From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:48:08 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: dos2unix/less/screen/terminology/tree: Social&Content -> System or Platform Development
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ee158fa01456fac2f1beba2dc67a75c89b739a43;p=scm%2Fmeta%2Fgit.git

dos2unix/less/screen/terminology/tree: Social&Content -> System or Platform Development

These packages do not belong into "Social & Content". Opinions differ
whether they belong into "System" or "Platform Development".

dos2unix and less were discussed without a final resolution in TINF-427.
This commit proposes to include them in "System" because more people
voted for that and there might be cases where normal users also need
these tools.

screen/terminology/tree get moved to "Platform Development" as
requested by Mikko. I am fine with that, because the deciding "who is
it for" question can be answered either way.

Change-Id: I031d16f935f7256ab00c884adb3b5d0c46f58a79
Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
---

diff --git a/git-trees b/git-trees
index 0dda4e4..af5c485 100644
--- a/git-trees
+++ b/git-trees
@@ -8071,7 +8071,7 @@ D: Platform Development
 B: tizen
 
 T: platform/upstream/dos2unix
-D: Social & Content
+D: System
 B: tizen
 
 T: platform/upstream/dosfstools
@@ -8980,7 +8980,7 @@ L: MIT-style
 L: FSF
 
 T: platform/upstream/less
-D: Social & Content
+D: System
 B: tizen
 
 T: platform/upstream/leveldb
@@ -10708,7 +10708,7 @@ D: Platform Development
 B: tizen
 
 T: platform/upstream/screen
-D: Social & Content
+D: Platform Development
 B: tizen
 
 T: platform/upstream/scrnsaverproto
@@ -10906,7 +10906,7 @@ D: System
 B: tizen
 
 T: platform/upstream/terminology
-D: Social & Content
+D: Platform Development
 B: tizen
 
 T: platform/upstream/texinfo
@@ -10953,7 +10953,7 @@ B: tizen
 L: UnclassifiedLicense
 
 T: platform/upstream/tree
-D: Social & Content
+D: Platform Development
 B: tizen
 
 T: platform/upstream/tzdata