From: Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 18:06:23 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Update comment to refer to core issue number.
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d162703b11af075e96d768860147a7d9fdc7a535;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fllvm.git

Update comment to refer to core issue number.

llvm-svn: 186848
---

diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
index dd46dfb..b6f5fe9 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
@@ -5076,10 +5076,8 @@ bool Sema::ShouldDeleteSpecialMember(CXXMethodDecl *MD, CXXSpecialMember CSM,
         SMI.shouldDeleteForBase(BI))
       return true;
 
-  // Defect report (no number yet): do not consider virtual bases of
-  // constructors of abstract classes, since we are not going to construct
-  // them. This is an extension of DR257 into the C++11 behavior for special
-  // members.
+  // Per DR1611, do not consider virtual bases of constructors of abstract
+  // classes, since we are not going to construct them.
   if (!RD->isAbstract() || !SMI.IsConstructor) {
     for (CXXRecordDecl::base_class_iterator BI = RD->vbases_begin(),
                                             BE = RD->vbases_end();