From: Noam Camus Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:15:32 +0000 (+0300) Subject: irqchip/eznps: Acknowledge NPS_IPI before calling the handler X-Git-Tag: v4.14-rc1~2240^2~2 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c0ca8df717061ae3d2ea624024033103c64210ae;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git irqchip/eznps: Acknowledge NPS_IPI before calling the handler IPI_IRQ (also TIMER0_IRQ) should be acked before the action->handler is called in handle_percpu_devid_irq. The IPI irq is edge sensitive and we might miss an IPI interrupt if it is triggered again while the handler runs. Fixes: 44df427c894a ("irqchip: add nps Internal and external irqchips") Signed-off-by: Noam Camus Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com Cc: jason@lakedaemon.net Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1476364532-12634-1-git-send-email-noamca@mellanox.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-eznps.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-eznps.c index efbf0e4..ebc2b0b 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-eznps.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-eznps.c @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void nps400_irq_eoi_global(struct irq_data *irqd) nps_ack_gic(); } -static void nps400_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *irqd) +static void nps400_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd) { unsigned int __maybe_unused irq = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd); @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static struct irq_chip nps400_irq_chip_percpu = { .name = "NPS400 IC", .irq_mask = nps400_irq_mask, .irq_unmask = nps400_irq_unmask, - .irq_eoi = nps400_irq_eoi, + .irq_ack = nps400_irq_ack, }; static int nps400_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,