From: Eric Wong Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:27:40 +0000 (-0700) Subject: epoll: lock ep->mtx in ep_free to silence lockdep X-Git-Tag: upstream/snapshot3+hdmi~5241^2~67 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ddf676c38b56a8641c8eb9fb856fa304018ff390;p=platform%2Fadaptation%2Frenesas_rcar%2Frenesas_kernel.git epoll: lock ep->mtx in ep_free to silence lockdep Technically we do not need to hold ep->mtx during ep_free since we are certain there are no other users of ep at that point. However, lockdep complains with a "suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!" message; so lock the mutex before ep_remove to silence the warning. Signed-off-by: Eric Wong Cc: Al Viro Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg Cc: Davide Libenzi Cc: Eric Dumazet Cc: NeilBrown , Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c index a3acf93..5744a7f 100644 --- a/fs/eventpoll.c +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c @@ -745,11 +745,15 @@ static void ep_free(struct eventpoll *ep) * point we are sure no poll callbacks will be lingering around, and also by * holding "epmutex" we can be sure that no file cleanup code will hit * us during this operation. So we can avoid the lock on "ep->lock". + * We do not need to lock ep->mtx, either, we only do it to prevent + * a lockdep warning. */ + mutex_lock(&ep->mtx); while ((rbp = rb_first(&ep->rbr)) != NULL) { epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn); ep_remove(ep, epi); } + mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx); mutex_unlock(&epmutex); mutex_destroy(&ep->mtx);