From: Paolo Bonzini Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:17:17 +0000 (-0400) Subject: KVM: mmu: Separate updating a PTE from kvm_set_pte_rmapp X-Git-Tag: v5.15~2569^2~22 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=cb3eedab453911ca177c1e2e44add0b7fe4a6f09;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git KVM: mmu: Separate updating a PTE from kvm_set_pte_rmapp The TDP MMU's own function for the changed-PTE notifier will need to be update a PTE in the exact same way as the shadow MMU. Rather than re-implementing this logic, factor the SPTE creation out of kvm_set_pte_rmapp. Extracted out of a patch by Ben Gardon. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index ef4a63a..3dec474 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -1747,6 +1747,21 @@ static int kvm_unmap_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head, return kvm_zap_rmapp(kvm, rmap_head); } +static u64 kvm_mmu_changed_pte_notifier_make_spte(u64 old_spte, kvm_pfn_t new_pfn) +{ + u64 new_spte; + + new_spte = old_spte & ~PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK; + new_spte |= (u64)new_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT; + + new_spte &= ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK; + new_spte &= ~SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE; + + new_spte = mark_spte_for_access_track(new_spte); + + return new_spte; +} + static int kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level, unsigned long data) @@ -1772,13 +1787,8 @@ restart: pte_list_remove(rmap_head, sptep); goto restart; } else { - new_spte = *sptep & ~PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK; - new_spte |= (u64)new_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT; - - new_spte &= ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK; - new_spte &= ~SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE; - - new_spte = mark_spte_for_access_track(new_spte); + new_spte = kvm_mmu_changed_pte_notifier_make_spte( + *sptep, new_pfn); mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(sptep); mmu_spte_set(sptep, new_spte);