From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 18:27:09 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: test-fpucw-ieee: Don't use _FPU_IEEE if not defined
X-Git-Tag: glibc-2.19~496
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e186536b6fa8ceb004dfa1ba45766edcc871a95b;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fglibc.git

test-fpucw-ieee: Don't use _FPU_IEEE if not defined

Not all architectures define this value, and if they don't,
just let the test run the same as test-fpucw, with __fpu_control
set to _FPU_DEFAULT explicitly.
---

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 4042e3b..b0ca6f7 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2013-11-18  Chris Metcalf  <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
+
+	* math/test-fpucw-ieee.c [!defined _FPU_IEEE] (FPU_CONTROL):
+	Omit definition of FPU_CONTROL and use default if no _FPU_IEEE.
+
 2013-11-18  Paul Pluzhnikov  <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
 
 	* elf/Makefile (tst-auxv): New test.
diff --git a/math/test-fpucw-ieee.c b/math/test-fpucw-ieee.c
index ae5fc73..7596486 100644
--- a/math/test-fpucw-ieee.c
+++ b/math/test-fpucw-ieee.c
@@ -16,9 +16,12 @@
    License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
    <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
 
-#define FPU_CONTROL _FPU_IEEE
+#ifdef _FPU_IEEE
+/* Some architectures don't have _FPU_IEEE.  */
+# define FPU_CONTROL _FPU_IEEE
+#endif
 
 #include "test-fpucw.c"
 
 /* Preempt the library's definition of `__fpu_control'.  */
-fpu_control_t __fpu_control = _FPU_IEEE;
+fpu_control_t __fpu_control = FPU_CONTROL;