From: Yonghong Song Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:49:11 +0000 (-0800) Subject: bpf: fix and add test cases for ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO semantics change X-Git-Tag: v5.15~10012^2~35^2 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b6ff63911232c2823e2763371ec4462ac64cc331;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git bpf: fix and add test cases for ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO semantics change Fix a few test cases to allow non-NULL map/packet/stack pointer with size = 0. Change a few tests using bpf_probe_read to use bpf_probe_write_user so ARG_CONST_SIZE arg can still be properly tested. One existing test case already covers size = 0 with non-NULL packet pointer, so add additional tests so all cases of size = 0 and 0 <= size <= legal_upper_bound with non-NULL map/packet/stack pointer are covered. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index bb3c4ad8c59f..bf092b83e453 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -3579,7 +3579,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { - "helper access to packet: test19, cls helper fail range zero", + "helper access to packet: test19, cls helper range zero", .insns = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), @@ -3599,8 +3599,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "invalid access to packet", + .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { @@ -4379,10 +4378,10 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4), - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), - BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_write_user), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, @@ -4486,9 +4485,10 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct test_val, foo)), - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), - BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_write_user), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, @@ -4622,13 +4622,14 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3), - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), - BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_write_user), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr = "R1 min value is outside of the array range", + .errstr = "R2 min value is outside of the array range", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, @@ -4765,13 +4766,14 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_3, offsetof(struct test_val, foo), 4), BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3), - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), - BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_write_user), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map2 = { 3 }, - .errstr = "R1 min value is outside of the array range", + .errstr = "R2 min value is outside of the array range", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, @@ -5350,7 +5352,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R1 off=-64 access_size=0", + .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack off -64+0 size 64", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, @@ -5505,7 +5507,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R1 off=-64 access_size=0", + .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack off -64+0 size 64", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, @@ -5668,7 +5670,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { - "helper access to variable memory: size = 0 not allowed on != NULL", + "helper access to variable memory: size = 0 allowed on != NULL stack pointer", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8), @@ -5681,8 +5683,99 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_csum_diff), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid stack type R1 off=-8 access_size=0", - .result = REJECT, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + }, + { + "helper access to variable memory: size = 0 allowed on != NULL map pointer", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 6), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, 0), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_csum_diff), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + }, + { + "helper access to variable memory: size possible = 0 allowed on != NULL stack pointer", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, 8, 7), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, 0), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_csum_diff), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + }, + { + "helper access to variable memory: size possible = 0 allowed on != NULL map pointer", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, 8, 4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, 0), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_csum_diff), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + }, + { + "helper access to variable memory: size possible = 0 allowed on != NULL packet pointer", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 7), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_6, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, 8, 4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, 0), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_csum_diff), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, {