From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 23:17:08 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: net/mlx4: Avoid 'may be used uninitialized' warnings
X-Git-Tag: v4.14-rc1~5355^2~31
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c1c52db16e26a26b545821abae303310a074350f;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git

net/mlx4: Avoid 'may be used uninitialized' warnings

With a cross-compiler based on gcc-4.9, I see warnings like the following:

  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c: In function 'mlx4_SW2HW_CQ_wrapper':
  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c:3048:10: error: 'cq' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
    cq->mtt = mtt;

I think the warning is spurious because we only use cq when
cq_res_start_move_to() returns zero, and it always initializes *cq in that
case.  The srq case is similar.  But maybe gcc isn't smart enough to figure
that out.

Initialize cq and srq explicitly to avoid the warnings.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c
index 92fce1b9..bafe218 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c
@@ -3187,7 +3187,7 @@ int mlx4_SW2HW_CQ_wrapper(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave,
 	int cqn = vhcr->in_modifier;
 	struct mlx4_cq_context *cqc = inbox->buf;
 	int mtt_base = cq_get_mtt_addr(cqc) / dev->caps.mtt_entry_sz;
-	struct res_cq *cq;
+	struct res_cq *cq = NULL;
 	struct res_mtt *mtt;
 
 	err = cq_res_start_move_to(dev, slave, cqn, RES_CQ_HW, &cq);
@@ -3223,7 +3223,7 @@ int mlx4_HW2SW_CQ_wrapper(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave,
 {
 	int err;
 	int cqn = vhcr->in_modifier;
-	struct res_cq *cq;
+	struct res_cq *cq = NULL;
 
 	err = cq_res_start_move_to(dev, slave, cqn, RES_CQ_ALLOCATED, &cq);
 	if (err)
@@ -3362,7 +3362,7 @@ int mlx4_SW2HW_SRQ_wrapper(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave,
 	int err;
 	int srqn = vhcr->in_modifier;
 	struct res_mtt *mtt;
-	struct res_srq *srq;
+	struct res_srq *srq = NULL;
 	struct mlx4_srq_context *srqc = inbox->buf;
 	int mtt_base = srq_get_mtt_addr(srqc) / dev->caps.mtt_entry_sz;
 
@@ -3406,7 +3406,7 @@ int mlx4_HW2SW_SRQ_wrapper(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave,
 {
 	int err;
 	int srqn = vhcr->in_modifier;
-	struct res_srq *srq;
+	struct res_srq *srq = NULL;
 
 	err = srq_res_start_move_to(dev, slave, srqn, RES_SRQ_ALLOCATED, &srq);
 	if (err)