From: Derek Basehore Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 20:34:34 +0000 (-0700) Subject: backlight: pwm_bl: Fix overflow condition X-Git-Tag: v4.14.9~75 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b04c22da18b53c7be730478282f7e6f62cef9425;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git backlight: pwm_bl: Fix overflow condition [ Upstream commit 5d0c49acebc9488e37db95f1d4a55644e545ffe7 ] This fixes an overflow condition that can happen with high max brightness and period values in compute_duty_cycle. This fixes it by using a 64 bit variable for computing the duty cycle. Signed-off-by: Derek Basehore Acked-by: Thierry Reding Reviewed-by: Brian Norris Signed-off-by: Lee Jones Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c index 9bd1768..1c2289d 100644 --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c @@ -79,14 +79,17 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_off(struct pwm_bl_data *pb) static int compute_duty_cycle(struct pwm_bl_data *pb, int brightness) { unsigned int lth = pb->lth_brightness; - int duty_cycle; + u64 duty_cycle; if (pb->levels) duty_cycle = pb->levels[brightness]; else duty_cycle = brightness; - return (duty_cycle * (pb->period - lth) / pb->scale) + lth; + duty_cycle *= pb->period - lth; + do_div(duty_cycle, pb->scale); + + return duty_cycle + lth; } static int pwm_backlight_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl)