From: Qu Wenruo Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 06:57:04 +0000 (+0900) Subject: btrfs-progs: Doc: Fix asciidoc grammar of btrfs-rescue X-Git-Tag: upstream/4.16.1~540 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f65b6b156f04a28c7de0aa62d91228734aae63a8;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fbtrfs-progs.git btrfs-progs: Doc: Fix asciidoc grammar of btrfs-rescue Code block of kernel backtrace lacks leading change line, causing the following man page result: ------ One can determine whether zero-log is needed according to the kernel backtrace: ? replay_one_dir_item+0xb5/0xb5 [btrfs] ? walk_log_tree+0x9c/0x19d [btrfs] ? btrfs_read_fs_root_no_radix+0x169/0x1a1 [btrfs] ? btrfs_recover_log_trees+0x195/0x29c [btrfs] ? replay_one_dir_item+0xb5/0xb5 [btrfs] ? btree_read_extent_buffer_pages+0x76/0xbc [btrfs] ? open_ctree+0xff6/0x132c [btrfs] + If the errors are like above, then zero-log should be used to clear the log and the filesystem may be mounted normally again. The keywords ------ Not only "+" is rendered as is, but also wrong indent. Fix it by adding change line before code block. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- diff --git a/Documentation/btrfs-rescue.asciidoc b/Documentation/btrfs-rescue.asciidoc index a9b471f..24b619c 100644 --- a/Documentation/btrfs-rescue.asciidoc +++ b/Documentation/btrfs-rescue.asciidoc @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ or less if the commit was implied by other filesystem activity. + One can determine whether *zero-log* is needed according to the kernel backtrace: ++ ---- ? replay_one_dir_item+0xb5/0xb5 [btrfs] ? walk_log_tree+0x9c/0x19d [btrfs]