From: Marek Polacek Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 22:42:27 +0000 (-0400) Subject: c++: FIX_TRUNC_EXPR in tsubst [PR102990] X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f0530882d99abc410bb080051aa04e5cea848f18;p=test_jj.git c++: FIX_TRUNC_EXPR in tsubst [PR102990] This is a crash where a FIX_TRUNC_EXPR gets into tsubst_copy_and_build where it hits gcc_unreachable (). The history of tsubst_copy_and_build/FIX_TRUNC_EXPR is such that it was introduced in r181478, but it did the wrong thing, whereupon it was turned into gcc_unreachable () in r258821 (see this thread: ). In a template, we should never create a FIX_TRUNC_EXPR (that's what conv_unsafe_in_template_p is for). But in this test we are NOT in a template when we call digest_nsdmi_init which ends up calling convert_like, converting 1.0e+0 to int, so convert_to_integer_1 gives us a FIX_TRUNC_EXPR. But then when we get to parsing f's parameters, we are in a template when processing decltype(Helpers{}), and since r268321, when the compound literal isn't instantiation-dependent and the type isn't type-dependent, finish_compound_literal falls back to the normal processing, so it calls digest_init, which does fold_non_dependent_init and since the FIX_TRUNC_EXPR isn't dependent, we instantiate and therefore crash in tsubst_copy_and_build. The fateful call to fold_non_dependent_init comes from massage_init_elt, We shouldn't be calling f_n_d_i on the result of get_nsdmi. This we can avoid by eschewing calling f_n_d_i on CONSTRUCTORs; their elements have already been folded. PR c++/102990 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * typeck2.cc (massage_init_elt): Avoid folding CONSTRUCTORs. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-template22.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-template23.C: New test. --- diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck2.cc b/gcc/cp/typeck2.cc index a4c825f..cebe6ac 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/typeck2.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/typeck2.cc @@ -1433,10 +1433,15 @@ massage_init_elt (tree type, tree init, int nested, int flags, new_flags |= LOOKUP_AGGREGATE_PAREN_INIT; init = digest_init_r (type, init, nested ? 2 : 1, new_flags, complain); /* When we defer constant folding within a statement, we may want to - defer this folding as well. */ - tree t = fold_non_dependent_init (init, complain); - if (TREE_CONSTANT (t)) - init = t; + defer this folding as well. Don't call this on CONSTRUCTORs because + their elements have already been folded, and we must avoid folding + the result of get_nsdmi. */ + if (TREE_CODE (init) != CONSTRUCTOR) + { + tree t = fold_non_dependent_init (init, complain); + if (TREE_CONSTANT (t)) + init = t; + } return init; } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-template22.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-template22.C new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4ed2501 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-template22.C @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +// PR c++/102990 +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } + +struct knob_t { + /* Let's create a FIX_TRUNC_EXPR. */ + int value = 1.0; +}; + +struct Helpers { + knob_t inputs; +}; + +template void f(decltype(Helpers{})); diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-template23.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-template23.C new file mode 100644 index 0000000..240cab4 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-template23.C @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +// PR c++/102990 +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } + +struct knob_t { + /* Let's create a FLOAT_EXPR. */ + double value = 1UL; +}; + +struct Helpers { + knob_t inputs; +}; + +template void f(decltype(Helpers{}));