From: Stefan M Schaeckeler <sschaeck@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 23:26:14 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: of: unittest: for strings, account for trailing \0 in property length field
X-Git-Tag: v4.9.111~69
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f92ec84c49f91756cbdd048c1a3136f15810cd94;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-amlogic.git

of: unittest: for strings, account for trailing \0 in property length field

commit 3b9cf7905fe3ab35ab437b5072c883e609d3498d upstream.

For strings, account for trailing \0 in property length field:

This is consistent with how dtc builds string properties.

Function __of_prop_dup() would misbehave on such properties as it duplicates
properties based on the property length field creating new string values
without trailing \0s.

Signed-off-by: Stefan M Schaeckeler <sschaeck@cisco.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Tested-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---

diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c
index 53c83d66..90b5a89 100644
--- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
@@ -155,20 +155,20 @@ static void __init of_unittest_dynamic(void)
 	/* Add a new property - should pass*/
 	prop->name = "new-property";
 	prop->value = "new-property-data";
-	prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
 	unittest(of_add_property(np, prop) == 0, "Adding a new property failed\n");
 
 	/* Try to add an existing property - should fail */
 	prop++;
 	prop->name = "new-property";
 	prop->value = "new-property-data-should-fail";
-	prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
 	unittest(of_add_property(np, prop) != 0,
 		 "Adding an existing property should have failed\n");
 
 	/* Try to modify an existing property - should pass */
 	prop->value = "modify-property-data-should-pass";
-	prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
 	unittest(of_update_property(np, prop) == 0,
 		 "Updating an existing property should have passed\n");
 
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static void __init of_unittest_dynamic(void)
 	prop++;
 	prop->name = "modify-property";
 	prop->value = "modify-missing-property-data-should-pass";
-	prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
 	unittest(of_update_property(np, prop) == 0,
 		 "Updating a missing property should have passed\n");