is failing because we are verifying the header with
fs_devices::fsid instead of fs_devices::metadata_uuid, despite the
metadata_uuid actually being present.

To fix this, use fs_devices::metadata_uuid. We copy fsid into
fs_devices::metadata_uuid if there is no metadata_uuid, so its fine.

Fixes: a3ddbaebc7c9 ("btrfs: scrub: introduce a helper to verify one metadata block")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.4+
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
16 months agobtrfs: fix infinite directory reads
Filipe Manana [Sun, 13 Aug 2023 11:34:08 +0000 (12:34 +0100)]
btrfs: fix infinite directory reads

The readdir implementation currently processes always up to the last index
it finds. This however can result in an infinite loop if the directory has
a large number of entries such that they won't all fit in the given buffer
passed to the readdir callback, that is, dir_emit() returns a non-zero
value. Because in that case readdir() will be called again and if in the
meanwhile new directory entries were added and we still can't put all the
remaining entries in the buffer, we keep repeating this over and over.

The following C program and test script reproduce the problem:

  $ cat /mnt/readdir_prog.c
  #include <sys/types.h>
  #include <dirent.h>
  #include <stdio.h>

  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
  {
    DIR *dir = opendir(".");
    struct dirent *dd;

    while ((dd = readdir(dir))) {
      printf("%s\n", dd->d_name);
      rename(dd->d_name, "TEMPFILE");
      rename("TEMPFILE", dd->d_name);
    }
    closedir(dir);
  }

  $ gcc -o /mnt/readdir_prog /mnt/readdir_prog.c

  $ cat test.sh
  #!/bin/bash

  DEV=/dev/sdi
  MNT=/mnt/sdi

  mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV &> /dev/null
  #mkfs.xfs -f $DEV &> /dev/null
  #mkfs.ext4 -F $DEV &> /dev/null

  mount $DEV $MNT

  mkdir $MNT/testdir
  for ((i = 1; i <= 2000; i++)); do
      echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i
  done

  cd $MNT/testdir
  /mnt/readdir_prog

  cd /mnt

  umount $MNT

This behaviour is surprising to applications and it's unlike ext4, xfs,
tmpfs, vfat and other filesystems, which always finish. In this case where
new entries were added due to renames, some file names may be reported
more than once, but this varies according to each filesystem - for example
ext4 never reported the same file more than once while xfs reports the
first 13 file names twice.

So change our readdir implementation to track the last index number when
opendir() is called and then make readdir() never process beyond that
index number. This gives the same behaviour as ext4.

Reported-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/2c8c55ec-04c6-e0dc-9c5c-8c7924778c35@landley.net/
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217681
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
16 months agobtrfs: set cache_block_group_error if we find an error
Josef Bacik [Wed, 2 Aug 2023 13:20:24 +0000 (09:20 -0400)]
btrfs: set cache_block_group_error if we find an error

We set cache_block_group_error if btrfs_cache_block_group() returns an
error, this is because we could end up not finding space to allocate and
mistakenly return -ENOSPC, and which could then abort the transaction
with the incorrect errno, and in the case of ENOSPC result in a
WARN_ON() that will trip up tests like generic/475.

However there's the case where multiple threads can be racing, one
thread gets the proper error, and the other thread doesn't actually call
btrfs_cache_block_group(), it instead sees ->cached ==
BTRFS_CACHE_ERROR.  Again the result is the same, we fail to allocate
our space and return -ENOSPC.  Instead we need to set
cache_block_group_error to -EIO in this case to make sure that if we do
not make our allocation we get the appropriate error returned back to
the caller.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
16 months agobtrfs: reject invalid reloc tree root keys with stack dump
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 3 Aug 2023 09:20:43 +0000 (17:20 +0800)]
btrfs: reject invalid reloc tree root keys with stack dump

[BUG]
Syzbot reported a crash that an ASSERT() got triggered inside
prepare_to_merge().

That ASSERT() makes sure the reloc tree is properly pointed back by its
subvolume tree.

[CAUSE]
After more debugging output, it turns out we had an invalid reloc tree:

  BTRFS error (device loop1): reloc tree mismatch, root 8 has no reloc root, expect reloc root key (-8, 132, 8) gen 17

Note the above root key is (TREE_RELOC_OBJECTID, ROOT_ITEM,
QUOTA_TREE_OBJECTID), meaning it's a reloc tree for quota tree.

But reloc trees can only exist for subvolumes, as for non-subvolume
trees, we just COW the involved tree block, no need to create a reloc
tree since those tree blocks won't be shared with other trees.

Only subvolumes tree can share tree blocks with other trees (thus they
have BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE flag).

Thus this new debug output proves my previous assumption that corrupted
on-disk data can trigger that ASSERT().

[FIX]
Besides the dedicated fix and the graceful exit, also let tree-checker to
check such root keys, to make sure reloc trees can only exist for subvolumes.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reported-by: syzbot+ae97a827ae1c3336bbb4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
16 months agobtrfs: exit gracefully if reloc roots don't match
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 3 Aug 2023 09:20:42 +0000 (17:20 +0800)]
btrfs: exit gracefully if reloc roots don't match

[BUG]
Syzbot reported a crash that an ASSERT() got triggered inside
prepare_to_merge().

[CAUSE]
The root cause of the triggered ASSERT() is we can have a race between
quota tree creation and relocation.

This leads us to create a duplicated quota tree in the
btrfs_read_fs_root() path, and since it's treated as fs tree, it would
have ROOT_SHAREABLE flag, causing us to create a reloc tree for it.

The bug itself is fixed by a dedicated patch for it, but this already
taught us the ASSERT() is not something straightforward for
developers.

[ENHANCEMENT]
Instead of using an ASSERT(), let's handle it gracefully and output
extra info about the mismatch reloc roots to help debug.

Also with the above ASSERT() removed, we can trigger ASSERT(0)s inside
merge_reloc_roots() later.
Also replace those ASSERT(0)s with WARN_ON()s.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reported-by: syzbot+ae97a827ae1c3336bbb4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
16 months agobtrfs: avoid race between qgroup tree creation and relocation
Qu Wenruo [Thu, 3 Aug 2023 09:20:41 +0000 (17:20 +0800)]
btrfs: avoid race between qgroup tree creation and relocation

[BUG]
Syzbot reported a weird ASSERT() triggered inside prepare_to_merge().

  assertion failed: root->reloc_root == reloc_root, in fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1919
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1919!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
  CPU: 0 PID: 9904 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted
  6.4.0-syzkaller-08881-g533925cb7604 #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine,
  BIOS Google 05/27/2023
  RIP: 0010:prepare_to_merge+0xbb2/0xc40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1919
  Code: fe e9 f5 (...)
  RSP: 0018:ffffc9000325f760 EFLAGS: 00010246
  RAX: 000000000000004f RBX: ffff888075644030 RCX: 1481ccc522da5800
  RDX: ffffc90005c09000 RSI: 00000000000364ca RDI: 00000000000364cb
  RBP: ffffc9000325f870 R08: ffffffff816f33ac R09: 1ffff9200064bea0
  R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff5200064bea1 R12: ffff888075644000
  R13: ffff88803b166000 R14: ffff88803b166560 R15: ffff88803b166558
  FS:  00007f4e305fd700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 000056080679c000 CR3: 00000000193ad000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
  DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   relocate_block_group+0xa5d/0xcd0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3749
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x7ab/0xd70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3283
   __btrfs_balance+0x1b06/0x2690 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4018
   btrfs_balance+0xbdb/0x1120 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4402
   btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x496/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3604
   vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
   __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
   __se_sys_ioctl+0xf8/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:856
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
  RIP: 0033:0x7f4e2f88c389

[CAUSE]
With extra debugging, the offending reloc_root is for quota tree (rootid 8).

Normally we should not use the reloc tree for quota root at all, as reloc
trees are only for subvolume trees.

But there is a race between quota enabling and relocation, this happens
after commit 85724171b302 ("btrfs: fix the btrfs_get_global_root return value").

Before that commit, for quota and free space tree, we exit immediately
if we cannot grab it from fs_info.

But now we would try to read it from disk, just as if they are fs trees,
this sets ROOT_SHAREABLE flags in such race:

             Thread A             |           Thread B
 ---------------------------------+------------------------------
 btrfs_quota_enable()             |
 |                                | btrfs_get_root_ref()
 |                                | |- btrfs_get_global_root()
 |                                | |  Returned NULL
 |                                | |- btrfs_lookup_fs_root()
 |                                | |  Returned NULL
 |- btrfs_create_tree()           | |
 |  Now quota root item is        | |
 |  inserted                      | |- btrfs_read_tree_root()
 |                                | |  Got the newly inserted quota root
 |                                | |- btrfs_init_fs_root()
 |                                | |  Set ROOT_SHAREABLE flag

[FIX]
Get back to the old behavior by returning PTR_ERR(-ENOENT) if the target
objectid is not a subvolume tree or data reloc tree.

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+ae97a827ae1c3336bbb4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 85724171b302 ("btrfs: fix the btrfs_get_global_root return value")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
16 months agobtrfs: properly clear end of the unreserved range in cow_file_range
Christoph Hellwig [Mon, 24 Jul 2023 13:26:55 +0000 (06:26 -0700)]
btrfs: properly clear end of the unreserved range in cow_file_range

When the call to btrfs_reloc_clone_csums in cow_file_range returns an
error, we jump to the out_unlock label with the extent_reserved variable
set to false.   The cleanup at the label will then call
extent_clear_unlock_delalloc on the range from start to end.  But we've
already added cur_alloc_size to start before the jump, so there might no
range be left from the newly incremented start to end.  Move the check for
'start < end' so that it is reached by also for the !extent_reserved case.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Fixes: a315e68f6e8b ("Btrfs: fix invalid attempt to free reserved space on failure to cow range")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
16 months agobtrfs: don't wait for writeback on clean pages in extent_write_cache_pages
Christoph Hellwig [Mon, 24 Jul 2023 13:26:54 +0000 (06:26 -0700)]
btrfs: don't wait for writeback on clean pages in extent_write_cache_pages

__extent_writepage could have started on more pages than the one it was
called for.  This happens regularly for zoned file systems, and in theory
could happen for compressed I/O if the worker thread was executed very
quickly. For such pages extent_write_cache_pages waits for writeback
to complete before moving on to the next page, which is highly inefficient
as it blocks the flusher thread.

Port over the PageDirty check that was added to write_cache_pages in
commit 515f4a037fb ("mm: write_cache_pages optimise page cleaning") to
fix this.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
16 months agobtrfs: don't stop integrity writeback too early
Christoph Hellwig [Mon, 24 Jul 2023 13:26:53 +0000 (06:26 -0700)]
btrfs: don't stop integrity writeback too early

extent_write_cache_pages stops writing pages as soon as nr_to_write hits
zero.  That is the right thing for opportunistic writeback, but incorrect
for data integrity writeback, which needs to ensure that no dirty pages
are left in the range.  Thus only stop the writeback for WB_SYNC_NONE
if nr_to_write hits 0.

This is a port of write_cache_pages changes in commit 05fe478dd04e
("mm: write_cache_pages integrity fix").

Note that I've only trigger the problem with other changes to the btrfs
writeback code, but this condition seems worthwhile fixing anyway.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ updated comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
16 months agobtrfs: wait for actual caching progress during allocation
Josef Bacik [Fri, 21 Jul 2023 20:09:43 +0000 (16:09 -0400)]
btrfs: wait for actual caching progress during allocation

Recently we've been having mysterious hangs while running generic/475 on
the CI system.  This turned out to be something like this:

  Task 1
  dmsetup suspend --nolockfs
  -> __dm_suspend
   -> dm_wait_for_completion
    -> dm_wait_for_bios_completion
     -> Unable to complete because of IO's on a plug in Task 2

  Task 2
  wb_workfn
  -> wb_writeback
   -> blk_start_plug
    -> writeback_sb_inodes
     -> Infinite loop unable to make an allocation

  Task 3
  cache_block_group
  ->read_extent_buffer_pages
   ->Waiting for IO to complete that can't be submitted because Task 1
     suspended the DM device

The problem here is that we need Task 2 to be scheduled completely for
the blk plug to flush.  Normally this would happen, we normally wait for
the block group caching to finish (Task 3), and this schedule would
result in the block plug flushing.

However if there's enough free space available from the current caching
to satisfy the allocation we won't actually wait for the caching to
complete.  This check however just checks that we have enough space, not
that we can make the allocation.  In this particular case we were trying
to allocate 9MiB, and we had 10MiB of free space, but we didn't have
9MiB of contiguous space to allocate, and thus the allocation failed and
we looped.

We specifically don't cycle through the FFE loop until we stop finding
cached block groups because we don't want to allocate new block groups
just because we're caching, so we short circuit the normal loop once we
hit LOOP_CACHING_WAIT and we found a caching block group.

This is normally fine, except in this particular case where the caching
thread can't make progress because the DM device has been suspended.

Fix this by not only waiting for free space to >= the amount of space we
want to allocate, but also that we make some progress in caching from
the time we start waiting.  This will keep us from busy looping when the
caching is taking a while but still theoretically has enough space for
us to allocate from, and fixes this particular case by forcing us to
actually sleep and wait for forward progress, which will flush the plug.

With this fix we're no longer hanging with generic/475.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
17 months agobtrfs: check for commit error at btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier()
Filipe Manana [Fri, 21 Jul 2023 09:49:21 +0000 (10:49 +0100)]
btrfs: check for commit error at btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier()

btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier() is used to get a handle pointing to the
current running transaction if the transaction has not started its commit
yet (its state is < TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START). If the transaction commit
has started, then we wait for the transaction to commit and finish before
returning - however we completely ignore if the transaction was aborted
due to some error during its commit, we simply return ERR_PT(-ENOENT),
which makes the caller assume everything is fine and no errors happened.

This could make an fsync return success (0) to user space when in fact we
had a transaction abort and the target inode changes were therefore not
persisted.

Fix this by checking for the return value from btrfs_wait_for_commit(),
and if it returned an error, return it back to the caller.

Fixes: d4edf39bd5db ("Btrfs: fix uncompleted transaction")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
17 months agobtrfs: check if the transaction was aborted at btrfs_wait_for_commit()
Filipe Manana [Fri, 21 Jul 2023 09:49:20 +0000 (10:49 +0100)]
btrfs: check if the transaction was aborted at btrfs_wait_for_commit()

At btrfs_wait_for_commit() we wait for a transaction to finish and then
always return 0 (success) without checking if it was aborted, in which
case the transaction didn't happen due to some critical error. Fix this
by checking if the transaction was aborted.

Fixes: 462045928bda ("Btrfs: add START_SYNC, WAIT_SYNC ioctls")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
17 months agobtrfs: remove BUG_ON()'s in add_new_free_space()
Filipe Manana [Fri, 30 Jun 2023 15:03:44 +0000 (16:03 +0100)]
btrfs: remove BUG_ON()'s in add_new_free_space()

At add_new_free_space() we have these BUG_ON()'s that are there to deal
with any failure to add free space to the in memory free space cache.
Such failures are mostly -ENOMEM that should be very rare. However there's
no need to have these BUG_ON()'s, we can just return any error to the
caller and all callers and their upper call chain are already dealing with
errors.

So just make add_new_free_space() return any errors, while removing the
BUG_ON()'s, and returning the total amount of added free space to an
optional u64 pointer argument.

Reported-by: syzbot+3ba856e07b7127889d8c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000e9cb8305ff4e8327@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
17 months agobtrfs: account block group tree when calculating global reserve size
Filipe Manana [Thu, 20 Jul 2023 11:44:33 +0000 (12:44 +0100)]
btrfs: account block group tree when calculating global reserve size

When using the block group tree feature, this tree is a critical tree just
like the extent, csum and free space trees, and just like them it uses the
delayed refs block reserve.

So take into account the block group tree, and its current size, when
calculating the size for the global reserve.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
17 months agobtrfs: zoned: do not enable async discard
Naohiro Aota [Thu, 29 Jun 2023 08:37:31 +0000 (17:37 +0900)]
btrfs: zoned: do not enable async discard

The zoned mode need to reset a zone before using it. We rely on btrfs's
original discard functionality (discarding unused block group range) to do
the resetting.

While the commit 63a7cb130718 ("btrfs: auto enable discard=async when
possible") made the discard done in an async manner, a zoned reset do not
need to be async, as it is fast enough.

Even worth, delaying zone rests prevents using those zones again. So, let's
disable async discard on the zoned mode.

Fixes: 63a7cb130718 ("btrfs: auto enable discard=async when possible")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.3+
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update message text ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
17 months agobtrfs: fix warning when putting transaction with qgroups enabled after abort
Filipe Manana [Fri, 14 Jul 2023 12:42:06 +0000 (13:42 +0100)]
btrfs: fix warning when putting transaction with qgroups enabled after abort

If we have a transaction abort with qgroups enabled we get a warning
triggered when doing the final put on the transaction, like this:

  [552.6789] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [552.6815] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 81745 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:144 btrfs_put_transaction+0x123/0x130 [btrfs]
  [552.6817] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor (...)
  [552.6819] CPU: 4 PID: 81745 Comm: btrfs-transacti Tainted: G        W          6.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-134+ #1
  [552.6819] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  [552.6819] RIP: 0010:btrfs_put_transaction+0x123/0x130 [btrfs]
  [552.6821] Code: bd a0 01 00 (...)
  [552.6821] RSP: 0018:ffffa168c0527e28 EFLAGS: 00010286
  [552.6821] RAX: ffff936042caed00 RBX: ffff93604a3eb448 RCX: 0000000000000000
  [552.6821] RDX: ffff93606421b028 RSI: ffffffff92ff0878 RDI: ffff93606421b010
  [552.6821] RBP: ffff93606421b000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa168c0d07c20
  [552.6821] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff93608dc52950 R12: ffffa168c0527e70
  [552.6821] R13: ffff93606421b000 R14: ffff93604a3eb420 R15: ffff93606421b028
  [552.6821] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff93675fb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [552.6821] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [552.6821] CR2: 0000558ad262b000 CR3: 000000014feda005 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
  [552.6822] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  [552.6822] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  [552.6822] Call Trace:
  [552.6822]  <TASK>
  [552.6822]  ? __warn+0x80/0x130
  [552.6822]  ? btrfs_put_transaction+0x123/0x130 [btrfs]
  [552.6824]  ? report_bug+0x1f4/0x200
  [552.6824]  ? handle_bug+0x42/0x70
  [552.6824]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70
  [552.6824]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
  [552.6824]  ? btrfs_put_transaction+0x123/0x130 [btrfs]
  [552.6826]  btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0xe7/0x5e0 [btrfs]
  [552.6828]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x23/0x40
  [552.6828]  ? try_to_wake_up+0x94/0x5e0
  [552.6828]  ? __pfx_process_timeout+0x10/0x10
  [552.6828]  transaction_kthread+0x103/0x1d0 [btrfs]
  [552.6830]  ? __pfx_transaction_kthread+0x10/0x10 [btrfs]
  [552.6832]  kthread+0xee/0x120
  [552.6832]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
  [552.6832]  ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
  [552.6832]  </TASK>
  [552.6832] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

This corresponds to this line of code:

  void btrfs_put_transaction(struct btrfs_transaction *transaction)
  {
      (...)
          WARN_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(
                          &transaction->delayed_refs.dirty_extent_root));
      (...)
  }

The warning happens because btrfs_qgroup_destroy_extent_records(), called
in the transaction abort path, we free all entries from the rbtree
"dirty_extent_root" with rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(), but we
don't actually empty the rbtree - it's still pointing to nodes that were
freed.

So set the rbtree's root node to NULL to avoid this warning (assign
RB_ROOT).

Fixes: 81f7eb00ff5b ("btrfs: destroy qgroup extent records on transaction abort")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
17 months agobtrfs: fix ordered extent split error handling in btrfs_dio_submit_io
Christoph Hellwig [Fri, 14 Jul 2023 08:42:41 +0000 (10:42 +0200)]
btrfs: fix ordered extent split error handling in btrfs_dio_submit_io

When the call to btrfs_extract_ordered_extent in btrfs_dio_submit_io
fails to allocate memory for a new ordered_extent, it calls into the
btrfs_dio_end_io for error handling.  btrfs_dio_end_io then assumes that
bbio->ordered is set because it is supposed to be at this point, except
for this error handling corner case.  Try to not overload the
btrfs_dio_end_io with error handling of a bio in a non-canonical state,
and instead call btrfs_finish_ordered_extent and iomap_dio_bio_end_io
directly for this error case.

Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+5b82f0e951f8c2bcdb8f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Fixes: b41b6f6937dc ("btrfs: use btrfs_finish_ordered_extent to complete direct writes")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Tested-by: syzbot <syzbot+5b82f0e951f8c2bcdb8f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
17 months agobtrfs: set_page_extent_mapped after read_folio in btrfs_cont_expand
Josef Bacik [Wed, 12 Jul 2023 16:44:12 +0000 (12:44 -0400)]
btrfs: set_page_extent_mapped after read_folio in btrfs_cont_expand

While trying to get the subpage blocksize tests running, I hit the
following panic on generic/476

  assertion failed: PagePrivate(page) && page->private, in fs/btrfs/subpage.c:229
  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/subpage.c:229!
  Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
  CPU: 1 PID: 1453 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 6.4.0-rc7+ #12
  Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS edk2-20230301gitf80f052277c8-26.fc38 03/01/2023
  pstate: 61400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
  pc : btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0
  lr : btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0
  Call trace:
   btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0
   btrfs_subpage_clear_checked+0x38/0xc0
   btrfs_page_clear_checked+0x48/0x98
   btrfs_truncate_block+0x5d0/0x6a8
   btrfs_cont_expand+0x5c/0x528
   btrfs_write_check.isra.0+0xf8/0x150
   btrfs_buffered_write+0xb4/0x760
   btrfs_do_write_iter+0x2f8/0x4b0
   btrfs_file_write_iter+0x1c/0x30
   do_iter_readv_writev+0xc8/0x158
   do_iter_write+0x9c/0x210
   vfs_iter_write+0x24/0x40
   iter_file_splice_write+0x224/0x390
   direct_splice_actor+0x38/0x68
   splice_direct_to_actor+0x12c/0x260
   do_splice_direct+0x90/0xe8
   generic_copy_file_range+0x50/0x90
   vfs_copy_file_range+0x29c/0x470
   __arm64_sys_copy_file_range+0xcc/0x498
   invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x80/0xd8
   do_el0_svc+0x6c/0x168
   el0_svc+0x50/0x1b0
   el0t_64_sync_handler+0x114/0x120
   el0t_64_sync+0x194/0x198

This happens because during btrfs_cont_expand we'll get a page, set it
as mapped, and if it's not Uptodate we'll read it.  However between the
read and re-locking the page we could have called release_folio() on the
page, but left the page in the file mapping.  release_folio() can clear
the page private, and thus further down we blow up when we go to modify
the subpage bits.

Fix this by putting the set_page_extent_mapped() after the read.  This
is safe because read_folio() will call set_page_extent_mapped() before
it does the read, and then if we clear page private but leave it on the
mapping we're completely safe re-setting set_page_extent_mapped().  With
this patch I can now run generic/476 without panicing.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
17 months agobtrfs: raid56: always verify the P/Q contents for scrub
Qu Wenruo [Fri, 30 Jun 2023 00:56:40 +0000 (08:56 +0800)]
btrfs: raid56: always verify the P/Q contents for scrub

[REGRESSION]
Commit 75b470332965 ("btrfs: raid56: migrate recovery and scrub recovery
path to use error_bitmap") changed the behavior of scrub_rbio().

Initially if we have no error reading the raid bio, we will assign
@need_check to true, then finish_parity_scrub() would later verify the
content of P/Q stripes before writeback.

But after that commit we never verify the content of P/Q stripes and
just writeback them.

This can lead to unrepaired P/Q stripes during scrub, or already
corrupted P/Q copied to the dev-replace target.

[FIX]
The situation is more complex than the regression, in fact the initial
behavior is not 100% correct either.

If we have the following rare case, it can still lead to the same
problem using the old behavior:

0 16K 32K 48K 64K
Data 1: |IIIIIII|                       |
Data 2: | |
Parity: | |CCCCCCC| |

Where "I" means IO error, "C" means corruption.

In the above case, we're scrubbing the parity stripe, then read out all
the contents of Data 1, Data 2, Parity stripes.

But found IO error in Data 1, which leads to rebuild using Data 2 and
Parity and got the correct data.

In that case, we would not verify if the Parity is correct for range
[16K, 32K).

So here we have to always verify the content of Parity no matter if we
did recovery or not.

This patch would remove the @need_check parameter of
finish_parity_scrub() completely, and would always do the P/Q
verification before writeback.

Fixes: 75b470332965 ("btrfs: raid56: migrate recovery and scrub recovery path to use error_bitmap")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.2+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
17 months agobtrfs: use irq safe locking when running and adding delayed iputs
Filipe Manana [Wed, 5 Jul 2023 23:41:16 +0000 (00:41 +0100)]
btrfs: use irq safe locking when running and adding delayed iputs

Running delayed iputs, which never happens in an irq context, needs to
lock the spinlock fs_info->delayed_iput_lock. When finishing bios for
data writes (irq context, bio.c) we call btrfs_put_ordered_extent() which
needs to add a delayed iput and for that it needs to acquire the spinlock
fs_info->delayed_iput_lock. Without disabling irqs when running delayed
iputs we can therefore deadlock on that spinlock. The same deadlock can
also happen when adding an inode to the delayed iputs list, since this
can be done outside an irq context as well.

Syzbot recently reported this, which results in the following trace:

  ================================
  WARNING: inconsistent lock state
  6.4.0-syzkaller-09904-ga507db1d8fdc #0 Not tainted
  --------------------------------
  inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
  btrfs-cleaner/16079 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
  ffff888107804d20 (&fs_info->delayed_iput_lock){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:350 [inline]
  ffff888107804d20 (&fs_info->delayed_iput_lock){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x28/0xe0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:3523
  {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
    lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline]
    lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726
    __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
    _raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
    spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:350 [inline]
    btrfs_add_delayed_iput+0x128/0x390 fs/btrfs/inode.c:3490
    btrfs_put_ordered_extent fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:559 [inline]
    btrfs_put_ordered_extent+0x2f6/0x610 fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:547
    __btrfs_bio_end_io fs/btrfs/bio.c:118 [inline]
    __btrfs_bio_end_io+0x136/0x180 fs/btrfs/bio.c:112
    btrfs_orig_bbio_end_io+0x86/0x2b0 fs/btrfs/bio.c:163
    btrfs_simple_end_io+0x105/0x380 fs/btrfs/bio.c:378
    bio_endio+0x589/0x690 block/bio.c:1617
    req_bio_endio block/blk-mq.c:766 [inline]
    blk_update_request+0x5c5/0x1620 block/blk-mq.c:911
    blk_mq_end_request+0x59/0x680 block/blk-mq.c:1032
    lo_complete_rq+0x1c6/0x280 drivers/block/loop.c:370
    blk_complete_reqs+0xb3/0xf0 block/blk-mq.c:1110
    __do_softirq+0x1d4/0x905 kernel/softirq.c:553
    run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:921 [inline]
    run_ksoftirqd+0x31/0x60 kernel/softirq.c:913
    smpboot_thread_fn+0x659/0x9e0 kernel/smpboot.c:164
    kthread+0x344/0x440 kernel/kthread.c:389
    ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308
  irq event stamp: 39
  hardirqs last  enabled at (39): [<ffffffff81d5ebc4>] __do_kmem_cache_free mm/slab.c:3558 [inline]
  hardirqs last  enabled at (39): [<ffffffff81d5ebc4>] kmem_cache_free mm/slab.c:3582 [inline]
  hardirqs last  enabled at (39): [<ffffffff81d5ebc4>] kmem_cache_free+0x244/0x370 mm/slab.c:3575
  hardirqs last disabled at (38): [<ffffffff81d5eb5e>] __do_kmem_cache_free mm/slab.c:3553 [inline]
  hardirqs last disabled at (38): [<ffffffff81d5eb5e>] kmem_cache_free mm/slab.c:3582 [inline]
  hardirqs last disabled at (38): [<ffffffff81d5eb5e>] kmem_cache_free+0x1de/0x370 mm/slab.c:3575
  softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffff814ac99f>] copy_process+0x227f/0x75c0 kernel/fork.c:2448
  softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_lock);
    <Interrupt>
      lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_lock);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  1 lock held by btrfs-cleaner/16079:
   #0: ffff888107804860 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleaner_kthread+0x103/0x4b0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1463

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 3 PID: 16079 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 6.4.0-syzkaller-09904-ga507db1d8fdc #0
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
   dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:106
   print_usage_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3978 [inline]
   valid_state kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4020 [inline]
   mark_lock_irq kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4223 [inline]
   mark_lock.part.0+0x1102/0x1960 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4685
   mark_lock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4649 [inline]
   mark_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4598 [inline]
   __lock_acquire+0x8e4/0x5e20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5098
   lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline]
   lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726
   __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
   _raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
   spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:350 [inline]
   btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x28/0xe0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:3523
   cleaner_kthread+0x2e5/0x4b0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1478
   kthread+0x344/0x440 kernel/kthread.c:389
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308
   </TASK>

So fix this by using spin_lock_irq() and spin_unlock_irq() when running
delayed iputs, and using spin_lock_irqsave() and spin_unlock_irqrestore()
when adding a delayed iput().

Reported-by: syzbot+da501a04be5ff533b102@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: ec63b84d4611 ("btrfs: add an ordered_extent pointer to struct btrfs_bio")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000d5c89a05ffbd39dd@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
17 months agobtrfs: fix iput() on error pointer after error during orphan cleanup
Filipe Manana [Mon, 3 Jul 2023 17:15:31 +0000 (18:15 +0100)]
btrfs: fix iput() on error pointer after error during orphan cleanup

At btrfs_orphan_cleanup(), if we can't find an inode (btrfs_iget() returns
an -ENOENT error pointer), we proceed with 'ret' set to -ENOENT and the
inode pointer set to ERR_PTR(-ENOENT). Later when we proceed to the body
of the following if statement:

    if (ret == -ENOENT || inode->i_nlink) {
        (...)
        trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 1);
        if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
            ret = PTR_ERR(trans);
            iput(inode);
            goto out;
        }
        (...)
        ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root,
                                    found_key.objectid);
        btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
        if (ret) {
            iput(inode);
            goto out;
        }
        continue;
    }

If we get an error from btrfs_start_transaction() or from the call to
btrfs_del_orphan_item() we end calling iput() against an inode pointer
that has a value of ERR_PTR(-ENOENT), resulting in a crash with the
following trace:

  [876.667] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000096
  [876.667] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
  [876.667] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
  [876.667] PGD 0 P4D 0
  [876.668] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
  [876.668] CPU: 0 PID: 2356187 Comm: mount Tainted: G        W          6.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-134+ #1
  [876.668] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  [876.668] RIP: 0010:iput+0xa/0x20
  [876.668] Code: ff ff ff 66 (...)
  [876.669] RSP: 0018:ffffafa9c0c9f9d0 EFLAGS: 00010282
  [876.669] RAX: ffffffffffffffe4 RBX: 000000000009453b RCX: 0000000000000000
  [876.669] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffafa9c0c9f930 RDI: fffffffffffffffe
  [876.669] RBP: ffff95c612f3b800 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffffffffffffe4
  [876.670] R10: 00018f2a71010000 R11: 000000000ead96e3 R12: ffff95cb7d6909a0
  [876.670] R13: fffffffffffffffe R14: ffff95c60f477000 R15: 00000000ffffffe4
  [876.670] FS:  00007f5fbe30a840(0000) GS:ffff95ccdfa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [876.670] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [876.671] CR2: 0000000000000096 CR3: 000000055e9f6004 CR4: 0000000000370ef0
  [876.671] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  [876.671] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  [876.672] Call Trace:
  [876.744]  <TASK>
  [876.744]  ? __die_body+0x1b/0x60
  [876.744]  ? page_fault_oops+0x15d/0x450
  [876.745]  ? __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x47/0x410
  [876.745]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x65/0x8a0
  [876.745]  ? exc_page_fault+0x74/0x170
  [876.746]  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
  [876.746]  ? iput+0xa/0x20
  [876.746]  btrfs_orphan_cleanup+0x221/0x330 [btrfs]
  [876.746]  btrfs_lookup_dentry+0x58f/0x5f0 [btrfs]
  [876.747]  btrfs_lookup+0xe/0x30 [btrfs]
  [876.747]  __lookup_slow+0x82/0x130
  [876.785]  walk_component+0xe5/0x160
  [876.786]  path_lookupat.isra.0+0x6e/0x150
  [876.786]  filename_lookup+0xcf/0x1a0
  [876.786]  ? mod_objcg_state+0xd2/0x360
  [876.786]  ? obj_cgroup_charge+0xf5/0x110
  [876.787]  ? should_failslab+0xa/0x20
  [876.787]  ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x47/0x450
  [876.787]  vfs_path_lookup+0x51/0x90
  [876.788]  mount_subtree+0x8d/0x130
  [876.788]  btrfs_mount+0x149/0x410 [btrfs]
  [876.788]  ? __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x47/0x410
  [876.788]  ? vfs_parse_fs_param+0xc0/0x110
  [876.789]  legacy_get_tree+0x24/0x50
  [876.834]  vfs_get_tree+0x22/0xd0
  [876.852]  path_mount+0x2d8/0x9c0
  [876.852]  do_mount+0x79/0x90
  [876.852]  __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0
  [876.853]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
  [876.899]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
  [876.958] RIP: 0033:0x7f5fbe50b76a
  [876.959] Code: 48 8b 0d a9 (...)
  [876.959] RSP: 002b:00007fff01925798 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5
  [876.959] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f5fbe694264 RCX: 00007f5fbe50b76a
  [876.960] RDX: 0000561bde6c8720 RSI: 0000561bde6bdec0 RDI: 0000561bde6c31a0
  [876.960] RBP: 0000561bde6bdc70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
  [876.960] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
  [876.960] R13: 0000561bde6c31a0 R14: 0000561bde6c8720 R15: 0000561bde6bdc70
  [876.960]  </TASK>

So fix this by setting 'inode' to NULL whenever we get an error from
btrfs_iget(), and to make the code simpler, stop testing for 'ret' being
-ENOENT to check if we have an inode - instead test for 'inode' being NULL
or not. Having a NULL 'inode' prevents any iput() call from crashing, as
iput() ignores NULL inode pointers. Also, stop testing for a NULL return
value from btrfs_iget() with PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(), because btrfs_iget() never
returns NULL - in case an inode is not found, it returns ERR_PTR(-ENOENT),
and in case of memory allocation failure, it returns ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM).
We also don't need the extra iput() calls on the error branches for the
btrfs_start_transaction() and btrfs_del_orphan_item() calls, as we have
already called iput() before, so remove them.

Fixes: a13bb2c03848 ("btrfs: add missing iputs on orphan cleanup failure")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.4
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
17 months agobtrfs: fix double iput() on inode after an error during orphan cleanup
Filipe Manana [Mon, 3 Jul 2023 17:15:30 +0000 (18:15 +0100)]
btrfs: fix double iput() on inode after an error during orphan cleanup

At btrfs_orphan_cleanup(), if we were able to find the inode, we do an
iput() on the inode, then if btrfs_drop_verity_items() succeeds and then
either btrfs_start_transaction() or btrfs_del_orphan_item() fail, we do
another iput() in the respective error paths, resulting in an extra iput()
on the inode.

Fix this by setting inode to NULL after the first iput(), as iput()
ignores a NULL inode pointer argument.

Fixes: a13bb2c03848 ("btrfs: add missing iputs on orphan cleanup failure")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.4
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
17 months agobtrfs: zoned: fix memory leak after finding block group with super blocks
Filipe Manana [Mon, 3 Jul 2023 11:03:21 +0000 (12:03 +0100)]
btrfs: zoned: fix memory leak after finding block group with super blocks

At exclude_super_stripes(), if we happen to find a block group that has
super blocks mapped to it and we are on a zoned filesystem, we error out
as this is not supposed to happen, indicating either a bug or maybe some
memory corruption for example. However we are exiting the function without
freeing the memory allocated for the logical address of the super blocks.
Fix this by freeing the logical address.

Fixes: 12659251ca5d ("btrfs: implement log-structured superblock for ZONED mode")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
17 months agobtrfs: fix use-after-free of new block group that became unused
Filipe Manana [Wed, 28 Jun 2023 16:13:37 +0000 (17:13 +0100)]
btrfs: fix use-after-free of new block group that became unused

If a task creates a new block group and that block group becomes unused
before we finish its creation, at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(),
then when btrfs_mark_bg_unused() is called against the block group, we
assume that the block group is currently in the list of block groups to
reclaim, and we move it out of the list of new block groups and into the
list of unused block groups. This has two consequences:

1) We move it out of the list of new block groups associated to the
   current transaction. So the block group creation is not finished and
   if we attempt to delete the bg because it's unused, we will not find
   the block group item in the extent tree (or the new block group tree),
   its device extent items in the device tree etc, resulting in the
   deletion to fail due to the missing items;

2) We don't increment the reference count on the block group when we
   move it to the list of unused block groups, because we assumed the
   block group was on the list of block groups to reclaim, and in that
   case it already has the correct reference count. However the block
   group was on the list of new block groups, in which case no extra
   reference was taken because it's local to the current task. This
   later results in doing an extra reference count decrement when
   removing the block group from the unused list, eventually leading the
   reference count to 0.

This second case was caught when running generic/297 from fstests, which
produced the following assertion failure and stack trace:

  [589.559] assertion failed: refcount_read(&block_group->refs) == 1, in fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4299
  [589.559] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [589.559] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4299!
  [589.560] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
  [589.560] CPU: 8 PID: 2819134 Comm: umount Tainted: G        W          6.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-134+ #1
  [589.560] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  [589.560] RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.561] Code: 68 62 da c0 (...)
  [589.561] RSP: 0018:ffffa55a8c3b3d98 EFLAGS: 00010246
  [589.561] RAX: 0000000000000058 RBX: ffff8f030d7f2000 RCX: 0000000000000000
  [589.562] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff953f0878 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
  [589.562] RBP: ffff8f030d7f2088 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa55a8c3b3c50
  [589.562] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8f05850b4c00
  [589.562] R13: ffff8f030d7f2090 R14: ffff8f05850b4cd8 R15: dead000000000100
  [589.563] FS:  00007f497fd2e840(0000) GS:ffff8f09dfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [589.563] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [589.563] CR2: 00007f497ff8ec10 CR3: 0000000271472006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
  [589.563] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  [589.564] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  [589.564] Call Trace:
  [589.564]  <TASK>
  [589.565]  ? __die_body+0x1b/0x60
  [589.565]  ? die+0x39/0x60
  [589.565]  ? do_trap+0xeb/0x110
  [589.565]  ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.566]  ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90
  [589.566]  ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.566]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x4e/0x70
  [589.566]  ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.567]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
  [589.567]  ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.567]  ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.567]  close_ctree+0x35d/0x560 [btrfs]
  [589.568]  ? fsnotify_sb_delete+0x13e/0x1d0
  [589.568]  ? dispose_list+0x3a/0x50
  [589.568]  ? evict_inodes+0x151/0x1a0
  [589.568]  generic_shutdown_super+0x73/0x1a0
  [589.569]  kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
  [589.569]  btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
  [589.569]  deactivate_locked_super+0x2e/0x70
  [589.569]  cleanup_mnt+0x104/0x160
  [589.570]  task_work_run+0x56/0x90
  [589.570]  exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x160/0x170
  [589.570]  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x22/0x50
  [589.570]  ? __x64_sys_umount+0x12/0x20
  [589.571]  do_syscall_64+0x48/0x90
  [589.571]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
  [589.571] RIP: 0033:0x7f497ff0a567
  [589.571] Code: af 98 0e (...)
  [589.572] RSP: 002b:00007ffc98347358 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
  [589.572] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f49800b8264 RCX: 00007f497ff0a567
  [589.572] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000557f558abfa0
  [589.573] RBP: 0000557f558a6ba0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffc98346100
  [589.573] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
  [589.573] R13: 0000557f558abfa0 R14: 0000557f558a6cb0 R15: 0000557f558a6dd0
  [589.573]  </TASK>
  [589.574] Modules linked in: dm_snapshot dm_thin_pool (...)
  [589.576] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Fix this by adding a runtime flag to the block group to tell that the
block group is still in the list of new block groups, and therefore it
should not be moved to the list of unused block groups, at
btrfs_mark_bg_unused(), until the flag is cleared, when we finish the
creation of the block group at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups().

Fixes: a9f189716cf1 ("btrfs: move out now unused BG from the reclaim list")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
17 months agobtrfs: be a bit more careful when setting mirror_num_ret in btrfs_map_block
Christoph Hellwig [Tue, 27 Jun 2023 06:13:23 +0000 (08:13 +0200)]
btrfs: be a bit more careful when setting mirror_num_ret in btrfs_map_block

The mirror_num_ret is allowed to be NULL, although it has to be set when
smap is set.  Unfortunately that is not a well enough specifiable
invariant for static type checkers, so add a NULL check to make sure they
are fine.

Fixes: 03793cbbc80f ("btrfs: add fast path for single device io in __btrfs_map_block")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
17 months agobtrfs: fix race between balance and cancel/pause
Josef Bacik [Fri, 23 Jun 2023 05:05:41 +0000 (01:05 -0400)]
btrfs: fix race between balance and cancel/pause

Syzbot reported a panic that looks like this:

  assertion failed: fs_info->exclusive_operation == BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED, in fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:465
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/messages.c:259!
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_assertfail+0x2c/0x30 fs/btrfs/messages.c:259
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   btrfs_exclop_balance fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:465 [inline]
   btrfs_ioctl_balance fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3564 [inline]
   btrfs_ioctl+0x531e/0x5b30 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4632
   vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
   __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
   __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x197/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:856
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

The reproducer is running a balance and a cancel or pause in parallel.
The way balance finishes is a bit wonky, if we were paused we need to
save the balance_ctl in the fs_info, but clear it otherwise and cleanup.
However we rely on the return values being specific errors, or having a
cancel request or no pause request.  If balance completes and returns 0,
but we have a pause or cancel request we won't do the appropriate
cleanup, and then the next time we try to start a balance we'll trip
this ASSERT.

The error handling is just wrong here, we always want to clean up,
unless we got -ECANCELLED and we set the appropriate pause flag in the
exclusive op.  With this patch the reproducer ran for an hour without
tripping, previously it would trip in less than a few minutes.

Reported-by: syzbot+c0f3acf145cb465426d5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: fix race between quota disable and relocation
Filipe Manana [Mon, 19 Jun 2023 16:21:50 +0000 (17:21 +0100)]
btrfs: fix race between quota disable and relocation

If we disable quotas while we have a relocation of a metadata block group
that has extents belonging to the quota root, we can cause the relocation
to fail with -ENOENT. This is because relocation builds backref nodes for
extents of the quota root and later needs to walk the backrefs and access
the quota root - however if in between a task disables quotas, it results
in deleting the quota root from the root tree (with btrfs_del_root(),
called from btrfs_quota_disable().

This can be sporadically triggered by test case btrfs/255 from fstests:

  $ ./check btrfs/255
  FSTYP         -- btrfs
  PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 debian0 6.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-134+ #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jun 15 11:59:28 WEST 2023
  MKFS_OPTIONS  -- /dev/sdc
  MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1

  btrfs/255 6s ... _check_dmesg: something found in dmesg (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/255.dmesg)
  - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/255.out.bad)
      --- tests/btrfs/255.out 2023-03-02 21:47:53.876609426 +0000
      +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/255.out.bad 2023-06-16 10:20:39.267563212 +0100
      @@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
       QA output created by 255
      +ERROR: error during balancing '/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1': No such file or directory
      +There may be more info in syslog - try dmesg | tail
       Silence is golden
      ...
      (Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/btrfs/255.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/255.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
  Ran: btrfs/255
  Failures: btrfs/255
  Failed 1 of 1 tests

To fix this make the quota disable operation take the cleaner mutex, as
relocation of a block group also takes this mutex. This is also what we
do when deleting a subvolume/snapshot, we take the cleaner mutex in the
cleaner kthread (at cleaner_kthread()) and then we call btrfs_del_root()
at btrfs_drop_snapshot() while under the protection of the cleaner mutex.

Fixes: bed92eae26cc ("Btrfs: qgroup implementation and prototypes")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: add comment to struct btrfs_fs_info::dirty_cowonly_roots
Filipe Manana [Mon, 19 Jun 2023 16:21:49 +0000 (17:21 +0100)]
btrfs: add comment to struct btrfs_fs_info::dirty_cowonly_roots

Add a comment to struct btrfs_fs_info::dirty_cowonly_roots to mention
that struct btrfs_fs_info::trans_lock is the lock that protects that
list.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: fix race when deleting free space root from the dirty cow roots list
Filipe Manana [Mon, 19 Jun 2023 16:21:48 +0000 (17:21 +0100)]
btrfs: fix race when deleting free space root from the dirty cow roots list

When deleting the free space tree we are deleting the free space root
from the list fs_info->dirty_cowonly_roots without taking the lock that
protects it, which is struct btrfs_fs_info::trans_lock.
This unsynchronized list manipulation may cause chaos if there's another
concurrent manipulation of this list, such as when adding a root to it
with ctree.c:add_root_to_dirty_list().

This can result in all sorts of weird failures caused by a race, such as
the following crash:

  [337571.278245] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdead000000000108: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
  [337571.278933] CPU: 1 PID: 115447 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W          6.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-134+ #1
  [337571.279153] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  [337571.279572] RIP: 0010:commit_cowonly_roots+0x11f/0x250 [btrfs]
  [337571.279928] Code: 85 38 06 00 (...)
  [337571.280363] RSP: 0018:ffff9f63446efba0 EFLAGS: 00010206
  [337571.280582] RAX: ffff942d98ec2638 RBX: ffff9430b82b4c30 RCX: 0000000449e1c000
  [337571.280798] RDX: dead000000000100 RSI: ffff9430021e4900 RDI: 0000000000036070
  [337571.281015] RBP: ffff942d98ec2000 R08: ffff942d98ec2000 R09: 000000000000015b
  [337571.281254] R10: 0000000000000009 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff942fe8fbf600
  [337571.281476] R13: ffff942dabe23040 R14: ffff942dabe20800 R15: ffff942d92cf3b48
  [337571.281723] FS:  00007f478adb7340(0000) GS:ffff94349fa40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [337571.281950] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [337571.282184] CR2: 00007f478ab9a3d5 CR3: 000000001e02c001 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
  [337571.282416] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  [337571.282647] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  [337571.282874] Call Trace:
  [337571.283101]  <TASK>
  [337571.283327]  ? __die_body+0x1b/0x60
  [337571.283570]  ? die_addr+0x39/0x60
  [337571.283796]  ? exc_general_protection+0x22e/0x430
  [337571.284022]  ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x22/0x30
  [337571.284251]  ? commit_cowonly_roots+0x11f/0x250 [btrfs]
  [337571.284531]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x42e/0xf90 [btrfs]
  [337571.284803]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x15/0x30
  [337571.285031]  ? release_extent_buffer+0x103/0x130 [btrfs]
  [337571.285305]  reset_balance_state+0x152/0x1b0 [btrfs]
  [337571.285578]  btrfs_balance+0xa50/0x11e0 [btrfs]
  [337571.285864]  ? __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x14a/0x410
  [337571.286086]  btrfs_ioctl+0x249a/0x3320 [btrfs]
  [337571.286358]  ? mod_objcg_state+0xd2/0x360
  [337571.286577]  ? refill_obj_stock+0xb0/0x160
  [337571.286798]  ? seq_release+0x25/0x30
  [337571.287016]  ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0x3ba/0x4b0
  [337571.287235]  ? percpu_counter_add_batch+0x2e/0xa0
  [337571.287455]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [337571.287675]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [337571.287901]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
  [337571.288126]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
  [337571.288352] RIP: 0033:0x7f478aaffe9b

So fix this by locking struct btrfs_fs_info::trans_lock before deleting
the free space root from that list.

Fixes: a5ed91828518 ("Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: fix race when deleting quota root from the dirty cow roots list
Filipe Manana [Mon, 19 Jun 2023 16:21:47 +0000 (17:21 +0100)]
btrfs: fix race when deleting quota root from the dirty cow roots list

When disabling quotas we are deleting the quota root from the list
fs_info->dirty_cowonly_roots without taking the lock that protects it,
which is struct btrfs_fs_info::trans_lock. This unsynchronized list
manipulation may cause chaos if there's another concurrent manipulation
of this list, such as when adding a root to it with
ctree.c:add_root_to_dirty_list().

This can result in all sorts of weird failures caused by a race, such as
the following crash:

  [337571.278245] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdead000000000108: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
  [337571.278933] CPU: 1 PID: 115447 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W          6.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-134+ #1
  [337571.279153] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  [337571.279572] RIP: 0010:commit_cowonly_roots+0x11f/0x250 [btrfs]
  [337571.279928] Code: 85 38 06 00 (...)
  [337571.280363] RSP: 0018:ffff9f63446efba0 EFLAGS: 00010206
  [337571.280582] RAX: ffff942d98ec2638 RBX: ffff9430b82b4c30 RCX: 0000000449e1c000
  [337571.280798] RDX: dead000000000100 RSI: ffff9430021e4900 RDI: 0000000000036070
  [337571.281015] RBP: ffff942d98ec2000 R08: ffff942d98ec2000 R09: 000000000000015b
  [337571.281254] R10: 0000000000000009 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff942fe8fbf600
  [337571.281476] R13: ffff942dabe23040 R14: ffff942dabe20800 R15: ffff942d92cf3b48
  [337571.281723] FS:  00007f478adb7340(0000) GS:ffff94349fa40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [337571.281950] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [337571.282184] CR2: 00007f478ab9a3d5 CR3: 000000001e02c001 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
  [337571.282416] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  [337571.282647] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  [337571.282874] Call Trace:
  [337571.283101]  <TASK>
  [337571.283327]  ? __die_body+0x1b/0x60
  [337571.283570]  ? die_addr+0x39/0x60
  [337571.283796]  ? exc_general_protection+0x22e/0x430
  [337571.284022]  ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x22/0x30
  [337571.284251]  ? commit_cowonly_roots+0x11f/0x250 [btrfs]
  [337571.284531]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x42e/0xf90 [btrfs]
  [337571.284803]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x15/0x30
  [337571.285031]  ? release_extent_buffer+0x103/0x130 [btrfs]
  [337571.285305]  reset_balance_state+0x152/0x1b0 [btrfs]
  [337571.285578]  btrfs_balance+0xa50/0x11e0 [btrfs]
  [337571.285864]  ? __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x14a/0x410
  [337571.286086]  btrfs_ioctl+0x249a/0x3320 [btrfs]
  [337571.286358]  ? mod_objcg_state+0xd2/0x360
  [337571.286577]  ? refill_obj_stock+0xb0/0x160
  [337571.286798]  ? seq_release+0x25/0x30
  [337571.287016]  ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0x3ba/0x4b0
  [337571.287235]  ? percpu_counter_add_batch+0x2e/0xa0
  [337571.287455]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [337571.287675]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [337571.287901]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
  [337571.288126]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
  [337571.288352] RIP: 0033:0x7f478aaffe9b

So fix this by locking struct btrfs_fs_info::trans_lock before deleting
the quota root from that list.

Fixes: bed92eae26cc ("Btrfs: qgroup implementation and prototypes")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: tracepoints: also show actual number of the outstanding extents
Naohiro Aota [Mon, 19 Jun 2023 02:15:31 +0000 (11:15 +0900)]
btrfs: tracepoints: also show actual number of the outstanding extents

The btrfs_inode_mod_outstanding_extents trace event only shows the modified
number to the number of outstanding extents. It would be helpful if we can
see the resulting extent number as well.

Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: update i_version in update_dev_time
Jeff Layton [Thu, 15 Jun 2023 12:49:45 +0000 (08:49 -0400)]
btrfs: update i_version in update_dev_time

When updating the ctime, we also want to update i_version.

This is just something I noticed by inspection. There is probably no way
to test this today unless you can somehow get to this inode via nfsd.
Still, I think it's the right thing to do for consistency's sake.

David Sterba's comment: I don't see anything wrong with setting the
iversion bit, however I also don't see where this would be useful.
Agreed with the consistency, otherwise the time is updated when device
super block is wiped or a device initialized, both are big events so
missing that due to lack of iversion update seems unlikely. I'll add it
to the queue, thanks.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
[ add comments ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: make btrfs_compressed_bioset static
Ben Dooks [Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:24:43 +0000 (18:24 +0100)]
btrfs: make btrfs_compressed_bioset static

The 'btrfs_compressed_bioset' struct isn't exported outside of the
fs/btrfs/compression.c file, so make it static to fix the following
sparse warning:

fs/btrfs/compression.c:40:16: warning: symbol 'btrfs_compressed_bioset' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: add handling for RAID1C23/DUP to btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile
Matt Corallo [Mon, 5 Jun 2023 23:49:45 +0000 (16:49 -0700)]
btrfs: add handling for RAID1C23/DUP to btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile

Callers of `btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile` expect it to return exactly
one allocation profile flag, and failing to do so may ultimately
result in a WARN_ON and remount-ro when allocating new blocks, like
the below transaction abort on 6.1.

`btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile` has two ways of determining the profile,
first it checks if a conversion balance is currently running and
uses the profile we're converting to. If no balance is currently
running, it returns the max-redundancy profile which at least one
block in the selected block group has.

This works by simply checking each known allocation profile bit in
redundancy order. However, `btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile` has not been
updated as new flags have been added - first with the `DUP` profile
and later with the RAID1C34 profiles.

Because of the way it checks, if we have blocks with different
profiles and at least one is known, that profile will be selected.
However, if none are known we may return a flag set with multiple
allocation profiles set.

This is currently only possible when a balance from one of the three
unhandled profiles to another of the unhandled profiles is canceled
after allocating at least one block using the new profile.

In that case, a transaction abort like the below will occur and the
filesystem will need to be mounted with -o skip_balance to get it
mounted rw again (but the balance cannot be resumed without a
similar abort).

  [770.648] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [770.648] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -22)
  [770.648] WARNING: CPU: 43 PID: 1159593 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4122 find_free_extent+0x1d94/0x1e00 [btrfs]
  [770.648] CPU: 43 PID: 1159593 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W 6.1.0-0.deb11.7-powerpc64le #1  Debian 6.1.20-2~bpo11+1a~test
  [770.648] Hardware name: T2P9D01 REV 1.00 POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:skiboot-bc106a0 PowerNV
  [770.648] NIP:  c00800000f6784fc LR: c00800000f6784f8 CTR: c000000000d746c0
  [770.648] REGS: c000200089afe9a0 TRAP: 0700   Tainted: G        W (6.1.0-0.deb11.7-powerpc64le Debian 6.1.20-2~bpo11+1a~test)
  [770.648] MSR:  9000000002029033 <SF,HV,VEC,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>  CR: 28848282  XER: 20040000
  [770.648] CFAR: c000000000135110 IRQMASK: 0
    GPR00: c00800000f6784f8 c000200089afec40 c00800000f7ea800 0000000000000026
    GPR04: 00000001004820c2 c000200089afea00 c000200089afe9f8 0000000000000027
    GPR08: c000200ffbfe7f98 c000000002127f90 ffffffffffffffd8 0000000026d6a6e8
    GPR12: 0000000028848282 c000200fff7f3800 5deadbeef0000122 c00000002269d000
    GPR16: c0002008c7797c40 c000200089afef17 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
    GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 c000200008bc5a98 0000000000000001
    GPR24: 0000000000000000 c0000003c73088d0 c000200089afef17 c000000016d3a800
    GPR28: c0000003c7308800 c00000002269d000 ffffffffffffffea 0000000000000001
  [770.648] NIP [c00800000f6784fc] find_free_extent+0x1d94/0x1e00 [btrfs]
  [770.648] LR [c00800000f6784f8] find_free_extent+0x1d90/0x1e00 [btrfs]
  [770.648] Call Trace:
  [770.648] [c000200089afec40] [c00800000f6784f8] find_free_extent+0x1d90/0x1e00 [btrfs] (unreliable)
  [770.648] [c000200089afed30] [c00800000f681398] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1a0/0x2f0 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089afeea0] [c00800000f681bf0] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x108/0x670 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089afeff0] [c00800000f66bd68] __btrfs_cow_block+0x170/0x850 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff100] [c00800000f66c58c] btrfs_cow_block+0x144/0x288 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff1b0] [c00800000f67113c] btrfs_search_slot+0x6b4/0xcb0 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff2a0] [c00800000f679f60] lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x128/0x7c0 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff3b0] [c00800000f67b338] lookup_extent_backref+0x70/0x190 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff470] [c00800000f67b54c] __btrfs_free_extent+0xf4/0x1490 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff5a0] [c00800000f67d770] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x328/0x1530 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff740] [c00800000f67ea2c] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xb4/0x3e0 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff800] [c00800000f699aa4] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8c/0x12b0 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff8f0] [c00800000f6dc628] reset_balance_state+0x1c0/0x290 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff9a0] [c00800000f6e2f7c] btrfs_balance+0x1164/0x1500 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089affb40] [c00800000f6f8e4c] btrfs_ioctl+0x2b54/0x3100 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089affc80] [c00000000053be14] sys_ioctl+0x794/0x1310
  [770.648] [c000200089affd70] [c00000000002af98] system_call_exception+0x138/0x250
  [770.648] [c000200089affe10] [c00000000000c654] system_call_common+0xf4/0x258
  [770.648] --- interrupt: c00 at 0x7fff94126800
  [770.648] NIP:  00007fff94126800 LR: 0000000107e0b594 CTR: 0000000000000000
  [770.648] REGS: c000200089affe80 TRAP: 0c00   Tainted: G        W (6.1.0-0.deb11.7-powerpc64le Debian 6.1.20-2~bpo11+1a~test)
  [770.648] MSR:  900000000000d033 <SF,HV,EE,PR,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>  CR: 24002848  XER: 00000000
  [770.648] IRQMASK: 0
    GPR00: 0000000000000036 00007fffc9439da0 00007fff94217100 0000000000000003
    GPR04: 00000000c4009420 00007fffc9439ee8 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
    GPR08: 00000000803c7416 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
    GPR12: 0000000000000000 00007fff9467d120 0000000107e64c9c 0000000107e64d0a
    GPR16: 0000000107e64d06 0000000107e64cf1 0000000107e64cc4 0000000107e64c73
    GPR20: 0000000107e64c31 0000000107e64bf1 0000000107e64be7 0000000000000000
    GPR24: 0000000000000000 00007fffc9439ee0 0000000000000003 0000000000000001
    GPR28: 00007fffc943f713 0000000000000000 00007fffc9439ee8 0000000000000000
  [770.648] NIP [00007fff94126800] 0x7fff94126800
  [770.648] LR [0000000107e0b594] 0x107e0b594
  [770.648] --- interrupt: c00
  [770.648] Instruction dump:
  [770.648] 3b00ffe4 e8898828 481175f5 60000000 4bfff4fc 3be00000 4bfff570 3d220000
  [770.648] 7fc4f378 e8698830 4811cd95 e8410018 <0fe00000f9c10060 f9e10068 fa010070
  [770.648] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
  [770.648] BTRFS: error (device dm-2: state A) in find_free_extent_update_loop:4122: errno=-22 unknown
  [770.648] BTRFS info (device dm-2: state EA): forced readonly
  [770.648] BTRFS: error (device dm-2: state EA) in __btrfs_free_extent:3070: errno=-22 unknown
  [770.648] BTRFS error (device dm-2: state EA): failed to run delayed ref for logical 17838685708288 num_bytes 24576 type 184 action 2 ref_mod 1: -22
  [770.648] BTRFS: error (device dm-2: state EA) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2144: errno=-22 unknown
  [770.648] BTRFS: error (device dm-2: state EA) in reset_balance_state:3599: errno=-22 unknown

Fixes: 47e6f7423b91 ("btrfs: add support for 3-copy replication (raid1c3)")
Fixes: 8d6fac0087e5 ("btrfs: add support for 4-copy replication (raid1c4)")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Signed-off-by: Matt Corallo <blnxfsl@bluematt.me>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: scrub: remove btrfs_fs_info::scrub_wr_completion_workers
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 12 Jun 2023 07:23:29 +0000 (15:23 +0800)]
btrfs: scrub: remove btrfs_fs_info::scrub_wr_completion_workers

Since the scrub rework introduced by commit 2af2aaf98205 ("btrfs:
scrub: introduce structure for new BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN based interface")
and later commits, scrub only needs one single workqueue,
fs_info::scrub_worker.

That scrub_wr_completion_workers is initially to handle the delay work
after write bios finished.  But the new scrub code goes submit-and-wait
for write bios, thus all the work are done inside the scrub_worker.

The last user of fs_info::scrub_wr_completion_workers is removed in
commit 16f93993498b ("btrfs: scrub: remove the old writeback
infrastructure"), so we can safely remove the workqueue.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: scrub: remove scrub_ctx::csum_list member
Qu Wenruo [Mon, 12 Jun 2023 06:14:29 +0000 (14:14 +0800)]
btrfs: scrub: remove scrub_ctx::csum_list member

Since the rework of scrub introduced by commit 2af2aaf98205 ("btrfs:
scrub: introduce structure for new BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN based interface")
and later commits, scrub no longer keeps its data checksum inside sctx.

Instead we have scrub_stripe::csums for the checksum of the stripe.
Thus we can remove the unused scrub_ctx::csum_list member.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: do not BUG_ON after failure to migrate space during truncation
Filipe Manana [Tue, 13 Jun 2023 16:07:54 +0000 (17:07 +0100)]
btrfs: do not BUG_ON after failure to migrate space during truncation

During truncation we reserve 2 metadata units when starting a transaction
(reserved space goes to fs_info->trans_block_rsv) and then attempt to
migrate 1 unit (min_size bytes) from fs_info->trans_block_rsv into the
local block reserve. If we ever fail we trigger a BUG_ON(), which should
never happen, because we reserved 2 units. However if we happen to fail
for some reason, we don't need to be so dire and hit a BUG_ON(), we can
just error out the truncation and, since this is highly unexpected,
surround the error check with WARN_ON(), to get an informative stack
trace and tag the branh as 'unlikely'. Also make the 'min_size' variable
const, since it's not supposed to ever change and any accidental change
could possibly make the space migration not so unlikely to fail.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: do not BUG_ON on failure to get dir index for new snapshot
Filipe Manana [Tue, 13 Jun 2023 15:42:16 +0000 (16:42 +0100)]
btrfs: do not BUG_ON on failure to get dir index for new snapshot

During the transaction commit path, at create_pending_snapshot(), there
is no need to BUG_ON() in case we fail to get a dir index for the snapshot
in the parent directory. This should fail very rarely because the parent
inode should be loaded in memory already, with the respective delayed
inode created and the parent inode's index_cnt field already initialized.

However if it fails, it may be -ENOMEM like the comment at
create_pending_snapshot() says or any error returned by
btrfs_search_slot() through btrfs_set_inode_index_count(), which can be
pretty much anything such as -EIO or -EUCLEAN for example. So the comment
is not correct when it says it can only be -ENOMEM.

However doing a BUG_ON() here is overkill, since we can instead abort
the transaction and return the error. Note that any error returned by
create_pending_snapshot() will eventually result in a transaction
abort at cleanup_transaction(), called from btrfs_commit_transaction(),
but we can explicitly abort the transaction at this point instead so that
we get a stack trace to tell us that the call to btrfs_set_inode_index()
failed.

So just abort the transaction and return in case btrfs_set_inode_index()
returned an error at create_pending_snapshot().

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: send: do not BUG_ON() on unexpected symlink data extent
Filipe Manana [Mon, 12 Jun 2023 10:40:59 +0000 (11:40 +0100)]
btrfs: send: do not BUG_ON() on unexpected symlink data extent

There's really no need to BUG_ON() if we find a symlink with an extent
that is not inline or is compressed. We can just make send fail with
an error (-EUCLEAN) and log an informative error message, so just do
that instead of BUG_ON().

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: do not BUG_ON() when dropping inode items from log root
Filipe Manana [Mon, 12 Jun 2023 10:40:17 +0000 (11:40 +0100)]
btrfs: do not BUG_ON() when dropping inode items from log root

When dropping inode items from a log tree at drop_inode_items(), we this
BUG_ON() on the result of btrfs_search_slot() because we don't expect an
exact match since having a key with an offset of (u64)-1 is unexpected.
That is generally true, but for dir index keys for example, we can get a
key with such an offset value, even though it's very unlikely and it would
take ages to increase the sequence counter for a dir index up to (u64)-1.
We can deal with an exact match, we just have to delete the key at that
slot, so there is really no need to BUG_ON(), error out or trigger any
warning. So remove the BUG_ON().

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: replace BUG_ON() at split_item() with proper error handling
Filipe Manana [Fri, 9 Jun 2023 10:49:07 +0000 (11:49 +0100)]
btrfs: replace BUG_ON() at split_item() with proper error handling

There's no need to BUG_ON() at split_item() if the leaf does not have
enough free space for the new item, we can just return -ENOSPC since
the caller can deal with errors from split_item(). Also, as this is a
very unlikely condition to happen, because the caller has invoked
setup_leaf_for_split() before calling split_item(), surround the
condition with a WARN_ON() which makes it easier to notice this
unexpected condition and tags the if branch with 'unlikely' as well.

I've actually once hit this BUG_ON() with some incorrect code changes
I had, which was very inconvenient as it required rebooting the VM.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failures at btrfs_del_ptr()
Filipe Manana [Thu, 8 Jun 2023 10:27:49 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failures at btrfs_del_ptr()

At btrfs_del_ptr(), instead of doing a BUG_ON() in case we fail to record
tree mod log operations, do a transaction abort and return the error to
the callers. There's really no need for the BUG_ON() as we can release all
resources in the context of all callers, and we have to abort because other
future tree searches that use the tree mod log (btrfs_search_old_slot())
may get inconsistent results if other operations modify the tree after
that failure and before the tree mod log based search.

This implies btrfs_del_ptr() return an int instead of void, and making all
callers check for returned errors.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failures at insert_ptr()
Filipe Manana [Thu, 8 Jun 2023 10:27:48 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failures at insert_ptr()

At insert_ptr(), instead of doing a BUG_ON() in case we fail to record
tree mod log operations, do a transaction abort and return the error to
the callers. There's really no need for the BUG_ON() as we can release all
resources in the context of all callers, and we have to abort because other
future tree searches that use the tree mod log (btrfs_search_old_slot())
may get inconsistent results if other operations modify the tree after
that failure and before the tree mod log based search.

This implies making insert_ptr() return an int instead of void, and making
all callers check for returned errors.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failure at insert_new_root()
Filipe Manana [Thu, 8 Jun 2023 10:27:47 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failure at insert_new_root()

At insert_new_root(), instead of doing a BUG_ON() in case we fail to
record the tree mod log operation, just return the error to the callers
after releasing the allocated tree block. At this point we haven't made
any changes to the b+tree, so we haven't left it in an inconsistent state
and therefore have no need to abort the transaction. All we need to do is
to unlock and free the extent buffer we just allocated with the purpose
of making it the new root.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failures at push_nodes_for_insert()
Filipe Manana [Thu, 8 Jun 2023 10:27:46 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failures at push_nodes_for_insert()

At push_nodes_for_insert(), instead of doing a BUG_ON() in case we fail to
record tree mod log operations, do a transaction abort and return the
error to the caller. There's really no need for the BUG_ON() as we can
release all resources in this context, and we have to abort because other
future tree searches that use the tree mod log (btrfs_search_old_slot())
may get inconsistent results if other operations modify the tree after
that failure and before the tree mod log based search.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: abort transaction at update_ref_for_cow() when ref count is zero
Filipe Manana [Thu, 8 Jun 2023 10:27:45 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: abort transaction at update_ref_for_cow() when ref count is zero

At update_ref_for_cow() we are calling btrfs_handle_fs_error() if we find
that the extent buffer has an unexpected ref count of zero, however we can
simply use btrfs_abort_transaction(), which achieves the same purposes: to
turn the fs to error state, abort the current transaction and turn the fs
to RO mode as well. Besides that, btrfs_abort_transaction() also prints a
stack trace which makes it more useful.

Also, as this is a very unexpected situation, indicating a serious
corruption/inconsistency, tag the if branch as 'unlikely', set the error
code to -EUCLEAN instead of -EROFS, and log an explicit message.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: abort transaction at balance_level() when left child is missing
Filipe Manana [Thu, 8 Jun 2023 10:27:44 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: abort transaction at balance_level() when left child is missing

At balance_level() we are calling btrfs_handle_fs_error() when the middle
child only has 1 item and the left child is missing, however we can simply
use btrfs_abort_transaction(), which achieves the same purposes: to turn
the fs to error state, abort the current transaction and turn the fs to
RO mode. Besides that, btrfs_abort_transaction() also prints a stack trace
which makes it more useful.

Also, as this is a highly unexpected case and it's about a b+tree
inconsistency, change the error code from -EROFS to -EUCLEAN, tag the if
branch as 'unlikely' and log an explicit error message.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: avoid unnecessarily setting the fs to RO and error state at balance_level()
Filipe Manana [Thu, 8 Jun 2023 10:27:43 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: avoid unnecessarily setting the fs to RO and error state at balance_level()

At balance_level(), when trying to promote a child node to a root node, if
we fail to read the child we call btrfs_handle_fs_error(), which turns the
fs to RO mode and sets it to error state as well, causing any ongoing
transaction to abort. This however is not necessary because at that point
we have not made any change yet at balance_level(), so any error reading
the child node does not leaves us in any inconsistent state. Therefore we
can just return the error to the caller.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: rename enospc label to out at balance_level()
Filipe Manana [Thu, 8 Jun 2023 10:27:42 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: rename enospc label to out at balance_level()

At balance_level() we have this 'enospc' label where we jump to in case
we get an error at several places. However that error is certainly not
-ENOSPC in call cases, it can be -EIO or -ENOMEM when reading a child
extent buffer for example, or -ENOMEM when trying to record tree mod log
operations. So to make this less confusing, rename the label to 'out'.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failure at balance_level()
Filipe Manana [Thu, 8 Jun 2023 10:27:41 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failure at balance_level()

At balance_level(), instead of doing a BUG_ON() in case we fail to record
tree mod log operations, do a transaction abort and return the error to
the callers. There's really no need for the BUG_ON() as we can release
all resources in this context, and we have to abort because other future
tree searches that use the tree mod log (btrfs_search_old_slot()) may get
inconsistent results if other operations modify the tree after that
failure and before the tree mod log based search.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failure at __btrfs_cow_block()
Filipe Manana [Thu, 8 Jun 2023 10:27:40 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failure at __btrfs_cow_block()

At __btrfs_cow_block(), instead of doing a BUG_ON() in case we fail to
record a tree mod log root insertion operation, do a transaction abort
instead. There's really no need for the BUG_ON(), we can properly
release all resources in this context and turn the filesystem to RO mode
and in an error state instead.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: avoid tree mod log ENOMEM failures when we don't need to log
Filipe Manana [Thu, 8 Jun 2023 10:27:39 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: avoid tree mod log ENOMEM failures when we don't need to log

When logging tree mod log operations we start by checking, in a lockless
manner, if we need to log - if we don't, we just return and do nothing,
otherwise we will allocate one or more tree mod log operations and then
check again if we need to log. This second check will take the tree mod
log lock in write mode if we need to log, otherwise it will do nothing
and we just free the allocated memory and return success.

We can improve on this by not returning an error in case the memory
allocations fail, unless the second check tells us that we actually need
to log. That is, if we fail to allocate memory and the second check tells
use that we don't need to log, we can just return success and avoid
returning -ENOMEM to the caller. Currently tree mod log failures are
dealt with either a BUG_ON() or a transaction abort, as tree mod log
operations are logged in code paths that modify a b+tree.

So just avoid failing with -ENOMEM if we fail to allocate a tree mod log
operation unless we actually need to log the operations, that is, if
tree_mod_dont_log() returns true.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: fix extent buffer leak after tree mod log failure at split_node()
Filipe Manana [Thu, 8 Jun 2023 10:27:38 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: fix extent buffer leak after tree mod log failure at split_node()

At split_node(), if we fail to log the tree mod log copy operation, we
return without unlocking the split extent buffer we just allocated and
without decrementing the reference we own on it. Fix this by unlocking
it and decrementing the ref count before returning.

Fixes: 5de865eebb83 ("Btrfs: fix tree mod logging")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: add missing error handling when logging operation while COWing extent buffer
Filipe Manana [Thu, 8 Jun 2023 10:27:37 +0000 (11:27 +0100)]
btrfs: add missing error handling when logging operation while COWing extent buffer

When COWing an extent buffer that is not the root node, we need to log in
the tree mod log that we replaced a pointer in the parent node, otherwise
a tree mod log user doing a search on the b+tree can return incorrect
results (that miss something). We are doing the call to
btrfs_tree_mod_log_insert_key() but we totally ignore its return value.

So fix this by adding the missing error handling, resulting in a
transaction abort and freeing the COWed extent buffer.

Fixes: f230475e62f7 ("Btrfs: put all block modifications into the tree mod log")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: set FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT instead of a dummy direct_IO method
Christoph Hellwig [Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:11:33 +0000 (11:11 +0200)]
btrfs: set FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT instead of a dummy direct_IO method

Since commit a2ad63daa88b ("VFS: add FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT file flag") file
systems can just set the FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT flag at open time instead of
wiring up a dummy direct_IO method to indicate support for direct I/O.
Do that for btrfs so that noop_direct_IO can eventually be removed.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: update documentation for a block group's bg_list member
Filipe Manana [Tue, 6 Jun 2023 14:26:03 +0000 (15:26 +0100)]
btrfs: update documentation for a block group's bg_list member

Currently we are only documenting two uses of the bg_list member of a
block group, but there two more:

1) To track deleted block groups for discard purposes, introduced in
   commit e33e17ee1098 ("btrfs: add missing discards when unpinning
   extents with -o discard");

2) To track block groups for automatic reclaim, introduced more recently
   by commit 18bb8bbf13c1 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones")

So document those two other use cases.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: reinsert BGs failed to reclaim
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 6 Jun 2023 05:36:36 +0000 (14:36 +0900)]
btrfs: reinsert BGs failed to reclaim

The reclaim process can temporarily fail. For example, if the space is
getting tight, it fails to make the block group read-only. If there are no
further writes on that block group, the block group will never get back to
the reclaim list, and the BG never gets reclaimed. In a certain workload,
we can leave many such block groups never reclaimed.

So, let's get it back to the list and give it a chance to be reclaimed.

Fixes: 18bb8bbf13c1 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: bail out reclaim process if filesystem is read-only
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 6 Jun 2023 05:36:35 +0000 (14:36 +0900)]
btrfs: bail out reclaim process if filesystem is read-only

When a filesystem is read-only, we cannot reclaim a block group as it
cannot rewrite the data. Just bail out in that case.

Note that it can drop block groups in this case. As we did
sb_start_write(), read-only filesystem means we got a fatal error and
forced read-only. There is no chance to reclaim them again.

Fixes: 18bb8bbf13c1 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: move out now unused BG from the reclaim list
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 6 Jun 2023 05:36:34 +0000 (14:36 +0900)]
btrfs: move out now unused BG from the reclaim list

An unused block group is easy to remove to free up space and should be
reclaimed fast. Such block group can often already be a target of the
reclaim process. As we check list_empty(&bg->bg_list), we keep it in the
reclaim list. That block group is never reclaimed until the file system
is filled e.g. up to 75%.

Instead, we can move unused block group to the unused list and delete it
fast.

Fixes: 18bb8bbf13c1 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: delete unused BGs while reclaiming BGs
Naohiro Aota [Tue, 6 Jun 2023 05:36:33 +0000 (14:36 +0900)]
btrfs: delete unused BGs while reclaiming BGs

The reclaiming process only starts after the filesystem volumes are
allocated to a certain level (75% by default). Thus, the list of
reclaiming target block groups can build up so huge at the time the
reclaim process kicks in. On a test run, there were over 1000 BGs in the
reclaim list.

As the reclaim involves rewriting the data, it takes really long time to
reclaim the BGs. While the reclaim is running, btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()
won't proceed because the reclaim side is holding
fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock. As a result, we will have a large number of
unused BGs kept in the unused list. On my test run, I got 1057 unused BGs.

Since deleting a block group is relatively easy and fast work, we can call
btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() while it reclaims BGs, to avoid building up
unused BGs.

Fixes: 18bb8bbf13c1 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: use btrfs_finish_ordered_extent to complete buffered writes
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:54:10 +0000 (09:54 +0200)]
btrfs: use btrfs_finish_ordered_extent to complete buffered writes

Use the btrfs_finish_ordered_extent helper to complete compressed writes
using the bbio->ordered pointer instead of requiring an rbtree lookup
in the otherwise equivalent btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished called from
btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: use btrfs_finish_ordered_extent to complete direct writes
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:54:09 +0000 (09:54 +0200)]
btrfs: use btrfs_finish_ordered_extent to complete direct writes

Use the btrfs_finish_ordered_extent helper to complete compressed writes
using the bbio->ordered pointer instead of requiring an rbtree lookup
in the otherwise equivalent btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished called from
btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: use btrfs_finish_ordered_extent to complete compressed writes
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:54:08 +0000 (09:54 +0200)]
btrfs: use btrfs_finish_ordered_extent to complete compressed writes

Use the btrfs_finish_ordered_extent helper to complete compressed writes
using the bbio->ordered pointer instead of requiring an rbtree lookup
in the otherwise equivalent btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished called from
btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: open code end_extent_writepage in end_bio_extent_writepage
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:54:07 +0000 (09:54 +0200)]
btrfs: open code end_extent_writepage in end_bio_extent_writepage

This prepares for switching to more efficient ordered_extent processing
and already removes the forth and back conversion from len to end back to
len.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: add a btrfs_finish_ordered_extent helper
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:54:06 +0000 (09:54 +0200)]
btrfs: add a btrfs_finish_ordered_extent helper

Add a helper to complete an ordered_extent without first doing a lookup.
The tracepoint cannot use the ordered_extent class as we also want to
print the range.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: factor out a btrfs_queue_ordered_fn helper
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:54:05 +0000 (09:54 +0200)]
btrfs: factor out a btrfs_queue_ordered_fn helper

Factor out a helper to queue up an ordered_extent completion in a work
queue.  This new helper will later be used complete an ordered_extent
without first doing a lookup.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: factor out a can_finish_ordered_extent helper
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:54:04 +0000 (09:54 +0200)]
btrfs: factor out a can_finish_ordered_extent helper

Factor out a helper from btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished that does the
actual per-ordered_extent work to check if we want to schedule an I/O
completion.  This new helper will later be used complete an
ordered_extent without first doing a lookup.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: use bbio->ordered in btrfs_csum_one_bio
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:54:03 +0000 (09:54 +0200)]
btrfs: use bbio->ordered in btrfs_csum_one_bio

Use the ordered_extent pointer in the btrfs_bio instead of looking it
up manually.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: add an ordered_extent pointer to struct btrfs_bio
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:54:02 +0000 (09:54 +0200)]
btrfs: add an ordered_extent pointer to struct btrfs_bio

Add a pointer to the ordered_extent to the existing union in struct
btrfs_bio, so all code dealing with data write bios can just use a
pointer dereference to retrieve the ordered_extent instead of doing
multiple rbtree lookups per I/O.

The reference to this ordered_extent is dropped at end I/O time,
which implies that an extra one must be acquired when the bio is split.
This also requires moving the btrfs_extract_ordered_extent call into
btrfs_split_bio so that the invariant of always having a valid
ordered_extent reference for the btrfs_bio is kept.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: open code btrfs_bio_end_io in btrfs_dio_submit_io
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:54:01 +0000 (09:54 +0200)]
btrfs: open code btrfs_bio_end_io in btrfs_dio_submit_io

btrfs_dio_submit_io is the only place that uses btrfs_bio_end_io to end a
bio that hasn't been submitted using btrfs_submit_bio yet, and this
invariant will become a problem with upcoming changes to the btrfs bio
layer.  Just open code the assignment of bi_status and the call to
btrfs_dio_end_io.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: add a is_data_bbio helper
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:54:00 +0000 (09:54 +0200)]
btrfs: add a is_data_bbio helper

Add a helper to check for that a btrfs_bio has a valid inode, and that
it is a data inode to key off all the special handling for data path
checksumming.  Note that this uses is_data_inode instead of REQ_META as
REQ_META is only set directly before submission in submit_one_bio and
we'll also want to use this helper for error handling where REQ_META
isn't set yet.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: remove btrfs_add_ordered_extent
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:53:59 +0000 (09:53 +0200)]
btrfs: remove btrfs_add_ordered_extent

All callers are gone now.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: pass an ordered_extent to btrfs_submit_compressed_write
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:53:58 +0000 (09:53 +0200)]
btrfs: pass an ordered_extent to btrfs_submit_compressed_write

btrfs_submit_compressed_write always operates on a single ordered_extent.
Make that explicit by using btrfs_alloc_ordered_extent in the callers
and passing the ordered_extent to btrfs_submit_compressed_write.  This
will help with storing and ordered_extent pointer in the btrfs_bio in
subsequent patches.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: pass an ordered_extent to btrfs_reloc_clone_csums
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:53:57 +0000 (09:53 +0200)]
btrfs: pass an ordered_extent to btrfs_reloc_clone_csums

Both callers of btrfs_reloc_clone_csums allocate the ordered_extent that
btrfs_reloc_clone_csums operates on.  Switch them to use
btrfs_alloc_ordered_extent instead of btrfs_add_ordered_extent and
pass the ordered_extent to btrfs_reloc_clone_csums instead of doing an
extra lookup.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: merge the two calls to btrfs_add_ordered_extent in run_delalloc_nocow
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:53:56 +0000 (09:53 +0200)]
btrfs: merge the two calls to btrfs_add_ordered_extent in run_delalloc_nocow

Refactor run_delalloc_nocow a little bit so that there is only a single
call to btrfs_add_ordered_extent instead of two.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: limit write bios to a single ordered extent
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:53:55 +0000 (09:53 +0200)]
btrfs: limit write bios to a single ordered extent

Currently buffered writeback bios are allowed to span multiple
ordered_extents, although that basically never actually happens since
commit 4a445b7b6178 ("btrfs: don't merge pages into bio if their page
offset is not contiguous").

Supporting bios than span ordered_extents complicates the file
checksumming code, and prevents us from adding an ordered_extent pointer
to the btrfs_bio structure.  Use the existing code to limit a bio to
single ordered_extent for zoned device writes for all writes.

This allows to remove the REQ_BTRFS_ONE_ORDERED flags, and the
handling of multiple ordered_extents in btrfs_csum_one_bio.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: fix file_offset for REQ_BTRFS_ONE_ORDERED bios that get split
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 07:53:54 +0000 (09:53 +0200)]
btrfs: fix file_offset for REQ_BTRFS_ONE_ORDERED bios that get split

If a bio gets split, it needs to have a proper file_offset for checksum
validation and repair to work properly.

Based on feedback from Josef, commit 852eee62d31a ("btrfs: allow
btrfs_submit_bio to split bios") skipped this adjustment for ONE_ORDERED
bios.  But if we actually ever need to split a ONE_ORDERED read bio, this
will lead to a wrong file offset in the repair code.  Right now the only
user of the file_offset is logging of an error message so this is mostly
harmless, but the wrong offset might be more problematic for additional
users in the future.

Fixes: 852eee62d31a ("btrfs: allow btrfs_submit_bio to split bios")
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: add block-group tree to lockdep classes
David Sterba [Wed, 31 May 2023 22:33:01 +0000 (00:33 +0200)]
btrfs: add block-group tree to lockdep classes

The block group tree was not present among the lockdep classes. We could
get potentially lockdep warnings but so far none has been seen, also
because block-group-tree is a relatively new feature.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: don't treat zoned writeback as being from an async helper thread
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 06:05:02 +0000 (08:05 +0200)]
btrfs: don't treat zoned writeback as being from an async helper thread

When extent_write_locked_range was originally added, it was only used
writing back compressed pages from an async helper thread.  But it is
now also used for writing back pages on zoned devices, where it is
called directly from the ->writepage context.  In this case we want to
be able to pass on the writeback_control instead of creating a new one,
and more importantly want to use all the normal cgroup interaction
instead of potentially deferring writeback to another helper.

Fixes: 898793d992c2 ("btrfs: zoned: write out partially allocated region")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: only call __extent_writepage_io from extent_write_locked_range
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 06:05:01 +0000 (08:05 +0200)]
btrfs: only call __extent_writepage_io from extent_write_locked_range

__extent_writepage does a lot of things that make no sense for
extent_write_locked_range, given that extent_write_locked_range itself is
called from __extent_writepage either directly or through a workqueue,
and all this work has already been done in the first invocation and the
pages haven't been unlocked since.  Call __extent_writepage_io directly
instead and open code the logic tracked in
btrfs_bio_ctrl::extent_locked.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: move writeback_control::nr_to_write update to __extent_writepage
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 06:05:00 +0000 (08:05 +0200)]
btrfs: move writeback_control::nr_to_write update to __extent_writepage

Move the nr_to_write accounting from __extent_writepage_io to
__extent_writepage_io as we'll grow another __extent_writepage_io that
doesn't want this accounting soon.  Also drop the obsolete comment -
decrementing a counter in the on-stack writeback_control data structure
doesn't need the page lock.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: remove non-standard extent handling in __extent_writepage_io
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 06:04:59 +0000 (08:04 +0200)]
btrfs: remove non-standard extent handling in __extent_writepage_io

__extent_writepage_io is never called for compressed or inline extents,
or holes.  Remove the not quite working code for them and replace it with
asserts that these cases don't happen.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: remove PAGE_SET_ERROR
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 06:04:58 +0000 (08:04 +0200)]
btrfs: remove PAGE_SET_ERROR

Now that the btrfs writeback code has stopped using PageError, using
PAGE_SET_ERROR to just set the per-address_space error flag is confusing.
Open code the mapping_set_error calls in the callers and remove
the PAGE_SET_ERROR flag.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: stop setting PageError in the data I/O path
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 06:04:57 +0000 (08:04 +0200)]
btrfs: stop setting PageError in the data I/O path

PageError is not used by the VFS/MM and deprecated because it uses up a
page bit and has no coherent rules.  Instead read errors are usually
propagated by not setting or clearing the uptodate bit, and write errors
are propagated through the address_space.  Btrfs now only sets the flag
and never clears it for data pages, so just remove all places setting it,
and the subpage error bit.

Note that the error propagation for superblock writes that work on the
block device mapping still uses PageError for now, but that will be
addressed in a separate series.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: don't check PageError in __extent_writepage
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 06:04:56 +0000 (08:04 +0200)]
btrfs: don't check PageError in __extent_writepage

__extent_writepage currenly sets PageError whenever any error happens,
and the also checks for PageError to decide if to call error handling.
This leads to very unclear responsibility for cleaning up on errors.
In the VM and generic writeback helpers the basic idea is that once
I/O is fired off all error handling responsibility is delegated to the
end I/O handler.  But if that end I/O handler sets the PageError bit,
and the submitter checks it, the bit could in some cases leak into the
submission context for fast enough I/O.

Fix this by simply not checking PageError and just using the local
ret variable to check for submission errors.  This also fundamentally
solves the long problem documented in a comment in __extent_writepage
by never leaking the error bit into the submission context.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: rename cow_file_range_async to run_delalloc_compressed
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 06:04:55 +0000 (08:04 +0200)]
btrfs: rename cow_file_range_async to run_delalloc_compressed

cow_file_range_async is only used for compressed writeback.  Rename it
to run_delalloc_compressed, which also fits in with run_delalloc_nocow
and run_delalloc_zoned.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: don't fail writeback when allocating the compression context fails
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 06:04:54 +0000 (08:04 +0200)]
btrfs: don't fail writeback when allocating the compression context fails

If cow_file_range_async fails to allocate the asynchronous writeback
context, it currently returns an error and entirely fails the writeback.
This is not a good idea as a writeback failure is a non-temporary error
condition that will make the file system unusable.  Just fall back to
synchronous uncompressed writeback instead.  This requires us to delay
setting the BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ASYNC_EXTENT flag until we've committed to
the async writeback.

The compression checks INODE_NOCOMPRESS and FORCE_COMPRESS are moved
from cow_file_range_async to the preceding checks btrfs_run_delalloc_range().

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: don't check PageError in btrfs_verify_page
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 06:04:53 +0000 (08:04 +0200)]
btrfs: don't check PageError in btrfs_verify_page

btrfs_verify_page is called from the readpage completion handler, which
is only used to read pages, or parts of pages that aren't uptodate yet.
The only case where PageError could be set on a page in btrfs is if we
had a previous writeback error, but in that case we won't called readpage
on it, as it has previously been marked uptodate.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: fix fsverify read error handling in end_page_read
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 06:04:52 +0000 (08:04 +0200)]
btrfs: fix fsverify read error handling in end_page_read

Also clear the uptodate bit to make sure the page isn't seen as uptodate
in the page cache if fsverity verification fails.

Fixes: 146054090b08 ("btrfs: initial fsverity support")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: factor out a btrfs_verify_page helper
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 06:04:51 +0000 (08:04 +0200)]
btrfs: factor out a btrfs_verify_page helper

Split all the conditionals for the fsverity calls in end_page_read into
a btrfs_verify_page helper to keep the code readable and make additional
refactoring easier.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: fix range_end calculation in extent_write_locked_range
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 06:04:50 +0000 (08:04 +0200)]
btrfs: fix range_end calculation in extent_write_locked_range

The range_end field in struct writeback_control is inclusive, just like
the end parameter passed to extent_write_locked_range.  Not doing this
could cause extra writeout, which is harmless but suboptimal.

Fixes: 771ed689d2cd ("Btrfs: Optimize compressed writeback and reads")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.9+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: insert tree mod log move in push_node_left
Boris Burkov [Thu, 1 Jun 2023 18:55:14 +0000 (11:55 -0700)]
btrfs: insert tree mod log move in push_node_left

There is a fairly unlikely race condition in tree mod log rewind that
can result in a kernel panic which has the following trace:

  [530.569] BTRFS critical (device sda3): unable to find logical 0 length 4096
  [530.585] BTRFS critical (device sda3): unable to find logical 0 length 4096
  [530.602] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000002
  [530.618] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
  [530.629] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
  [530.641] PGD 0 P4D 0
  [530.647] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
  [530.654] CPU: 30 PID: 398973 Comm: below Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S         O  K   5.12.0-0_fbk13_clang_7455_gb24de3bdb045 #1
  [530.680] Hardware name: Quanta Mono Lake-M.2 SATA 1HY9U9Z001G/Mono Lake-M.2 SATA, BIOS F20_3A15 08/16/2017
  [530.703] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_map_block+0xaa/0xd00
  [530.755] RSP: 0018:ffffc9002c2f7600 EFLAGS: 00010246
  [530.767] RAX: ffffffffffffffea RBX: ffff888292e41000 RCX: f2702d8b8be15100
  [530.784] RDX: ffff88885fda6fb8 RSI: ffff88885fd973c8 RDI: ffff88885fd973c8
  [530.800] RBP: ffff888292e410d0 R08: ffffffff82fd7fd0 R09: 00000000fffeffff
  [530.816] R10: ffffffff82e57fd0 R11: ffffffff82e57d70 R12: 0000000000000000
  [530.832] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: ffffc9002c2f76f0
  [530.848] FS:  00007f38d64af000(0000) GS:ffff88885fd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [530.866] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [530.880] CR2: 0000000000000002 CR3: 00000002b6770004 CR4: 00000000003706e0
  [530.896] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  [530.912] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  [530.928] Call Trace:
  [530.934]  ? btrfs_printk+0x13b/0x18c
  [530.943]  ? btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked+0x3d/0x130
  [530.955]  btrfs_map_bio+0x75/0x330
  [530.963]  ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x12a/0x2d0
  [530.973]  ? btrfs_submit_metadata_bio+0x63/0x100
  [530.984]  btrfs_submit_metadata_bio+0xa4/0x100
  [530.995]  submit_extent_page+0x30f/0x360
  [531.004]  read_extent_buffer_pages+0x49e/0x6d0
  [531.015]  ? submit_extent_page+0x360/0x360
  [531.025]  btree_read_extent_buffer_pages+0x5f/0x150
  [531.037]  read_tree_block+0x37/0x60
  [531.046]  read_block_for_search+0x18b/0x410
  [531.056]  btrfs_search_old_slot+0x198/0x2f0
  [531.066]  resolve_indirect_ref+0xfe/0x6f0
  [531.076]  ? ulist_alloc+0x31/0x60
  [531.084]  ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x12e/0x2b0
  [531.095]  find_parent_nodes+0x720/0x1830
  [531.105]  ? ulist_alloc+0x10/0x60
  [531.113]  iterate_extent_inodes+0xea/0x370
  [531.123]  ? btrfs_previous_extent_item+0x8f/0x110
  [531.134]  ? btrfs_search_path_in_tree+0x240/0x240
  [531.146]  iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x98/0xd0
  [531.157]  ? btrfs_search_path_in_tree+0x240/0x240
  [531.168]  btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino+0xd9/0x180
  [531.179]  btrfs_ioctl+0xe2/0x2eb0

This occurs when logical inode resolution takes a tree mod log sequence
number, and then while backref walking hits a rewind on a busy node
which has the following sequence of tree mod log operations (numbers
filled in from a specific example, but they are somewhat arbitrary)

  REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING slot 532
  REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING slot 531
  REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING slot 530
  ...
  REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING slot 0
  REMOVE slot 455
  REMOVE slot 454
  REMOVE slot 453
  ...
  REMOVE slot 0
  ADD slot 455
  ADD slot 454
  ADD slot 453
  ...
  ADD slot 0
  MOVE src slot 0 -> dst slot 456 nritems 533
  REMOVE slot 455
  REMOVE slot 454
  REMOVE slot 453
  ...
  REMOVE slot 0

When this sequence gets applied via btrfs_tree_mod_log_rewind, it
allocates a fresh rewind eb, and first inserts the correct key info for
the 533 elements, then overwrites the first 456 of them, then decrements
the count by 456 via the add ops, then rewinds the move by doing a
memmove from 456:988->0:532. We have never written anything past 532, so
that memmove writes garbage into the 0:532 range. In practice, this
results in a lot of fully 0 keys. The rewind then puts valid keys into
slots 0:455 with the last removes, but 456:532 are still invalid.

When search_old_slot uses this eb, if it uses one of those invalid
slots, it can then read the extent buffer and issue a bio for offset 0
which ultimately panics looking up extent mappings.

This bad tree mod log sequence gets generated when the node balancing
code happens to do a balance_node_right followed by a push_node_left
while logging in the tree mod log. Illustrated for ebs L and R (left and
right):

L                 R
  start:
  [XXX|YYY|...]      [ZZZ|...|...]
  balance_node_right:
  [XXX|YYY|...]      [...|ZZZ|...] move Z to make room for Y
  [XXX|...|...]      [YYY|ZZZ|...] copy Y from L to R
  push_node_left:
  [XXX|YYY|...]      [...|ZZZ|...] copy Y from R to L
  [XXX|YYY|...]      [ZZZ|...|...] move Z into emptied space (NOT LOGGED!)

This is because balance_node_right logs a move, but push_node_left
explicitly doesn't. That is because logging the move would remove the
overwritten src < dst range in the right eb, which was already logged
when we called btrfs_tree_mod_log_eb_copy. The correct sequence would
include a move from 456:988 to 0:532 after remove 0:455 and before
removing 0:532. Reversing that sequence would entail creating keys for
0:532, then moving those keys out to 456:988, then creating more keys
for 0:455.

i.e.,

  REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING slot 532
  REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING slot 531
  REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING slot 530
  ...
  REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING slot 0
  MOVE src slot 456 -> dst slot 0 nritems 533
  REMOVE slot 455
  REMOVE slot 454
  REMOVE slot 453
  ...
  REMOVE slot 0
  ADD slot 455
  ADD slot 454
  ADD slot 453
  ...
  ADD slot 0
  MOVE src slot 0 -> dst slot 456 nritems 533
  REMOVE slot 455
  REMOVE slot 454
  REMOVE slot 453
  ...
  REMOVE slot 0

Fix this to log the move but avoid the double remove by putting all the
logging logic in btrfs_tree_mod_log_eb_copy which has enough information
to detect these cases and properly log moves, removes, and adds. Leave
btrfs_tree_mod_log_insert_move to handle insert_ptr and delete_ptr's
tree mod logging.

(Un)fortunately, this is quite difficult to reproduce, and I was only
able to reproduce it by adding sleeps in btrfs_search_old_slot that
would encourage more log rewinding during ino_to_logical ioctls. I was
able to hit the warning in the previous patch in the series without the
fix quite quickly, but not after this patch.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: warn on invalid slot in tree mod log rewind
Boris Burkov [Thu, 1 Jun 2023 18:55:13 +0000 (11:55 -0700)]
btrfs: warn on invalid slot in tree mod log rewind

The way that tree mod log tracks the ultimate length of the eb, the
variable 'n', eventually turns up the correct value, but at intermediate
steps during the rewind, n can be inaccurate as a representation of the
end of the eb. For example, it doesn't get updated on move rewinds, and
it does get updated for add/remove in the middle of the eb.

To detect cases with invalid moves, introduce a separate variable called
max_slot which tries to track the maximum valid slot in the rewind eb.
We can then warn if we do a move whose src range goes beyond the max
valid slot.

There is a commented caveat that it is possible to have this value be an
overestimate due to the challenge of properly handling 'add' operations
in the middle of the eb, but in practice it doesn't cause enough of a
problem to throw out the max idea in favor of tracking every valid slot.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: disable allocation warnings for compression workspaces
David Sterba [Mon, 22 May 2023 14:51:10 +0000 (16:51 +0200)]
btrfs: disable allocation warnings for compression workspaces

The workspaces for compression are typically much larger than a page and
for high zstd levels in the range of megabytes. There's a fallback to
vmalloc but this can still fail (see the report).

Some of the workspaces are preallocated at module load time so we have a
safe fallback, otherwise when a new workspace is needed it's allocated
but if this fails then the process waits. Which means the warning is
only causing noise and we can use the GFP flag to disable it.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217466
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: open code need_full_stripe conditions
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 04:17:39 +0000 (06:17 +0200)]
btrfs: open code need_full_stripe conditions

need_full_stripe is just a somewhat complicated way to say
"op != BTRFS_MAP_READ".  Just spell that explicit check out, which makes
a lot of the code currently using the helper easier to understand.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: open code btrfs_map_sblock
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 04:17:38 +0000 (06:17 +0200)]
btrfs: open code btrfs_map_sblock

btrfs_map_sblock just hard codes three arguments and calls
btrfs_map_sblock.  Remove it as it doesn't provide any real value, but
makes following the btrfs_map_block call chains harder.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: rename __btrfs_map_block to btrfs_map_block
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 04:17:37 +0000 (06:17 +0200)]
btrfs: rename __btrfs_map_block to btrfs_map_block

Now that the old btrfs_map_block is gone, drop the leading underscores
from __btrfs_map_block.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: remove unused btrfs_map_block
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 04:17:36 +0000 (06:17 +0200)]
btrfs: remove unused btrfs_map_block

There are no users of btrfs_map_block left, so remove it.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
18 months agobtrfs: optimize simple reads in btrfsic_map_block
Christoph Hellwig [Wed, 31 May 2023 04:17:35 +0000 (06:17 +0200)]
btrfs: optimize simple reads in btrfsic_map_block

Pass a smap into __btrfs_map_block so that the usual case of a read that
doesn't require parity raid recovery doesn't need an extra memory
allocation for the btrfs_io_context.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>