From: Wilco Dijkstra <wdijkstr@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:44:41 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Rather than using a C implementation of memmove, directly call memmove, which
X-Git-Tag: upstream/2.30~6279
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=af96be34825586536ebcfbf5c675e795ddd3c8fa;p=external%2Fglibc.git

Rather than using a C implementation of memmove, directly call memmove, which
typically has a much faster optimized implementation.
---

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 6eb5290..b55d6d6 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
 2015-02-27  Wilco Dijkstra  wdijkstr@arm.com
 
+	* string/bcopy.c (bcopy): Call memmove for performance.
+
+2015-02-27  Wilco Dijkstra  wdijkstr@arm.com
+
 	* string/bzero.c (__bzero): Call memset for performance.
 
 2015-02-27  John David Anglin  <dave.anglin@bell.net>
diff --git a/string/bcopy.c b/string/bcopy.c
index 326478a..f74e589 100644
--- a/string/bcopy.c
+++ b/string/bcopy.c
@@ -17,12 +17,8 @@
 
 #include <string.h>
 
-#define	memmove		bcopy
-#define	rettype		void
-#define	RETURN(s)	return
-#define	a1		src
-#define	a1const		const
-#define	a2		dest
-#define	a2const
-
-#include <string/memmove.c>
+void
+bcopy (const void *src, void *dest, size_t len)
+{
+  memmove (dest, src, len);
+}