From: Patrick Palka Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:56:34 +0000 (-0500) Subject: c++: constrained partial spec using qualified name [PR92944, PR103678] X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ce6054a22ae14594a2919d2ad87cd9478e616fb3;p=test_jj.git c++: constrained partial spec using qualified name [PR92944, PR103678] In the nested_name_specifier branch within cp_parser_class_head, we need to update 'type' with the result of maybe_process_partial_specialization like we do in the template_id_p branch. PR c++/92944 PR c++/103678 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * parser.cc (cp_parser_class_head): Update 'type' with the result of maybe_process_partial_specialization in the nested_name_specifier branch. Refactor nearby code to accomodate that maybe_process_partial_specialization returns a _TYPE, not a TYPE_DECL, and eliminate local variable 'class_type' in passing. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec10.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec11.C: New test. --- diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc index 8b38165..f1947ee 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc @@ -26535,7 +26535,7 @@ cp_parser_class_head (cp_parser* parser, } else if (nested_name_specifier) { - tree class_type; + type = TREE_TYPE (type); /* Given: @@ -26545,31 +26545,27 @@ cp_parser_class_head (cp_parser* parser, we will get a TYPENAME_TYPE when processing the definition of `S::T'. We need to resolve it to the actual type before we try to define it. */ - if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (type)) == TYPENAME_TYPE) + if (TREE_CODE (type) == TYPENAME_TYPE) { - class_type = resolve_typename_type (TREE_TYPE (type), - /*only_current_p=*/false); - if (TREE_CODE (class_type) != TYPENAME_TYPE) - type = TYPE_NAME (class_type); - else + type = resolve_typename_type (type, /*only_current_p=*/false); + if (TREE_CODE (type) == TYPENAME_TYPE) { cp_parser_error (parser, "could not resolve typename type"); type = error_mark_node; } } - if (maybe_process_partial_specialization (TREE_TYPE (type)) - == error_mark_node) + type = maybe_process_partial_specialization (type); + if (type == error_mark_node) { type = NULL_TREE; goto done; } - class_type = current_class_type; /* Enter the scope indicated by the nested-name-specifier. */ pushed_scope = push_scope (nested_name_specifier); /* Get the canonical version of this type. */ - type = TYPE_MAIN_DECL (TREE_TYPE (type)); + type = TYPE_MAIN_DECL (type); /* Call push_template_decl if it seems like we should be defining a template either from the template headers or the type we're defining, so that we diagnose both extra and missing headers. */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec10.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec10.C new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d45a1b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec10.C @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +// PR c++/92944 +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } } + +namespace ns { template struct A { }; } + +template requires true struct ns::A { using type = T; }; +template requires false struct ns::A { }; + +template struct ns::A { }; +template requires true struct ns::A { using type = T; }; +template requires false struct ns::A { }; + +using ty1 = ns::A::type; +using ty1 = int; + +using ty2 = ns::A::type; +using ty2 = int; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec11.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec11.C new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0333450 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-partial-spec11.C @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +// PR c++/103678 +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } } + +template +struct A { + template + struct B; +}; + +template +template +struct A::B {}; + +template +template +requires requires { + typename B_t; +} +struct A::B {};