From: Chris Wilson Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:08:45 +0000 (+0100) Subject: drm/i915/execlists: Simplify gen12_csb_parse X-Git-Tag: v5.10.7~3692^2~43^2~79 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f9d4eae25d93a76f8ed52b1519cc27c5b3cb1dcb;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git drm/i915/execlists: Simplify gen12_csb_parse Having decided that we only care about the promotion predicate, we can simplify gen12_csb_parse to simply check whether we need to jump to a new queue. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Mika Kuoppala Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190925130845.17952-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c index caac091..ab725a6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c @@ -1801,9 +1801,6 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb) bool ctx_away_valid = GEN12_CSB_CTX_VALID(upper_dw); bool new_queue = lower_dw & GEN12_CTX_STATUS_SWITCHED_TO_NEW_QUEUE; - if (!ctx_away_valid && ctx_to_valid) - return true; - /* * The context switch detail is not guaranteed to be 5 when a preemption * occurs, so we can't just check for that. The check below works for @@ -1811,8 +1808,10 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb) * instructions and lite-restore. Preempt-to-idle via the CTRL register * would require some extra handling, but we don't support that. */ - if (new_queue && ctx_away_valid) + if (!ctx_away_valid || new_queue) { + GEM_BUG_ON(!ctx_to_valid); return true; + } /* * switch detail = 5 is covered by the case above and we do not expect a @@ -1820,7 +1819,6 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb) * use polling mode. */ GEM_BUG_ON(GEN12_CTX_SWITCH_DETAIL(upper_dw)); - return false; }