From: Mingzheng Xing Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 16:56:48 +0000 (+0800) Subject: riscv: Handle zicsr/zifencei issue between gcc and binutils X-Git-Tag: v6.6.17~4166^2~2 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ca09f772cccaeec4cd05a21528c37a260aa2dd2c;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git riscv: Handle zicsr/zifencei issue between gcc and binutils Binutils-2.38 and GCC-12.1.0 bumped[0][1] the default ISA spec to the newer 20191213 version which moves some instructions from the I extension to the Zicsr and Zifencei extensions. So if one of the binutils and GCC exceeds that version, we should explicitly specifying Zicsr and Zifencei via -march to cope with the new changes. but this only occurs when binutils >= 2.36 and GCC >= 11.1.0. It's a different story when binutils < 2.36. binutils-2.36 supports the Zifencei extension[2] and splits Zifencei and Zicsr from I[3]. GCC-11.1.0 is particular[4] because it add support Zicsr and Zifencei extension for -march. binutils-2.35 does not support the Zifencei extension, and does not need to specify Zicsr and Zifencei when working with GCC >= 12.1.0. To make our lives easier, let's relax the check to binutils >= 2.36 in CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_EXPLICIT_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI. For the other two cases, where clang < 17 or GCC < 11.1.0, we will deal with them in CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_OLD_ISA_SPEC. For more information, please refer to: commit 6df2a016c0c8 ("riscv: fix build with binutils 2.38") commit e89c2e815e76 ("riscv: Handle zicsr/zifencei issues between clang and binutils") Link: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=aed44286efa8ae8717a77d94b51ac3614e2ca6dc [0] Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=98416dbb0a62579d4a7a4a76bab51b5b52fec2cd [1] Link: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=5a1b31e1e1cee6e9f1c92abff59cdcfff0dddf30 [2] Link: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=729a53530e86972d1143553a415db34e6e01d5d2 [3] Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=b03be74bad08c382da47e048007a78fa3fb4ef49 [4] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230308220842.1231003-1-conor@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230223220546.52879-1-conor@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley Acked-by: Guo Ren Cc: Signed-off-by: Mingzheng Xing Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809165648.21071-1-xingmingzheng@iscas.ac.cn Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt --- diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index 4c07b91..10e7a7a 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -570,24 +570,30 @@ config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZIHINTPAUSE config TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_EXPLICIT_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI def_bool y # https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=aed44286efa8ae8717a77d94b51ac3614e2ca6dc - depends on AS_IS_GNU && AS_VERSION >= 23800 - help - Newer binutils versions default to ISA spec version 20191213 which - moves some instructions from the I extension to the Zicsr and Zifencei - extensions. + # https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=98416dbb0a62579d4a7a4a76bab51b5b52fec2cd + depends on AS_IS_GNU && AS_VERSION >= 23600 + help + Binutils-2.38 and GCC-12.1.0 bumped the default ISA spec to the newer + 20191213 version, which moves some instructions from the I extension to + the Zicsr and Zifencei extensions. This requires explicitly specifying + Zicsr and Zifencei when binutils >= 2.38 or GCC >= 12.1.0. Zicsr + and Zifencei are supported in binutils from version 2.36 onwards. + To make life easier, and avoid forcing toolchains that default to a + newer ISA spec to version 2.2, relax the check to binutils >= 2.36. + For clang < 17 or GCC < 11.1.0, for which this is not possible, this is + dealt with in CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_OLD_ISA_SPEC. config TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_OLD_ISA_SPEC def_bool y depends on TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_EXPLICIT_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI # https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/22e199e6afb1263c943c0c0d4498694e15bf8a16 - depends on CC_IS_CLANG && CLANG_VERSION < 170000 - help - Certain versions of clang do not support zicsr and zifencei via -march - but newer versions of binutils require it for the reasons noted in the - help text of CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_EXPLICIT_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI. This - option causes an older ISA spec compatible with these older versions - of clang to be passed to GAS, which has the same result as passing zicsr - and zifencei to -march. + # https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=b03be74bad08c382da47e048007a78fa3fb4ef49 + depends on (CC_IS_CLANG && CLANG_VERSION < 170000) || (CC_IS_GCC && GCC_VERSION < 110100) + help + Certain versions of clang and GCC do not support zicsr and zifencei via + -march. This option causes an older ISA spec compatible with these older + versions of clang and GCC to be passed to GAS, which has the same result + as passing zicsr and zifencei to -march. config FPU bool "FPU support" diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile index 1893457..b86e5e2 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile @@ -11,7 +11,13 @@ compat_vdso-syms += flush_icache COMPAT_CC := $(CC) COMPAT_LD := $(LD) -COMPAT_CC_FLAGS := -march=rv32g -mabi=ilp32 +# binutils 2.35 does not support the zifencei extension, but in the ISA +# spec 20191213, G stands for IMAFD_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI. +ifdef CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_EXPLICIT_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI + COMPAT_CC_FLAGS := -march=rv32g -mabi=ilp32 +else + COMPAT_CC_FLAGS := -march=rv32imafd -mabi=ilp32 +endif COMPAT_LD_FLAGS := -melf32lriscv # Disable attributes, as they're useless and break the build.