From: Christophe Leroy Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:27:20 +0000 (+0100) Subject: powerpc/mm/slice: Remove intermediate bitmap copy X-Git-Tag: v4.14.48~4 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e14db4feb0351172ed7ab48040f9527b6b2ad62a;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git powerpc/mm/slice: Remove intermediate bitmap copy commit 326691ad4f179e6edc7eb1271e618dd673e4736d upstream. bitmap_or() and bitmap_andnot() can work properly with dst identical to src1 or src2. There is no need of an intermediate result bitmap that is copied back to dst in a second step. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c index a4f93699194b..b79897bb89e3 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c @@ -379,21 +379,17 @@ static unsigned long slice_find_area(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long len, static inline void slice_or_mask(struct slice_mask *dst, struct slice_mask *src) { - DECLARE_BITMAP(result, SLICE_NUM_HIGH); - dst->low_slices |= src->low_slices; - bitmap_or(result, dst->high_slices, src->high_slices, SLICE_NUM_HIGH); - bitmap_copy(dst->high_slices, result, SLICE_NUM_HIGH); + bitmap_or(dst->high_slices, dst->high_slices, src->high_slices, + SLICE_NUM_HIGH); } static inline void slice_andnot_mask(struct slice_mask *dst, struct slice_mask *src) { - DECLARE_BITMAP(result, SLICE_NUM_HIGH); - dst->low_slices &= ~src->low_slices; - bitmap_andnot(result, dst->high_slices, src->high_slices, SLICE_NUM_HIGH); - bitmap_copy(dst->high_slices, result, SLICE_NUM_HIGH); + bitmap_andnot(dst->high_slices, dst->high_slices, src->high_slices, + SLICE_NUM_HIGH); } #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES