From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:35:12 +0000 (-0700) Subject: Revert "net: correct sk_acceptq_is_full()" X-Git-Tag: accepted/tizen/unified/20230118.172025~7507^2~42 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c609e6aae4efcf383fe86b195d1b060befcb3666;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git Revert "net: correct sk_acceptq_is_full()" This reverts commit f211ac154577ec9ccf07c15f18a6abf0d9bdb4ab. We had similar attempt in the past, and we reverted it. History: 64a146513f8f12ba204b7bf5cb7e9505594ead42 [NET]: Revert incorrect accept queue backlog changes. 8488df894d05d6fa41c2bd298c335f944bb0e401 [NET]: Fix bugs in "Whether sock accept queue is full" checking I am adding a fat comment so that future attempts will be much harder. Fixes: f211ac154577 ("net: correct sk_acceptq_is_full()") Cc: iuyacan Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h index 3e3a5da2..8487f58 100644 --- a/include/net/sock.h +++ b/include/net/sock.h @@ -934,9 +934,13 @@ static inline void sk_acceptq_added(struct sock *sk) WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_ack_backlog, sk->sk_ack_backlog + 1); } +/* Note: If you think the test should be: + * return READ_ONCE(sk->sk_ack_backlog) >= READ_ONCE(sk->sk_max_ack_backlog); + * Then please take a look at commit 64a146513f8f ("[NET]: Revert incorrect accept queue backlog changes.") + */ static inline bool sk_acceptq_is_full(const struct sock *sk) { - return READ_ONCE(sk->sk_ack_backlog) >= READ_ONCE(sk->sk_max_ack_backlog); + return READ_ONCE(sk->sk_ack_backlog) > READ_ONCE(sk->sk_max_ack_backlog); } /*