From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:36:35 +0000 (+0000) Subject: ARM: shmobile: mark shmobile_init_late as __init X-Git-Tag: v3.7-rc1~38^2~1^2~2 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b3796d92086ecea4c4825fa232da60b6d6f354af;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fkernel-adaptation-pc.git ARM: shmobile: mark shmobile_init_late as __init Patch 35f2b0bd59 "ARM: shmobile: Move definition of shmobile_init_late() to header" moved the definition of the shmobile_init_late function, but dropped the __init annotation, which is now causing warnings because the function calls shmobile_suspend_init, which is also marked init. Without this patch, building kota2_defconfig results in: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0xb7c8): Section mismatch in reference from the function shmobile_init_late() to the function .init.text:shmobile_suspend_init() The function shmobile_init_late() references the function __init shmobile_suspend_init(). This is often because shmobile_init_late lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of shmobile_suspend_init is wrong. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Magnus Damm Cc: Simon Horman --- diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h index ed77ab8..d47e215 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static inline int shmobile_cpu_is_dead(unsigned int cpu) { return 1; } extern void shmobile_smp_init_cpus(unsigned int ncores); -static inline void shmobile_init_late(void) +static inline void __init shmobile_init_late(void) { shmobile_suspend_init(); shmobile_cpuidle_init();