From: Dou Liyang Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 02:21:33 +0000 (+0800) Subject: x86/apic: Fix num_processors value in case of failure X-Git-Tag: v4.8-rc7~25^2 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c291b015158577be533dd5a959dfc09bab119eed;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-exynos.git x86/apic: Fix num_processors value in case of failure If the topology package map check of the APIC ID and the CPU is a failure, we don't generate the processor info for that APIC ID yet we increase disabled_cpus by one - which is buggy. Only increase num_processors once we are sure we don't fail. Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang Acked-by: David Rientjes Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473214893-16481-1-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com [ Rewrote the changelog. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c index 50c95af..f3e9b2d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c @@ -2093,7 +2093,6 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version) return -EINVAL; } - num_processors++; if (apicid == boot_cpu_physical_apicid) { /* * x86_bios_cpu_apicid is required to have processors listed @@ -2116,10 +2115,13 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version) pr_warning("APIC: Package limit reached. Processor %d/0x%x ignored.\n", thiscpu, apicid); + disabled_cpus++; return -ENOSPC; } + num_processors++; + /* * Validate version */