From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 08:38:12 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: u64_stats,lockdep: Fix u64_stats_init() vs lockdep
X-Git-Tag: v5.15.73~12369^2~1
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d5b0e0677bfd5efd17c5bbb00156931f0d41cb85;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git

u64_stats,lockdep: Fix u64_stats_init() vs lockdep

Jakub reported that:

    static struct net_device *rtl8139_init_board(struct pci_dev *pdev)
    {
	    ...
	    u64_stats_init(&tp->rx_stats.syncp);
	    u64_stats_init(&tp->tx_stats.syncp);
	    ...
    }

results in lockdep getting confused between the RX and TX stats lock.
This is because u64_stats_init() is an inline calling seqcount_init(),
which is a macro using a static variable to generate a lockdep class.

By wrapping that in an inline, we negate the effect of the macro and
fold the static key variable, hence the confusion.

Fix by also making u64_stats_init() a macro for the case where it
matters, leaving the other case an inline for argument validation
etc.

Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Debugged-by: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: "Erhard F." <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YEXicy6+9MksdLZh@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
---

diff --git a/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h b/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h
index c6abb79501b3..e81856c0ba13 100644
--- a/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h
+++ b/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h
@@ -115,12 +115,13 @@ static inline void u64_stats_inc(u64_stats_t *p)
 }
 #endif
 
+#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32 && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
+#define u64_stats_init(syncp)	seqcount_init(&(syncp)->seq)
+#else
 static inline void u64_stats_init(struct u64_stats_sync *syncp)
 {
-#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32 && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
-	seqcount_init(&syncp->seq);
-#endif
 }
+#endif
 
 static inline void u64_stats_update_begin(struct u64_stats_sync *syncp)
 {