From: Revital Eres Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 07:08:44 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Doloop pattern for ARM X-Git-Tag: upstream/12.2.0~84424 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ce7b376154d74610821b94aed418677baf998dba;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fgcc.git Doloop pattern for ARM From-SVN: r173645 --- diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index 671cc54..b2103c2 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +2011-05-11 Revital Eres + + * modulo-sched.c (sms_schedule): Support new form of doloop pattern + * loop-doloop.c (doloop_condition_get): Likewise. + * config/arm/thumb2.md (*thumb2_addsi3_compare0): Remove "*". + (doloop_end): New. + * config/arm/arm.md (*addsi3_compare0): Remove "*". + 2011-05-10 Nathan Froyd * tree.def (CASE_LABEL_EXPR): Add an operand. diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.md b/gcc/config/arm/arm.md index 40ebf35..fad82f0 100644 --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.md +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.md @@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ "" ) -(define_insn "*addsi3_compare0" +(define_insn "addsi3_compare0" [(set (reg:CC_NOOV CC_REGNUM) (compare:CC_NOOV (plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "s_register_operand" "r, r") diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md b/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md index 11caa61..897d805 100644 --- a/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md +++ b/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ "operands[4] = GEN_INT (- INTVAL (operands[2]));" ) -(define_insn "*thumb2_addsi3_compare0" +(define_insn "thumb2_addsi3_compare0" [(set (reg:CC_NOOV CC_REGNUM) (compare:CC_NOOV (plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "s_register_operand" "l, 0, r") @@ -1118,3 +1118,55 @@ " operands[2] = GEN_INT (32 - INTVAL (operands[2])); ") + +;; Define the subtract-one-and-jump insns so loop.c +;; knows what to generate. +(define_expand "doloop_end" + [(use (match_operand 0 "" "")) ; loop pseudo + (use (match_operand 1 "" "")) ; iterations; zero if unknown + (use (match_operand 2 "" "")) ; max iterations + (use (match_operand 3 "" "")) ; loop level + (use (match_operand 4 "" ""))] ; label + "TARGET_32BIT" + " + { + /* Currently SMS relies on the do-loop pattern to recognize loops + where (1) the control part consists of all insns defining and/or + using a certain 'count' register and (2) the loop count can be + adjusted by modifying this register prior to the loop. + ??? The possible introduction of a new block to initialize the + new IV can potentially affect branch optimizations. */ + if (optimize > 0 && flag_modulo_sched) + { + rtx s0; + rtx bcomp; + rtx loc_ref; + rtx cc_reg; + rtx insn; + rtx cmp; + + /* Only use this on innermost loops. */ + if (INTVAL (operands[3]) > 1) + FAIL; + + if (GET_MODE (operands[0]) != SImode) + FAIL; + + s0 = operands [0]; + if (TARGET_THUMB2) + insn = emit_insn (gen_thumb2_addsi3_compare0 (s0, s0, GEN_INT (-1))); + else + insn = emit_insn (gen_addsi3_compare0 (s0, s0, GEN_INT (-1))); + + cmp = XVECEXP (PATTERN (insn), 0, 0); + cc_reg = SET_DEST (cmp); + bcomp = gen_rtx_NE (VOIDmode, cc_reg, const0_rtx); + loc_ref = gen_rtx_LABEL_REF (VOIDmode, operands [4]); + emit_jump_insn (gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, pc_rtx, + gen_rtx_IF_THEN_ELSE (VOIDmode, bcomp, + loc_ref, pc_rtx))); + DONE; + }else + FAIL; + }") + diff --git a/gcc/loop-doloop.c b/gcc/loop-doloop.c index 1833954..1527c48 100644 --- a/gcc/loop-doloop.c +++ b/gcc/loop-doloop.c @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ doloop_condition_get (rtx doloop_pat) rtx inc_src; rtx condition; rtx pattern; + rtx cc_reg = NULL_RTX; + rtx reg_orig = NULL_RTX; /* The canonical doloop pattern we expect has one of the following forms: @@ -96,7 +98,16 @@ doloop_condition_get (rtx doloop_pat) 2) (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1)) (set (pc) (if_then_else (reg != 0) (label_ref (label)) - (pc))). */ + (pc))). + + Some targets (ARM) do the comparison before the branch, as in the + following form: + + 3) (parallel [(set (cc) (compare ((plus (reg) (const_int -1), 0))) + (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1)))]) + (set (pc) (if_then_else (cc == NE) + (label_ref (label)) + (pc))) */ pattern = PATTERN (doloop_pat); @@ -104,19 +115,47 @@ doloop_condition_get (rtx doloop_pat) { rtx cond; rtx prev_insn = prev_nondebug_insn (doloop_pat); + rtx cmp_arg1, cmp_arg2; + rtx cmp_orig; - /* We expect the decrement to immediately precede the branch. */ + /* In case the pattern is not PARALLEL we expect two forms + of doloop which are cases 2) and 3) above: in case 2) the + decrement immediately precedes the branch, while in case 3) + the compare and decrement instructions immediately precede + the branch. */ if (prev_insn == NULL_RTX || !INSN_P (prev_insn)) return 0; cmp = pattern; - inc = PATTERN (PREV_INSN (doloop_pat)); + if (GET_CODE (PATTERN (prev_insn)) == PARALLEL) + { + /* The third case: the compare and decrement instructions + immediately precede the branch. */ + cmp_orig = XVECEXP (PATTERN (prev_insn), 0, 0); + if (GET_CODE (cmp_orig) != SET) + return 0; + if (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (cmp_orig)) != COMPARE) + return 0; + cmp_arg1 = XEXP (SET_SRC (cmp_orig), 0); + cmp_arg2 = XEXP (SET_SRC (cmp_orig), 1); + if (cmp_arg2 != const0_rtx + || GET_CODE (cmp_arg1) != PLUS) + return 0; + reg_orig = XEXP (cmp_arg1, 0); + if (XEXP (cmp_arg1, 1) != GEN_INT (-1) + || !REG_P (reg_orig)) + return 0; + cc_reg = SET_DEST (cmp_orig); + + inc = XVECEXP (PATTERN (prev_insn), 0, 1); + } + else + inc = PATTERN (PREV_INSN (doloop_pat)); /* We expect the condition to be of the form (reg != 0) */ cond = XEXP (SET_SRC (cmp), 0); if (GET_CODE (cond) != NE || XEXP (cond, 1) != const0_rtx) return 0; - } else { @@ -162,11 +201,15 @@ doloop_condition_get (rtx doloop_pat) return 0; if ((XEXP (condition, 0) == reg) + /* For the third case: */ + || ((cc_reg != NULL_RTX) + && (XEXP (condition, 0) == cc_reg) + && (reg_orig == reg)) || (GET_CODE (XEXP (condition, 0)) == PLUS - && XEXP (XEXP (condition, 0), 0) == reg)) + && XEXP (XEXP (condition, 0), 0) == reg)) { if (GET_CODE (pattern) != PARALLEL) - /* The second form we expect: + /* For the second form we expect: (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1)) (set (pc) (if_then_else (reg != 0) @@ -181,7 +224,24 @@ doloop_condition_get (rtx doloop_pat) (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1))) (additional clobbers and uses)]) - So we return that form instead. + For the third form we expect: + + (parallel [(set (cc) (compare ((plus (reg) (const_int -1)), 0)) + (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1)))]) + (set (pc) (if_then_else (cc == NE) + (label_ref (label)) + (pc))) + + which is equivalent to the following: + + (parallel [(set (cc) (compare (reg, 1)) + (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1))) + (set (pc) (if_then_else (NE == cc) + (label_ref (label)) + (pc))))]) + + So we return the second form instead for the two cases. + */ condition = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (NE, VOIDmode, inc_src, const1_rtx); diff --git a/gcc/modulo-sched.c b/gcc/modulo-sched.c index f37d743..091c005 100644 --- a/gcc/modulo-sched.c +++ b/gcc/modulo-sched.c @@ -1009,9 +1009,11 @@ sms_schedule (void) continue; } - /* Don't handle BBs with calls or barriers, or !single_set insns, - or auto-increment insns (to avoid creating invalid reg-moves - for the auto-increment insns). + /* Don't handle BBs with calls or barriers or auto-increment insns + (to avoid creating invalid reg-moves for the auto-increment insns), + or !single_set with the exception of instructions that include + count_reg---these instructions are part of the control part + that do-loop recognizes. ??? Should handle auto-increment insns. ??? Should handle insns defining subregs. */ for (insn = head; insn != NEXT_INSN (tail); insn = NEXT_INSN (insn)) @@ -1021,7 +1023,8 @@ sms_schedule (void) if (CALL_P (insn) || BARRIER_P (insn) || (NONDEBUG_INSN_P (insn) && !JUMP_P (insn) - && !single_set (insn) && GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) != USE) + && !single_set (insn) && GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) != USE + && !reg_mentioned_p (count_reg, insn)) || (FIND_REG_INC_NOTE (insn, NULL_RTX) != 0) || (INSN_P (insn) && (set = single_set (insn)) && GET_CODE (SET_DEST (set)) == SUBREG))