From: Hyunwoo Kim Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 04:10:56 +0000 (-0500) Subject: appletalk: Fix Use-After-Free in atalk_ioctl X-Git-Tag: v6.6.17~1964 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e15ded324a3911358e8541a1b573665f99f216ef;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git appletalk: Fix Use-After-Free in atalk_ioctl [ Upstream commit 189ff16722ee36ced4d2a2469d4ab65a8fee4198 ] Because atalk_ioctl() accesses sk->sk_receive_queue without holding a sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, it can cause a race with atalk_recvmsg(). A use-after-free for skb occurs with the following flow. ``` atalk_ioctl() -> skb_peek() atalk_recvmsg() -> skb_recv_datagram() -> skb_free_datagram() ``` Add sk->sk_receive_queue.lock to atalk_ioctl() to fix this issue. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213041056.GA519680@v4bel-B760M-AORUS-ELITE-AX Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- diff --git a/net/appletalk/ddp.c b/net/appletalk/ddp.c index 8978fb6..b070a89 100644 --- a/net/appletalk/ddp.c +++ b/net/appletalk/ddp.c @@ -1811,15 +1811,14 @@ static int atalk_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) break; } case TIOCINQ: { - /* - * These two are safe on a single CPU system as only - * user tasks fiddle here - */ - struct sk_buff *skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue); + struct sk_buff *skb; long amount = 0; + spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); + skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue); if (skb) amount = skb->len - sizeof(struct ddpehdr); + spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); rc = put_user(amount, (int __user *)argp); break; }