From: Chris Wilson Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 15:03:56 +0000 (+0000) Subject: drm/i915: Include GT/seqno activity in engine/hangcheck debugfs X-Git-Tag: v5.15~11060^2~37^2~41 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f73b567462e0f086bbff5ae22040ff1bc3d87487;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git drm/i915: Include GT/seqno activity in engine/hangcheck debugfs Whilst investigating some mysterious failures with hangcheck not running during gem_busy/basic-hang-default, the question is why did we decide to cancel the retire_work (which queues the hangcheck)? That decision is based around GT activity, so include that information in the debug report. v2: Include the GT awake status in the error state Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Mika Kuoppala Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170302150356.9713-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index 1a28b52..b84ee7a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c @@ -1361,14 +1361,17 @@ static int i915_hangcheck_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) } else seq_printf(m, "Hangcheck inactive\n"); + seq_printf(m, "GT active? %s\n", yesno(dev_priv->gt.awake)); + for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id) { struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = &engine->breadcrumbs; struct rb_node *rb; seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", engine->name); - seq_printf(m, "\tseqno = %x [current %x, last %x]\n", + seq_printf(m, "\tseqno = %x [current %x, last %x], inflight %d\n", engine->hangcheck.seqno, seqno[id], - intel_engine_last_submit(engine)); + intel_engine_last_submit(engine), + engine->timeline->inflight_seqnos); seq_printf(m, "\twaiters? %s, fake irq active? %s, stalled? %s\n", yesno(intel_engine_has_waiter(engine)), yesno(test_bit(engine->id, @@ -3253,6 +3256,11 @@ static int i915_engine_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv); + seq_printf(m, "GT awake? %s\n", + yesno(dev_priv->gt.awake)); + seq_printf(m, "Global active requests: %d\n", + dev_priv->gt.active_requests); + for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id) { struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = &engine->breadcrumbs; struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq; @@ -3260,11 +3268,12 @@ static int i915_engine_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) u64 addr; seq_printf(m, "%s\n", engine->name); - seq_printf(m, "\tcurrent seqno %x, last %x, hangcheck %x [%d ms]\n", + seq_printf(m, "\tcurrent seqno %x, last %x, hangcheck %x [%d ms], inflight %d\n", intel_engine_get_seqno(engine), intel_engine_last_submit(engine), engine->hangcheck.seqno, - jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - engine->hangcheck.action_timestamp)); + jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - engine->hangcheck.action_timestamp), + engine->timeline->inflight_seqnos); rcu_read_lock(); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 48b34a9..d9f29d1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h @@ -934,6 +934,7 @@ struct i915_gpu_state { char error_msg[128]; bool simulated; + bool awake; int iommu; u32 reset_count; u32 suspend_count; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c index 2b1d156..9579770 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c @@ -632,6 +632,7 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m, CSR_VERSION_MINOR(csr->version)); } + err_printf(m, "GT awake: %s\n", yesno(error->awake)); err_printf(m, "EIR: 0x%08x\n", error->eir); err_printf(m, "IER: 0x%08x\n", error->ier); for (i = 0; i < error->ngtier; i++) @@ -1615,6 +1616,8 @@ static void i915_error_capture_msg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, static void i915_capture_gen_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, struct i915_gpu_state *error) { + error->awake = dev_priv->gt.awake; + error->iommu = -1; #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU error->iommu = intel_iommu_gfx_mapped;