From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:31:44 +0000 (+0200) Subject: mm: remove folio_account_redirty X-Git-Tag: v6.6.17~3697^2~99 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ed2da9246f324ae88a2dcae629fc2008632ff151;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git mm: remove folio_account_redirty Fold folio_account_redirty into folio_redirty_for_writepage now that all other users except for the also unused account_page_redirty wrapper are gone. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h index fba9379..083387c 100644 --- a/include/linux/writeback.h +++ b/include/linux/writeback.h @@ -375,11 +375,6 @@ void tag_pages_for_writeback(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end); bool filemap_dirty_folio(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio); -void folio_account_redirty(struct folio *folio); -static inline void account_page_redirty(struct page *page) -{ - folio_account_redirty(page_folio(page)); -} bool folio_redirty_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *, struct folio *); bool redirty_page_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *, struct page *); diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index d3f4200..b8d3d70 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -1193,7 +1193,7 @@ static void wb_update_write_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb, * write_bandwidth = --------------------------------------------------- * period * - * @written may have decreased due to folio_account_redirty(). + * @written may have decreased due to folio_redirty_for_writepage(). * Avoid underflowing @bw calculation. */ bw = written - min(written, wb->written_stamp); @@ -2712,37 +2712,6 @@ bool filemap_dirty_folio(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio) EXPORT_SYMBOL(filemap_dirty_folio); /** - * folio_account_redirty - Manually account for redirtying a page. - * @folio: The folio which is being redirtied. - * - * Most filesystems should call folio_redirty_for_writepage() instead - * of this fuction. If your filesystem is doing writeback outside the - * context of a writeback_control(), it can call this when redirtying - * a folio, to de-account the dirty counters (NR_DIRTIED, WB_DIRTIED, - * tsk->nr_dirtied), so that they match the written counters (NR_WRITTEN, - * WB_WRITTEN) in long term. The mismatches will lead to systematic errors - * in balanced_dirty_ratelimit and the dirty pages position control. - */ -void folio_account_redirty(struct folio *folio) -{ - struct address_space *mapping = folio->mapping; - - if (mapping && mapping_can_writeback(mapping)) { - struct inode *inode = mapping->host; - struct bdi_writeback *wb; - struct wb_lock_cookie cookie = {}; - long nr = folio_nr_pages(folio); - - wb = unlocked_inode_to_wb_begin(inode, &cookie); - current->nr_dirtied -= nr; - node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_DIRTIED, -nr); - wb_stat_mod(wb, WB_DIRTIED, -nr); - unlocked_inode_to_wb_end(inode, &cookie); - } -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_account_redirty); - -/** * folio_redirty_for_writepage - Decline to write a dirty folio. * @wbc: The writeback control. * @folio: The folio. @@ -2757,13 +2726,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_account_redirty); bool folio_redirty_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct folio *folio) { - bool ret; + struct address_space *mapping = folio->mapping; long nr = folio_nr_pages(folio); + bool ret; wbc->pages_skipped += nr; - ret = filemap_dirty_folio(folio->mapping, folio); - folio_account_redirty(folio); + ret = filemap_dirty_folio(mapping, folio); + if (mapping && mapping_can_writeback(mapping)) { + struct inode *inode = mapping->host; + struct bdi_writeback *wb; + struct wb_lock_cookie cookie = {}; + wb = unlocked_inode_to_wb_begin(inode, &cookie); + current->nr_dirtied -= nr; + node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_DIRTIED, -nr); + wb_stat_mod(wb, WB_DIRTIED, -nr); + unlocked_inode_to_wb_end(inode, &cookie); + } return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_redirty_for_writepage);