From: Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 12:44:30 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: Fix Wdocumentation missing parameter warnings. NFCI.
X-Git-Tag: llvmorg-14-init~4223
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f7bc9db95aba77157f10b627a4dea32c3174e148;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fllvm.git

Fix Wdocumentation missing parameter warnings. NFCI.
---

diff --git a/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugReporterVisitors.h b/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugReporterVisitors.h
index 17a8e78..047b207 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugReporterVisitors.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugReporterVisitors.h
@@ -317,8 +317,7 @@ public:
 
   /// Handle the given store and produce the node.
   ///
-  /// \param E The expression value which we are tracking
-  /// \param N A node where the evaluation of \c E actually happens.
+  /// \param SI The information fully describing the store.
   /// \param Opts Tracking options specifying how we are tracking the value.
   ///
   /// \return the produced note, null if the handler doesn't support this kind
@@ -346,8 +345,7 @@ public:
 /// \param N A node "downstream" from the evaluation of the statement.
 /// \param E The expression value which we are tracking
 /// \param R The bug report to which visitors should be attached.
-/// \param EnableNullFPSuppression Whether we should employ false positive
-///         suppression (inlined defensive checks, returned null).
+/// \param Opts Tracking options specifying how we are tracking the value.
 ///
 /// \return Whether or not the function was able to add visitors for this
 ///         statement. Note that returning \c true does not actually imply