From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 21:38:14 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: Uniquify test names from gdb.python/{py-objfile.exp,py-pp-registration.exp}
X-Git-Tag: users/ARM/embedded-binutils-2_26-branch-2016q1~1190
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d60a92216e5d599fed6b37c58c744debe38a0b24;p=external%2Fbinutils.git

Uniquify test names from gdb.python/{py-objfile.exp,py-pp-registration.exp}

While running some regression tests, I noticed that the two Python
tests mentioned in the $SUBJECT contain non-unique names.  This is a
violation of our guidelines:

  <https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDBTestcaseCookbook#Make_sure_test_messages_are_unique>

And also makes things harder for BuildBot.  So I hacked both testcases
and made every test name unique.  I guess this could be considered an
obvious patch, but I decided to post it before pushing because others
may have different opinions about the names.

OK to apply?

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-07-28  Sergio Durigan Junior  <sergiodj@redhat.com>

	* gdb.python/py-objfile.exp: Make some tests have unique names.
	* gdb.python/py-pp-registration.exp: Likewise.
---

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 3ca42a8..34f6d8b 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2015-07-28  Sergio Durigan Junior  <sergiodj@redhat.com>
+
+	* gdb.python/py-objfile.exp: Make some tests have unique names.
+	* gdb.python/py-pp-registration.exp: Likewise.
+
 2015-07-28  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>
 
 	* gdb.server/server-exec-info.exp: Issue a "disconnect".
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-objfile.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-objfile.exp
index 4de20c5..7dd094c 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-objfile.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-objfile.exp
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ gdb_test "python print (objfile.username)" "${testfile}" \
   "Get objfile user name"
 
 gdb_test "python print (gdb.lookup_objfile (\"${testfile}\").filename)" \
-    "${testfile}"
+    "${testfile}" "print lookup_objfile filename"
 gdb_test "python print (gdb.lookup_objfile (\"junk\"))" \
     "Objfile not found\\.\r\n${python_error_text}"
 
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ if [string compare $binfile_build_id ""] {
     gdb_test "python print (objfile.build_id)" "$binfile_build_id" \
     "Get objfile build id"
     gdb_test "python print (gdb.lookup_objfile (\"$binfile_build_id\", by_build_id=True).filename)" \
-	"${testfile}"
+	"${testfile}" "print lookup_objfile filename by build-id"
 } else {
     unsupported "build-id is not supported by the compiler"
 }
@@ -64,9 +64,11 @@ if [string compare $binfile_build_id ""] {
 # Other lookup_objfile_by_build_id tests we can do, even if compiler doesn't
 # support them.
 gdb_test "python print (gdb.lookup_objfile (\"foo\", by_build_id=True))" \
-    "Not a valid build id\\.\r\n${python_error_text}"
+    "Not a valid build id\\.\r\n${python_error_text}" \
+    "print invalid file lookup_objfile by build-id"
 gdb_test "python print (gdb.lookup_objfile (\"1234abcdef\", by_build_id=True))" \
-    "Objfile not found\\.\r\n${python_error_text}"
+    "Objfile not found\\.\r\n${python_error_text}" \
+    "print invalid file lookup_objfile by build-id 2"
 
 gdb_test "python print (objfile.progspace)" "<gdb\.Progspace object at .*>" \
   "Get objfile program space"
@@ -104,7 +106,7 @@ if ![runto_main] {
     return 0
 }
 
-gdb_py_test_silent_cmd "python objfile = gdb.objfiles()\[0\]" \
+gdb_py_test_silent_cmd "python objfile = gdb.s()\[0\]" \
     "Get no-debug objfile file" 1
 
 gdb_test "python print (objfile.owner)" "None" \
@@ -131,7 +133,8 @@ gdb_test "p main" "= {int \\(\\)} $hex <main>" \
 # Separate debug files are not findable.
 if { [get_python_valueof "sep_objfile.build_id" "None"] != "None" } {
     gdb_test "python print (gdb.lookup_objfile (sep_objfile.build_id, by_build_id=True))" \
-	"Objfile not found\\.\r\n${python_error_text}"
+	"Objfile not found\\.\r\n${python_error_text}" \
+	"print lookup_objfile of separate debug file"
 }
 
 # An objfile that was a symlink to a differently named file is still
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-pp-registration.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-pp-registration.exp
index 2193407..60f3436 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-pp-registration.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-pp-registration.exp
@@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ proc prepare_test { } {
 	return 0
     }
 
-    gdb_test_no_output "python exec (open ('${remote_python_file}').read ())"
+    gdb_test_no_output "python exec (open ('${remote_python_file}').read ())" \
+	"read file"
 
     gdb_test_no_output "py progspace = gdb.current_progspace()"
     gdb_test_no_output "py my_pretty_printer1 = build_pretty_printer1()"
@@ -108,9 +109,13 @@ with_test_prefix "replace" {
     gdb_test "py gdb.printing.register_pretty_printer(progspace, my_pretty_printer2, replace=False)" \
 	"RuntimeError: pretty-printer already registered: pp-test\r\nError while executing Python code."
 
-    test_printers "s1"
+    with_test_prefix "test printers 1" {
+	test_printers "s1"
+    }
 
     gdb_test_no_output "py gdb.printing.register_pretty_printer(progspace, my_pretty_printer2, replace=True)"
 
-    test_printers "s2"
+    with_test_prefix "test printers 2" {
+	test_printers "s2"
+    }
 }