From: Fredrik Söderquist <fs@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 12:31:47 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: Scale the result of TightBounds when path was inverse-scaled
X-Git-Tag: accepted/tizen/5.0/unified/20181102.025319~55^2~1021
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b60e8645ecddb1846cdba52073db394a633841ff;p=platform%2Fupstream%2FlibSkiaSharp.git

Scale the result of TightBounds when path was inverse-scaled

When the path was "large" (as defined by ScaleFactor(...)), the computed
bounds would not be adjusted to the correct space. Make sure to scale
the result in those cases.

BUG=chromium:678162

Change-Id: Ia2eb94050c4620286e9abb69976dbc0202ecc307
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/6501
Reviewed-by: Cary Clark <caryclark@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Cary Clark <caryclark@google.com>
---

diff --git a/src/pathops/SkPathOpsTightBounds.cpp b/src/pathops/SkPathOpsTightBounds.cpp
index d748ff5..f379c9e 100644
--- a/src/pathops/SkPathOpsTightBounds.cpp
+++ b/src/pathops/SkPathOpsTightBounds.cpp
@@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ bool TightBounds(const SkPath& path, SkRect* result) {
     while ((current = current->next())) {
         bounds.add(current->bounds());
     }
+    if (scaleFactor > SK_Scalar1) {
+        bounds.set(bounds.left() * scaleFactor, bounds.top() * scaleFactor,
+                   bounds.right() * scaleFactor, bounds.bottom() * scaleFactor);
+    }
     *result = bounds;
     if (!moveBounds.isEmpty()) {
         result->join(moveBounds);
diff --git a/tests/PathOpsTightBoundsTest.cpp b/tests/PathOpsTightBoundsTest.cpp
index 8fd0fdb..a2e7bca 100644
--- a/tests/PathOpsTightBoundsTest.cpp
+++ b/tests/PathOpsTightBoundsTest.cpp
@@ -188,3 +188,14 @@ DEF_TEST(PathOpsTightBoundsIllBehaved, reporter) {
     REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, bounds != tight);
 }
 
+DEF_TEST(PathOpsTightBoundsIllBehavedScaled, reporter) {
+    SkPath path;
+    path.moveTo(0, 0);
+    path.quadTo(1048578, 1048577, 1048576, 1048576);
+    const SkRect& bounds = path.getBounds();
+    SkRect tight;
+    REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, TightBounds(path, &tight));
+    REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, bounds != tight);
+    REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, tight.right() == 1048576);
+    REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, tight.bottom() == 1048576);
+}