From: Tomi Valkeinen Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:50:28 +0000 (+0200) Subject: pinctrl: single: fix pcs_disable with bits_per_mux X-Git-Tag: accepted/tizen/common/20141203.182822~769^2~12 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=dd4c2b3cb39da587fc1e5a9315d4d894a83ec481;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-arm64.git pinctrl: single: fix pcs_disable with bits_per_mux pcs_enable() uses vals->mask instead of pcs->fmask when bits_per_mux is enabled. However, pcs_disable() always uses pcs->fmask. Fix pcs_disable() to use vals->mask with bits_per_mux. Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi Acked-by: Tony Lindgren Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c index 829b98c..174f4c5 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c @@ -525,12 +525,18 @@ static void pcs_disable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned fselector, for (i = 0; i < func->nvals; i++) { struct pcs_func_vals *vals; unsigned long flags; - unsigned val; + unsigned val, mask; vals = &func->vals[i]; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pcs->lock, flags); val = pcs->read(vals->reg); - val &= ~pcs->fmask; + + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) + mask = vals->mask; + else + mask = pcs->fmask; + + val &= ~mask; val |= pcs->foff << pcs->fshift; pcs->write(val, vals->reg); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcs->lock, flags);