From: Rebecca N. Palmer Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 13:26:50 +0000 (+0100) Subject: drm/i915: Fix possible security hole in command parsing X-Git-Tag: v4.2-rc1~13^2~54^2~2 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c7c7372edc4ebc173ad359aeb5752e9ce09f2741;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-exynos.git drm/i915: Fix possible security hole in command parsing i915_parse_cmds returns -EACCES on chained batches, which "tells the caller to abort and dispatch the workload as a non-secure batch", but the mechanism implementing that was broken when flags |= I915_DISPATCH_SECURE was moved from i915_gem_execbuffer_parse to i915_gem_do_execbuffer (17cabf571e50677d980e9ab2a43c5f11213003ae): i915_gem_execbuffer_parse returns the original batch_obj in this case, and i915_gem_do_execbuffer doesn't check for that. Don't set the secure bit in this case to make sure such batches don't run with elevated priviledges. Signed-off-by: Rebecca Palmer Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala [danvet: Stitch together commit message. Also remove a comment as suggested by Mika. And style-align the comment while at it.] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c index 7ab63d9..560c79a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c @@ -1540,28 +1540,39 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, } if (i915_needs_cmd_parser(ring) && args->batch_len) { - batch_obj = i915_gem_execbuffer_parse(ring, + struct drm_i915_gem_object *parsed_batch_obj; + + parsed_batch_obj = i915_gem_execbuffer_parse(ring, &shadow_exec_entry, eb, batch_obj, args->batch_start_offset, args->batch_len, file->is_master); - if (IS_ERR(batch_obj)) { - ret = PTR_ERR(batch_obj); + if (IS_ERR(parsed_batch_obj)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(parsed_batch_obj); goto err; } /* - * Set the DISPATCH_SECURE bit to remove the NON_SECURE - * bit from MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START commands issued in the - * dispatch_execbuffer implementations. We specifically - * don't want that set when the command parser is - * enabled. + * parsed_batch_obj == batch_obj means batch not fully parsed: + * Accept, but don't promote to secure. */ - dispatch_flags |= I915_DISPATCH_SECURE; - exec_start = 0; + if (parsed_batch_obj != batch_obj) { + /* + * Batch parsed and accepted: + * + * Set the DISPATCH_SECURE bit to remove the NON_SECURE + * bit from MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START commands issued in + * the dispatch_execbuffer implementations. We + * specifically don't want that set on batches the + * command parser has accepted. + */ + dispatch_flags |= I915_DISPATCH_SECURE; + exec_start = 0; + batch_obj = parsed_batch_obj; + } } batch_obj->base.pending_read_domains |= I915_GEM_DOMAIN_COMMAND;