From: Tony Lindgren Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 11:09:15 +0000 (+0300) Subject: PM: runtime: Fix unpaired parent child_count for force_resume X-Git-Tag: v5.15~1131^2^2 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c745253e2a691a40c66790defe85c104a887e14a;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git PM: runtime: Fix unpaired parent child_count for force_resume As pm_runtime_need_not_resume() relies also on usage_count, it can return a different value in pm_runtime_force_suspend() compared to when called in pm_runtime_force_resume(). Different return values can happen if anything calls PM runtime functions in between, and causes the parent child_count to increase on every resume. So far I've seen the issue only for omapdrm that does complicated things with PM runtime calls during system suspend for legacy reasons: omap_atomic_commit_tail() for omapdrm.0 dispc_runtime_get() wakes up 58000000.dss as it's the dispc parent dispc_runtime_resume() rpm_resume() increases parent child_count dispc_runtime_put() won't idle, PM runtime suspend blocked pm_runtime_force_suspend() for 58000000.dss, !pm_runtime_need_not_resume() __update_runtime_status() system suspended pm_runtime_force_resume() for 58000000.dss, pm_runtime_need_not_resume() pm_runtime_enable() only called because of pm_runtime_need_not_resume() omap_atomic_commit_tail() for omapdrm.0 dispc_runtime_get() wakes up 58000000.dss as it's the dispc parent dispc_runtime_resume() rpm_resume() increases parent child_count dispc_runtime_put() won't idle, PM runtime suspend blocked ... rpm_suspend for 58000000.dss but parent child_count is now unbalanced Let's fix the issue by adding a flag for needs_force_resume and use it in pm_runtime_force_resume() instead of pm_runtime_need_not_resume(). Additionally omapdrm system suspend could be simplified later on to avoid lots of unnecessary PM runtime calls and the complexity it adds. The driver can just use internal functions that are shared between the PM runtime and system suspend related functions. Fixes: 4918e1f87c5f ("PM / runtime: Rework pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume()") Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen Cc: 4.16+ # 4.16+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c index 1fc1a99..b570848 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c @@ -1637,6 +1637,7 @@ void pm_runtime_init(struct device *dev) dev->power.request_pending = false; dev->power.request = RPM_REQ_NONE; dev->power.deferred_resume = false; + dev->power.needs_force_resume = 0; INIT_WORK(&dev->power.work, pm_runtime_work); dev->power.timer_expires = 0; @@ -1804,10 +1805,12 @@ int pm_runtime_force_suspend(struct device *dev) * its parent, but set its status to RPM_SUSPENDED anyway in case this * function will be called again for it in the meantime. */ - if (pm_runtime_need_not_resume(dev)) + if (pm_runtime_need_not_resume(dev)) { pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev); - else + } else { __update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_SUSPENDED); + dev->power.needs_force_resume = 1; + } return 0; @@ -1834,7 +1837,7 @@ int pm_runtime_force_resume(struct device *dev) int (*callback)(struct device *); int ret = 0; - if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev) || pm_runtime_need_not_resume(dev)) + if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev) || !dev->power.needs_force_resume) goto out; /* @@ -1853,6 +1856,7 @@ int pm_runtime_force_resume(struct device *dev) pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev); out: + dev->power.needs_force_resume = 0; pm_runtime_enable(dev); return ret; } diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h index c965740..1d8209c 100644 --- a/include/linux/pm.h +++ b/include/linux/pm.h @@ -601,6 +601,7 @@ struct dev_pm_info { unsigned int idle_notification:1; unsigned int request_pending:1; unsigned int deferred_resume:1; + unsigned int needs_force_resume:1; unsigned int runtime_auto:1; bool ignore_children:1; unsigned int no_callbacks:1;