From: Tiecheng Zhou Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 00:55:45 +0000 (+0800) Subject: drm/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0: Reorder the gfx, kiq and kcq rings test sequence X-Git-Tag: v5.15~7182^2~3^2~11 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e49cddcd0ab08f2a3bf3fea8554ea45ae1446d26;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git drm/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0: Reorder the gfx, kiq and kcq rings test sequence The kiq ring and the very first compute ring may fail occasionally if they are tested directly following kiq_kcq_enable. Insert the gfx ring test before kiq ring test to delay the kiq and kcq ring tests will fix the issue. Acked-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Tiecheng Zhou Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c index 381f593b..164ffc9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c @@ -4278,9 +4278,8 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_cp_gfx_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev) amdgpu_ring_clear_ring(ring); gfx_v8_0_cp_gfx_start(adev); ring->sched.ready = true; - r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring); - return r; + return 0; } static void gfx_v8_0_cp_compute_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable) @@ -4369,10 +4368,9 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_kiq_kcq_enable(struct amdgpu_device *adev) amdgpu_ring_write(kiq_ring, upper_32_bits(wptr_addr)); } - r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(kiq_ring); - if (r) - DRM_ERROR("KCQ enable failed\n"); - return r; + amdgpu_ring_commit(kiq_ring); + + return 0; } static int gfx_v8_0_deactivate_hqd(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 req) @@ -4709,16 +4707,32 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_kcq_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev) if (r) goto done; - /* Test KCQs - reversing the order of rings seems to fix ring test failure - * after GPU reset - */ - for (i = adev->gfx.num_compute_rings - 1; i >= 0; i--) { +done: + return r; +} + +static int gfx_v8_0_cp_test_all_rings(struct amdgpu_device *adev) +{ + int r, i; + struct amdgpu_ring *ring; + + /* collect all the ring_tests here, gfx, kiq, compute */ + ring = &adev->gfx.gfx_ring[0]; + r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring); + if (r) + return r; + + ring = &adev->gfx.kiq.ring; + r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring); + if (r) + return r; + + for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_compute_rings; i++) { ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[i]; - r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring); + amdgpu_ring_test_helper(ring); } -done: - return r; + return 0; } static int gfx_v8_0_cp_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev) @@ -4739,6 +4753,11 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_cp_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev) r = gfx_v8_0_kcq_resume(adev); if (r) return r; + + r = gfx_v8_0_cp_test_all_rings(adev); + if (r) + return r; + gfx_v8_0_enable_gui_idle_interrupt(adev, true); return 0; @@ -5056,6 +5075,7 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_post_soft_reset(void *handle) { struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle; u32 grbm_soft_reset = 0; + struct amdgpu_ring *ring; if ((!adev->gfx.grbm_soft_reset) && (!adev->gfx.srbm_soft_reset)) @@ -5086,6 +5106,8 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_post_soft_reset(void *handle) REG_GET_FIELD(grbm_soft_reset, GRBM_SOFT_RESET, SOFT_RESET_GFX)) gfx_v8_0_cp_gfx_resume(adev); + gfx_v8_0_cp_test_all_rings(adev); + adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->start(adev); return 0;