From: Mike Rapoport Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 03:20:01 +0000 (-0700) Subject: mm: memblock: do not enforce current limit for memblock_phys* family X-Git-Tag: v5.4-rc4~7^2~13 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f3057ad767542be7bbac44e548cb44017178a163;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git mm: memblock: do not enforce current limit for memblock_phys* family Until commit 92d12f9544b7 ("memblock: refactor internal allocation functions") the maximal address for memblock allocations was forced to memblock.current_limit only for the allocation functions returning virtual address. The changes introduced by that commit moved the limit enforcement into the allocation core and as a result the allocation functions returning physical address also started to limit allocations to memblock.current_limit. This caused breakage of etnaviv GPU driver: etnaviv etnaviv: bound 130000.gpu (ops gpu_ops) etnaviv etnaviv: bound 134000.gpu (ops gpu_ops) etnaviv etnaviv: bound 2204000.gpu (ops gpu_ops) etnaviv-gpu 130000.gpu: model: GC2000, revision: 5108 etnaviv-gpu 130000.gpu: command buffer outside valid memory window etnaviv-gpu 134000.gpu: model: GC320, revision: 5007 etnaviv-gpu 134000.gpu: command buffer outside valid memory window etnaviv-gpu 2204000.gpu: model: GC355, revision: 1215 etnaviv-gpu 2204000.gpu: Ignoring GPU with VG and FE2.0 Restore the behaviour of memblock_phys* family so that these functions will not enforce memblock.current_limit. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1570915861-17633-1-git-send-email-rppt@kernel.org Fixes: 92d12f9544b7 ("memblock: refactor internal allocation functions") Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Reported-by: Adam Ford Tested-by: Adam Ford [imx6q-logicpd] Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Fabio Estevam Cc: Lucas Stach Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index 7d4f61a..c4b16ca 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -1356,9 +1356,6 @@ static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_range_nid(phys_addr_t size, align = SMP_CACHE_BYTES; } - if (end > memblock.current_limit) - end = memblock.current_limit; - again: found = memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, start, end, nid, flags); @@ -1469,6 +1466,9 @@ static void * __init memblock_alloc_internal( if (WARN_ON_ONCE(slab_is_available())) return kzalloc_node(size, GFP_NOWAIT, nid); + if (max_addr > memblock.current_limit) + max_addr = memblock.current_limit; + alloc = memblock_alloc_range_nid(size, align, min_addr, max_addr, nid); /* retry allocation without lower limit */