From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 04:44:31 +0000 (-0700) Subject: fs: Allow unprivileged linkat(..., AT_EMPTY_PATH) aka flink X-Git-Tag: upstream/snapshot3+hdmi~4588^2~1 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=bb2314b47996491bbc5add73633905c3120b6268;p=platform%2Fadaptation%2Frenesas_rcar%2Frenesas_kernel.git fs: Allow unprivileged linkat(..., AT_EMPTY_PATH) aka flink Every now and then someone proposes a new flink syscall, and this spawns a long discussion of whether it would be a security problem. I think that this is missing the point: flink is *already* allowed without privilege as long as /proc is mounted -- it's called AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW. Now that O_TMPFILE is here, the ability to create a file with O_TMPFILE, write it, and link it in is very convenient. The only problem is that it requires that /proc be mounted so that you can do: linkat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/self/fd/", dfd, path, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) This sucks -- it's much nicer to do: linkat(tmpfd, "", dfd, path, AT_EMPTY_PATH) Let's allow it. If this turns out to be excessively scary, it we could instead require that the inode in question be I_LINKABLE, but this seems pointless given the /proc situation Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c index 8b61d10..89a612e 100644 --- a/fs/namei.c +++ b/fs/namei.c @@ -3671,15 +3671,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(linkat, int, olddfd, const char __user *, oldname, if ((flags & ~(AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW | AT_EMPTY_PATH)) != 0) return -EINVAL; /* - * To use null names we require CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH - * This ensures that not everyone will be able to create - * handlink using the passed filedescriptor. + * Using empty names is equivalent to using AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW + * on /proc/self/fd/. */ - if (flags & AT_EMPTY_PATH) { - if (!capable(CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH)) - return -ENOENT; + if (flags & AT_EMPTY_PATH) how = LOOKUP_EMPTY; - } if (flags & AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW) how |= LOOKUP_FOLLOW;