From: Oleg Nesterov Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 23:55:38 +0000 (-0800) Subject: proc: change first_tid() to use while_each_thread() rather than next_thread() X-Git-Tag: upstream/snapshot3+hdmi~3586^2~37 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c986c14a6a88427946dc77d7018a81b95b3d41b6;p=platform%2Fadaptation%2Frenesas_rcar%2Frenesas_kernel.git proc: change first_tid() to use while_each_thread() rather than next_thread() Rerwrite the main loop to use while_each_thread() instead of next_thread(). We are going to fix or replace while_each_thread(), next_thread() should be avoided whenever possible. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Sameer Nanda Cc: Sergey Dyasly Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c index f223a56..be8e17c 100644 --- a/fs/proc/base.c +++ b/fs/proc/base.c @@ -3106,23 +3106,23 @@ static struct task_struct *first_tid(struct task_struct *leader, } /* If nr exceeds the number of threads there is nothing todo */ - pos = NULL; if (nr && nr >= get_nr_threads(leader)) - goto out; + goto fail; /* It could be unhashed before we take rcu lock */ if (!pid_alive(leader)) - goto out; + goto fail; /* If we haven't found our starting place yet start * with the leader and walk nr threads forward. */ - for (pos = leader; nr > 0; --nr) { - pos = next_thread(pos); - if (pos == leader) { - pos = NULL; - goto out; - } - } + pos = leader; + do { + if (nr-- <= 0) + goto found; + } while_each_thread(leader, pos); +fail: + pos = NULL; + goto out; found: get_task_struct(pos); out: