From: Jarkko Hietaniemi Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:58:18 +0000 (+0300) Subject: perldiag.pod: followup on the PerlIO::scalar patch X-Git-Tag: accepted/trunk/20130322.191538~16963 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f5a7294f1dd651fb00c000797104b15457a93401;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fperl.git perldiag.pod: followup on the PerlIO::scalar patch Message-ID: <4520E2BA.1000309@iki.fi> p4raw-id: //depot/perl@28912 --- diff --git a/pod/perldiag.pod b/pod/perldiag.pod index d55ba22..ac67f15 100644 --- a/pod/perldiag.pod +++ b/pod/perldiag.pod @@ -2766,8 +2766,11 @@ which is odd, because hashes come in key/value pairs. (F, W layer) You tried to do a read/write/send/recv/seek operation with an offset pointing outside the buffer. This is difficult to -imagine. The sole exception to this is that Cing past the -buffer will extend the buffer and zero pad the new area. +imagine. The sole exceptions to this are that zero padding will +take place when going past the end of the string when either +Cing a file, or when seeking past the end of a scalar opened +of I/O (in anticipation of future reads and to imitate the behaviour with +real files). =item %s() on unopened %s