From: Gustavo A. R. Silva Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 19:28:17 +0000 (-0500) Subject: watchdog: f71808e_wdt: mark expected switch fall-throughs X-Git-Tag: v4.19~1623^2~38 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=fd846b57a6b0b551cf7a31c301bd9705759ce825;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git watchdog: f71808e_wdt: mark expected switch fall-throughs In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck --- diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c index 8658dba..e0678c1 100644 --- a/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c +++ b/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static long watchdog_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, if (new_options & WDIOS_ENABLECARD) return watchdog_start(); - + /* fall through */ case WDIOC_KEEPALIVE: watchdog_keepalive(); @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ static long watchdog_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, return -EINVAL; watchdog_keepalive(); - /* Fall */ + /* fall through */ case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT: return put_user(watchdog.timeout, uarg.i);