From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 21:34:31 +0000 (-0800)
Subject: KVM: selftests: Convert memslot_perf_test away from VCPU_ID
X-Git-Tag: v6.1-rc5~719^2~6^2~329
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e82e630ba965ad8a1278cf8bbe9759975a5a5109;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git

KVM: selftests: Convert memslot_perf_test away from VCPU_ID

Convert memslot_perf_test to use __vm_create_with_one_vcpu() and pass
around a 'struct kvm_vcpu' object instead of using a global VCPU_ID.
This is the first of many, many steps towards eliminating VCPU_ID from
all KVM selftests, and towards eventually purging the VM+vcpu_id mess.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
index 1727f75..009eb19 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
@@ -25,8 +25,6 @@
 #include <kvm_util.h>
 #include <processor.h>
 
-#define VCPU_ID 0
-
 #define MEM_SIZE		((512U << 20) + 4096)
 #define MEM_SIZE_PAGES		(MEM_SIZE / 4096)
 #define MEM_GPA		0x10000000UL
@@ -90,6 +88,7 @@ static_assert(MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE <= MEM_TEST_SIZE,
 
 struct vm_data {
 	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	pthread_t vcpu_thread;
 	uint32_t nslots;
 	uint64_t npages;
@@ -127,29 +126,29 @@ static bool verbose;
 			pr_info(__VA_ARGS__);	\
 	} while (0)
 
-static void check_mmio_access(struct vm_data *vm, struct kvm_run *run)
+static void check_mmio_access(struct vm_data *data, struct kvm_run *run)
 {
-	TEST_ASSERT(vm->mmio_ok, "Unexpected mmio exit");
+	TEST_ASSERT(data->mmio_ok, "Unexpected mmio exit");
 	TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.is_write, "Unexpected mmio read");
 	TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.len == 8,
 		    "Unexpected exit mmio size = %u", run->mmio.len);
-	TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.phys_addr >= vm->mmio_gpa_min &&
-		    run->mmio.phys_addr <= vm->mmio_gpa_max,
+	TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.phys_addr >= data->mmio_gpa_min &&
+		    run->mmio.phys_addr <= data->mmio_gpa_max,
 		    "Unexpected exit mmio address = 0x%llx",
 		    run->mmio.phys_addr);
 }
 
-static void *vcpu_worker(void *data)
+static void *vcpu_worker(void *__data)
 {
-	struct vm_data *vm = data;
-	struct kvm_run *run;
+	struct vm_data *data = __data;
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = data->vcpu;
+	struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
 	struct ucall uc;
 
-	run = vcpu_state(vm->vm, VCPU_ID);
 	while (1) {
-		vcpu_run(vm->vm, VCPU_ID);
+		vcpu_run(data->vm, vcpu->id);
 
-		switch (get_ucall(vm->vm, VCPU_ID, &uc)) {
+		switch (get_ucall(data->vm, vcpu->id, &uc)) {
 		case UCALL_SYNC:
 			TEST_ASSERT(uc.args[1] == 0,
 				"Unexpected sync ucall, got %lx",
@@ -158,7 +157,7 @@ static void *vcpu_worker(void *data)
 			continue;
 		case UCALL_NONE:
 			if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_MMIO)
-				check_mmio_access(vm, run);
+				check_mmio_access(data, run);
 			else
 				goto done;
 			break;
@@ -238,6 +237,7 @@ static struct vm_data *alloc_vm(void)
 	TEST_ASSERT(data, "malloc(vmdata) failed");
 
 	data->vm = NULL;
+	data->vcpu = NULL;
 	data->hva_slots = NULL;
 
 	return data;
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots,
 	data->hva_slots = malloc(sizeof(*data->hva_slots) * data->nslots);
 	TEST_ASSERT(data->hva_slots, "malloc() fail");
 
-	data->vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, mempages, guest_code);
+	data->vm = __vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&data->vcpu, mempages, guest_code);
 	ucall_init(data->vm, NULL);
 
 	pr_info_v("Adding slots 1..%i, each slot with %"PRIu64" pages + %"PRIu64" extra pages last\n",