From: Ian Rogers Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 07:22:01 +0000 (-0700) Subject: perf pmus: Prefer perf_pmu__scan over perf_pmus__for_each_pmu X-Git-Tag: v6.6.17~4410^2~206 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f24ebe8053514936d4e8cffb707af3a275fa32e5;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git perf pmus: Prefer perf_pmu__scan over perf_pmus__for_each_pmu perf_pmus__for_each_pmu doesn't lazily initialize pmus making its use error prone. Just use perf_pmu__scan as this only impacts non-performance critical tests. Reviewed-by: Kan Liang Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers Cc: Adrian Hunter Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Ali Saidi Cc: Athira Rajeev Cc: Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Cc: Huacai Chen Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: James Clark Cc: Jing Zhang Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: John Garry Cc: Kajol Jain Cc: Kang Minchul Cc: Leo Yan Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Mike Leach Cc: Ming Wang Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ravi Bangoria Cc: Rob Herring Cc: Sandipan Das Cc: Sean Christopherson Cc: Suzuki Poulouse Cc: Thomas Richter Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Xing Zhengjun Cc: coresight@lists.linaro.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230527072210.2900565-26-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/pmu-scan.c b/tools/perf/bench/pmu-scan.c index f0f0078..f4a6c37 100644 --- a/tools/perf/bench/pmu-scan.c +++ b/tools/perf/bench/pmu-scan.c @@ -40,13 +40,11 @@ static struct pmu_scan_result *results; static int save_result(void) { - struct perf_pmu *pmu; + struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL; struct list_head *list; struct pmu_scan_result *r; - perf_pmu__scan(NULL); - - perf_pmus__for_each_pmu(pmu) { + while ((pmu = perf_pmu__scan(pmu)) != NULL) { r = realloc(results, (nr_pmus + 1) * sizeof(*r)); if (r == NULL) return -ENOMEM; diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/event_groups.c b/tools/perf/tests/event_groups.c index 029442b..3d9a2b5 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/event_groups.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/event_groups.c @@ -50,13 +50,10 @@ static int event_open(int type, unsigned long config, int group_fd) static int setup_uncore_event(void) { - struct perf_pmu *pmu; + struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL; int i, fd; - if (list_empty(&pmus)) - perf_pmu__scan(NULL); - - perf_pmus__for_each_pmu(pmu) { + while ((pmu = perf_pmu__scan(pmu)) != NULL) { for (i = 0; i < NR_UNCORE_PMUS; i++) { if (!strcmp(uncore_pmus[i].name, pmu->name)) { pr_debug("Using %s for uncore pmu event\n", pmu->name); diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c index 72a10be..277607e 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c @@ -108,11 +108,11 @@ static int test__checkevent_raw(struct evlist *evlist) TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong number of entries", 0 != evlist->core.nr_entries); perf_evlist__for_each_evsel(&evlist->core, evsel) { - struct perf_pmu *pmu; + struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL; bool type_matched = false; TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong config", test_perf_config(evsel, 0x1a)); - perf_pmus__for_each_pmu(pmu) { + while ((pmu = perf_pmu__scan(pmu)) != NULL) { if (pmu->type == evsel->attr.type) { TEST_ASSERT_VAL("PMU type expected once", !type_matched); type_matched = true; @@ -2243,13 +2243,10 @@ static int test__terms2(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __ma static int test__pmu_events(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused) { - struct perf_pmu *pmu; + struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL; int ret = TEST_OK; - if (list_empty(&pmus)) - perf_pmu__scan(NULL); - - perf_pmus__for_each_pmu(pmu) { + while ((pmu = perf_pmu__scan(pmu)) != NULL) { struct stat st; char path[PATH_MAX]; struct dirent *ent; diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmus.h b/tools/perf/util/pmus.h index d475e29..257de10 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/pmus.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmus.h @@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ extern struct list_head pmus; struct perf_pmu; -#define perf_pmus__for_each_pmu(pmu) list_for_each_entry(pmu, &pmus, list) - const struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__pmu_for_pmu_filter(const char *str); #endif /* __PMUS_H */