From: Zhang Qilong Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:02:32 +0000 (+0800) Subject: spi: img-spfi: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync X-Git-Tag: v6.6.17~6143^2~37 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c79ce0a2824bc987ee4cd19f6a0a4e1eb493a8d8;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git spi: img-spfi: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync Using the newest pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate for simplifing code here. Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220922150232.115843-1-zhangqilong3@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-img-spfi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-img-spfi.c index 71376b6..bfd1224 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-img-spfi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-img-spfi.c @@ -730,11 +730,9 @@ static int img_spfi_resume(struct device *dev) struct img_spfi *spfi = spi_master_get_devdata(master); int ret; - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); - if (ret < 0) { - pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev); + if (ret < 0) return ret; - } spfi_reset(spfi); pm_runtime_put(dev);