From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 11:48:31 +0000 (+0300)
Subject: flow_offload: Reject matching on layer 2 miss
X-Git-Tag: v6.6.7~2536^2~202^2~4
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f4356947f0297b0962fdd197672db7edf9f58be6;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git

flow_offload: Reject matching on layer 2 miss

Adjust drivers that support the 'FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META' key to reject
filters that try to match on the newly added layer 2 miss field. Add an
extack message to clearly communicate the failure reason to user space.

The following users were not patched:

1. mtk_flow_offload_replace(): Only checks that the key is present, but
   does not do anything with it.
2. mlx5_tc_ct_set_tuple_match(): Used as part of netfilter offload,
   which does not make use of the new field, unlike tc.
3. get_netdev_from_rule() in nfp: Likewise.

Example:

 # tc filter add dev swp1 egress pref 1 proto all flower skip_sw l2_miss true action drop
 Error: mlxsw_spectrum: Can't match on "l2_miss".
 We have an error talking to the kernel

Acked-by: Elad Nachman <enachman@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_flower.c
index 91a478b..3e20e71 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_flower.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_flower.c
@@ -148,6 +148,12 @@ static int prestera_flower_parse_meta(struct prestera_acl_rule *rule,
 	__be16 key, mask;
 
 	flow_rule_match_meta(f_rule, &match);
+
+	if (match.mask->l2_miss) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack, "Can't match on \"l2_miss\"");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
 	if (match.mask->ingress_ifindex != 0xFFFFFFFF) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack,
 				   "Unsupported ingress ifindex mask");
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
index e95414e..1b0906c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
@@ -2587,6 +2587,12 @@ static int mlx5e_flower_parse_meta(struct net_device *filter_dev,
 		return 0;
 
 	flow_rule_match_meta(rule, &match);
+
+	if (match.mask->l2_miss) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack, "Can't match on \"l2_miss\"");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
 	if (!match.mask->ingress_ifindex)
 		return 0;
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c
index 594cdcb..6fec922 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c
@@ -294,6 +294,12 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_flower_parse_meta(struct mlxsw_sp_acl_rule_info *rulei,
 		return 0;
 
 	flow_rule_match_meta(rule, &match);
+
+	if (match.mask->l2_miss) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack, "Can't match on \"l2_miss\"");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
 	if (match.mask->ingress_ifindex != 0xFFFFFFFF) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack, "Unsupported ingress ifindex mask");
 		return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
index ee05240..e0916af 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c
@@ -592,6 +592,16 @@ ocelot_flower_parse_key(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port, bool ingress,
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
 
+	if (flow_rule_match_key(rule, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META)) {
+		struct flow_match_meta match;
+
+		flow_rule_match_meta(rule, &match);
+		if (match.mask->l2_miss) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Can't match on \"l2_miss\"");
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		}
+	}
+
 	/* For VCAP ES0 (egress rewriter) we can match on the ingress port */
 	if (!ingress) {
 		ret = ocelot_flower_parse_indev(ocelot, port, f, filter);