From: Sergey Senozhatsky Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:04:52 +0000 (-0700) Subject: zsmalloc: do not take class lock in zs_shrinker_count() X-Git-Tag: v4.3-rc1~40^2~6 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b3e237f1f5a86030c875e186ff19640f4f4f3c63;p=profile%2Fwearable%2Fplatform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-4.9-exynos9110.git zsmalloc: do not take class lock in zs_shrinker_count() We can avoid taking class ->lock around zs_can_compact() in zs_shrinker_count(), because the number that we return back is outdated in general case, by design. We have different sources that are able to change class's state right after we return from zs_can_compact() -- ongoing I/O operations, manually triggered compaction, or two of them happening simultaneously. We re-do this calculations during compaction on a per class basis anyway. zs_unregister_shrinker() will not return until we have an active shrinker, so classes won't unexpectedly disappear while zs_shrinker_count() iterates them. Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky Acked-by: Minchan Kim Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c index ce08d04..c19b99c 100644 --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c @@ -1710,8 +1710,6 @@ static struct page *isolate_source_page(struct size_class *class) * * Based on the number of unused allocated objects calculate * and return the number of pages that we can free. - * - * Should be called under class->lock. */ static unsigned long zs_can_compact(struct size_class *class) { @@ -1834,9 +1832,7 @@ static unsigned long zs_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrinker, if (class->index != i) continue; - spin_lock(&class->lock); pages_to_free += zs_can_compact(class); - spin_unlock(&class->lock); } return pages_to_free;