From: Marc Zyngier Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:56:23 +0000 (+0000) Subject: KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Take the srcu lock when parsing the memslots X-Git-Tag: v4.19.39~47 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e4705ae72736911310d6dd1eb2c7ee608aee2148;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Take the srcu lock when parsing the memslots [ Upstream commit 7494cec6cb3ba7385a6a223b81906384f15aae34 ] Calling kvm_is_visible_gfn() implies that we're parsing the memslots, and doing this without the srcu lock is frown upon: [12704.164532] ============================= [12704.164544] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [12704.164560] 5.1.0-rc1-00008-g600025238f51-dirty #16 Tainted: G W [12704.164573] ----------------------------- [12704.164589] ./include/linux/kvm_host.h:605 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [12704.164602] other info that might help us debug this: [12704.164616] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [12704.164631] 6 locks held by qemu-system-aar/13968: [12704.164644] #0: 000000007ebdae4f (&kvm->lock){+.+.}, at: vgic_its_set_attr+0x244/0x3a0 [12704.164691] #1: 000000007d751022 (&its->its_lock){+.+.}, at: vgic_its_set_attr+0x250/0x3a0 [12704.164726] #2: 00000000219d2706 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0 [12704.164761] #3: 00000000a760aecd (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0 [12704.164794] #4: 000000000ef8e31d (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0 [12704.164827] #5: 000000007a872093 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0 [12704.164861] stack backtrace: [12704.164878] CPU: 2 PID: 13968 Comm: qemu-system-aar Tainted: G W 5.1.0-rc1-00008-g600025238f51-dirty #16 [12704.164887] Hardware name: rockchip evb_rk3399/evb_rk3399, BIOS 2019.04-rc3-00124-g2feec69fb1 03/15/2019 [12704.164896] Call trace: [12704.164910] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x138 [12704.164920] show_stack+0x24/0x30 [12704.164934] dump_stack+0xbc/0x104 [12704.164946] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xcc/0x110 [12704.164958] gfn_to_memslot+0x174/0x190 [12704.164969] kvm_is_visible_gfn+0x28/0x70 [12704.164980] vgic_its_check_id.isra.0+0xec/0x1e8 [12704.164991] vgic_its_save_tables_v0+0x1ac/0x330 [12704.165001] vgic_its_set_attr+0x298/0x3a0 [12704.165012] kvm_device_ioctl_attr+0x9c/0xd8 [12704.165022] kvm_device_ioctl+0x8c/0xf8 [12704.165035] do_vfs_ioctl+0xc8/0x960 [12704.165045] ksys_ioctl+0x8c/0xa0 [12704.165055] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38 [12704.165067] el0_svc_common+0xd8/0x138 [12704.165078] el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78 [12704.165089] el0_svc+0x8/0xc Make sure the lock is taken when doing this. Fixes: bf308242ab98 ("KVM: arm/arm64: VGIC/ITS: protect kvm_read_guest() calls with SRCU lock") Reviewed-by: Eric Auger Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin (Microsoft) --- diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c index c1071ed..621bb00 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c @@ -760,8 +760,9 @@ static bool vgic_its_check_id(struct vgic_its *its, u64 baser, u32 id, int l1_tbl_size = GITS_BASER_NR_PAGES(baser) * SZ_64K; u64 indirect_ptr, type = GITS_BASER_TYPE(baser); int esz = GITS_BASER_ENTRY_SIZE(baser); - int index; + int index, idx; gfn_t gfn; + bool ret; switch (type) { case GITS_BASER_TYPE_DEVICE: @@ -788,7 +789,8 @@ static bool vgic_its_check_id(struct vgic_its *its, u64 baser, u32 id, if (eaddr) *eaddr = addr; - return kvm_is_visible_gfn(its->dev->kvm, gfn); + + goto out; } /* calculate and check the index into the 1st level */ @@ -822,7 +824,12 @@ static bool vgic_its_check_id(struct vgic_its *its, u64 baser, u32 id, if (eaddr) *eaddr = indirect_ptr; - return kvm_is_visible_gfn(its->dev->kvm, gfn); + +out: + idx = srcu_read_lock(&its->dev->kvm->srcu); + ret = kvm_is_visible_gfn(its->dev->kvm, gfn); + srcu_read_unlock(&its->dev->kvm->srcu, idx); + return ret; } static int vgic_its_alloc_collection(struct vgic_its *its,