From: Bob Peterson Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 13:19:52 +0000 (-0400) Subject: dlm: remove lock_sock to avoid scheduling while atomic X-Git-Tag: v4.14-rc1~1903^2~2 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d2fee58a3bb15b2b8f1eaff14aa3432cf0f35d8c;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git dlm: remove lock_sock to avoid scheduling while atomic Before this patch, functions save_callbacks and restore_callbacks called function lock_sock and release_sock to prevent other processes from messing with the struct sock while the callbacks were saved and restored. However, function add_sock calls write_lock_bh prior to calling it save_callbacks, which disables preempts. So the call to lock_sock would try to schedule when we can't schedule. Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson Signed-off-by: David Teigland --- diff --git a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c index 485494e..df680a2 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c +++ b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c @@ -519,24 +519,20 @@ out: /* Note: sk_callback_lock must be locked before calling this function. */ static void save_callbacks(struct connection *con, struct sock *sk) { - lock_sock(sk); con->orig_data_ready = sk->sk_data_ready; con->orig_state_change = sk->sk_state_change; con->orig_write_space = sk->sk_write_space; con->orig_error_report = sk->sk_error_report; - release_sock(sk); } static void restore_callbacks(struct connection *con, struct sock *sk) { write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - lock_sock(sk); sk->sk_user_data = NULL; sk->sk_data_ready = con->orig_data_ready; sk->sk_state_change = con->orig_state_change; sk->sk_write_space = con->orig_write_space; sk->sk_error_report = con->orig_error_report; - release_sock(sk); write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock); }